=== sebi_` is now known as sebi`
[02:54] <lfaraone> My package needs dh7 from backports to build on Hardy. Is there a way to make my PPA include the backported CDBS package?
[02:55] <wgrant> lfaraone: 'Edit PPA dependencies'
[02:59] <lfaraone> wgrant: aha.
[03:06] <Burgundavia> wgrant, who should I talk to about getting a comment deleted as it is dangerous spam and the account that created it locked
[03:06] <Burgundavia> ?
[03:08] <wgrant> Burgundavia: Have you asked a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad?
[03:08] <wgrant> It needs an admin, none of which will be around for 24 hours.
[03:14] <Burgundavia> wgrant, nop, haven't. will ping somebody monday
[03:51] <psusi> can I get launchpad to stop adding [ubuntu-bugcontrol] to the subject line on the bug mails I get for being subscribed to the list for being a member of ubuntu-bugcontrol?
[03:53] <wgrant> psusi: You can't, unless you include unsubscribing from the list as a solution.
[03:54] <psusi> damn, that blows, is there a bug filed to fix that?
[03:54] <wgrant> I thought I'd filed one.
[03:55] <wgrant> But I can't find it right now.
[03:55]  * wgrant hunts harder.
[03:55] <psusi> I already filter based on List-Id:, I don't need the subject line pushed another 20 characters to the right with essentially garbage ;)
[03:55] <wgrant> Exactly.
[03:55] <psusi> between the [ubuntu-bugcontrol] and [bug nnnnnnn]
[03:56] <psusi> if I want to know the bug details I can see that in the message... subject should just be the bug subject line so I have an idea at a glance what the mail is about
[03:56] <wgrant> Bug #396888
[03:56] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 396888 in launchpad-registry "prefixing subjects in mailing list posts considered harmful" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/396888
[07:11] <micahg> wgrant: is there a problem with files in PPAs ATM?
[07:14] <wgrant> micahg: What exactly do you mean?
[07:14] <micahg> wgrant: I'm getting a 404 when I try to wget a .orig.tar.gz from a PPA
[07:15] <wgrant> micahg: That generally means that you've got a duplicate orig.tar.gz, probably through a copy bug that was fixed last week. Which PPA, and which filename?
[07:16] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35/+packages
[07:16] <micahg> prism_1.0b3+svn20100210r62050.orig.tar.gz
[07:18] <micahg> wgrant: ^^
[07:18] <wgrant> Yeah, looking...
[07:35] <wgrant> micahg: Ah, got it.
[07:35] <wgrant> I thought for a while that the file had actually been prematurely expired, but it's still at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40919833/prism_1.0b3%2Bsvn20100210r62050.orig.tar.gz.
[07:36] <wgrant> The problem is in the +files traversal -- it finds the first copy of the orig.tar.gz, which has been expired, so it returns a 404. If it had checked for another file by that name that wasn't deleted, it would have succeeded.
[07:40] <wgrant> (The first copy that I speak of is from the old, superseded upload. We expire and delete PPA binaries and sources a few days after they are superseded or deleted.)
[07:41] <wgrant> Can someone confirm that OOPS-1562EC198 is a DeletedProxiedLibraryFileAlias?
[07:41] <ubottu> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1562EC198
[07:47] <micahg> wgrant: is there a way for the to discover the original URL like you found?
[07:48] <wgrant> micahg: You have to guess :/
[07:49] <wgrant> Or just use the file in the archive.
[07:50] <wgrant> In this case I found the URL by noting the changes file librarian URL, replacing the filename with that of the orig.tar.gz, and trying a few numbers on either side.
[07:51] <micahg> wgrant: it gives me an error when I use the one from the archve
[07:51] <wgrant> micahg: Which URL, and which error?
[07:52] <micahg> wgrant: when I try uploading based on the version in the lucid archive it tells me the tarballs are separate
[07:52] <wgrant> micahg: By 'the archive' I meant 'this archive'
[07:53] <micahg> wgrant: ah, that's what I want to do :)  I need the orig.tar.gz to do that though
[07:53] <wgrant> micahg: Look in http://ppa.launchpad.net/mozillateam/ffox35/ubuntu?
[07:54] <micahg> wgrant: ah, didn't think of that :)
[11:00] <shadeslayer> hi can someone help me out here? a lp admin maybe
[11:01] <wgrant> shadeslayer: Ask your question here -- if somebody can help they will, otherwise we can point you to the right place.
[11:01] <shadeslayer> well one of my PPA contains packages with the wrong name,can they be deleted?
[11:02] <shadeslayer> from here : http://ppa.launchpad.net/rekonq/rekonq-daily/ubuntu/pool/main/r/rekonq/
[11:02] <shadeslayer> i want to delete all the packages listed there...
[11:03] <wgrant> shadeslayer: Does the 'Delete packages' link at https://launchpad.net/~rekonq/+archive/rekonq-daily/+packages not work?
[11:04] <shadeslayer> wgrant: it does,but it does not actually delete the packages from the repo... the packages can be seen in the link i sent you
[11:04] <wgrant> shadeslayer: They should be removed from the indices within five minutes, and the package files themselves should vanish from ppa.launchpad.net within a day.
[11:05] <shadeslayer> wgrant: ok so they will be removed till tomorrow?
[11:05] <wgrant> shadeslayer: Probably.
[11:05] <shadeslayer> wgrant: ah ok,thanks :D
[12:28] <directhex> okay, this is a weird one. it seems if i upload a PPA package which no longer builds some binaries compared to a previous version, those binaries are never deleted? there are 17 ancient packages in http://ppa.launchpad.net/directhex/ppa/ubuntu/pool/main/m/mono/ with 1.9.1+dfsg-6~dhx1 version
[12:29] <wgrant> directhex: In the primary archive that is handled by archive admins manually removing the binaries (ie. NBS).
[12:30] <directhex> wgrant, and in PPAs?
[12:30] <wgrant> directhex: You can delete those binaries by deleting the superseded sources -- they'll still show up on +delete-packages until everything is gone, and re-deleting them will remove all binaries.
[12:32] <directhex> aha
=== tdev_ is now known as tdev
[15:57] <mkarnicki> hi guys, i'm seeking help: bzr push lp:~mkarnicki/+junk/hello returned: Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
[15:57] <mkarnicki> Permission denied (publickey).
[15:57] <mkarnicki> i have registered my ssh public key with lp
[15:57] <mkarnicki> this is my first push
[15:58] <mkarnicki> any hints?
[16:09] <mkarnicki> ok, had to use ssh-add on the new key. done.
[16:54] <andol> Will be hosting a Launchpad workshop. In that process there will be a bogus project and a few bogus teams. Is that something which is ok to temporarily register in the real Launchpad, or should I use staging.launchpad.net?
[17:15] <beuno> andol, staging is the right way to go
[17:17] <andol> beuno: From what I've understood the staging database is reset every 24 hours? Any idea at what time?
[17:18] <andol> Would be somewhat inconvinient if it happened in the middle of the workshop :)
[17:18] <beuno> andol, I don't, to be honest
[17:18] <beuno> but I think it's around midnight UTC
[17:21] <andol> beuno: Well, midnight UTC would actually work out pretty well for me. Any way for you to find out for sure?
[17:22] <beuno> andol, not until Monday I think
[17:22] <beuno> spm is the next sysadmin scheduled to wake up
[17:23] <beuno> but it'll be a few more hours before he does
[17:28] <andol> ok, thanks
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[21:01] <Some_Person> I can't for the life of me figure out why something failed to build
=== ursula__ is now known as Ursinha
[21:34] <GeekShadow> hello
[21:34] <GeekShadow> I can't launch into my account
[21:34] <GeekShadow> Oops!
[21:34] <GeekShadow> Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad.
[21:34] <GeekShadow> We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies for the inconvenience.
[21:34] <GeekShadow> (Error ID: OOPS-1562G2374)
[21:34] <ubottu> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1562G2374
[21:36] <GeekShadow> oooooooops
[21:36] <GeekShadow> nevermind -_-
[21:36] <GeekShadow> it work now
[21:44] <cody-somerville> hmmm... that looks like a legitimate bug.
[21:46] <askhl> Huh.  Launchpad exported a po-file to me which has bad syntax.  Specifically, the plural line is missing: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43852239/po_evolution-indicator-da.po
[21:47] <askhl> I can fix it, of course, but this is a bit strange.
[21:47] <askhl> (Danish has two plurals, whereas there's only msgstr[0], not msgstr[1])
[22:04] <andol> Nafallo: You don't happen to know the answer to the question I asked earlier in the channel, about at what time of the day the staging.launchpad.net database is reset?
[22:05] <Nafallo> andol: nope sorry. a losa would know.
[22:06] <andol> ok
[22:15] <ripps> Hmm... is anybody working on a way to intergrate MPD with Zeigeist? It seems some people are coming up with some pretty cool ideas with it, but It seems applications need plugins in order for zeigeist to gather this information
[22:23] <thumper> ripps: what is MPD?
[22:23] <ripps> thumper: oops, sorry wrong channel, mpd = music player daemon
[22:23] <thumper> ripps: ah, ok
[22:40] <alefteris> checkbox test results are send to lp as bug reports?
[22:42] <wgrant> alefteris: No. They are submitted to the Launchpad hardware database.
[22:43] <wgrant> andol: I don't believe staging's DB is reset with any regularity at the moment.
[22:43] <alefteris> thx
[22:50] <andol> wgrant: Ohh, the "What's this?" link on the front page says every 24 hours, if I read it correctly?
[22:51] <psusi> I have set up the e2defrag project on lp, have a development trunk, created a release named 0.75, but I can't figure out how to get a package built for it... I tried dput ppa:e2defrag/0.75 but it seems to have gone into a black hole
[23:03] <wgrant> andol: Yeah, but that's often not true. It should probably be updated.
[23:04] <wgrant> psusi: You signed the .changes?
[23:25] <psusi> wgrant, yea... but I can't get a handle on whether the project even has its own archive
[23:25] <wgrant> psusi: Let's move this to #-motu, where I've posed you more questions.
[23:47] <Chazz> How do I rename a project?
[23:48] <wgrant> Chazz: You'll need to get an admin to do that for you. Ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[23:49] <Chazz> Ok, thanks. :)