[01:44] <nigelb> bdmurray, I did some edits to the patch subscription script and pushed to my own branch.  can take a look?
[01:44] <nigelb> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-qa-tools/patch-review-script/annotate/head%3A/launchpadlib-scripts/patch-subscriber.py
[01:51] <bdmurray> nigelb: seems fine but I don't see any reason to reduce the list of workflow_teams as they might be subscribed to old bug reports and it doesn't hurt does it?
[01:51] <nigelb> bdmurray, I wanted to talk to the old workflow teams and help extend dholbach's resubscribe script for those teams too
[01:52] <nigelb> like subscribe ubuntu-sru where motu-sru is subscribed etc, persia_ encouraged me to talk to the team owners about that
[01:53] <nigelb> and i've added one more package to jfo's list and one more package to be ignored :)
[01:53] <bdmurray> okay but if an old team is subscribed to a bug with a patch and then the reviewers team gets subscribed to it what will the reviewers team do?
[01:53] <bdmurray> nigelb: yes I saw those other changes too thanks!
[01:54] <nigelb> No, what I meant is, daniel's script subscribes sponsors if u-u-s or u-m-s is subscribed to a bug
[01:55] <nigelb> so if we can give the old teams an extend of that script to be run occasionally, they can take care of it
[01:55] <nigelb> we might not have anything to review on a motu-sru bug, we'll just delay it
[01:55] <bdmurray> right and if a bug with u-u-s subscribed shows up in our search results with your branch the reviewers team will be subscribed to it
[01:56] <bdmurray> because your branch removes u-u-s from workflow teams
[01:56] <nigelb> aah. ok.  common sense.  I should have left them there :D
[01:56] <bdmurray> so if you fix that I'll be happy to merge it
[01:58] <nigelb> ubuntu-ma-sponsors should be ubuntu-main-sponsors?
[01:59] <bdmurray> why yes!
[02:02] <nigelb> ok, so here goes
[02:02] <nigelb> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-qa-tools/patch-review-script/annotate/head%3A/launchpadlib-scripts/patch-subscriber.py
[02:02] <nigelb> shall I request a merge?
[07:16] <dholbach> good morning
[15:15] <nigelb> I'm slowly working on the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/GettingInvolved to incorporate examples.  If someone would like to give suggestions, correction, please let me know
[15:16] <nigelb> hyperair, poke
[17:11] <nigelb> bdmurray, you want me to request a sync for the script?
[17:12] <bdmurray> nigelb: a merge proposal would help thanks
[17:12] <nigelb> bdmurray, will do.  I wasn't sure how to go about it :)
[17:35] <nigelb> persia, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/GettingInvolved
[17:35] <nigelb> any more suggestions?
[17:40] <nigelb> bdrung, got a minute?
[17:41] <bdrung> nigelb: at least three seconds ;)
[17:41] <bdrung> *at most
[17:41] <nigelb> can sign up for a few hours at  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay?
[17:43] <nigelb> bdrung, ^
[17:48] <bdrung> nigelb: will have a look at it later
[17:48] <nigelb> bdrung, thank you :) even 1 hour is much appreciated :)
[18:24]  * nigelb notes that there is still 40 slots open
[18:42] <Ciemon> nigelb: I just had a look at PatchDay, I wonder if that's something for someone with minimal experience.. like me?
[18:43] <nigelb> Ciemon, yep it is.  you're welcome to contribute
[18:43] <nigelb> you need to be able to test patches and if working, encourage patch author to forward to upstream bug tracker
[18:44] <nigelb> Ciemon, the reviewers team doesn't have too much requirements, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam
[18:44] <Ciemon> OK, I'll have had more practice my then; and I see the "bugs with patches added" link.
[18:46] <Ciemon> yeah, I've read ReviewersTeam before.. interesting that you've said that the patch author shold forward upstream. Is that "policy"?
[18:46] <Ciemon> It's something I want to make happen with the batch I'm working through at the moment.
[18:46] <nigelb> Ciemon, the idea is the author should be able to respond to feedback
[18:47] <nigelb> Ciemon, but if patch author shows no response, we'll have to forward
[18:47]  * Ciemon ponders
[18:49] <nigelb> Ciemon, upstream might ask for changes or give comments, its easier if the patch author does it him/her-self
[18:50] <Ciemon> ok
[18:51] <nigelb> I'm off.  ask any questions here, I'll reply in scroll back if noone else does :)
[18:54] <Ciemon> Thanks.. no questions for now, just practise.