[00:41] <chrisccoulson> micahg - do you have any more changes to get in to firefox? i'm going to start doing a test build in about 10 minutes, and then i'll tag it and upload it once i've done that
[00:42] <micahg> chrisccoulson: not this time, there's a bug that needs to be fixed before release though
[00:42] <micahg> chrisccoulson: bug 526291
[00:46] <micahg> chrisccoulson: unless you want to figure it out quickly, I spent some time last night on it without success
[00:46] <micahg> chrisccoulson: feel free to take if you find a solution
[00:47]  * micahg thinks it has to do with the makefile but isn't sure
[00:48] <micahg> chrisccoulson: so you decided to remove kazehakase?
[00:48] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, it doesn't make much sense in keeping it
[00:49] <chrisccoulson> you're right, the webkit backend doesnt work. i thought i'd tested that, but i must have just got a bit confused with all the different things i did last week ;)
[00:49] <micahg> chrisccoulson: nice, the debug switch is fixed :)
[00:50] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I still have to port kazehakase for hardy, jaunty, and karmic
[00:50] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, it's fixed for builds with DEB_MIN_SYSDEPS=1, but the fix would break if it's built without that
[00:51] <micahg> weird
[00:51] <chrisccoulson> but that's ok for now, i need to try and figure out exactly how the wrapper script is meant to work really, and do a proper fix
[00:51] <chrisccoulson> but that's for next cycle
[00:53] <micahg> Mook_sb: no more linux?
[00:53] <Mook_sb> micahg: no more linux QA and binary releases, yeah :(
[00:54] <Mook_sb> (it keeps building on the buildbot and stuff, though, since, among other things, we actually _use_ it there internally...)
[00:54] <micahg> Mook_sb: well, we don't use the binaries, but will it still be buildable or are we on our own to patch for linux issues
[00:54] <micahg> Mook_sb: the real question is should we still try to package it or not?
[00:55] <Mook_sb> yeah, I don't think there's going to be too much difference for you, except for maybe longer review times for preed
[00:55] <Mook_sb> let's put it this way: I'd still like a package :)
[00:55] <micahg> Mook_sb: ok, as long as we'll still have some support from upstream, I'm game for trying
[00:56] <Mook_sb> sadly, it's mostly a problem of not being able to get people to actually pony up license money for linux (for the branded distributions).
[00:56] <micahg> Mook_sb: license money?
[00:57] <Mook_sb> yeah; we're actually getting income for device people shipping songbird as their device + media player software
[00:57] <chrisccoulson> micahg - oh, that's strange. i did a 3.6.3 build earlier with system xulrunner (i just wanted to see how different the binary packages were), and i get the proper abrowser icons in that build ;)
[00:57] <Mook_sb> nobody wants to even try to spring for a linux license though :(
[00:58] <micahg> Mook_sb: I seem to be missing something WRT a linux license
[00:58] <micahg> chrisccoulson: interesting
[00:59] <Mook_sb> micahg: basically, no (licensing) customers are interested in linux, hence we need to focus on other things that actually generate income
[00:59] <micahg> Mook_sb: ah, ok, when does someone buy a license?
[01:00] <Mook_sb> micahg: to ship songbird as part of the software package when they ship physical mp3/whatever players
[01:00] <Mook_sb> basically, we get bundled
[01:00] <micahg> Mook_sb: ah, ok, cool
[01:01] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I have to run, I'll chat with you over the weekend maybe...please push thunderbird as well if possible :)
[05:03] <ddecator> this will be interesting. support the community build of songbird and maintain it downstream, or work on a fork of songbird that is completely opensoure and focused on linux (lyrebird)
[18:01] <lito> Hi
[18:08] <lito> As the songbird developers dropped linux support today, are there any further plans to integrate Songbird into the Ubuntu repos?
[18:41] <chrisccoulson> lito - not that i'm aware of
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> tbh, we already have enough work to do ;)
[18:51] <lito> sure, I was just asking cos ddecator made a remark, that maybe, songbird could be in the repos for 10.10, but the step today by the songbird devs to drop linux support made that plans somehow unrealistic
[18:54] <lito> well, thx anyway for the info
[19:14] <BUGa_vacations> evening