=== dmb is now known as mbm
=== mbm is now known as dmb
=== dmb_ is now known as dmb
=== apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger____
[10:30] <pitti> so I did some NBS and component mismatches fixes, which should clean some i386 bits on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/lucid_probs.html
[10:31] <pitti> but for this to be really useful I guess we have to wait a day or two for the buildds to catch up
[10:32] <pitti> (which have been used for some 16 hours for security and openjdk builds)
[11:39] <ScottK> Not to mention a huge stack of private builds overnight too.
[12:03] <nigelb> ok, I got this ack on wednesday from release team, since today we're in beta freeze, do I need another ack?
[12:03] <nigelb> I subscribed sponsors, no one bothered I guess
[12:13] <ScottK> nigelb: No, just normal sponsorship.
[12:13] <nigelb> ScottK, so that ack would also hold good for beta freeze, right?
[12:33] <cjwatson> beta freeze just means that everything gets manually reviewed before it hits the archive
[12:33] <cjwatson> after beta-2 release, we go back to feature freeze status for a while, so feature freeze approvals still hold good - if it's not considered suitable for beta-2 by the reviewer, we just hold it in the queue until the beta's out
[12:35] <nigelb> ok, thanks :)
[12:35] <ttx> cjwatson: Do you formally review all uploads during freeze, or expect to be pinged for things that need to go through ? I was wondering if we should avoid uploading what is not beta2-critical (because reviewing the queue means more work to you)
[12:36] <ttx> the announcement is not clear if we should "refrain from uploading" like during the softfreezes
[12:37] <cjwatson> if there's stuff that *must not* go into beta-2, please don't upload it
[12:37] <cjwatson> otherwise, it's probably best to upload anyway, but if there's something you explicitly need then it's a good idea to ask
[12:37] <ttx> cjwatson: ok
[13:07] <Riddell> I wonder where today's kubuntu daily CDs got lost
[13:08] <cjwatson> lost?
[13:08] <Riddell> nothing at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily/20100401/  build logs seem fine
[13:09] <cjwatson> Missing debootstrap-required libdb4.7
[13:09] <cjwatson> CD1 missing some packages needed by debootstrap
[13:09] <cjwatson> make: *** [/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/kubuntu/daily/tmp/lucid-amd64/packages-stamp] Error 1
[13:09] <cjwatson> ERROR WHILE BUILDING OFFICIAL IMAGES !!
[13:09] <cjwatson> archive error, I'll fix it
[13:10] <Riddell> ah, it helps if I look at the daily build log not the daily live log
=== apachelogger____ is now known as apachelogger
[13:35] <lamont> rolling brownout of buildds for a new lp-buildd rollout, just fyi
[16:31] <pitti> slangasek: oh, we haven't talked about it last Friday? will we move the release team meeting to Tuesday or somethign such? (Good Friday/Easter Monday holidays)
[16:31] <pitti> or just skip it?
[16:32] <slangasek> pitti: oh, I keep forgetting that Europe gets Good Friday off
[16:32] <pitti> slangasek: oh, the US doesn't?
[16:32] <slangasek> I don't think we should try to do one on Tuesday; we'll have our hands full with the beta itself at that point
[16:32] <pitti> *nod*
[16:32] <slangasek> no, we don't
[16:32] <slangasek> we get Easter off ;P
[16:32] <pitti> Monday?
[16:32] <ScottK> pitti: Schools often get it off, but not work.
[16:33] <ScottK> No, Sunday.
[16:33] <slangasek> pitti: no, Easter Sunday :)
[16:33] <pitti> how .. generous :)
[16:33] <pitti> slangasek: anyway, is it okay if I update our release status page to the current status quo, and ask Ken or Rick to join the meeting as a desktop team delegate?
[16:34] <pitti> the release status page is really what takes most of the work/conveys the most interesting information anyway
[16:34] <ttx> slangasek: fwiw, the french work on Good Friday.
[16:35] <slangasek> pitti: sure
[16:37] <slangasek> cjwatson: I can haz queue bot?
[16:41] <cjwatson> you can haz
[16:42] <slangasek> kthx!
[16:51] <ev> If someone could let usb-creator through, I'd appreciate it.  According to rgreening, it fixes a critical bug in the kde frontend.
[17:02] <slangasek> ev: looking
[17:04] <ttx> slangasek: the dhcp3 thing there is mine, would be good to have in the milestone to catch any corner case I didn't think of, but it's hardly critical or needed for beta2.
[17:05]  * ttx calls it a day
[17:06] <slangasek> ev: this breaks string freeze?
[17:06] <ev> erm, yeah, ouch
[17:07] <ev> please reject, fixing
[17:07] <slangasek> ok
[17:07] <slangasek> that might be alright to let in immediately post-beta, if coordinated with translators; the new string is short and easy
[17:07] <slangasek> and unlikely to appear in screenshots
[17:18] <ev> reuploaded
[17:28] <pitti> liblauncher-0.1 kills the previous changelog, I pinged didrocks to fix and reupload
[17:28] <pitti> (actual code change is obvious one-line patch)
[17:35] <slangasek> ev: <cough> this upload misses the functional changes to the kde frontend
[17:35] <pitti> mvo: so, I can't make too much sense of the aptdaemon upload, and there's no associated bug
[17:36] <ev> arrrr
[17:36] <pitti> mvo: what does that do? and how much was it tested?
[17:36] <ev> this is what I get for rushing
[17:45] <ev> slangasek: okay, uploaded.  Sorry for the hassle.  I've got to run to catch a train though.  If it's broken this time, it's a release note, I guess.
[17:45] <slangasek> ev: ok, g'night :)
[17:45] <ev> slangasek: cheers
[17:46] <ScottK> slangasek: ^^^ clamav update catches (minor) security fixes from clamav 0.96 final.  I'd like those in for the beta, but am waiting on uploading 0.96 final so I can coordinate with Debian.
[18:47] <mvo> pitti: sorry, its for the ubuntuone-music-store
[18:47] <mvo> pitti: and it makes it use less authentication dialogs
[18:48] <mvo> pitti: currently each action (add-repo, update-cache, install-pkg) is a policykit action that needs confirmation
[18:48] <mvo> pitti: with the patch add-repo implicitely grants update-cache and install-pkg so that the music store needs to prompt only once
[18:48] <mvo> pitti: if you need a bugreport I can ask aquarius to write one
=== bjf is now known as bjf-afk
[21:37] <ScottK> queue bot gone mad.
[21:42] <ScottK> Looking at the packages in Main without a package set, it seems like there's a need to adjust the promotion process to also add to a package set.
[21:42] <slangasek> hmm, no doubt
[21:56] <ScottK> Is UNR using chromium-browser?  It's in Universe and not part of a package set, but I thought they were.
[21:56] <cjwatson> promotion process> yes, there is a problem at the moment that the two processes aren't unified
[21:56] <cjwatson> this is a real pain but I haven't had time to sit down and fix it
[21:57] <cjwatson> package set addition relies on me periodically processing the output of a script :-/
=== dmb__ is now known as dmb
[23:55] <doko_> please consider accepting python2.6 (only affecting the python2.6-dbg package and helping apport)
[23:58] <cjwatson> grub-installer is one half of the server splash screen bug; the other half is a debian-cd change, which I can do easily but don't want to do before grub-installer's in
[23:59]  * cjwatson -> bed