| nigelb | can someone give me an ack for a UIFe for pitivi before thu freeze? bug 314885 | 02:47 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 314885 in pitivi "Don't show version number in titlebar" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/314885 | 02:47 |
| nigelb | I'd really appreciate an ack for bug 314885 from someone from the release team | 16:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 314885 in pitivi "Don't show version number in titlebar" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/314885 | 16:09 |
| nigelb | cjwatson, ping | 16:18 |
| cjwatson | nigelb: hi? | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | ... ok | 16:24 |
| nigelb | cjwatson, got some time to ack a UIfe? | 17:35 |
| lamont | slangasek: are we installable enough that it makes sense for me to roll new lucid tarballs? would speed up build times to not be dist-upgrading them every build | 17:42 |
| lamont | slangasek: and I'm not clear what sort of schedule all y'all would like around that activity, in the general sense | 17:43 |
| slangasek | lamont: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/lucid_probs.html | 17:43 |
| slangasek | certainly more installable than last night | 17:43 |
| lamont | slangasek: heh | 17:44 |
| lamont | interesting - I just upgraded twisted on a few buildds | 17:44 |
| cjwatson | nigelb: acked | 17:45 |
| nigelb | cjwatson, thanks :) | 17:46 |
| doko__ | asac, slangasek: is the xulrunner-dev demotion seriously wanted? what's the replacement? | 19:15 |
| slangasek | doko__: sorry, what's the context? | 19:17 |
| slangasek | the upstream security policy impacts what we're going to be supporting | 19:17 |
| slangasek | i.e., "as little as possible" | 19:17 |
| doko__ | slangasek: openjdk-6 build failure due to demotion | 19:17 |
| doko__ | didn't see any warning before ... | 19:18 |
| slangasek | ah | 19:18 |
| slangasek | I don't know who demoted it; it shouldn't have been done while there were reverse-deps | 19:18 |
| slangasek | doko__: it looks like xulrunner-1.9.2 is in main now? | 19:19 |
| doko__ | slangasek: ok, will reupload. | 19:20 |
| doko__ | slangasek: I assume it is planned as well to update xulrunner to xulrunner-1.9.3 and so on for lts updates? does this mean you want to rebuild dependencies as well? | 19:21 |
| slangasek | if it's planned, it hasn't been mentioned to me; https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-new-firefox-support-model is the blueprint about this | 19:24 |
| doko__ | the only thing about demotion I can find is: decide on demotion vs. droppage of xulrunner-1.9.x from the archive | 19:27 |
| ScottK | Personally, I think it should be removed, not demoted | 19:30 |
| slangasek | what does openjdk need xulrunner for, btw? It doesn't seem to have a runtime dep on it? | 19:31 |
| doko__ | slangasek: the plugin | 19:33 |
| slangasek | it only needs headers to build that, no runtime dep? or is it statically linking something? | 19:34 |
| doko__ | dynamically linking | 19:34 |
| doko__ | /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/*/IcedTeaPlugin.so | 19:35 |
| slangasek | doko__: I only see a dependency on libnspr4-0d; should it be build-depending on nspr instead of xulrunner? | 19:35 |
| slangasek | oh, hm, it links against xul but doesn't have a dep on it | 19:36 |
| doko__ | $ ldd /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/IcedTeaPlugin.so|grep 'not found' | 19:36 |
| doko__ | libxul.so => not found | 19:36 |
| doko__ | libxpcom.so => not found | 19:36 |
| doko__ | ahh | 19:36 |
| slangasek | probably because of the "not found" | 19:37 |
| doko__ | ok, let's add this manually ... | 19:37 |
| slangasek | dh_shlibdeps -l/path/to/libs? | 19:37 |
| doko__ | asac: ^^^ I think we did have the problem before | 19:37 |
| doko__ | will do | 19:37 |
| doko__ | the xulrunner cooperation between debian and ubuntu is just 'nice' ... | 19:50 |
| doko__ | sid: $ xulrunner-1.9.1 --gre-version | 19:51 |
| doko__ | 1.9.1.8 | 19:51 |
| doko__ | but no directory with this version | 19:51 |
| doko__ | asac: is there anything simpler? | 20:08 |
| doko__ | echo /usr/lib/xulrunner-$($(basename $(pkg-config --libs-only-L libxul | sed 's/^-L//;s/-devel//;s,/lib *$,,' )) --gre-version | sed 's/^\(.....\).*/\1/') | 20:08 |
| doko__ | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 | 20:08 |
| doko__ | slangasek: doesn't help: | 20:19 |
| doko__ | dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from library name `libxpcom.so' | 20:19 |
| doko__ | dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from library name `libxul.so' | 20:19 |
| slangasek | meh, figures | 20:22 |
| doko__ | slangasek: xulrunner-1.9.* doesn't have any shlibs files | 20:36 |
| slangasek | well, and if it did they apparently wouldn't work due to the unversioned soname | 20:36 |
| doko__ | filed bug #552780, I'll hardcode the dependency for now | 20:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 552780 in xulrunner-1.9.2 "how to properly link against libxul and libxpcom?" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/552780 | 20:40 |
| Keybuk | slangasek: new mountall uploaded | 21:03 |
| Keybuk | buildds seem very behind today | 21:03 |
| Keybuk | so the screaming probably won't start until tomorrow | 21:04 |
| * ajmitch hopes that stuff uploaded in the next few hours won't get us told off? | 21:22 | |
| slangasek | nope, it's my responsibility to pull the trigger on the archive freeze when it's time | 21:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!