[00:19] <antivirtel> bb
[02:11] <cyphermox> there's been a build failure of network-manager on amd64 earlier today, I'm trying to understand what went wrong: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43575045/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.network-manager_0.8-0ubuntu3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz -- my understanding so far is that it just failed because the dependencies were broken at that time for reasons other than NM's packaging, correct?
[02:22] <ScottK> cyphermox: That's correct.
[02:23] <cyphermox> awesome, thanks.
[02:23] <cyphermox> what should I do about making sure it builds now? upload a new version?
[02:24] <ScottK> cyphermox: No.  Ask a core-dev to retry it.
[02:24] <cyphermox> ok
[02:25] <ScottK> cyphermox: Hint: I'm a core-dev.
[02:25] <cyphermox> I figured ;) could you please  run the retry?
[02:26] <ScottK> Give me the url to the package page and I will.
[02:27] <cyphermox> ScottK, I assume you mean this: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/0.8-0ubuntu3/+build/1684395
[02:27] <ScottK> Yes. Thanks.
[02:28] <cyphermox> actually, it failed for more than just amd64, so it's not entirely true
[02:29] <cyphermox> also, a related package failed to build in the same way: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-pptp/0.8-0ubuntu2
[02:29] <ScottK> cyphermox: SInce it built on i386, the others are probably archive squew as well.
[02:29] <cyphermox> yup
[02:29] <cyphermox> (and -2 was building fine... the change was in depends/recommends)
[02:30] <ScottK> NM is retried on amd64.  It'll start soon, so let's see how it does.
[02:30] <cyphermox> sure
[02:31] <lifeless>  /win 110
[02:55] <cyphermox> ScottK, thanks for running the retry, it seems to have worked properly this time
[03:13] <cyphermox> ScottK, would you mind doing a retry for amd64 for network-manager-pptp? https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-pptp/0.8-0ubuntu2/+build/1684401
[03:13] <cyphermox> I believe the other archs could wait a bit longer without too much issues?
[03:34] <ScottK> cyphermox: Done.
[03:34] <ScottK> I'll give the others a try too.
[03:36] <ScottK> Done.
[03:39] <cyphermox> thanks a bunch
[03:54] <crimsun> GrueMaster: ok
[09:24]  * antivirtel is back (gone 00:05:11)
[10:17] <hunger_p> my lucid box freezes in gdm since the last update:-(
[14:20] <GNU\colossus> hi all
[14:20] <GNU\colossus> what's the reasoning behind changing /etc/event.d to /etc/init in 10.04? I can't find anything in the bugtracker.
[14:24] <persia> It's an upstream change.
[14:30] <GNU\colossus> persia: and what's Upstart's reason for doing that? what's so bad about /etc/event.d/, now that all distros using Upstart actually adopted that path? is /etc/init/ at least going to be mandatory?
[14:30] <persia> No idea, sorry.
[14:35] <joaopinto> GNU\colossus, the change is described on karmic's release notes, but not the rational
[14:36] <joaopinto> GNU\colossus, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/KarmicUpstartPackagingPolicy
[14:41] <GNU\colossus> joaopinto: thanks for digging that up.
[17:29] <sistpoty> lamont: ghc6 made it on armel :)
[17:30] <sistpoty> lamont: can you easily generate a list of armel packages where the build failed? (we'll need to rebuild all haskell packages more or less in order of http://orangesquash.org.uk/~laney/haskell-installability/armel.png, and I'm starting to loose track on which ones I've given back already)
[17:33] <sistpoty> lamont: or do a mass give-back, in case the armel build-queue allows it?
[17:59] <ScottK> sistpoty: Just go to qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs and look.  You should get a pretty good list.
[18:02] <sistpoty> ScottK: is that list constantly updated? (I've given back 1/3 of haskell this afternoon already)
[18:04] <ScottK> sistpoty: I think /6 hours.  wgrant would know.  He can probably move it to more frequently on a temporary basis.
[18:04] <sistpoty> ScottK: thanks, that's very helpful, indeed :)
[18:57] <sistpoty> zul: any reason for the ltsp task at bug #522509 (can I mark that as fix released?)
[19:12] <directhex> where can i find the new logo font?
[19:21] <ari-tczew> please move packages from SRU proposed to updates bug 421684 and bug 262235
[19:31] <GrueMaster> crimsun: found the fix for bug 528524.  I had thought NCommander's patch had been pushed into main.  It has not.  I just reimaged with Beta 2, tested (fail), installed libspeex1 & libspeexdsp1 from ppa, works.
[19:35] <crimsun> GrueMaster: phew, I was going crazy eebugging that asm
[19:35] <crimsun> debugging, even. Anyhow, closing the pulse task. Thanks for confirming and testing!
[19:36] <GrueMaster> Better you than me.  My asm experience is x86 only, and predates P4.
[19:36] <GrueMaster> :P
[19:36] <GrueMaster> I'm retesting on dove now.
[19:37] <GrueMaster> Works on imx51 image.
[19:38] <crimsun> great, I'll apply the patch and push to lucid
[19:44] <apw> ogra_cmpc, was that kernel ok
[19:55] <apw> don't suppose there are any archive admins on duty at the weekend
[20:23] <GrueMaster> crimsun: This fix also works on dove image.  Good to go.  Thanks for your help.  If you are at UDS-M, remind me and I'll buy you a beer.
[20:24] <crimsun> GrueMaster: you're welcome, thanks much for your assistance with all the arm sound issues.
[20:25] <GrueMaster> I really should see about getting back into audio development again.  At least part time.
[21:41]  * abogani waves
[22:11] <slangasek> Keybuk: can you please confirm my analysis in bug #560175?
[22:46] <Keybuk> slangasek: partially correct I think
[23:22] <zul> sistpoty: no please go ahead
[23:22] <sistpoty> zul: thanks!