[01:25] I have qemu+libvirt on one server; if I run ufw enable on that I lose connectionto any guests. What rule do I need to add to allow communication through the host but not to the host? === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk [03:16] New bug: #556996 in samba (main) "winbind pam-config potentially breaks stacking with modules of lower priority in common-passwd" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/556996 [03:24] New bug: #556785 in shadow (main) "Passwd in Ubuntu Lucid has started giving errors since last update" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/556785 [03:25] jdstrand: sorry about that [03:31] jdstrand: I have all vm's running over a bridged network - eth0 bridged with br0 -> vnet1 -> virtual_server_1. So do I just allow everything from anywhere to anywhere on vnet1? [03:32] oh.... [03:32] in/out [03:43] MTecknology: I've not done bridged networking with libvirt. however it should work how you'd expect. eg if some remote host wants to connect to your vm on port 22 on ip 1.2.3.4, then you can do: sudo ufw allow to 1.2.3.4 port ssh [03:44] MTecknology: keep in mind the in/out is for INPUT and OUTPUT. if you need to manipulate the forward chain, then you are going to need to add stuff to /etc/ufw/before.rule [03:44] s [03:51] jdstrand: I just want to allow any traffic for that server to go through to that server so I can use iptables on there. [03:52] I tried just 'ufw allow to 192.168.1.5' then ufw enable and I couldn't talk to that vm anymore [03:53] If I try something like 'ufw allow from any port any to 192.168.1.6 port any' I get ERROR: 'Could not find protocol' [03:54] MTecknology: don't use 'port any', just 'from any to any' [03:55] MTecknology: if ufw is blocking, you'll need to look in kern.log [03:55] if you use 'port' you need to define udp or tcp (or other protocols that use ports) [03:56] 'ufw allow any to any' - still kills my connection when I enable it.. [03:56] Apr 6 21:55:50 pessum kernel: [29088.509108] [UFW BLOCK] IN=br0 OUT=br0 PHYSIN=eth0 PHYSOUT=vnet3 SRC=192.168.3.6 DST=192.168.1.6 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=51033 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=47120 DPT=22 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 [04:04] This is what I have now - http://dpaste.com/180294/ [04:04] jdstrand: I don't know if it makes a difference - I'm on 10.04 [04:05] MTecknology: I think you need to read http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Bridged_networking_.28aka_.22shared_physical_device.22.29 [04:06] MTecknology: it references a fedora bug in libvirt that is probably what is causing you trouble [04:06] MTecknology: I gotta head out, but I bet that is the issue [04:08] jdstrand: with network manager not supproting bridged interfaces? [04:09] oh [04:09] jdstrand: alrighty, thanks :) === macrocosm_ is now known as macrocosm === shennyg_ is now known as shennyg [05:14] i have installed my system using a usb key [05:14] but it was installed on sdb [05:14] and the system is sda now that the usb isn't plugged anymore [05:15] I guess I need to update the grub [05:15] can someone tell me how ? [05:17] Bleh. [05:17] That's why I hate grub and its stupid device.map [06:43] Heh. Seems to be a horde of people wanting to get ubuntu 10.04 beta1. ;) [09:04] how can i reserve a device name for my USB device so that it's always got the same /dev/devicenamehere? [09:05] AnRkey: label the partition on the USB device (so that you have /dev/disk/byu-label/ [09:05] it's a printer [09:06] two printers actually, they keep getting switched around or given ttyUSB3 or whatever [09:07] AnRkey, you can use udev for that [09:08] udev? [09:08] AnRkey, this article may help you: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7316 [09:08] * AnRkey googles it [09:08] thanks for the push in the right direction [09:08] AnRkey, no problem [09:09] AnRkey, here is an example rule for a printer: http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html#example-printer [09:10] AnRkey, you can read that document too... but it may be to comprehensive [09:10] *too [09:56] i'am trying to basically setup a lil intranet wiki, and i see it does support ldap, but can ldap be easily configure to just use posix system users? [09:56] configured* [10:18] bronto2: usually no. but there are some scripts which you can use to convert your system users. but then again: why use ldap in the first place if you only want your system users to login? [11:21] hi guys, I installed and configured MRTG to monitor one internet line.... i installed it on my ubuntu server [11:22] in the index url now, I see 8 graphs related to the router being monitored [11:22] each graph is of the form "Traffic Analysis for #num# -- [11:24] any idea what these graphs are? [11:24] how can I choose which graphs to remove?.. or are all of these important?... please advis === swift_ is now known as swift [12:21] smoser: ping me when available [12:21] here now. [12:21] ttx, [12:22] Two things, I suppose you got my answer to the ramdisk email... [12:22] yeah. [12:22] What's your opinion on it ? [12:22] i would like to have no ramdisks. [12:23] How much testing did the current noramdisk things get so far ? [12:23] on my hardware, i've recreated failure with beta-1 and success on all of 2010040[1256] [12:23] i cannot seem to create failure. [12:24] i think that between reasonable test of your hardware (which was 'sometimes fail'), mine (always fail) and dustin's (always fail) and data center (always pass), we have fairly good coverage of that. [12:24] OK, I'll play a few rounds myself [12:24] and we'll take the final decision by the meeting time [12:24] in between... we need to sort out the testcases [12:24] above, the parentheses state what it was before. [12:24] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntuserver/all shows they are pretty broken [12:24] i updated http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/System/EC2CloudImages#preview [12:25] Do you have testcases for the EC2 and the UEC images ? [12:25] what do you mean? [12:26] I mean we need: [12:26] EC2/classic -> 2 testcases (multiple instance run, userdata/config) [12:26] EC2/EBSroot -> 2 testcases (multiple instance run, userdata/config) [12:27] i have a "test suite"read the link above and let me know if its not sufficient [12:27] i have a "test suite" that runs all those tests [12:27] UEC -> 2 testcases (instance run, userdata/config) [12:28] i'm writing userdata/config for UEC right now (copying from EC2) [12:28] ok [12:28] smoser: do you agree EBSroot should have the same tests ? [12:28] (currently they have no tests) [12:28] yeah, it should have same tests, with an additional "shut down instance" and "start instance" [12:29] (i commented on that in EC2CloudImages above) [12:41] smoser: please sync with ara when you have the links set. I updated her on #ubuntu-release a few minutes ago [13:10] Looks like the default archive used in sources.list for canonical AMIs on ec2 is out (http://us-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/universe) [13:11] anyone know if this is a policy change, or just an outage? [13:29] kirkland, ping [13:29] cemerick, no policy change [13:29] what do you mean by out ? [13:29] do you get errors? [13:30] i've just verified from a lucid instance that it seems functional [13:30] smoser: well, it's unreachable :-) http://isitup.org/us-east-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com [13:30] Hi is it possible to install the ubuntu enterprise cloud later on a ubuntu server? [13:31] cemerick, it is never available from outside of that region [13:31] i'm guessing that 'isitup.org' doesn't run inside us-east-1, so that would be expected [13:32] smoser: ok; then I'm a little baffled w.r.t. the timeouts that aptitude update, et al. are yielding. [13:32] binBASH, it is possible, yes. i'm sorry that i dont have a good link for how though. maybe ttx or kirkland do [13:32] your instance is in us-east-1 region ? [13:33] what's the best way to remove tomcat5.5 and 6 (completely remove theme) if they were installed from apt-get [13:33] smoser: us-east-1d, yes [13:33] smoser: At least that sounds already good ;) Because I have a root server at hetzner.de and they provide only ubuntu-server images without uec. [13:34] cemerick, can you 'apt-get update 2>&1 | tee out.log' and pastebin that ? [13:34] smoser: sure, 1m [13:35] cemerick, i just replaced all 'lucid' with 'karmic' in my lucid instance that i have and run apt-get update successfully. [13:35] so it seems like it would be limited to your instance. maybe some networking things you've done ? [13:36] smoser: this is a totally virgin node, started from ami-bb709dd2 FWIW [13:37] binBASH, single system UEC installation is tricky at best. i do not believe its officially supported. [13:37] I got 6 servers atm, planning to have 150 if all works fine ;) [13:37] cemerick, firing one up, and i'll check from taht. [13:38] smoser: FYI http://dpaste.com/180431/ [13:38] binBASH, and they're physical? the nodes have to be run on physical hardware.... in theory you could do nested virt if they where amd64, but thats not going to be fast :) [13:39] smoser: Yup, physical [13:39] cemerick, well, waiting for a spot instance request to come up and then i'll test also [13:40] smoser: Planning to run some KVM Hypervisors there :) [13:40] OK. I'm switching over to another aws acct; I remember having some wonky network issues long, long ago that didn't replicate over to another acct (for some ungodly reason). [13:40] smoser: http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produkte_rootserver/eq6/ [13:41] smoser: Whooo. Different aws acct, all's good there. :-( [13:41] yikes [13:42] cemerick, if you have support, i would try using it. if not, i would try the forums. [13:42] cemerick, mine just worked (apt-get update) [13:42] smoser: yup, heading there now. When this happened once before, a forum msg magically fixed networking on the affected acct's nodes. It's odd tho, other network access works just fine. [13:43] thanks, sorry for the noise :-( [13:44] hello ! I am using ubuntu-server 8.04 as a platform of mysql server ! the problem that I have is that I can't access the server remotely ! I have commented the bind-address line to allow external connections.. but still got this error : Host '172.16.50.52' is not allowed to connect to this MySQL server [13:44] any suggestions plz [13:51] smoser: I think I found it here > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/PackageInstall [13:56] binBASH: beware that's outdated (applies to karmic), so it might not work [13:56] we still need to fix the docs [13:58] smoser: whats up [13:59] kirkland: see my comments on bug 556932, I think it's invalid -- if you agree please edit your test results so that it doesn't show failure on the tracker, please [13:59] Launchpad bug 556932 in eucalyptus "Not enough resources available: addresses (try --addressing private)" [High,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/556932 [14:01] ttx: I will try it :-) [14:03] yay i ran out of disk space! [14:07] * ttx ⁵'s zul [14:07] stupid daily ppas [14:17] ttx: ok [14:17] is dump/restore working with ext4 now? [14:17] kirkland: thanks ! [14:18] if not what would be a good replacement? [14:19] ttx: doh [14:19] kirkland: :) [14:19] ttx: yep, all my fault, sorry [14:19] ttx: i did a lot of installs yesterday [14:20] kirkland: we need some testing of the UEC cloud image without ramdisk to assess its boot stability, if yo uhave some time before the meeting [14:21] kirkland: smoser can give you the method to test it [14:21] (I'm on it right now, but the more the merrier) [14:22] Just noticed a mention of the auto-upgrade-tester in the LTS upgrade blueprint and a problem or something or other with moving it to a data center. Our site can provide some (free) hosting if it would be useful for running the auto upgrade tester. [14:25] I've been planning on running a copy of it locally anyway. [14:31] New bug: #557300 in tomcat6 (main) "tomcat6 package changes ownership of directories" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/557300 [14:32] a_ok: I have never used it, but the man of dumpe2fs says 'ext4' [14:33] Omahn: mvo is running it, please talk to him, he might be interested [14:33] kirkland, just publish an image without a ramdisk, and see if it boots. [14:34] uec-publish-image --ramdisk=none image.tar.gz lucid-20100407-noramdisk amd64 [14:34] a_ok: Didn't even know such a program existed for linux [14:34] alvin: ok I will just have to test it than. the changelog of the dump project mentions only preliminary ext4 support [14:34] alvin: we have been using it for many years. dates back to ext2 [14:34] a_ok: I think most people use tar (preferably in combination with LVM snapshots) [14:35] a_ok: I have only used it for UFS [14:35] alvin: can't use tar for that kind of backups. you will lose sertain atributes etc [14:35] Nice to know you can use it for ext too [14:35] a_ok: Very true. In that case, there's always dd :-) [14:36] alvin: dd will mean our backups will be at least twice as large [14:36] At the least, yes [14:36] But it's a good question. [14:37] I wonder whether LVM has a way of sending a volume to a file [14:37] fsarchiver seems a nice project but not good enough for production yet [14:38] No, on first sight (man lvm) lvm doesn't have that. [14:39] Actually, things like that are the reason I prefer ZFS for enterprise storage, wherever possible. We'll probably have to wait for BTRFS to get the good stuff in Linux too. [14:41] smoser: the no-ramdisk uec image looks good to me [14:44] ttx: I'll drop mvo a pm, thanks. [14:47] smoser: I managed to have one instance stuck ! [14:48] what is stuck ? [14:48] doesn't boot all the way [14:48] euca-get-console-output $IID | pastebin [14:48] ? [14:48] I'm on it [14:49] I've getting problems with nat configuration in ufw [14:49] can't define nat chain [14:49] smoser: the end of it @ http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/410557/ === mathiaz_ is now known as mathiaz [14:50] startedtwo in parallel [14:50] the other one worked, pasting end of console-output as well [14:50] i put this lines in before.rules [14:50] ttx, hm... well, that hang is much different than before. [14:50] and i wouldn't think ramdisk related [14:50] see the Generating locales output [14:51] it shows that uec-init was running [14:51] *nat [14:51] smoser: The one that worked: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/410558/ [14:51] :PREROUTING - [0:0] [14:51] and landscape-client also running, which runs well after. [14:51] but it gives me error [14:51] why can't I configure nat in before.rules file, using ufw [14:52] I'm trying to avoid iptables, although I understand very well iptables, I'm trying to use ufw [14:52] ttx, i really have no idea where that bug can be coming from... [14:52] euca-run-instances -k mykey $EMI -t $TYPE -n 2 [14:53] trying again [14:53] can't I define advanced rules (nat for example) using ufw? [14:53] worked [14:55] smoser: I don't think that invalidates noramdisk, just shows that we need to test test test [14:55] LinuxAdmin: just vote for bug 247455 [14:55] Launchpad bug 247455 in ufw "a Nat option would be helpful for gateway systems" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/247455 [14:55] smoser: cannot reallt reproduce it [14:57] kirkland: what's your take on bug 556312? [14:57] Launchpad bug 556312 in libvirt "libvirt packages should not Recommend hypervisor packages" [Wishlist,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/556312 [15:06] LinuxAdmin: yes you can use nat rules with ufw [15:07] LinuxAdmin: can you paste your before.rules file? [15:10] LinuxAdmin: also, what Ubuntu release are you using? [15:10] I'm using ubuntu server 9.10 [15:10] I'll paste the text in a few seconds... [15:12] just this two lines in beginning of the file give me an erro: [15:12] *nat [15:12] :PREROUTING - [0:0] [15:12] LinuxAdmin: please use paste.ubuntu.com [15:13] !pastebin| LinuxAdmin [15:13] LinuxAdmin: For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://tinyurl.com/imagebin | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. [15:13] LinuxAdmin: and paste the entire before.rules [15:13] ok, just a minute [15:16] Any suggestions for an easy to use mailing list that will let random users sign up? I'm considering mailman - just not sure if that's the best solution. [15:19] in paste.ubuntu.com do I have to "download as text"? [15:19] sorry it's the first time [15:19] LinuxAdmin: no-- just give me the link [15:19] ok [15:19] http://paste.ubuntu.com/410566/ [15:20] LinuxAdmin: you forgot COMMIT for the nat table [15:21] LinuxAdmin: on the line under your -A POSTROUTING rule, add: [15:21] COMMIT [15:21] ok, as I understand I have to commit before start a new chain, wright? [15:21] LinuxAdmin: a new table, yes [15:22] a new table, sorry [15:22] ok, let me try [15:24] can i put PREROUTING and POSTROUTING in before.rules or do I have to put POSTROUTING in after.rules? [15:24] LinuxAdmin: it is fine as is. before.rules and after.rules are named as such for when the files are processed [15:25] LinuxAdmin: before* first, user* (ie, cli added rules) 2nd, and after* 3rd [15:25] ok, thanks [15:26] it works [15:26] cool [15:26] thanks again [15:26] np [15:26] let me ask you just one more question [15:26] shoot [15:27] I'm curious about ufw-before-forward [15:27] indeed, about ufw-before* [15:28] do I have to do anything in this chains to apply port forwarding using NAT? [15:29] LinuxAdmin: if you want to customize the INPUT, FORWARD or OUTPUT chains beyond what the cli command can do (indeed, the cli command doesn't do FORWARD yet), you should add these rules to ufw-before* (or ufw-after* if you'd prefer, but most do in before) [15:30] ok, thanks Jamie, you helped a lot [15:31] LinuxAdmin: specifically, for port forwarding, you will want to add them to the *filter table in ufw-before-forward [15:31] ok [15:31] LinuxAdmin: see the Chains section /usr/share/doc/ufw/README.gz for more info [15:31] ok [15:32] LinuxAdmin: basically, instead of doing -A FORWARD... you would do -A ufw-before-forward [15:32] mathiaz: Could you provide a sanitised preseed file that you were using? [15:33] Daviey: sure [15:33] ok [15:37] good morning [15:54] If my server will only deal with mailman as far as email is concerned - what's the best smtp server to use? [15:54] probably postfix? [15:56] ttx: is there a way to reconfigure uec via the console configtool if wrong values were added by accident? [15:59] mathiaz: did you see my responses in #ubuntu-meeting? [15:59] sommer: yes [15:59] mathiaz: okay, just making sure heh :) [15:59] MTecknology: Postfix is good, and supported as the ubuntu mail server [15:59] sommer: if the server guide is up-to-date for lucid then we should not drop it from the archive [16:00] sommer: my proposal was done under the assumption that the server guide wasn't up-to-date [16:00] yep yep, just got confused when you replied to ttx [16:00] sommer: and I'd rather not ship outdated documentation for an LTS [16:00] sommer: as we did for karmic and ldap [16:01] mathiaz: totally agree, and the doc team SRU process I believe is better now [16:01] sommer: I think the content is great and you're doing a great job at it [16:01] mathiaz: thanks man :) [16:01] sommer: but sometimes life gets in the way - which is ok [16:01] sommer: and we just take decisions based on that [16:02] sommer: I think having a discussion about the *form* would be good at the next UDS [16:03] ya, I think that'd be a great topic... I'll be creating a blueprint this week [16:03] hum. The corrected ISO is the 20100406.1, right? [16:06] ttx, so what are your thoughts about the syncing the new packages [16:06] Daviey: bug 556833 updated with a failing preseed file [16:06] Launchpad bug 556833 in eucalyptus "System fails to reboot after eucalyptus preseeded instlation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/556833 [16:07] hggdh: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ [16:07] hggdh: ^^ this list the version of the ISO supposed to be tested [16:07] hggdh: otherwise ask in #ubuntu-release [16:09] smoser: do you have access to the ubuntuserver blog? [16:10] mathiaz: indeed I could have *read* the page instead of just hitting the link [16:10] mathiaz, i do not think so. [16:10] or at least do not know so [16:10] smoser: yeah - confirmed you don't have access to it [16:11] smoser: when writting up the meeting minutes they should be published to the ubuntuserver blog [16:11] smoser: do you have a wordpress.com account? [16:11] smoser: ubuntuserver.wordpress.com is the place where the ubuntuserver blog is located [16:12] i dont know if i do or not. i will get one if not and let you know. [16:13] smoser: ok - let me know what email address you're using for your wordpress.com account [16:13] smoser: and I'll add to the list of users of the ubuntuserver blog [16:17] mathiaz: /dev/cciss/, raises alarm bells with me.. I used to have helluva time with cciss support, but i thought that was all fixed now. [16:21] How far off would you say I am with getting the mailman web interface going? http://lists.kalliki.com [16:25] ttx, http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/lucid/20100407.1/ is there now. [16:25] and if you rsync, those images should get *very* good similarity to 20100407 [16:26] my sync took 3m [16:29] MTecknology: who knows! All I see is a directory index .. and I guess you want a proper mailman interface? [16:29] sherr: ya [16:29] MTecknology: mailman docs/setup ... it's been too long for me. But should be straightforward. [16:30] manifests are identical between 20100407 and 20100407.1 so the only change really *is* the lack of a UEC ramdisk in the .tar.gz file. [16:30] Daviey: right - cciss is working great now [16:30] I'd check your apache config first. [16:30] Daviey: the thing is: take the preseed and comment the eucalyptus-udeb line and the install will work correctly [16:30] sherr: I was trying to follow - http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/serverguide/C/mailman.html - I wound up with this config - http://paste.ubuntu.com/410590/ [16:31] Daviey: with eucalyptus-udeb, the install fails to reboot correctly [16:33] MTecknology: You don't seem to have modpython support. [16:34] mathiaz: that is crazy! [16:34] Daviey: yeah - no kidding.... welcome to my world! [16:35] MTecknology: why two ScriptAlias lines the same? [16:35] i've a question about https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/NetworkConsole [16:35] anyeone know if you can set it up to start the install in a 'screen' ? and just start it without user input ? [16:35] i basically want to be able to watch an automated install of a remote machine without a.) network kvm or b.) serial console [16:36] hmm the network console throws you into D-I over ssh [16:36] only want to poke at it if it gets hung [16:36] MTecknology: I am a little surprised you have "Indexes" on the mailman archives/public dir. [16:36] smoser: so ignore the fact you are on a network console [16:36] Daviey, yeah, so i was hoping it would throw you into D-I over ssh in screen [16:36] :) [16:36] if you preseed, the questions - then you get what you want :) [16:36] sherr: I copied it from /etc/mailman/apache.conf [16:36] so it wont' prompt at all ? [16:37] i'll have ot play with it i guess. [16:38] MTecknology: sorry, I have to pop out. I'd check the config again - maybe as per /usr/shape/doc/mailman (or whatever) - Debian readme? back later. [16:38] *share [16:38] thanks Daviey . the main interest is that i have 2 machines that i do autmated UEC install on down in the basement, but occasionally they hang (debconf question change or whatnot) and i'm so terribly lazy that i dont want to walk down there to see. i'd like to be able to ssh in an dcheck on them. [16:39] the warning about "reliable network" made me think that running the installer inside screen would be good, and then just attaching the incoming user to that === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [16:45] smoser: Yeah, it's a shame network-installer doesn't get more publicity and love. I hate working over a noisey server, so similar setup here. [16:46] is there a new policy about /etc/fstab about using UUID for LVM volumes? [16:54] * alvin will ask in ubuntu-bugs. It's probably a bug anyway. [16:58] sherr: thanks, that's helped with postfix setup but not apache [16:59] Anybody know mailman that could help me figure out the rest of this setup? [17:02] mathiaz: how did you get past the boot hanging on the uec rig? [17:11] stupid question: anyone have an easy command to run that takes a package, and exits failure if it is not installed ? [17:13] dpkg-query --show byobu | awk '-F\t' '$2 != "" { print $2; exit 0 } ; END { exit 1; }' [17:13] is what i have [17:14] but figured there is some way without the awk [17:15] exit $(dpkg -l $1 | egrep -q ^ii) === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk [17:22] er. missed the echo $? [17:23] smoser: My cloud is setup, very cool ;) [17:23] smoser: exit (dpkg -l $1 | egrep -q ^ii; echo $?) [17:23] hggdh, yeah. i saw. thanks. [17:23] ver=$(dpkg-query --show --showformat '${Version}\n' "$p") [17:23] [ -n "${ver}" ] && echo "PASS: ${p} installed (${ver})" || [17:23] echo "FAIL: $p not installed" [17:24] is what i came up with. mostly: ver=$(dpkg-query --show --showformat '${Version}\n' "$p") && [ -n "${ver}" ] [17:24] binBASH, yeah? its functioning ? [17:26] smoser: I didn't test to start a vm yet, but instead of my former CentOS 5.4 setup I can find the nodes ;) [17:26] so I think it's working [17:43] smoser: amd64/UEC image looking good [17:43] smoser: please fully test those by eod today [17:44] ttx, i'm trying to automate a few more of the user data tests and then will start the ec2 runs. [17:44] hi all - I have a server setup with some lvm2 volumes - is it possible to attach a new disk to make ubuntu mirror them without recreating things? [17:44] smoser: and see with kirkland about validation on his setup as well [17:44] since he was hitting those issues quite steadily [17:44] smoser: what's up? [17:45] kirkland: uec cloud images back to noramdisk, need as much testing as we can give it by eod [17:45] * ttx pauses for dinner and will be back [17:45] ttx: syncing now [17:45] kirkland, i was going to ask about enabling nework ssh in your installer (uec-auto). if you'd thought of that. [17:48] smoser: so http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/lucid/current/ are ramdiskless now? [17:48] smoser: i'm wgetting [17:48] yes. 20100417.1 [18:00] smoser: okay, it's up and running [18:00] smoser: well... i'm not sure, how can I make sure i have no ramdisk? [18:00] smoser: ls /boot? [18:00] you can't tell from inside. [18:01] euca-describe-images will not show an ari [18:01] and console output will not have ramdisk like messages [18:01] smoser: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/410632/ [18:01] smoser: registration looks right [18:01] right. [18:02] smoser: so i'm confident i registered it without a ramdisk [18:02] euca-describe-images should have 'aki-' for that image, but no 'ari-'. right. [18:02] and it boots ? [18:02] $ euca-describe-images emi-3FCB1298 [18:02] IMAGE emi-3FCB1298 foo/lucid-server-uec-amd64.img.manifest.xml admin available public x86_64 machine eki-66F2179C [18:02] smoser: yep, booted [18:03] yeah, previously on your hardware we saw hang almost all the time. [18:04] and on mine 100% of the time. [18:04] mathiaz, hggdh i'd like to run this test on the data center uec if possible [18:05] as that was the place that never seemed to fail when we had no ramdisk before (everyone else generally saw failure, so *something* was different -- timeing -- and i want to test there) [18:10] smoser give me 15 minutes [18:13] hi guys, I am hosting a web application using ubuntu server. I have the application in English and german, the german version is not displayed right in the browser, is that a server issue? [18:13] * I mean german characters are not displayed [18:14] smoser: sweet, so this is resolved? [18:14] smoser: what was the fix? [18:14] well, we hope so. [18:15] there are several changes since beta-1 in upstart, mountall, and plymouth ( i dont thikn plymouth was involved). [18:15] kirkland, one nice thing for you to do would be to verify that this fails with beta-1 [18:15] jdstrand: are there any libvirt uploads pending? [18:15] ie, download beta1 tarball, uec-publish-tarball --ramdisk=none [18:15] that should hang like we used to see it. [18:16] (it does for me) [18:16] jdstrand: i needed to fix a couple of minor issues in the upstart init script and the debian/control [18:16] smoser: can you url me the beta1 download? [18:17] kirkland: yes, ubuntu19 is waiting to be accepted [18:17] kirkland, you are lazy [18:17] kirkland: (already uploaded) [18:18] smoser: i'm doing several things right now [18:18] http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/beta1/ubuntu-10.04-beta1-server-uec-amd64.tar.gz [18:18] smoser: beautiful, thanks [18:18]