[00:13] sistpoty, ScottK: It's been running hourly for a couple of weeks. [00:14] But it was broken yesterday because LP decided to break the API. [00:34] lamont: do you know why I'm unable to retry the compiz/ia64 build? [00:46] ArneGoetje: when do you plan to do final language packs for 10.04 final? Do you expect there to be a respin between RC and final? [02:31] wgrant: I'd appreciate it if you could have a look at Bug #560422. [02:31] Launchpad bug 560422 in soyuz "Consistent retry failures on web UI" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/560422 [02:33] ScottK: I may be able to assist if you can find some Canonical person to look at the OOPS and get the traceback somewhere public. [02:34] Sigh. Probably not much chance of that on the weekend. [02:34] * ScottK wonders if slangasek is around and knows how to do it? [02:36] no clue, sorry [02:36] I probably don't have the access [02:36] OOPS-1562O184 [02:36] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1562O184 [02:37] whassup [02:37] /msg kees did you see the new Doctor Who yet? [02:38] wgrant: IntegrityError: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "buildpackagejob__build__key" [02:38] err s/^ // :p [02:38] Fuck. [02:39] We have DB corruption. [02:39] \o/ [02:39] I thought that was all fixed in Jan... :/ [02:39] Have fun. [02:39] * ScottK departs to go retrieve $TEENAGER from a distant location. [02:41] wgrant: sure its not a bug ? [02:41] lifeless: It probably is a bug. I meant that we thought we'd fixed all cases that caused anything like that. [02:42] pasted you the test [02:42] wgrant: ah, so is this probably related to my OOPS when trying to get a retry of an ia64 package earlier? [02:42] s/test/rest/ [02:42] (compiz/ia64) [02:43] slangasek: That's the same one. [02:43] ah [02:43] (package) [02:43] heh, ok - hadn't looked at the bug [02:44] lifeless: Thanks. [02:44] lamont: You haven't been playing with builds in the last couple of days? [02:56] slangasek: I know some nice people who could go look at (the brand new) OOPS-1562ED96 and tell you why we can't retry it [02:56] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1562ED96 [02:56] wgrant: haven't been playing with builds lately, no [02:57] lamont: looks like these nice people are already doing so :) [02:57] yeah - just walked back in, about to run off to dinner with the family [02:57] and finally notciing the rest of scrollback... anyway, ew. [02:58] So, yeah, we have some impossible DB state. Easy to fix, but it will probably have to wait for Soyuz to appear on Monday. === mrcurrington is now known as mrc === mrc is now known as mcurrington === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth === mag__ is now known as dottedmag === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter [11:24] slangasek, you broke fglrx [11:25] * sebner pets didrocks [11:25] * sebner pets directhex [11:25] didrocks: well, you too :D [11:25] sebner: thank you! :) [11:25] heh :) [11:26] looks like Bug #552548 [11:26] Launchpad bug 552548 in fglrx-installer "fglrx broken after update to 2:8.721-0ubuntu7 (dup-of: 494699)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/552548 [11:26] Launchpad bug 494699 in fglrx-installer "Does not support current Lucid kernel (2.6.32) or xserver (1.7)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/494699 [11:27] it's so totally not a dup of 494699 [12:03] doko__: http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/test-rebuild-20100407/ [12:04] wgrant: cool, many thanks! [12:17] * persia idly wonders why exim4 *and* postfix are both in main [12:44] could someone make this sync plz? https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hellanzb/+bug/549234 [12:44] Launchpad bug 549234 in hellanzb "Please sync hellanzb (0.13-6) from debian unstable" [High,Confirmed] === skipper_ is now known as bdrung [14:51] james_w: hola ;) ... so what would it take to get branch imports going for ppas? is that in the pipeline? [14:53] asac: Do you really want that? Would you not prefer auto-PPA upload from bzr push? [14:54] persia: is that mutually exclusive? [14:54] i would like both in the end ;) [14:54] Well, probably, unless one has different branch names for PPA->bzr and bzr->PPA to avoid loops. [14:55] But I expect that the development/integration effort would end up prioritising one of the features first. [14:57] drĂ´le de cuite message... [15:06] Hi. I was wondering if anyone knows where I can file a bug for icon-naming-utils? [15:17] pyther: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icon-naming-utils/+filebug [15:17] iulian: I need to repot it upstream [15:19] pyther: I don't know. [15:20] Looks for its homepage. Maybe it has a bug tracking system. [15:20] s/looks/look/ [15:22] iulian: yah I've looked and come out pretty unsuccesful [15:35] there is a new release of wacom.ko that support 5 new Bamboo tablets and some others. is it possible to get this into lucid? [15:44] frenkel: We're past KernelFreeze, so it'd be very hard to get significant new kernel changes into lucid at this point. I'd recommend asking for guidance on integration policies/procedures in #ubuntu-kernel: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KnowledgeBase may help give you some pointers as to how to help make that happen. [15:45] persia: i was afraid of that already [15:45] persia: thanks :) [15:46] still nobody for syncing https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hellanzb/+bug/549234 ? [15:46] Launchpad bug 549234 in hellanzb "Please sync hellanzb (0.13-6) from debian unstable" [High,Confirmed] [15:52] holy crap [15:53] I need to download 2,275M Of packages to upgrade to lucid [15:53] * bluefoxicy downloads the 692M daily alternate CD instead. [15:55] hi guys, i'm seeking help: bzr push lp:~mkarnicki/+junk/hello returned: Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. // [15:56] Permission denied (publickey). [15:56] any hints? I have registered my ssh public key with lp [15:56] mkarnicki: Launchpad help is on #launchpad. [15:56] a, thank you ScottK [16:01] bigon: just wait. a member of ubuntu-archive will do the sync. (i assume it will be synced tomorrow) === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates [16:45] anyone running lucid with the nvidia gt240m? [16:45] asac: I don't plan to work on it [16:56] padraic: i think i have g210m [17:09] mkarnicki: does it work? [17:10] i tried the live-cd with it and i just got a load of corrupt video after the bootscree [17:31] * abogani waves [17:31] I'm looking for sponsors: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlessioIgorBogani/linux-rtPPUApplication [17:31] Thanks! === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:48] padraic: it's ASUS UL30VT, i think G210M. once i had 'the rainbow', but.. the next time i tried it worked fine [18:04] lool: around? === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [19:56] iulian: hi [20:25] zyga: Hello. [20:25] Blah. [20:26] stupid question that I don't seem to be very good at googling... [20:26] why is it that I cannot alt-tab while dragging and dropping [20:28] jdong: this could be related to the various there Grab() blocks modifier keys [20:28] ah found a LP bug for it [20:28] bug 111939 [20:28] Launchpad bug 111939 in metacity "Not possible to alt-tab during a drag-and-drop operation" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/111939 [20:30] who do I have to beg to accept the 1-liner patch? [20:35] Nobody: just upload it (or if you can't, submit a sponsorship request, or if it exists, wait) [20:41] directhex: by making it buildable and installable? [20:43] well, 2 versions ago seemed pretty installed to me. but it's the issue with the stuff in /etc/ati/ not being replaced on update (i.e. all the files, which are required for the driver to work, are gone, and only .dpkg-bak versions are there) [20:45] directhex: which I haven't touched [20:45] looks like luck is the biggest factor in why i hadn't been hit before, then [20:56] directhex: well, there is some dodgy conffile handling in the preinst that I noticed; since the comment says "these need to match what upstream wants but they have to be in /etc so fiddle around on upgrade", the right answer is probably to fix the preinst to nuke all of /etc/ati and make it a symlink to something under /usr [21:19] slangasek, i agree. i don't think /etc is the right place for this stuff [21:20] directhex: and in fact, the package seems to take great pains to avoid etc/ati being tagged as conffiles, which at least partly explains the conflicts error on upgrade === skipper_ is now known as bdrung [23:34] Anyone wanna tell me what this kernel failure might be? http://pastebin.com/pVvcPdVc [23:37] Apport tries to run, but it is denied permission (which is another bug to deal with).