[11:07] <lool> slangasek: (I bet you're subscribed to the page, but I updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseManifest to use "armel+omap" instead of "armel+OMAP3")
[12:03] <pmcenery> Hi release managers... I've filed an exception sync request this morning. Wondered what the next stage is to get this included in lucid. bug #558946
[12:17] <ttx> pmcenery: the next stage is wait for the exception to granted/denied.
[12:18] <pmcenery> ttx: Thank you. Do I need a MOTU to support the request?
[12:18] <ttx> pmcenery: if the exception is granted, yes
[12:19] <ttx> pmcenery: but the motu-release person that decides on the FFe would probably also ack the request
[12:20] <pmcenery> ttx: Thanks. I'll hang out there to see if I can entice someone to take a look at it.
[15:19] <mhall119> good morning
[15:19] <mhall119> I'd like to ask the ubuntu-release team to consider qimo-wallpaper and qimo-session for an FFe
[15:20] <ScottK> mhall119: If you can find an archive admin who has time and interest to process through New, it should be easy (I don't have time).
[15:20] <mhall119> ScottK: what do you mean "process through New"?
[15:22] <ScottK> mhall119: The archive administrators (members of the LP team ~ubuntu-archive) give the packages the final checks before they enter the archive for technical correctness and proper licensing.  It can be fairly time intensive.  Lack of time to do it is one of the main reasons we have a cutoff date for new packages.
[15:22] <mhall119> jdstrand: is that something you can do?
[15:24] <nigelb> mhall119, catch one of these folks https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members
[15:25] <mhall119> man nigelb, you are everywhere!
[15:25] <nigelb> mhall119, hehe :)
[15:26] <mhall119> well jdstrand is on the list
[15:26] <mhall119> I'll wait to hear from him, since he's already been helping me with these packages
[15:27] <nigelb> I was about to suggest that :)
[15:32] <jdstrand> mhall119, ScottK: it is something I can do, if the FFe is granted. I looked at these once before and the necessary changes were made in revu
[15:32] <ScottK> mhall119: What bug number(s)?
[15:33] <mhall119> Bug 522720, 522729 and 522731
[15:34] <ScottK> OK.  Give me a few minutes to finish something else and I'll have a look.
[15:34] <mhall119> thank you
[15:44] <slangasek> lool: sounds good, thanks
[16:01] <ScottK> mhall119: All approved.
[16:02] <mhall119> thanks ScottK
[16:02] <ScottK> mhall119: You're welcome.  Thanks for working to bring this into Ubuntu.
[16:03]  * mhall119 is one happy developer
[16:07] <mhall119> thanks jdstrand for all your help too
[16:08] <jdstrand> mhall119: sure. are they all uploaded now? I can process them today
[16:08] <cjwatson> would anyone like to look over bug 557003?
[16:10] <mhall119> jdstrand: uploaded where? to archive?
[16:10] <mhall119> I uploaded them to review
[16:10] <mhall119> highvoltage I think uploaded them to archive
[16:11] <jdstrand> mhall119: ok, thanks. and thanks for your contributions :)
[16:12]  * mhall119 is happy to contribute
[18:45] <ogasawara> slangasek: bug 557429 is seeing discussion on the linux-raid mailing list with a possible solution being proposed for mdadm but no patches submitted at the moment
[18:45] <ogasawara> slangasek: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=127067374402401&w=2 (I also posted this to the bug for reference)
[18:45] <ogasawara> slangasek: I set the milestone to ubuntu-10.04 so it stays on the radar, but I'm not sure how realistic that is given patches have not yet landed
[18:46]  * slangasek nods
[18:47] <slangasek> it's a pretty gross bug, so if it's at all possible, we should get it fixed before final
[18:47] <ScottK> slangasek: I asked about Kubuntu installer issues and the response I got was "That's because amichair's branch isn't merged yet", so hopefully cjwatson's upload today will help.  Also shtylman said he planned on putting some work in on it over the weekend.
[18:48] <ScottK> Once we have an image with today's upload in it, I'll put out a call for testing.
[18:48] <slangasek> ok
[18:49] <slangasek> that's 2.2.16?
[18:51]  * ScottK doesn't see a 2.2.16 yet.
[18:56] <slangasek> sorry, you said "today's upload" - ubiquity 2.2.15 was uploaded 3 days ago, what should I key off for respinning?
[18:57] <ScottK> cjwatson said he was going to upload a new one today.  Not sure when.
[18:58] <slangasek> ok
[18:58] <slangasek> ah, that was his "I'll make sure there is" from the meeting
[18:59] <slangasek> cjwatson: any eta on that installer upload?
[19:14] <cjwatson> slangasek: putting it together now
[19:17] <slangasek> ok, cool
 debconf-updatepo... also known as "I'm feeling unproductive today.
[19:25] <cjwatson>         Please give me a huge diff to check in"
[20:40] <slangasek> lamont: is acorn happy yet?
[20:45] <cjwatson> could somebody NEW parted?
[20:45] <cjwatson> (ubiquity FTBFS due to that)
[20:45] <slangasek> lookin'
[20:45] <lamont> slangasek: it'll hate you until we get diff disks on it, I fear
[20:45] <lamont> I crashed it with spew this morning
[20:45] <lamont> so, um, clementine
[20:46] <slangasek> lamont: ok
[20:46] <lamont> and EOW for me
[20:47] <slangasek> lamont: ok, have a good weekend :)
[20:48] <slangasek> cjwatson: accepted
[22:06] <ScottK> Ubiquity retried (that shoulda have been long enough)
[22:23] <slangasek> boo, fglrx-installer FTBFS on i386, no wonder people are still unhappy
[23:37] <slangasek> oy, where'd antimony go?
[23:37] <elmo> I rebooted it
[23:38] <slangasek> ah, ok