[04:15] <jdong> lesson #921 of UbuntuForums bad word filter design: You can't spell specialist without cialis.
[04:15] <RAOF> HAH
[04:15] <jdong> I think that's a life lesson too ;-)
[07:39] <\sh> moins
[08:22] <siretart> hi \sh!
[08:40] <dholbach> good morning
[08:41] <joaopinto> hi
[10:51] <bencrisford> what is the different between a .desktop file and a .desktop.in file?
[11:05] <directhex> foo.in is used to generate foo
[11:26] <lazka> Hey, my packa is failing in the PPA but building fine here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42767981/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.quodlibet_2.2.99-0~rev4421~d961b9b1b60b~ppa1~karmic_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[11:26] <lazka> package
[11:27] <lazka> The file that it says is missing is a symlink
[11:27] <bencrisford> directhex: do package.desktop.in generates the .desktop file?
[11:29] <directhex> bencrisford, precisely
[11:29] <noodles775> lazka: is it building fine using pbuilder there?
[11:30] <lazka> here, on lucid, yes
[11:31] <noodles775> lazka: using pbuilder (I'm just asking because the file might exist locally for you, using pbuilder will ensure it's an isolated environment like that used by the PPA builders).
[11:32] <lazka> oh, is that different to dpkg-buildpackage?
[11:34] <lazka> noodles775, you're right.. :) thanks..
[11:34] <lazka> damn
[11:34] <noodles775> lazka: np.
[15:36] <cnd> I decided to check out why the diagnostics package wasn't building, and I found it was because the version of libace-dev in ubuntu has a bug that's been fixed in debian
[15:36] <cnd> james_w said to file a sync request, but I'm wondering if that's worthwhile since the sync freeze is in place
[15:39] <james_w> cnd: we are frozen for auto-syncs for a few months, but specifically requested ones are still processed. We are also frozen for beta, but that only includes packages in the CDs, so it libace-dev isn't on a CD we can sync it, or it can wait for a week when it will be synced.
[15:39] <cnd> james_w: is there an easy way to determine if the package is on the cd?
[15:41] <james_w> not exactly
[15:41] <james_w> if it's in main then it's quite likely
[15:41] <james_w> the freeze is actually for main at this point anyway
[15:43] <james_w> cnd: you can go ahead and make the request
[15:43] <cnd> james_w: ok, thanks
[19:30] <savvas0> Hi, I submitted a patch for bug #553237 - I haven't done patch submission for a while, which launchpad team should I subscribe to the bug to sponsor the patch? :)
[19:31] <ScottK> savvas0: ubuntu-sponsors
[19:32] <savvas0> thank you!
[21:04] <IntuitiveNipple> When creating a new package, should pkgconfig .pc files be in the -dev or libXXXX package?
[21:06] <directhex> IntuitiveNipple, -dev
[21:06] <IntuitiveNipple> Thanks! got it right already then, but was second-guessing myself :)
[23:08] <micahg> \sh: was dojo ever shipped with ZF in Ubuntu?
[23:16] <Riddell> dylan mccall about?
[23:17] <ari-tczew> jdong: ping
[23:39] <ari-tczew> jdong, if you see that please check what about SRU upload for bugs 262235 421684
[23:42] <jdong> ari-tczew: should have a test case and regression potential as well
[23:42] <jdong> (at minimum a test case)
[23:42] <jdong> see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xmms-crossfade/+bug/208666 as an example
[23:43] <jdong> but in both case, the patches I've already ACKed for upload
[23:43] <jdong> just need for a sponsor to upload those for you
[23:44] <ari-tczew> jdong: I can't test it because I don't use 64bit
[23:44] <jdong> ari-tczew: no, you don't need to test it, you need to write instructions how to test it
[23:44] <ari-tczew> but bug 421684 I have tested and it works!
[23:44] <jdong> what should testers be looking for?
[23:45] <ari-tczew> testers should be looking for to whether problem has been fixed
[23:45] <jdong> how do they do that?
[23:45] <jdong> step 1, step 2, step 3, etc