| Laney | can I just upload a new version of a package that is in unapproved? | 00:38 |
|---|---|---|
| * Laney tries it | 00:43 | |
| slangasek | kirkland: "if ! pidof /usr/sbin/libvirtd >/dev/null; then" - you're in the pre-start script for the service that launches libvirtd; why is this not a no-op? | 02:20 |
| pac1 | I have a daily lucid iso that will not boot properly on my hardware. How can i collect information for submitting a bug on a live cd? | 02:24 |
| lamont | buildd 28521 98.2 0.7 9040 3472 ? R 00:46 116:34 | \_ dot /build/buildd/schroot-1.4.0/debian/build/doc/schroot/html/dir_17e0cfd21565d25c859a9e2623b17004_dep.dot -Tpng -o /build/buildd/schroot-1.4.0/debian/build/doc/schroot/html/dir_17e0cfd21565d25c859a9e2623b17004_dep.png -Tcmapx -o /build/buildd/schroot-1.4.0/debian/build/doc/schroot/html/dir_17e0cfd21565d25c859a9e2623b17004_dep.map | 02:45 |
| lamont | <-- doko: schroot vs armel | 02:45 |
| ScottK | lamont: JFTR, the second sparc buildd wasn't my fault, the retry was either automatic or someone else did it. | 03:14 |
| lamont | yeah - if it times out it goes "oh, want me to see if it'll kill another one? ok.: | 03:15 |
| lamont | oh look. glib2.90 | 03:16 |
| lamont | 2.0 even | 03:16 |
| lamont | just like now - freshly restarted, and sejong is the lucky winner | 03:20 |
| * lamont waits for the unpack to finish so he can shoot it in the head | 03:20 | |
| lamont | my way's not very sportsman like | 03:20 |
| doko__ | lamont: schroot wins, uploading without --enable-doxygen for arm | 03:22 |
| doko__ | s/schroot/armel/ | 03:22 |
| lamont | doko__: let me know when it's published and I'll go kill the build' | 03:22 |
| doko__ | lamont: now waiting for approval (ScottK?) | 03:31 |
| * lamont is +1, ScottK | 03:31 | |
| ScottK | What for? | 03:31 |
| lamont | schroot | 03:31 |
| * ScottK looks | 03:31 | |
| lamont | FTBFS on armel, fixed | 03:31 |
| ScottK | lamont and doko__: accepted. | 03:33 |
| lamont | oh most cool. the previous version actually "just died" rather than taking out buttercup | 03:34 |
| * lamont hugs bbg3 | 03:34 | |
| ScottK | Speaking of which, glib is waiting first in line to wipe out your sparc buildds if you restart them. | 03:34 |
| lamont | ScottK: not any more... it failed to build | 03:35 |
| ScottK | On, sure enough | 03:35 |
| ScottK | On/Oh | 03:35 |
| lamont | with strange configure errors that look like some buildd admin nuked the build tree | 03:35 |
| ScottK | I probably shouldn't retry it then. | 03:35 |
| lamont | just one of the many services we provide | 03:35 |
| ScottK | ;-) | 03:35 |
| lamont | ScottK: I'd have to hurt you if you did | 03:35 |
| ScottK | Yeah, no problem. I got the word now. | 03:36 |
| lamont | that does tend to be a spectacularly obvious failure mode | 03:37 |
| wgrant | lamont: Well, if you haven't seen it before it looks like a 'wtf happened here, that looks spurious. *retry*.' | 03:38 |
| lamont | wgrant: true | 03:38 |
| lamont | should be part of our standard buildd-admin briefing | 03:38 |
| wgrant | lamont: Note that non-buildd-admins can retry. | 03:38 |
| wgrant | (anyone with upload rights) | 03:38 |
| lamont | oh, and a "no really, make this build never try again, regardless of what the ppa owner says" button for buildd-admins would be nice | 03:39 |
| wgrant | lamont: "UPDATE build SET buildstate=5 WHERE id=%s" isn't good enough for you? Picky. :P | 03:40 |
| lamont | wgrant: that is insufficent in some cases, depending on the build state | 03:40 |
| lamont | leaves dangling cruft to make bigjools cry later | 03:40 |
| wgrant | Yeah, you'd probably have to play with the Job state as well. | 03:40 |
| wgrant | But that will all be changing in a few weeks. | 03:40 |
| lamont | \o/ | 03:40 |
| lamont | at least I hope | 03:40 |
| wgrant | There we be ONE BUILD STATE FIELD! And no extra records hanging around to delete. | 03:41 |
| wgrant | And it might even make it easier to implement the mythical 'Abort build' button. | 03:41 |
| lamont | oh major WIN | 03:41 |
| lamont | heh | 03:41 |
| * ScottK has had some very similar looking armel failures work on retry. | 03:41 | |
| lamont | we have that, it just requires shell access to the buildd | 03:42 |
| wgrant | lamont: In what fraction of cancel-requiring failures do non-virt builders respond? | 03:43 |
| wgrant | If a virt builder doesn't respond to an abort request, I plan to just hit the reset trigger. | 03:43 |
| wgrant | But we can't quite do that for non-virt builders. | 03:43 |
| sistpoty | just out of interest, what kernel/distro is running on the sparc buildds? (if it's later than 7.10, then I'll have a strong reason to not upgrade revu to that version *g*) | 03:45 |
| lamont | hardy is the dominant platform | 03:46 |
| lamont | ppc is karmic | 03:46 |
| lamont | armel is split between *cough* jaunty and lucid | 03:47 |
| lamont | wgrant: not sure | 03:47 |
| lamont | sistpoty: across the variety of platforms, it's hardy unless specified above | 03:48 |
| * ScottK wonders what the heck doko__ is doing with all the Dapper toolchain builds. | 03:48 | |
| lamont | dapper is love, no? | 03:48 |
| sistpoty | lamont: ah, thanks, I guess I'm lucky with revu running gutsy then := | 03:49 |
| sistpoty | :) | 03:49 |
| wgrant | Isn't Gutsy out of support? | 03:49 |
| lamont | armel 6 3 jobs (50 seconds) <-- lying | 03:49 |
| doko__ | tired of openjdk security backports for every release ... | 03:49 |
| lamont | wgrant: way big time | 03:49 |
| ScottK | wgrant: Yes, but it the last one that works on sparc. | 03:49 |
| lamont | doko__: that's 2 ofus | 03:50 |
| wgrant | lamont: Estimation is completely screwed at the moment. | 03:50 |
| sistpoty | oh, wait, it's hardy on revu even | 03:50 |
| wgrant | It's about to become even more completely screwed. | 03:50 |
| lamont | sistpoty: much better | 03:50 |
| wgrant | lamont: Only by a year. | 03:50 |
| doko__ | lamont: ofus? | 03:50 |
| lamont | I hear there's an LTS coming soon | 03:50 |
| lamont | doko__: of us | 03:50 |
| ScottK | Gutsy is the last Sparc installer that worked though. | 03:50 |
| lamont | space bar fail | 03:50 |
| doko__ | no ufos ... | 03:50 |
| lamont | ScottK: ssssssssssssssssssssssshhh | 03:50 |
| lamont | doko__: clearly, you need to drink more... will find ufos then | 03:51 |
| doko__ | but upstart did build again in lucid | 03:51 |
| ScottK | lamont: Just tell NCommander no cookies unless he fixes it for Lucid. | 03:51 |
| ScottK | doko__: So it may actually work, just no new installs. | 03:51 |
| lamont | dear sparc. good luck on catching up | 03:51 |
| lamont | ScottK: heh | 03:52 |
| wgrant | How sick is PowerPC these days? | 03:52 |
| ScottK | Runs but not extremely stable. | 03:52 |
| ScottK | We even get Live CD images. | 03:52 |
| lamont | wgrant: other than the porter machine, it seems happy... I'm inclined to point at the machine, rather than the architecture/distro | 03:52 |
| wgrant | Ah. | 03:53 |
| * ScottK got samba4 to build today. | 03:53 | |
| wgrant | Which snapshot? | 03:53 |
| ScottK | Had to downgrade ldb and upgrade samba4 | 03:54 |
| ScottK | The September on from Unstable | 03:54 |
| wgrant | Ah. | 03:54 |
| ScottK | Thus “ldb” 1:0.9.10~git20091212+really0.9.6~git20090912-0ubuntu1 | 03:54 |
| * lamont decides that it's bedtime | 03:54 | |
| NCommander | lamont: sparc is dead as far as I am concerned for this cycle :-/ | 05:05 |
| doko_ | losa ... | 05:08 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === medex is now known as mtx_init | ||
| === mtx_init is now known as medex | ||
| === BlackZ_ is now known as BlackZ | ||
| LLStarks | hi. what bug tag do i use for a beta 2 exemption? | 10:43 |
| === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage | ||
| === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
| zubin71 | hello, i had an idea id like to propose on behalf of ubuntu for gsoc; as the idea is one of my own im looking around for someone who could mentor me. :) But before that id like to discuss the idea. Could someone spare a little time? It`d be great if you could. | 14:10 |
| jpds | zubin71: I'd try #ubuntu-gsoc. | 14:11 |
| zubin71 | jpds: i did ; and i mailed to the list to, as they had just suggested. I was wondering if someone might be interested(and having some spare time) to listen to my idea. | 14:14 |
| zubin71 | has anyone here worked on any project related to iptables? | 14:17 |
| chrisccoulson | slangasek - i uploaded firefox last night. would you mind approving it if you get the chance so it builds over the weekend? | 14:31 |
| lifeless | jpds: I'm about 50% through a smart HTTP server for lmirror | 14:39 |
| lifeless | jpds: I'll have it wrapped tomorrow - this gets rid of the per-file round trip overhead. | 14:39 |
| lifeless | gnight everyone | 14:39 |
| mpt | kwwii, hi, what happened to that Ubuntu logo icon fix? | 14:52 |
| mpt | vish, do you know if a new Ubuntu logo icon was uploaded? | 14:55 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === radoe_ is now known as radoe | ||
| === mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| jzacsh | hello, I'm trying to play around with android development on ubuntu with eclipse (never really used eclipse before)- tried following instructions, and some trouble shooting, no luck. I keep getting dependency errors: http://paste.ubuntu.com/408702/ | 21:49 |
| === mrcurrington is now known as mcurrington | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!