| stub | What's the bestest way of running a single story nowadays? | 07:44 |
|---|---|---|
| deryck | Morning, all. | 10:59 |
| === deryck changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: Launchpad Development Channel | Week 4 of 10.03 | PQM is open | https://dev.launchpad.net/ | Get the code: https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting | On-call review in irc://irc.freenode.net/#launchpad-reviews | Use http://paste.ubuntu.com/ for pastes | ||
| === wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: Launchpad Development Channel | Week 0 of 10.04 | PQM is open | https://dev.launchpad.net/ | Get the code: https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting | On-call review in irc://irc.freenode.net/#launchpad-reviews | Use http://paste.ubuntu.com/ for pastes | ||
| === salgado_ is now known as salgado | ||
| salgado | maxb, around? have you tried running the python2.6 branch of LP recently? | 14:33 |
| barry | gmb: ping | 14:45 |
| gmb | barry, Hi | 14:48 |
| barry | gmb: hi. responded to your email. thanks for your help with this! | 14:50 |
| gmb | barry, No worries. Sorry for letting myself get sidetracked *again* | 14:50 |
| gmb | barry, FYI, I've converted Mark's export to Launchpad interchange format and I'm going to try doing the import locally to see what happens to the patches. | 14:51 |
| barry | awesome, thanks | 14:51 |
| gmb | I'll reply to the thread with what I find out. Hopefully should have some answers today. | 14:51 |
| barry | cool | 14:52 |
| kfogel | barry: got a sec? In my spare time I'm working on bug #231023 | 15:06 |
| mup | Bug #231023: on status change, show new status in Subject: <email> <Launchpad Bugs:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/231023> | 15:06 |
| kfogel | barry: ... and although I'm adding all sorts of instrumentation to lib/canonical/launchpad/mailnotification.py:BugNotificationBuilder.build | 15:07 |
| kfogel | I can't seem to get any of it to take effect in launchpad.dev. Is that the right place? | 15:07 |
| barry | kfogel: sure | 15:07 |
| kfogel | barry: and lib/lp/bugs/doc/bugnotification-email.txt should also pass/fail based on changes I make in that code, right? | 15:08 |
| barry | kfogel: that's what i would think. did you put a break point in .build()? | 15:10 |
| kfogel | barry: well, I'm doing this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/409510/ | 15:11 |
| kfogel | barry: IOW, I added an "x" suffix to "Bug" just to make sure things are working, and then log the whole subject to a tmpfile. | 15:11 |
| maxb | salgado: hey. Not recently, no | 15:12 |
| kfogel | barry: last week, I'd run that code and then go into launchpad.dev and make all sorts of bug changes -- but my tmpfile never showed up. | 15:12 |
| kfogel | barry: trying again now | 15:12 |
| barry | kfogel: it's always helpful to stick a pdb.set_trace() in there and see if the code you think is getting hit actually is ;) | 15:13 |
| kfogel | barry: that's a good idea | 15:13 |
| salgado | maxb, I've asked because I'm trying to resurrect it but am blocked on what seems to be http://reinout.vanrees.org/weblog/2009/11/13/distribute-buildout-recursion-fixed.html (which should be fixed on our version of buildout) | 15:41 |
| maxb | Ah. For any insane buildout behaviour, I would direct you towards gary :-) | 15:41 |
| salgado | maxb, if only he were around today... :< | 15:43 |
| salgado | :( | 15:43 |
| kfogel | barry: even this patch http://paste.ubuntu.com/409529/ is not throwing me into the debugger | 15:51 |
| kfogel | barry: this is when I go to https://bugs.launchpad.dev/firefox/+bug/5 and make various changes (I add a comment, change status, change assignee, etc) | 15:52 |
| kfogel | barry: I'm wondering if there's something I'm supposed to do to get the entire notification system "turned on"? | 15:52 |
| deryck | mars, hi. Do you have a minute to help me work out something for a Windmill test? | 16:04 |
| mars | deryck, yes, in a few minutes | 16:04 |
| deryck | mars, ok, thanks! Just ping when you have 2-3 minutes. | 16:05 |
| kfogel | deryck: you have backscroll to see my above conversation with barry? If you know why I can't seem to get launchpad.dev's bug notification system operating, pls let me know. | 16:20 |
| mars | deryck, online, let me know when you have a moment, and I can help you | 16:21 |
| deryck | kfogel, so lp's notifications system is really just a set of calls to notify() and then running the notification script. I would guess the script acts based on config settings, but I've not actually run it locally. | 16:24 |
| deryck | mars, cool. thanks. So I'm working on bug 494257 | 16:25 |
| mup | Bug #494257: Users not notified in email when subscribed by someone else <email> <ubuntu-qa> <Launchpad Bugs:In Progress by deryck> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/494257> | 16:25 |
| mars | deryck, ok | 16:25 |
| deryck | mars, and the issue there is that the notify(ObjectCreatedEvent()) stuff happens in browser code, not model code. So it's never hit from JS use of API... | 16:26 |
| deryck | mars, so I want a windmill test to verify this and do TDD on the fix for it. So see: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~deryck/launchpad/not-notified-someone-else-subscribed-494257/revision/10607 | 16:26 |
| deryck | mars, the event listener stuff there doesn't seem to work, and I'm wondering if BugsWindmillLayer will support this approach to testing this? | 16:27 |
| mars | deryck, the first thing I have to ask about this is: does windmill share process and configuration with the application server? | 16:29 |
| mars | I know that we can now use the ObjectFactory with windmill | 16:29 |
| mars | but that fact does not imply that the event listener in your windmill test is being registered with the application server process | 16:31 |
| kfogel | deryck: "notify()", huh? Sounds like that's a major entry point that I've... not encountered yet in code, though I've heard it referred to ;-). Where is the "notification script"? Is it ./cronscripts/send-bug-notifications.py ? | 16:34 |
| deryck | kfogel, yes, that's the script. and look through model/bug.py for notify calls. | 16:34 |
| kfogel | deryck: thx | 16:35 |
| deryck | np | 16:35 |
| mars | rockstar, ping, do you remember who set up the windmill objectfactory integration? | 16:35 |
| mars | rockstar, it was done recently IIRC | 16:35 |
| deryck | mars, I think it was flacoste and BjornT at various times, but neither is available today, I believe | 16:35 |
| mars | deryck, yeah, may have been BjornT | 16:36 |
| deryck | mars, this is actually what I'm asking you, is can this be done? i.e. is there access to the app server in windmill in this way | 16:36 |
| mars | deryck, I don't know. | 16:36 |
| deryck | mars, ok, cool. thanks anyway :-) | 16:37 |
| mars | no problem. Hopefully BjornT knows. | 16:37 |
| deryck | I thought BjornT might be the only one to know. but was casting about for help. :-) | 16:37 |
| mars | I think he is the only person who knows the entire system structure. Others know parts of it, and can assemble the whole thing if need be. | 16:39 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-brb | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| Ursinha | sinzui, hi | 17:54 |
| Ursinha | sinzui, is bug 548578 really ready to qa? I mean, are you able to qa that on staging or edge? | 17:54 |
| mup | Bug #548578: scripts/cache-country-mirrors.py is generating files with perms 0600 <qa-needstesting> <Launchpad Registry:Fix Committed by sinzui> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/548578> | 17:54 |
| Ursinha | or anywhere else | 17:55 |
| === salgado-brb is now known as salgado | ||
| sinzui | Ursinha, yes it is ready for QA because it will be test by spm on the machine that is affected | 18:02 |
| Ursinha | sinzui, right | 18:02 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === salgado_ is now known as salgado | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === jelmer is now known as Guest72846 | ||
| thumper | morning | 20:31 |
| jelmer_ | hi thumper | 20:31 |
| === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
| kfogel | Whoa. pqm.launchpad.net says "Now playing... * 1 request(s) for other project(s). | 21:31 |
| kfogel | " | 21:31 |
| kfogel | What does that mean? | 21:31 |
| salgado | kfogel, it means it thinks the submission's target is not a LP branch | 21:33 |
| kfogel | salgado: ah, okay. Pity it's not more... informative about that. | 21:34 |
| salgado | yeah, it could do a lot better | 21:35 |
| kfogel | salgado: I guess I'm trying to find out if those messages are about the two branches I just submitted. | 21:35 |
| kfogel | salgado: I should wait for the email? | 21:35 |
| salgado | kfogel, yeah, you'll get FAILURE emails shortly, but you might re-run the pqm-submit commands with --dry-run to find out what's wrong | 21:37 |
| salgado | unless you're not landing launchpad branches? | 21:37 |
| kfogel | salgado: my intention was certainly to land launchpad branches. | 21:37 |
| kfogel | salgado: what PQM thinks my intention is, I cannot say. | 21:37 |
| salgado | kfogel, and to make things worse it won't clearly tell you what went wrong in the FAILURE emails. we can only infer that by looking at what was sent to PQM, | 21:39 |
| kfogel | salgado: Yes. In retrospect, it was probably a mistake to put PQM in charge of all NATO air defense systems. | 21:45 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === bfiller is now known as bfiller_afk | ||
| bdmurray | Can I set bug 544387 to fix released? | 22:50 |
| mup | Bug #544387: date_created for a bug subscription not exported in the API <qa-ok> <Launchpad Bugs:Fix Committed by brian-murray> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/544387> | 22:50 |
| wgrant | bdmurray: Yes. | 22:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!