[00:02] <superm1> um, did vnc4-common just disappear from universe?
[00:03] <superm1> rmadison appears to think so. http://paste.ubuntu.com/408810/ but the publishing history doesn't agree with that: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vnc4/+publishinghistory
[00:08] <Daviey> superm1: rmadison certainly suggests that, but it's certainly in the the archive pool under the universe pocket still.
[00:09] <superm1> Daviey, i think this is part of the LucidPlatformSupportableBinaries possibly
[00:09] <superm1> it looks like it was on slangasek's original list
[00:09] <crimsun> E: Package vnc4-common has no installation candidate
[00:10] <Daviey> that is odd, because apt-get source vnc4-common certainly pulls in 4.1.1+xorg1.0.2-0ubuntu7
[00:10] <Daviey> (vnc4)
[00:11] <slangasek> the removals were binary-only
[00:12] <slangasek> feel free to fix the build failure
[00:13] <Daviey> slangasek: Sorry, which build failure?  I see a dep wait on armel
[00:13] <wgrant> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/i386/vnc4-common is the equivalent binary publication page -- just like the source one, it is always right and should have a deletion comment.
[00:14] <slangasek> Daviey: the build failure at the root of the spec - should be trivial to reproduce by grabbing the source and trying to build it
[00:15] <Daviey> slangasek: yes, sorry - just read the spec
[00:35] <superm1> woo, the debian vnc4 package builds.  i'll request a sync for it
[02:06] <superm1> can an archive admin release vnc4server from NEW so all the rdepends can get back to building?
[02:20] <ScottK> \
[02:20] <ScottK> superm1: Done.
[02:22] <wgrant> It has rdepends?
[02:26] <micahg> any archive admins around?
[02:27] <superm1> wgrant, mythbuntu-common needs it, and tons of stuff needs mythbuntu-common to build
[02:27] <superm1> thanks ScottK
[02:27] <ScottK> No problem.
[02:27] <wgrant> Ah.
[02:29] <ScottK> I understand a bit better why you were excited when it went missing.
[02:32] <superm1> yeah :)
[02:33] <superm1> kinda sorta breaks live disks
[03:20] <slangasek> lool: do you know why there's no build record for valgrind on armel?
[03:27] <micahg> slangasek: can you push a Thunderbird and Firefox through unapproved?
[03:36] <slangasek> micahg: looking
[03:54]  * kees hugs chrisccoulson micahg and mdeslaur
[04:02] <slangasek> ccheney: do you know why OOo b-d on ant1.7 on ia64 (which doesn't exist) instead of ant (which does and appears to be installable)?
[04:03] <micahg> thanks slangasek
[04:07] <slangasek> sure thing
[04:22] <SandGorgon> hi guys, this idea ( http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/24276/ ) just hit the front page of Hacker News - if somebody can get a moderator to look at it, please do
[04:36] <LaserJock> SandGorgon: you probably want to talk to Brainstorm admins about that
[05:06] <crypt-0> Are there plans to re-enable SMART probing in 9.10? If so when?
[06:15] <River_Song> popey> Spoilers! -_-
[12:18] <bdrung> persia: hi, i want to become member of u-u-s again (then i can unsubscribe u-u-s again)
[13:02] <Annaa> http://tinypic.zapto.org/2kn4m8.png?t=1270382061 do my breasts look to big?
[14:41]  * _romeo_ says happy easter to all
[16:52] <TrueTom> does anyone know if acpid is still used for events like notebook lid opening/closing?
[17:09] <TrueTom> does anyone know if acpid is still used for events like notebook lid opening/closing?
[17:10] <jpds> !weekend
[17:14] <TrueTom> fair enough :)
[18:30] <jdong> lazy question, does Lucid upgrade existing GRUB legacy systems to GRUB2 or no?
[18:34] <micahg> jdong: I seem to have a mix and match...grub is legacy, grub-common is grub 2
[18:34] <jdong> fun
[18:34] <jdong> so it still doesn't attempt to rewrite the bootloader, like in 9.10
[18:35] <micahg> jdong: I get an option to use grub 2 chainloader in grub 1, but that might be because of something I did in 9.10
[18:47] <owen1> there is a serious bug with many asus and dell laptops but it was not assigned to any developer. what can I do to get the attention of canonical? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/512192
[18:48] <owen1> this thouchpad is too sensitive which forces me to use external keyboard.
[18:49] <micahg> owen1: you can try #ubuntu-kernel tomorrow
[18:50] <owen1> micahg: thank you. what do u mean by tomorrow? i am in pacific time.
[18:50] <micahg> owen1: Monday
[18:50] <micahg> owen1: you can try today, but there's no guarantee anyone will be around
[18:50] <owen1> ok. i will.
[19:18] <micahg> directhex: any idea how I can test gluezilla being ported to 1.9.2?
[19:19] <micahg> *xulrunner 1.9.2
[20:09] <directhex> micahg, good question. i think gluezilla is used by the system.windows.forms web browser control, so try any old "hello world" web browser example code
[20:10] <micahg> directhex: unfortunately, I'm not familiar with mono
[20:13] <micahg> directhex: do we have a mono IDE in Ubuntu?
[20:13] <ScottK> micahg: monodevelop?
[20:14] <micahg> ScottK: looks, right, thanks
[20:21] <directhex> monodevelop, but it's for gtk# work mostly
[20:21] <micahg> directhex: I can't make an easy Hello World browser test in it quickly?
[20:21] <xnox> it's general purpose though =) you can write C, C++ and JS in it =)
[20:22] <xnox> It's like Anjuta done write similar to XCode imho
[20:22] <xnox> s / write / right
[20:23] <directhex> try http://www.java2s.com/Tutorial/CSharp/0460__GUI-Windows-Forms/BrowserwithUrlentrybox.htm
[20:24] <directhex> messy segfault on lucid, for me
[20:25] <micahg> directhex: forgive my ignorance, but what do I do with the code?
[20:25] <directhex> micahg, gmcs -pkg:dotnet foo.cs
[20:26] <micahg> directhex: wfm :)
[20:26] <directhex> odd
[20:26] <directhex> micahg, running foo.exe ?
[20:26] <micahg> directhex: I'm using my modified gluezilla
[20:26] <directhex> ah. awesome
[20:26] <directhex> can you fling the patch at debian plz?
[20:26] <micahg> oops
[20:26] <micahg> just core dumped
[20:27] <micahg> i'ts using the wrong xul...I'll have to look into iit further, thanks
[20:29] <micahg> directhex: just enabled 1.9.2 vs 1.9.1 and built with 1.9.2, obviously not enough...I'll dig a little further
[20:29] <directhex> thanks micahg
[20:30] <directhex> micahg, it's not an a1 priority, as none of the default apps use it... but user apps may well do
[20:30] <micahg> directhex: are you the debian maintainer?
[20:34] <directhex> micahg, more or less
[20:36] <micahg> directhex: there's a problem that clean deletes Makefile.in in tests/browser which makes rebuilding a pain, I was going to file a bug later this week
[21:19] <lifeless> kees: is squid/squid3 meant to get security fixes ?
[21:20] <lifeless> kees: nevermind, clearly in universe.
[22:21] <cjohnston> superm1: ping
[22:47] <superm1> cjohnston, what's up?
[22:47] <micahg> sk that it be set as wishlist
[22:47] <micahg> oops
[22:47] <cjohnston> superm1: mind a PM?
[22:48] <superm1> cjohnston, sure?
[22:51] <crypt-0> where are all of the scripts located that preform the auto mounting / password prompt with full disk encryption?
[22:53] <lifeless> cryptsetup
[22:53] <lifeless> crypttab
[23:19] <crypt-0> lifeless, if i wanted to expand upon a script how would i do so eg a script that is run *before* that one
[23:19] <crypt-0> lifeless, crypttab is one line.
[23:32] <crypt-0> 0_o wrong dir dorry