[05:33]  * ScottK returns with more Scotch.
[05:33] <ScottK> More Scotch == More NBS gets done.
[05:54] <ScottK> Urgh.  Samba4 got no updates this cycle.  Do we want the 9 month old snapshot we have, the 7 month old snapshot from Unstable, or the 4 month old snapshot from December?
[05:54] <ScottK> Need to rebuild due to talloc transition anyway.
[05:55] <ScottK> Correction, the Experimental snapshot is two months old
[05:56] <ScottK> I'll leave all three building when I go to bed and see what survives.
[06:06] <ScottK> Looks like the answer may be "the one that builds".  Two of the three didn't make it through configure.
[06:17] <ScottK> OK, 0 for 3 and I see it's on the supportable binaries removal list.  Will see what I can do with it tomorrow.
[12:59] <asac>   ubufox_0.9~rc1-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
[12:59] <asac> Successfully uploaded packages.
[12:59] <asac> ok ...
[12:59] <asac> slangasek: we wont be able to attend todays meeting ... holiday + travelling
[13:00] <asac> slangasek: i will send a mail with our status replying to the meeting reminder
[13:00] <asac> slangasek: also will include the stuff we wanted to discuss on omap ...
[13:00] <asac> i will be back on Wed
[15:46] <slangasek> asac: omap> ok, thanks - have a good holiday!
[19:05] <ScottK> slangasek: I believe I have a plan: downgrade ldb to 1:0.9.6~git20090912-1, upgrade samba4 to 4.0.0~alpha8+git20090912-1 (from Unstable), then rebuild openchange and sssd.  I've tried these locally.
[19:05] <ScottK> Can haz FFe?
[19:05] <ScottK> (please no paperwork, I don't think I could stand making a sensible bug of it)
[19:15] <ScottK> 1:0.9.10~git20091212+really0.9.6~git20090912-0ubuntu1
[20:33] <slangasek> ScottK: how are you handling the downgrade?  +really.git20090912-1?
[20:34] <ScottK> Except ld is getting confused now for some reason.
[20:35] <slangasek> howso?
[20:36] <ScottK> err dpkg-shlibdeps I mean
[20:36] <ScottK> https://launchpad.net/~kitterman/+archive/ppa/+build/1623812/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.ldb_1:0.9.10~git20091212+really0.9.6~git20090912-0ubuntu1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[20:37] <ScottK> I'm trying another local build of the unmodified package to make sure it's related to the rename
[20:37] <ScottK> Should know in ~5 minutes
[20:38] <ScottK> Yeah, builds fine when not renamed
[20:41] <ScottK> Foundi t.
[20:41] <ScottK> it.
[20:43] <slangasek> \o/
[20:44] <slangasek> ScottK: FFe granted, yes
[20:44] <ScottK> Thanks.
[21:02] <ScottK> On it's way.
[21:24] <doko__> hmm, who did give back schroot on armel? did give it back just 1h ago ...
[21:34] <slangasek> not me
[21:36]  * ScottK neither
[22:39] <ScottK> Any ideas what samba4 would be in the Xubuntu package set?
[22:49] <slangasek> sounds like a bug to me
[22:52]  * ScottK wonders if the bug gets filed against cjwatson?
[22:53] <ScottK> I was wrong about saving a binary New.  The newer samba4 snapshot has new binary packages.
[22:59]  * ScottK is off for a while.
[23:03] <slangasek> ScottK: the kdebase-workspace repo has an unrelated change to the default homepage; are you ok with that going in w/ the plymouth fix, or should I revert temporarily?
[23:03] <slangasek> ScottK: I see samba4 in the queue, but not ldb?
[23:16] <ScottK> slangasek: I went ahead and pushed ldb through since Universe isn't frozen.
[23:16] <slangasek> ah, ok
[23:16] <ScottK> slangasek: I'm fine with the homepage change (it's been discussed in #kubuntu-devel)
[23:16] <ScottK> Pushed samba4 too.
[23:36] <ScottK> I'm off (really this time).  I 'll at kdebase-workspace when I get back.
[23:37] <slangasek> ok - should finally reach the queue in 10min or so