| === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang | ||
| mneptok | uhhh ... do banforwards to #ubuntu+1 not work because of the + ? | 01:41 |
|---|---|---|
| mneptok | if so, this ircd needs ehlp | 01:41 |
| mneptok | help, even | 01:41 |
| Flannel | mneptok: They should, it's $ now as a delimiter | 01:41 |
| vanishing | Flannel: ok.. | 01:42 |
| Flannel | mneptok: I guess I haven't tried it yet though, so it might be a bug | 01:42 |
| mneptok | Flannel: yeah, the delimiter i know. just got nothing when entering what appears to be the correct inputline. | 01:43 |
| bazhang | shpongle? | 01:43 |
| Flannel | mneptok: Oooh, did you get an error in your server window saying you're not an op in +1? | 01:43 |
| mneptok | Flannel: nope | 01:43 |
| Flannel | mneptok: You have to be an operator in both channels now to forward | 01:43 |
| mneptok | oh, wait. yeah. | 01:43 |
| vanishing | Flannel: so i asked a mysql upstart script question in ubuntu, mneptok told me to leave #ubuntu and join #ubuntu+1 | 01:43 |
| mneptok | that's indredilame. | 01:43 |
| Flannel | mneptok: We need to get +1 set +f (or +F? I don't remember) | 01:44 |
| vanishing | Flannel: and i stopped asking questions about this issue, then he kicked me.. | 01:44 |
| mneptok | vanishing: yes, i did. because by your own admission you're using Lucid. | 01:44 |
| vanishing | mneptok: i also use karmic | 01:44 |
| vanishing | mneptok: and by using lucid, im blocked from #ubuntu? | 01:44 |
| Flannel | vanishing: Development versions of Ubuntu aren't supported in #ubuntu, because the issues may be because of bugs in the code, etc. | 01:44 |
| Flannel | vanishing: No, that's not what anyone said. | 01:44 |
| vanishing | Flannel: i understand that.. | 01:44 |
| Flannel | vanishing: You cannot ask questions about help with development versions in #ubuntu, those belong in +1 | 01:45 |
| vanishing | Flannel: but since karmic use upstart too..i thought it can be achieved in #ubuntu too since karmic is not +1 | 01:45 |
| Flannel | vanishing: If you're having the same problem in a supported version, then #ubuntu is a valid place, but you need to be testing the stuff on the version, not assuming it works the same both places | 01:45 |
| vanishing | Flannel: and after he ask me to join #ubuntu+1 i did not ask any lucid question did i? | 01:45 |
| mneptok | vanishing: i kicked you from #ubuntu because multiple people told you about the rules regarding development versions, and your responses included ... | 01:45 |
| Flannel | vanishing: Yes, but "upstart version a" and "upstart version B" aren't the same | 01:45 |
| mneptok | 18:35 < vanishing> mneptok: why should i part with this channel when somebody solved my problem? | 01:46 |
| vanishing | Flannel: what i need is just the contain of mysql upstart script, it is there in karmic. | 01:46 |
| mneptok | vanishing: "i got the help i needed, so i'm not going to follow the channel rules," is hardly an attitude we encourage | 01:46 |
| vanishing | mneptok: yes..why should i part with a channel just after an issue is solved? | 01:47 |
| Flannel | vanishing: The reason you were kicked ultimately is because you had a bad attitude when it was suggested you take Lucid support to #ubuntu+1 where it belongs | 01:47 |
| vanishing | mneptok: and where did you see "i got the help i needed, so i'm not going to follow the channel rules," | 01:47 |
| mneptok | 18:35 < vanishing> mneptok: why should i part with this channel when somebody solved my problem? <---- that's what that sounds like | 01:47 |
| vanishing | Flannel: and i said politely i wont ask anymore lucid questions | 01:47 |
| mneptok | you're sending 2 different messages | 01:48 |
| vanishing | mneptok: to me, that sounded more like, i could leave a channel after my problem is solved, but i dont want to leave that channel. | 01:48 |
| vanishing | mneptok: whats wrong with that? | 01:48 |
| mneptok | "i won;t ask Lucid questions" and "i got the help i need here, so why leave?" | 01:48 |
| vanishing | mneptok: to me, i felt you are abusing your power | 01:48 |
| vanishing | mneptok: yea. i got karmic machine, and i wont ask more lucid questions, still, i cant stay in #ubuntu? | 01:49 |
| mneptok | you can't if you're going to be argumentative when people point out channel rules and policies. | 01:49 |
| vanishing | mneptok: did i argue? | 01:50 |
| vanishing | mneptok: you were forcing me to leave | 01:50 |
| vanishing | mneptok: and i simply stating maybe i got more question non-related to lucid to ask in this channel | 01:50 |
| mneptok | 18:31 < vanishing> mneptok: i know you gona redirect me to lucid | 01:51 |
| mneptok | it seems clear you know the rules, but simply choose to ignore them | 01:51 |
| vanishing | mneptok: and no warning, but simply kick? | 01:51 |
| mneptok | you know the rules, but choose to ignore them. you basically admit as much. but suddenly when you say you won;t ask more Lucid questions, we're supposed to have an unshakeable faith that that is the case. | 01:52 |
| mneptok | if you know Lucid questions do not belong in the channel, then don't ask them there. | 01:53 |
| mneptok | full stop. | 01:53 |
| vanishing | mneptok: that does not explain the kcik | 01:53 |
| vanishing | kcik* | 01:53 |
| vanishing | kick* | 01:54 |
| mneptok | you were kicked for continuing to be argumentative, and being deliberately confrintational | 01:54 |
| bazhang | dhanesh still ban evading | 01:54 |
| mneptok | i said "i do not have confidence that you will not ask Lucid questions" and your (snarky, IMO) response was "where do you get your confidence?" | 01:55 |
| mneptok | you decided to cop an attitude and be argumentative. you chose the a person with op privileges to do that with. now you're complaining about the outcomes of your own actions. | 01:56 |
| vanishing | mneptok: i was simply curious how did you know whether i was going to ask more lucid questions or not, and where did you get your confidence. a | 01:56 |
| vanishing | mneptok: and i think you abused your power too much | 01:57 |
| mneptok | you're entitled to think whatver you'd like. doesn't make it true. | 01:58 |
| * mneptok heads off for some dinner | 01:58 | |
| vanishing | mneptok: samething apply to you | 01:58 |
| vanishing | mneptok: so do NOT abuse your power :) | 01:58 |
| bazhang | no response via PM | 02:00 |
| Flannel | bazhang: which channel? | 02:03 |
| Flannel | vanishing: Is there anything else we can help you with tonight? | 02:03 |
| bazhang | Flannel, #ubuntu ; I Pm'ed and he finally parted, asked him to join here | 02:03 |
| vanishing | Flannel: yea | 02:03 |
| vanishing | Flannel: punish mneptok ..lols | 02:04 |
| vanishing | Flannel: lols..thanks for the support | 02:04 |
| vanishing | Flannel: good night | 02:04 |
| bazhang | bye | 02:04 |
| ubottu | Random832 called the ops in #ubuntu () | 02:14 |
| bazhang | he;s gone | 02:15 |
| bazhang | err he's | 02:15 |
| Pici | odd | 02:15 |
| ubottu | IdleOne called the ops in #ubuntu (l0de) | 04:27 |
| bazhang | removed | 04:29 |
| elky | !staff | l0de is an issue and your wannabes are being obnoxious in #f | 06:23 |
| ubottu | l0de is an issue and your wannabes are being obnoxious in #f: Hey nalioth, jenda, rob, SportChick, seanw, Dave2, Christel, tomaw, Gary, PriceChild, niko or stew, I could use a bit of your time :) | 06:23 |
| thief` | hello? | 07:21 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from ubuntu) | 08:25 |
| Tm_T | ciao! | 09:51 |
| * elky looks at -women and raises an eyebrow | 12:19 | |
| * elky gets the stapler out ready | 12:24 | |
| Tm_T | highvoltage: hi | 12:42 |
| elky | Tm_T, i pinged him elsewhere | 12:44 |
| elky | he's closed the client. oddly he wasn't flaking elsewhere. | 12:44 |
| Tm_T | I see | 12:45 |
| Tm_T | 1530.36 -!- SandGorgon is "... and I go apeshit on you" | 13:31 |
| ikonia | @mark slam_dunk #ubuntu bacta ban doding in #ubuntu on 203.100.212.17 and discussing it in ##club-ubuntu | 13:31 |
| ubottu | The operation succeeded. | 13:31 |
| ikonia | @mark slamdrunk #ubuntu bacta ban dodging in #ubuntu on 203.100.212.17 | 13:33 |
| ubottu | The operation succeeded. | 13:33 |
| ikonia | !staff | bacta - the user you just removed a kline from is caught ban dodging on purpose in #ubuntu again | 13:34 |
| ubottu | bacta - the user you just removed a kline from is caught ban dodging on purpose in #ubuntu again: Hey nalioth, jenda, rob, SportChick, seanw, Dave2, Christel, tomaw, Gary, PriceChild, niko or stew, I could use a bit of your time :) | 13:34 |
| ikonia | ughh, I'm not with it today | 13:34 |
| ubottu | In ubottu, steffan said: Weechat is a modern IRC client, based on a powerful text-driven interface. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WeeChat for help. | 13:53 |
| elky | !weechat | 13:57 |
| elky | ikonia, is he also gurgling about his -women trollingz there too? | 14:03 |
| ikonia | elky: not seen anything on that | 17:39 |
| ubottu | steffan called the ops in #ubuntu () | 18:01 |
| ikonia | looking | 18:02 |
| Losha | hello ops, anyone there? | 20:53 |
| tsimpson | Losha: is there something we can help you with? | 20:55 |
| Losha | In #ubuntu, the topic came up of adding an alias to ubottu for 'firewall' as 'nat'. Who would/could approve that? | 20:55 |
| tsimpson | you can suggest the change with '/msg ubottu nat is <alias> firewall' and someone here will review it | 20:57 |
| Losha | Thank you. And thanks to all the ops for their work. o+o | 20:58 |
| ubottu | In ubottu, Losha said: nat is <alias> firewall | 20:59 |
| Tm_T | where's the fifth council member? | 21:04 |
| tsimpson | not here :( | 21:05 |
| Tm_T | haven't seen him at all lately | 21:06 |
| tsimpson | he's been idle for nearly 19 hours | 21:06 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from myrl) | 23:13 |
| ubottu | In ubottu, VBB-VolleyballBa said: Hello ubottu this is a Victoria's Secret bot that wants to see you buy one of our sexy new bras so please tell us your bra size so we can get started. | 23:29 |
| knome | hahaha | 23:41 |
| jpds | Fail. | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!