[08:05] <ddecator_> does renaming a profile essentially create a new profile?
[08:54] <BUGabundo_remote> BOONNNSSSSSS DDIIIIIAAAASSSSSSSSS
[08:55] <ddecator_> and hello again BUGabundo_remote =p
[08:55]  * BUGabundo_remote hugs ddecator_ and throws him up in the air
[08:55]  * BUGabundo_remote waves as he goes up
[08:55] <ddecator_> BUGabundo_remote: whoa o.o
[08:55] <ddecator_> haha
[08:56] <ddecator_> BUGabundo_remote: quick question. do you know if a user simply renaming their firefox profile has the same effect as creating a new profile?
[08:56] <BUGabundo_remote> yes
[08:57] <BUGabundo_remote> but $ firefox --ProfileManager is a better option
[08:58] <ddecator_> right, i think that's what they used...i'm working on a bug report and i asked them to make a new profile, gave them the command, and they said they renamed it, haha. just wanted to make sure so i can respond accordingly
[08:58] <ddecator_> unless you can't rename a profile using the profile manager, idk
[08:58] <BUGabundo_remote> much better then that
[08:58] <BUGabundo_remote> is to start on SAFEMODE and reproduce
[08:58] <BUGabundo_remote> much less hassle
[08:58] <BUGabundo_remote> or if wanna do it the _funny_ way
[08:59] <BUGabundo_remote> ask them to start a Gnome Guest Session from FUSA
[08:59] <BUGabundo_remote> that's a clean, destructable user profile
[08:59] <BUGabundo_remote> works with 9.10 and 10.04
[09:00] <ddecator_> i used to ask people to try safe-mode, but i didn't want them to accidently reset all of their settings or anything because they didn't read the dialogue box that pops up =p
[09:00] <BUGabundo_remote> the hard part would be for screenshots to be send back
[09:00] <BUGabundo_remote> yeah, that could be dangerous
[09:09] <ddecator_> idk, it's 3:10am here, i need to figure that out tomorrow...er, later today, haha
[09:13] <fta2> do we have a minifier for javascript in lucid?
[10:12] <ripps> hmmmmm.... html5 youtube causes chromium dev ppa to crash
[10:32] <fta2> ripps, ? url?
[10:33] <fta2> wfm here in x64
[10:33] <fta2> using trunk
[10:35] <ripps> fta2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZlyHtSZsYQ&feature=grec
[10:35] <ripps> actually, I think it crashes everytime I try to play any video
[10:36] <ripps> I can play video podcasts from google reader, I always have to open the link in epiphany to play it.
[10:37] <fta2> that url works for me
[10:37] <fta2> chromium-browser 5.0.365.0~svn20100329r42923-0ubuntu1~ucd1
[10:37] <fta2> chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra 0.5+svn20100330r43036+43030+43160-0ubuntu1~ucd1
[10:38] <ripps> fta2: yeah, I have the same packages.
[10:39] <fta2> if you can get a crash trace, please file a bug
[10:40] <ripps> geez, 87 mb just for a dbg package
[10:59] <BUGabundo_remote> fta we are not bundling flash with chromium are we ??
[10:59] <BUGabundo_remote> please say NO
[11:00] <BUGabundo_remote> ripps: WFM
[11:00] <ripps> wfm?
[11:00] <BUGabundo_remote> Works For Me
[11:01] <ripps> ah
[11:01] <ripps> I'm installing some dbg packages now to try to get to the root of the problem
[11:02] <ripps> hmm... chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra-dbg tries to install ffmpeg package instead of ffmpeg-extra
[11:07] <ripps> fta2: I'm not getting anything in gdb when a crash occurs, how do I get gdb to focus on a particular tab's thread?
[11:14] <ripps> 0xb6e0e26c in av_opt_set_defaults2 () from /usr/lib/chromium-browser/libffmpegsumo.so
[11:17] <ripps> fta2 BUGabundo_remote: ^^
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote> don't look at me
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote> I'm just an user
[11:23] <ripps> Hmm... when I use the normal ffmepg-codecs, not -extra, browser doesn't crash, but the video never loads, the loading icon just keeps going.
[11:35] <BUGabundo_remote> html5 is on the "normal"
[12:37] <fta2> ripps, please install the codecs dbg too, then let apport resolve it
[12:37] <fta2> BUGabundo_remote, internal flash, not sure. this needs to be discussed
[12:37] <fta2> there are pros and cons
[12:39] <ripps> fta2: well, -extras-dbg removes the -extra package and installs the normal -ffmpeg package. Apport doesn't seem to capture any crashes in chromium, so I'm not sure how that should help.
[12:39] <ripps> And I only experience the "crash" with the -extra codecs, normal just never loads.
[12:41] <fta2> hm, i need to fix that dbg thing then
[12:45] <fta2> fixed, but bzr is down, and lp read-only
[12:46] <ripps> I'm going to bed anyway, I've already filed a bug at the chromium bug tracker.
[17:06] <chrisccoulson> asac - so, i've nearly finished with the mozilla updates now. i've updated nss in karmic to 3.12.6 as required. we don't need to update nss in jaunty for the default browser (3.0), but we ship 3.5/1.9.1 in universe which needs it. is that ok to update too?
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[21:27] <ripps> fta2: dev-channel google chrome works with youtube html5, but not chromium. So I think something must be wrong with the codec packages.
[22:02] <BUGabundo> bRoas
=== mahfouz_ is now known as mahfouz
=== mahfouz is now known as Guest88672
=== gavin__ is now known as gavin