/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/04/02/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asacchrisccoulson: lets talk about extensions tomorrow00:33
asacwill check that list more carefully00:33
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, no worries00:33
asaci think some of those marked as removed should stay00:33
chrisccoulsoni won't be around all day tomorrow00:33
asacbut if you say its broken upstream, its probably fine00:33
asacchrisccoulson: yeah i figure00:33
asac;)00:33
asacfriday is holiday00:34
asaci think i will catch you00:34
asacwill fly back on sat00:34
asacand take tue a swap day00:34
asacbut we can surealy chat to sort this out to nail down the rest for lucid00:34
chrisccoulsonyeah, it would be good to get that sorted before final freeze00:35
asacack00:37
asacchrisccoulson: i think in general its fine and you should decide what to do00:38
asaci just think one or two of those marked as removed might be policically nice to keep00:38
asacotherwise ... well done.00:38
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, thanks00:38
chrisccoulsonthe other thing micahg mentioned to me tonight is bug 52562100:38
ubottuLaunchpad bug 525621 in xulrunner-1.9 "package xulrunner-1.9 1.9.0.18+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52562100:38
asacwhats the problem there=00:39
asac=00:39
asac?00:39
asacdamn ;)00:39
chrisccoulsonthat seems tricky to solve (it's hardy's 1.9.0 xul postrm script failing, when we remove it after the upgrade)00:39
chrisccoulsoni've not looked at it in detail yet, but it's the update-alternatives call which fails00:39
asacchrisccoulson: in the old package postrm?00:40
asachmm00:40
chrisccoulsonso, i'm not sure how to handle that other than providing a transitional xul1.9 package in lucid whose purpose is just to clean up the mess from hardy00:40
asacchrisccoulson: yeah. .... what removes the package actually?00:40
chrisccoulsoni think update-manager gives the option to remove it because it's no longer in the archive00:40
asactrue00:41
asacso yeah. i think if all rdepends are gone using a transitional package is probably the right way00:41
chrisccoulsonso, i'll think about how to do that over the weekend00:41
asacor talking to mvo if he can do somde hack on update-manager side00:41
asache can do some tstuff00:41
asacand we dont support these upgrades just with apt-get dist-upgrade00:41
asacso if there is an update-manager tweak that would be fine00:42
chrisccoulsonyeah, i will chat to him too00:42
asackk... sounds like a plan00:43
asacok have to drop out ... busy day tomorrow again :(00:43
asacwill be back at 1700 UTC for a bit00:44
asacthen back on wednesday :/00:44
asacbut lets chat in the meantime if you are there00:44
asac22:16 < sebner> asac: bah, you br0ke firefox with your last upload :P00:44
asacchrisccoulson: ^^00:44
asacany idea what happened?00:44
crimsunin Lucid? that doesn't make sense. It WFM.00:45
chrisccoulsonhmmm, i'm not sure. i've not had any issues yet00:46
asacchrisccoulson: did the security updates go out yet? if so, maybe check bugs sorted by NEW00:47
asac;)00:47
asace.g. most recent00:47
asacnot sure ... sebner posted it here in the channel a few ours ago00:47
chrisccoulsonasac - not yet, i'm still waiting for the xulrunner builds to finish and publish00:47
asaclets check with him; if there is not a bug flood its probably ok00:47
chrisccoulsonthen i will do the firefox uploads to the PPA in the morning00:47
chrisccoulsonthere's been quite some delay with the builders today, mostly due to me ;)00:48
asacchrisccoulson: yeah. maybe try to catch sebner tomorrow ... maybe he is running security ppa00:48
asacmost likely its just noise ;)00:48
asacbut better safe than sorry00:48
chrisccoulsonyeah, possibly. the security PPA is still in transition at the moment until everything builds00:48
asackk00:49
chrisccoulsonasac - and the lucid firefox upload isn't published yet either00:49
asachmm00:49
asacso it probably was ppa indeed. i think we should really check if we can find him00:50
asacthough he might just be confused ;)00:50
chrisccoulsonyeah, i will try and get hold of him00:50
chrisccoulsonbut things haven't settled down yet in the security PPA00:50
chrisccoulsonoh, ok, firefox is published on i386 in lucid00:51
chrisccoulsonbut not on amd64, which is why i don;'t see it00:51
asaccrimsun: thx. you run i386?00:54
* asac off (sorry ... long and early day tomorrow)00:56
micahgchrisccoulson: anything else we need to chat about tonight or you need me to take care of?02:38
micahgchrisccoulson: new version of Firefox, I'm bumping the changelog03:35
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
micahgchrisccoulson: FYI, NSS needs NSPR >= 4.8 which means I have to add that to the PPA for <= Jaunty as well09:33
sebnerasac: I'm never confused :P10:03
asacheh10:06
asacsebner: so please talk to chris about your issues10:06
sebnerchrisccoulson: asac: issue is gone. Yesterday I updated firefox (normal lucid repo) and restartet it. dpkg -l showed 3.6.2 but firefox itself still 3.6. Another restart, same result. Everything worked fine except debian git webbrowsing showed me this XML-failure thing. Now everything is fine10:12
asacsebner: ok. seems your firefox wasnt properly restarted then10:13
asace.g. log out/in cures it10:13
sebnerasac: aye, I'll keep that in mind :) It just confused me that restarted firefox *twice* and nothing changed10:14
asacsebner: right. ffox for ages soketimes goes in bad state10:15
asacwhen running while upgrading10:15
asacespecially if you see the XML failure its always busted frm there on10:15
sebnerasac: I guess but the restart normally works. I guess if was your april joke. If (user == sebner) break();10:16
sebner;-P10:16
asacheh10:42
ftachromium does better there. it's not impacted by upgrades10:45
asacwell. chromium is all static10:54
asacso its not any magic ;)10:54
asaci would expect that upgrading might make the -sandbox thing incompatible from time to time10:54
asacor is that preloaded and never loaded after start?10:55
ftanope, ch keeps fd opens to plenty of files, so upgrades have no impact until either ch or the desktop is restarted10:55
ftarestarting my desktop, brb10:56
sebnerasac: GRR, yesterday firefox 3.6.3 got released.11:21
BUGabundofta: what is this I read about BZR repo changing formats? I can't upgrade most of my local branches11:53
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_vacations
asacchrisccoulson: ^^ (ffox 3.6.3)12:27
asac:)12:27
asacBUGabundo: you need to upgrade them12:29
BUGabundoI need?12:29
BUGabundothey are not mine12:29
asacbug 54103012:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 541030 in linux-ti-omap "omap kernel musb/ehci ports not enabled on beagleboard" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54103012:30
chrisccoulsonhi asac12:30
ftaBUGabundo, then drop yours and fetch new ones12:30
chrisccoulsonanother ffox release?12:30
BUGabundook12:30
asachi chrisccoulson12:30
asacchrisccoulson: welcome to the world of mozilla ,)12:31
asac12:21 < sebner> asac: GRR, yesterday firefox 3.6.3 got released.12:31
asacprobably a firedrill12:31
asacso we shouldnt push .2 to stable channels12:31
asacchrisccoulson: ^^12:31
chrisccoulsonok, i can do that today. i was planning to do an upload today anyway, because the font-rendering is targetted for beta-212:31
asacchrisccoulson: thought that was up already?12:31
chrisccoulsonasac - not yet, the upload yesterday was what was already tagged in the branch12:32
asacah ok12:32
asacyeah ... just skip it and make .312:32
asacand upload with both changelog entries in changes12:32
chrisccoulsonslangasek says the cut-off for beta-2 is today really12:32
chrisccoulsonso, i'll get that done12:32
asacyes12:32
asacyes12:32
asacchrisccoulson: we should fix ubufox ... one second i think thats commited in upstream branch12:33
asac(search engine being amazon on non en-US)12:33
sebnerasac: 1 april releases are bad but it seems to fix a grave security issue12:33
asacchrisccoulson: do you know the bug id for search order?=12:35
asacgot it ... its bug 52641112:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 526411 in ubufox "In a fresh installation, firefox search engines are ordered alphabetically" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52641112:36
chrisccoulsonheh, yeah, i was waiting for lp to speed up a bit12:36
ftaBUGabundo, did you file a bug for the ugly fonts in ch?12:38
sebnerWhy do I have the feeling that chrisccoulson is taking over the mighty mozilla monkey title from asac? :P12:39
asacchrisccoulson: ok i released 0.9rc1 ubufox upstream12:39
asacwe should upload that12:39
asacit just has a few bug fixes12:39
asaci can do that if you want12:39
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, thanks. i dont mind uploading that12:39
BUGabundofta: I haven't had a prob with them12:39
asacwe still have some bugs left for after beta ;)12:39
asacchrisccoulson: you want to do the merge to packaging branch etc.?12:39
ftaBUGabundo: my fixed font is not longer fixed12:39
chrisccoulsonyeah, can do12:39
asacchrisccoulson: i think you cherry picked a patch that needs to get dropped with this12:40
asacchrisccoulson: cool. tag is 0.9rc112:40
chrisccoulsonthanks12:40
asacchrisccoulson: i think the ubuntu branch has .bzr-builddeb/default.conf ... and you need to bump the tag there during the bzr merge12:40
BUGabundofta: I don't understand12:40
asacchrisccoulson: hmm ubuntu2 was never ocmmitted to ubufox.ubuntu it seems12:41
asacchrisccoulson: let me do that ;)... thats the least i can do for you ...12:41
chrisccoulsonasac - ubuntu2 was committed to lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubufox/ubuntu12:42
chrisccoulsonis that not the right branch?12:42
asacchrisccoulson: odd12:42
asacone second ... maybe i unbound my branch ;)12:42
asacseems so12:43
asacalright ... pulling12:43
chrisccoulsonasac - one of the security updates fails to build on hppa: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42831066/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-hppa.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.19%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz12:44
chrisccoulson:-/12:45
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_vacations
asacchrisccoulson: that might not be a regression ... did the previous one work there?12:49
chrisccoulsonasac - hmm, the last security update ftbfs on hppa too12:50
chrisccoulsonso it's not a regression in this update12:51
asacchrisccoulson: can you quick verify http://people.canonical.com/~asac/tmp/ubufox_0.9~rc1-0ubuntu1_all.deb12:51
asacfor the searchorder?12:51
asacthanks12:51
asacchrisccoulson: yeah. then we dont care for hardy hppa12:51
asacwe might want to fix it at some point if we have time :)12:51
chrisccoulsonok, thats good then, i won't block on that12:51
asacyep12:51
chrisccoulsoni'm still waiting for the builders to catch up with all the xulrunner uploads yesterday :/12:52
asacchrisccoulson: try ubufox ;)12:52
asacin the meantime :)12:52
chrisccoulsonyeah, just doing that now12:52
asacchrisccoulson: hmm. someone should bump prio on those12:52
asaclet me get ncommander do that12:53
chrisccoulsonasac - i got pitti to bump the priority on nss yesterday12:53
asacif he is there12:53
asacyes, but pitti is not here today :)12:53
asacchrisccoulson: do you have urls for the builds that need to be bupmed?12:53
chrisccoulsonasac - these are the outstanding ones: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa/+builds12:54
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, ubufox seems to work (just tested in french)12:55
asaccool12:55
asacuploading12:55
chrisccoulsonlet me just delete my profile just to make sure12:55
chrisccoulsonok, thats fine from a fresh profile too12:57
asaccool12:57
asacthanks for checking12:57
chrisccoulsonheh, i was just about to say "what happened to the amd64 builds of firefox", before i realised that i am actually running the latest version already :-/13:00
asacheh13:31
asac14:30 < StevenK> asac: Sorting it out, I've asked Hobbsee to bump them13:31
asacchrisccoulson: ^^13:31
sebnerasac: Hobbsee is still alive? Haven't seen her for ages13:33
ftaBUGa_vacations, http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/fixed-fonts.png13:40
BUGa_vacationsfta: FF looks better13:41
ftaindeed13:41
ftait changed (regressed) in ch a few days ago13:41
BUGa_vacationslooks nicer on my side13:42
ftait's a fresh install of lucid13:47
ftano font tweak at all13:48
BUGa_vacationsill start a guest session and compare13:48
BUGa_vacationsbrb13:48
BUGa_vacationsI keep forgeting chromium won't start on a new session13:49
BUGa_vacationsif open else where :(13:49
BUGa_vacationsI wish that would work OFTB13:50
BUGa_vacationsfta: can't start chromium in guest session13:53
BUGa_vacationssomething about not able to move PID13:53
ftasandbox issue?14:00
ftahttp://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3466014:00
BUGa_vacationsfta: subbed14:09
ftaBUGa_vacations, do you have the ms fonts installed?14:13
BUGa_vacationsprobsbly14:13
ftaBUGa_vacations, ttf-mscorefonts-installer14:20
BUGa_vacations  Installed: 3.214:21
BUGa_vacationsguys, rant or serious thread http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntucat/why-i-might-switch-to-mac-from-ubuntu/  ?14:22
chrisccoulsonasac - thanks. hopefully they will build a bit quicker now :)14:27
ftahttp://www.osnews.com/story/23097/Quake_II_Ported_to_HTML516:11
BUGa_vacationsI read it16:11
BUGa_vacationsthough it was one more April fools joke16:11
ftai'm not sure WebGL is part of html5 though16:22
chrisccoulsonasac - is it ok for me to apply the xulrunner patch bz467738_att351145_lockPref_everywhere.patch to firefox? TeTeT has been asking for that16:29
dutchieHi, I'm looking at fixing bug 541951 by applying the supplied patch, but I'm not sure how to deal with the .tar.bz file in lp:ubuntu/firefox. Could anybody point me in the right direction? (just asked in #ubuntu-motu)16:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 541951 in firefox "Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref " [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54195116:31
chrisccoulsondutchie - there's no need to do anything with that, as i'm already looking at some firefox updates16:32
dutchiethe bug?16:32
chrisccoulsonyes16:32
dutchieoh, ok16:32
micahgchrisccoulson: could that have been fixed with the patch I added last night for persistent settings?16:32
chrisccoulsonmicahg - one second, i will check16:32
dutchiefor future reference, how would I deal with the tarball?16:32
micahgdutchie: the mozilla team has special procedures for updates16:33
dutchiedoes that translate into "leave mozilla bugs alone"?16:33
micahgdutchie: not necessarily16:34
micahgdutchie: the patch system takes care of the tarball, but updates don't get pushed until they land in our bzr branches16:34
micahgdutchie: you can still propose a diff, but you would subscribe the mozilla team instead of sponsors to get it included16:35
dutchieok16:36
dutchiewell, thanks16:37
micahgchrisccoulson: also, that patch might be out of date as the bug was marked a dupe16:39
micahgchrisccoulson: do you know who this josh holland is?16:39
chrisccoulsonmicahg - dutchie ;)16:40
micahgah16:40
chrisccoulsonmicahg - we currently apply this  patch to xul192, so it should work ok with ff36 too16:40
micahgchrisccoulson: right, but it seems that there might have been a change to the patch upstream, but idk about that16:41
micahgchrisccoulson: I didn't mean to scare him off16:41
chrisccoulsonok, i will have a look at that16:41
chrisccoulsonheh16:41
micahgchrisccoulson: should I reassign to  you?16:42
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, feel free16:42
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== BUGa_vacations is now known as BUGa_snack
micahgchrisccoulson: should I push nspr to firefox-stable PPA also?17:36
=== BUGa_snack is now known as BUGa_vacations
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, feel free to do that18:14
ftarickspencer3, fyi,"[ubuntu/lucid] chromium-browser 5.0.342.7~r42476-0ubuntu1 (Waiting for approval)" since yesterday, but no idea where it is now, the link in the email is broken18:38
ftaand it's not listed there: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/chromium-browser/18:38
fta(that's the version fixing your ssl issue)18:39
rickspencer3thanks fta18:39
LLStarksgrrr. text input in 3.7 is so ****ed right now.18:58
LLStarksyou have click outside the text box to activate it.18:58
LLStarksmicahg, are forms and text boxes kaput in 3.7?20:05
micahgLLStarks: what do you mean?20:05
LLStarksi can't type in them unless i click another first20:05
micahgsorry LLStarks, busy right now, ping me over the weekend and I'll try to reproduce20:41
LLStarksokay20:41
ftawfm20:46
micahgasac: do I need to worry about in source NSS/NSPR for thunderbird stable?22:01
micahgchrisccoulson: are firefox and thunderbird getting pushed today?22:05
chrisccoulsonmicahg - firefox will be. thunderbird is ready too?22:06
micahgchrisccoulson: I left it open for you, just needs to be tagged for release22:06
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, will do that later22:07
micahgchrisccoulson: thanks22:07
micahgchrisccoulson: edbrowse is ready as well with a diff on bug 553052 if you have time22:08
ubottuLaunchpad bug 553052 in edbrowse "Port edbrowse to xulrunner-1.9.2" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/55305222:08
chrisccoulsonmicahg - thanks, i'll do some sponsoring tonight then22:09
chrisccoulsoni'm still not sure whether to apply the updated patch to fix bug 541951 or not :-/22:09
ubottuLaunchpad bug 541951 in firefox "Firefox 3.6 does not honour lockPref " [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54195122:09
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I might have one more, but that depends how much time I have22:09
micahgchrisccoulson: asac never gave you an answer?22:10
chrisccoulsonmicahg - not yet, but i think he is travelling today22:10
micahgchrisccoulson: ah, ok22:10
micahgchrisccoulson: well, if it's not release critical, we can push later, right?22:10
chrisccoulsonyeah, that's true22:10
micahgchrisccoulson: we can do at least one more upload before final freeze22:11
micahgchrisccoulson: is xulrunner itself seeded?22:12
micahgI mean shipped on the CD?22:12
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, xulrunner is pulled in by yelp and couchdb22:14
chrisccoulsonmicahg - you can check the germinate output for seeing what stuff is seeded, and also why:22:17
chrisccoulsonhttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.lucid/rdepends/xulrunner-1.9.2/xulrunner-1.9.222:17
chrisccoulsonwtf? - https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa/+build/159687422:29
micahgchrisccoulson: looksl like someone overrode the buildd22:30
chrisccoulsonwtf x 2 - https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ppa/+build/159711122:30
chrisccoulsonthat's a weird build failure too :-/22:30
micahgidk on that one22:31
ftahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/42879942/cyFmB4YYd2Cu5Qq1Gn29OP0jDjT.txt22:31
micahgchrisccoulson: should we push the xulrunner security update for beta 2?22:32
chrisccoulsonfta - where did you find that?22:32
ftafrom your upload logs22:32
chrisccoulsonmicahg - we could try, but i can't upload that for lucid22:33
ftaOriginal error: QueryCanceledError('canceling statement due to user request\n',)22:33
fta -> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42879942/cyFmB4YYd2Cu5Qq1Gn29OP0jDjT.txt (Statement: 'SELECT Build.archive, Build.buildduration, Build.builder, Build.buildlog, Build.buildstate, Build.date_first_dispatched, Build.datebuilt,22:33
fta'Rejection during accept' lol22:34
chrisccoulsonhmmmm :-/22:34
chrisccoulsonfta - i know that an archive admin rescored that build earlier so that it got built earlier, but i'm not sure why that would mess it up22:36
ftasorry, no idea about lp's internals22:37
chrisccoulsonfta - me neither ;)22:38
BUGa_vacationsMozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Mobile/7B334b Safari/531.21.1022:40
chrisccoulsonhuh?22:43
BUGa_vacationschrisccoulson: ipad user agent22:46
BUGa_vacationsyou can fake on gmail and see the special page they made for ipad22:47
BUGa_vacationsI don't get it22:47
BUGa_vacationsapple and google keep fighting22:47
BUGa_vacationsstill google makes special pages for them22:47
BUGa_vacationsand ipad will even bring several google apps22:47
BUGa_vacationsoooopppssssss23:17
BUGa_vacationsfta: seems we will need to be ready to tell users that FF won't play youtube html5 codecs23:17
BUGa_vacationsjust had to explain that to a power users23:18
BUGa_vacations*user23:18
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=  :(23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!