/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/04/11/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

BUGabundoasac: fta: what was that about:confix to reeanble process separation ?00:07
asacchrisccoulson: isnt libnss3-0d empty?00:55
asachmm. the .0d links are in there00:56
rippsDoes google do anything different when it builds google-chrome compared to how chromium-browser is built? After trying both, (both the same -dev version number) I think that google-chrome is just a tiny bit faster. This is a completely subjective comparison, but I was wondering if google did anything special with it's builds, like how firefox uses profiling with it's windows builds.02:00
asacripps: only thing that is probably differentis that they use a different gcc version or something02:13
cwillu_at_workasac, moments away from tests :)03:13
cwillu_at_workit only took 24 hours longer03:13
* cwillu_at_work waits for ff to install03:28
* cwillu_at_work waits for ff to launch04:10
cwillu_at_workseems to be working04:23
cwillu_at_workasac, karmic's 3.5.3 built from source shows the extra scrollbars in google maps04:24
cwillu_at_workasac, amusingly, the error console is _missing_ its scrollbar :04:26
cwillu_at_workalthough that may be related to my build more than anything04:28
cwillu_at_workperformance with the patch seems quite a bit better; I'll do some proper a/b testing tomorrow04:54
cwillu_at_workpatched firefox gets the slower beagle :)04:54
lonejackhi, I've some problems with sites made with silverlight. I tryed to install the moonlight plugin by synaptic but the version is too much old (1.x). So, I tryed to install the new version directly from novell site... So, does anybody know if exist any reason why the ff should not work?08:34
micahglonejack: lots of reasons08:35
micahglonejack: which Ubuntu version?08:35
lonejackWhat make me wonder is that I've a friend that work with debian and his system works wery well. VErsion 9.1008:36
micahglonejack: it might work08:38
lonejackmicahg: but it doesn't. Can we investigate why?08:40
micahglonejack: which version of Firefox?08:41
lonejack3.5.908:41
lonejack64 bit08:41
lonejackubuntu08:42
lonejackNovell moonlight 2.208:42
micahgI'm not sure what the compatability status of moon 2.2 with Firefox 3.5 is08:42
micahgwe've actually had some problems with 3.6 as well08:44
micahgwhat version was your friend using?08:45
lonejackI understand but, after moonlight synaptic installation, what other choose did I have?08:45
micahglonejack: idk, I'm just saying that I don't know offhand the compatability of the upstream moon08:46
micahgI know that 2.2 is in Lucid and we are having a few issues with Firefox 3.608:46
lonejackSqueeze08:47
micahg?08:48
lonejackin beta version08:48
micahgLucid != Squeeze08:48
lonejackDo I told Lucid?08:50
micahg?08:50
DanaGAnyone know if the ubuntu-mozilla-daily packages are supposed to have the Lorentz crash-isolation feature?08:53
lonejackmicahg: why U wrote "Lucid != Squeeze"? I know that my friend works with debian in beta version and he can see a lot of sites make with silverlight....08:53
DanaGWhen I last tried the PPA (a few hours ago), it didn't.08:53
micahglonejack: ah, ok, I thought you were saying Lucid is Squeeze08:53
ddecatorDanaG: FF 3.7 has had it for a while, but it hasn't worked (since i last tested)08:53
micahgDanaG: 3.6 and 3.7 should08:54
DanaGThe version of Mozilla's own releases is 3.6.3plugin108:54
DanaGThe version on PPA is 3.6.4pre.... yet it didn't isolate plugin crashes.08:54
micahgDanaG: yes, bit should08:54
micahgDanaG: what happens?08:54
DanaGgoogle for "flashcrash" -- that page about "bug hasn't been fixed in years".08:55
DanaGFirefox just freezes.08:55
DanaGDoesn't crash.... just freezes.08:55
ddecatorit's been doing that for a while..08:55
micahgDanaG: yeah, seems like we have the same problem in 3.6 as 3.7 now08:55
DanaGThe official beta 3.6.3plugin1 does isolate those crashes.08:55
ddecatorwhen you use the source?08:56
micahgwhich isn't good because upstream thought it was a separate xulrunner -> firefox issue, but 3.6 has its own xul08:56
micahgDanaG: yeah, we need to track down the issue08:56
DanaGOh, and the thunderbird 3.0 dailies still don't allow non-integer layout.css.csspixelsperdevpx08:56
DanaG147 DPI display... means I need that to be 1.5.08:56
micahgDanaG: i don't remember when that was fixed08:57
* micahg goes to look08:57
* micahg thought upstream fixed that in trunk08:58
micahgDanaG: does it work in Firefox 3.6 or 3.7?08:58
DanaGhmm, which issue now... dpi, or crash-isolation?09:00
ddecatordpi09:00
micahgDanaG: dpi09:00
DanaGIt's fixed in Firefox 3.6; now only Thunderbird is left to fix.09:01
micahgDanaG: then it will get fixed in Thunderbird 3.109:01
DanaGCool.09:01
lonejackbut in general these problems with moonlight when will be solved?09:11
micahglonejack: well, squeeze and karmic have the same version of moon09:12
micahglonejack: maybe before release, maybe after09:13
lonejackmicahg, your advice is to remove the plugin and install the one that stays on repo?09:14
micahglonejack: i don't know if I have any advice ATM09:15
lonejackmicahg, exsuse me what it means ATM?09:17
ddecatorlonejack: At The Moment09:17
micahglonejack: at the moment09:17
ddecatorwhoa09:17
micahgddecator: exactly at the moment ;)09:17
lonejackevery time is the right time to learn something new...09:18
ddecatorlonejack: well said09:18
lonejackok, last question. is there a difference between install FF pluging from repo or directly from direct download?09:23
ddecatorrepo has more testing and is generally more compatible09:24
ddecatorbut generally a lot of them are more for ease of install09:24
ddecatoryou shouldn't notice a difference09:25
micahglonejack: we're dropping a lot of the addons from lucid09:26
lonejackmicahg, ddecator: there is a new(beta) version on moonlight. is it wasted time to try to install it?09:35
micahglonejack: idk09:36
micahglonejack: they say it works09:38
micahglonejack: I'd say give it a try09:38
lonejackthis moonlight plugin has something mystic.09:39
lonejackalso the 3.0 doesn't work...09:40
micahglonejack: try a new profile: firefox -ProfileManager09:41
lonejacktoday it's sunday not christmas09:41
ddecator..what?09:42
lonejackmicahg, I launched that cmd from terminal. It has opened a new ff window09:42
lonejackis it correct?09:42
micahglonejack: no, you have to close firefox first, or use: MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 firefox -ProfileManager09:43
lonejackmicahg, something has chaged I obtain a message from terminal: "(firefox:3887): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times"09:46
lonejackthen a dialog  choose user profile09:47
ddecatorlonejack: that's normal09:47
ddecatorcreate a new profile09:47
lonejacki did. so I went on a page written in silverlight... It show me a message that inform me that is necessary to install moonlight... Click here??? Moonlight is already installed!!!09:50
lonejackNo I did a mistake. The moonlight disappered..09:51
ddecatorthat's what creating a new profile does09:52
ddecatorit's a clean version, no add-ons, default settings09:52
lonejackat this point what I have to do? Install it doing click or synaptic?09:53
ddecator(you launch the profile manager again later to switch back to your normal profile)09:53
ddecatornot sure what micahg wanted you to do09:53
micahglonejack: wanted to see if a clean profile helped moon09:54
lonejackmicahg, this is a test, ok: what U prefer: Install it doing click or synaptic?09:54
micahglonejack: either09:55
* micahg needs to go to sleep though, so catch me later with the results09:55
lonejackok, direct download first.09:57
lonejackmicahg, it works09:59
ddecatorlonejack: that means that there is likely an add-on or a setting on your default profile causing the issue10:00
* ddecator would guess an add-on10:00
ddecatorlonejack: if you run "firefox -ProfileManager" again, you can select your normal profile again, then disable your add-ons one at a time to see which one(s) is/are conflicting with moon10:02
lonejackOk. but before I prefer to try to install the plugin from synpatic...10:06
ddecatorok. i'm not sure if the version in synaptic is the latest stable they have on their site..10:07
ddecatoryou said you're running 9.10?10:07
lonejackyes10:08
lonejackit doesn't work10:09
ddecatorkarmic is still using 1.0.1, yes?10:09
lonejackforthermor the moonlight(after synaptic installation) isn't shown in the FF extension...10:10
ddecatorthe synaptic one should show up under plugins as silverlight10:10
lonejack1.0.1, right10:10
ddecatorso 2.x works, just not the 1.0.1 in the repo10:11
lonejackfrom synaptic I installed libmoon,moonlight-pligin-core/mozilla10:12
lonejackbut on FF extension isn't shown10:12
ddecatordo you see silverlight under FF plugins?10:12
ddecatoror it might say moonlight, i can't remember for sure. but the synatpic one should be under FF plugins10:14
lonejackok, now I undestand what you mean. When I installed the 2.2 from downlonad the moonlight was appearing on the extensions, instead now it appear as Silverlight plugin...10:15
ddecatorright. from website = extension. from synaptic = plugin.10:15
ddecatormoonlight 2.2 is in lucid already10:16
ddecatorfor karmic, you can continue to use the version from the site10:16
lonejackOk. Now I've SL plugin installed but on the site I'm looking "please install ML.."10:16
ddecatorright, the one from synaptic is outdated and doesn't seem to work right10:17
lonejackSo it seems that on the next UBUNTU version (probably) it should work...10:17
ddecator-should-, but according to micah there are reports of it not working for some people with FF 3.6 and 3.710:18
ddecatorbut that might be due to moonlight being behind silverlight, so it can't handle everything10:19
micahgddecator: more likely an issue with the migration to xul19210:19
lonejackis a nightmare...10:19
* micahg is out for real now 10:19
ddecatorwhoa10:19
ddecatorwell there's your answer, haha10:20
lonejackddecator, thank you very much for your help!!!10:20
ddecatorlonejack: np =)10:20
lonejackSo have you a good sunday...10:21
lonejackbye10:21
ddecatoryou too, cya10:21
* cwillu gets out a stick and prepares to pokes asac with it14:04
asaccwillu_at_work: ho14:05
asacwhats up?14:05
cwillufinally got a root image booting up14:06
cwilluhaven't tried the karmic's stock firefox yet, but my 3.5.3 rebuild shows scrollbars on gmaps14:06
cwilluand also by virtue of not having tried karmic's stock firefox, I haven't done a proper a/b test between the rebuild with the bitdepth patch, but the rebuild sure as hell feels alot faster14:07
cwillui.e., it feels responsive while scrolling a page of text,14:08
cwilluI'm heading off to work in an hour or so, and then I'll poke you for real :p14:08
jdstrandasac: good morning/afternoon14:10
jdstrandchrisccoulson_: good morning/afternoon14:11
jdstrandasac, chrisccoulson_: so, what's the verdict?14:11
asacchrisccoulson_: there?14:26
asacchrisccoulson_: whats your eval? is the P.*FromOrigin Function broken and doesnt check if a link exists?14:26
asacchrisccoulson_: so what we should do before droppin the links is checkkng the binary extensions like traybiff and enigmail if they link against the .0d thing14:38
=== skipper_ is now known as bdrung
cwillu_at_workasac, firebug shows the extra scrollbars in its ui15:11
cwillu_at_workasac, overflow: hidden seems to trigger an separate scrollbar15:12
cwillu_at_workasac, that's odd: in firebug on a bugger element:   background: url(...image) no-repeat scroll 0 0;15:18
cwillu_at_workif I remove scroll, it pops back in15:18
asaccwillu_at_work: yeah-.15:18
asacfeels odd15:18
cwillu_at_workhmm, does the same thing on my desktop15:19
asacon your desktop you get a scrollbar?15:20
cwillu_at_workno15:20
cwillu_at_workbut the same behaviour of it popping back in after I delete it15:20
asaccwillu_at_work: you said you see the same in chrome?15:20
asacor just html?15:20
cwillu_at_workfirebug had an extra scrollbar, yes15:20
asachmm.15:20
asaccwillu_at_work: what element is that?15:21
asachmm. mxr is slow15:21
cwillu_at_workthe html tab15:21
cwillu_at_workit went away at some point, not sure when15:21
asacjdstrand: ok so ... did chris upload that to -security ppa?15:21
asacotherwise let me do and then test15:21
asacin hardy thats reproducible right?15:22
asaccwillu_at_work: ok. the tab could be a valid one?15:22
jdstrandasac: there is no new tbird in ppa15:22
cwillu_at_workdon't believe so15:22
jdstrandasac: the version of nss is still 3.12.6-0ubuntu0.9.10.215:22
jdstrandasac: ie, the one with the fips cleanup15:23
asackk15:23
asaci was talking about tbird15:23
asacjdstrand: thats hardy to karmic?15:23
jdstrandasac: karmic. hardy-jaunty didn't get a new nss15:23
asackk15:24
jdstrandasac: and presumably lucid15:24
jdstrandasac: though it has tbird 3 so I don't know15:24
asacjdstrand: do you have the tbird bug id at hand`15:25
asac?15:25
jdstrandasac: 55991815:25
asacjdstrand: lucid is a new branch. that hasnt the problem15:25
jdstrandcool15:25
asacbug 55991815:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 559918 in nss "Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d 3.12.6 is installed" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/55991815:25
jdstrandthat the one15:26
asacjdstrand: what heading line should i use in changelog?15:28
asac"Regression upload for nss3 security/stability update - USN-910-2" ?15:29
asacoh thats the wrong usn ;)15:29
jdstrandasac: you don't need a USN.15:29
jdstrandasac: how about "Regression upload for recent nss3 security/stability update"15:30
jdstrandasac: with the LP number15:30
asaci just skipped it15:31
asacoh i failed15:31
asacso let me use that15:31
asac ' * fix LP: #559918 - Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d > 3.12.6 is installed; we drop the dangling .so.0d links that became obsolete when we moved to non-versioned SONAMES for nss3 and nspr4 - update debian/thunderbird.links' --fixes 'lp:559918'15:32
ubottuLaunchpad bug 559918 in nss "Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d 3.12.6 is installed" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/55991815:32
asacthats what it is now ;)15:32
jdstrandasac: excellent15:32
asachttp://pastebin.com/7jzH2U0a15:33
jdstrandasac: huge thanks :)15:33
asacthats the diff15:33
asacheh. not too early15:33
asaclets first get this properly tested ;)15:33
asac(and built)15:33
jdstrand:)15:33
* asac found he doesnt have the right orig ,)15:33
* asac goes for launchpad15:34
asacso ... killing my decades old irc server from my internal net made my normal bandwith go up ;)15:34
asacget 1.2M/s now when downloading from lp15:35
jdstrandheheh15:35
asaci replaced it with mini 10 with poulsbo chip ;)15:36
asaclet me screen the recent tbird bug noise quick15:37
asacbug 55992315:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 559923 in thunderbird "package thunderbird 2.0.0.23 build1 nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/thunderbird', which is also in package thunderbird-mozilla-build 0:3.0.4-0ubuntu1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/55992315:37
asachmm15:37
asacis that a moz build?15:37
asacor some random guy?15:37
jdstrandI've confirmed that the nss upload fixes fips. another guy confirmed performing the debian/rules stuff manually on libnssdbm3.so fixes it15:39
jdstrandI'm going to upload that15:39
jdstranderr... publish that15:39
asacyeah. missing .chk should be safe15:40
asacif we see and improvement somewhere its probably and improvement for everyone ;)15:40
jdstrandchrisccoulson_ also tested it and said it worked15:40
asacgoodie15:41
* asac pushes now15:41
asacwell in two seconds ;)15:41
asac[PPA ubuntu-mozilla-security] [ubuntu/karmic] thunderbird 2.0.0.24+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.2 (Accepted)15:52
cwillu_at_workasac, further testing will have to wait an hour or two, my sd card just self-destructed15:56
cwillu_at_workprotip:  don't buy surplus intelligence agency storage devices, they're not a bargain15:56
jdstrandasac: looks like i386 is queued to start in an hour. amd64 is building now. I'm going to go afk for a while15:58
jdstrandnss is pocket copied, and I'm just waiting on the publisher to finish before I publish nss SUN-927-215:59
jdstrands/SUN/USN/15:59
asacSUN ;)16:00
asacenjoy16:00
asac09:25 < ogra> asac, same image as mentioned on friday ... http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/lucid-netbook-armel+omap.img16:01
asacoops16:01
asac;)16:01
asaccwillu_at_work: ^^^16:01
asacyou can try that image ;)16:01
cwillu_at_workthe image isn't the problem :p16:01
asacbut tats lucid ;)16:02
asacjust for next time ...16:02
micahgasac: can you look at the pyxpcom bug to see if sugar really needs it16:02
cwillu_at_workI'm writing two new cards right now16:03
cwillu_at_workand it's hard for me to express how little javascript performance matters to me before I can scroll the screen at better than 5 fps :p16:03
asacmicahg: i am sure sugar needs it for some parts16:04
micahgasac: so the question is do we get sugar in archive for Lucid?16:04
asaccwillu_at_work: well. do what you want. i would just suggest to use most recent stuff16:04
cwillu_at_workduh :p16:05
asacmicahg: you mean: are we ok to drop it ?16:05
asaci assume its in16:05
cwillu_at_workbut I'm only going to change one thing at a time16:05
micahgasac: no,  it's out ATM because it can't be built16:05
asacthats fine then imo16:05
cwillu_at_workit's gonna be a few months before we release anything on top of lucid anyway16:05
asaccwillu_at_work: kk. what are you working on if i might ask?16:06
asacor secret sauce ;)?16:06
micahgasac: ScottK wanted to get some version of sugar in for Edubuntu16:07
cwillu_at_workindustrial hci16:07
cwillu_at_workapplied real-time-strategy games, basically :p16:07
asacnice ;)16:07
cwillu_at_workI'm actually planning an isometric system overview screen later this year :)16:08
asacmicahg: do you understand what pyxcpom is needed for exactly?16:08
micahgasac: I think they use it for their web browser16:08
micahgasac: not exactly, I can try to track down one of the maintainers16:09
asacyeah16:09
asacthat would probably be ok16:09
micahgasac: does that mean we should try to get it in?16:10
asacno16:11
asacfirst understanding what the are using it for16:11
micahgasac: ok16:11
asacand if they can stop doing that ;)16:11
asac(if its risky)16:11
micahglfaraone: are you familiar with Sugar's usage of python-xpcom?16:13
micahgasac: BTW, fennec and prism built for Hardy :)16:14
micahgasac: on another note, not really sure about IPC in 3.6.416:15
lfaraonemicahg: yes, it's depended on by hulahop iirc.16:15
micahglfaraone: is there a way around it?16:15
lfaraonemicahg: well, the Browse activity is a Python + GTK wrapper around it.16:15
micahglfaraone: can we use python-gtkmozembed?16:16
lfaraonemicahg: I don't think so. Hulahop gives access to the whole xpcom API to its clients, and I think Browse uses more than gtkmozembed provides.16:17
lfaraoneI'll check with upstream.16:17
micahglfaraone: ok, thanks, please let us know16:18
micahgasac: I don't think we should have IPC on the release CD if we can avoid it16:18
lfaraonemicahg: from a cursory reading of http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/mainline/blobs/master/browser.py ( a small component of Browse :)), it looks like that is the case, unfortunately.16:22
micahgasac: ^^^16:22
lfaraonemicahg: if I had a month to rewrite it, and a few years more PyGTK experience, I might be able to write a reduced-functionality version which accomplishes the same thing, but final freeze is shortly approaching.16:24
asaclfaraone: micahg: is that "just" one package requiring it?16:28
micahgasac: it seems to be one package that uses it and the otehrs depend on it16:29
asacmaybe that packag ecan build in-source pyxpcom or something?16:32
asacusually upstreams already include that in their tree16:32
asacmicahg: lfaraone ?16:32
micahgwill be back in an hour16:35
lfaraoneasac: sorry. Uh, sure, we could embed pyxpcom in hulahop, but pyxpcom will need to be rebuilt (I think) whenever there's a change to xulrunner.16:44
lfaraone++-+-16:46
lfaraone~.16:47
lfaraone.16:47
cwillu_at_workhunspell or myspell?16:47
lfaraoneasac: is it not feasible to enable building pyxpcom in xulrunner? I think debian's xulrunner has it.17:25
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
jdstrandasac, chrisccoulson_: fyi-- just tested tbird on amd64 and it works fine. I can connect using pop3s with libnss3-0d installed. with old version I could not.18:20
jdstrandasac, chrisccoulson_: see my comment in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss/+bug/559918/comments/1318:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 559918 in thunderbird "Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d 3.12.6 is installed" [High,Fix committed]18:21
jdstrandasac, chrisccoulson_: waiting on armel, i386 and ia64 to finish building (all have started)18:22
* jdstrand -> afk for a bit18:22
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_snack
micahgasac: just wondering why you used source format 3 for enigmail19:01
bdrungmicahg: because it's great ;)19:01
micahgbdrung: we're going to need to backport it though19:02
bdrungnot good19:02
micahgbdrung: which, source format 3 or the need to backport?19:03
bdrungmicahg: the combination: the need to backport a 3.0 (quilt) formatted package19:03
micahgbdrung: that's why we can19:09
micahg't migrate the mozilla stack to 3.019:09
ftamicahg, fyi, per doko's request, i've suspended all the dailies19:09
micahgfta: oh, so his rebuild can finish?19:09
ftayep19:09
micahgfta: how long?19:10
ftauntil it's done :P19:10
micahgfta: would we be able to do just firefox once I figure out why IPC doesn't work?19:10
ftashould be ok19:11
micahgfta: ok, thanks, I'll let you know19:11
micahglfaraone: pyxpcom is a different upstream source now19:15
=== BUGabundo_snack is now known as BUGabundo
BUGabundowow19:46
BUGabundofta: chromium is *eating* http:// from the URL bar19:46
LLStarkshey guys, would a text area input bug be filed under "form controls"?20:39
gavinare you asking about bugzilla.m.o ?20:40
LLStarksyah20:40
gavinit depends. what's the bug?20:40
LLStarkstext areas only work 25% of the time with 3.7 nightlies20:40
LLStarkssometimes you need to click or type elsewhere first20:40
LLStarksridiculously annoying20:41
LLStarksif you use message boards20:41
gavindoes it happen for all textareas or only specific ones?20:43
gavinis it a recent regression?20:43
micahgit sounds familiar for some reason20:44
LLStarksgavin, i really don't know how to distinguish text areas20:44
LLStarksfor example, ubuntuforums is affected20:44
gavinwell, I mean does it happen on multiple sites, or just ubuntuforums?20:44
LLStarksa lot of sites20:44
LLStarkswith message boards20:45
gavindo those sites use the same message board software?20:45
LLStarksdoesn't matter if phpbb, smf, vb, etc20:45
gavinok20:45
LLStarksmicahg, i've brought it up before, never bothered to file a bug yet.20:45
micahgLLStarks: ah, that's why20:46
micahgLLStarks: does it happen with upstream builds?20:46
LLStarkslatest nightlies20:46
LLStarkshas been like this for a week or two20:47
LLStarkshaven't  tested outside of umd20:47
gavingo ahead and file it in Core : General20:47
gavinif yo can find a 1-day regression range using nightlies, that'd be perfect20:47
micahgLLStarks: that's why I asked if upstream builds were affected20:47
LLStarksMozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.3a4pre) Gecko/20100407 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.7a4pre - Build ID: 2010033103371220:48
gavinfeel free to CC me too (gavin.sharp)20:48
LLStarkswhat do i regress against? xulrunner 1.9.3?20:48
LLStarksor better yet, what's that site that lists changes for zeroing in for regression testing20:49
gavinnot sure what you mean - I assumed by "latest nightlies" you meant "latest mozilla.org firefox nightlies"20:49
LLStarksi remember it being a mercurial site20:49
gavinhttps://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/20:49
LLStarksbingo20:49
LLStarksthanks20:49
gavinif you get the changeset IDs from the relevant builds using about:buildconfig, you can enter them into http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=1b944ebb5ca6&tochange=35059e8e8ce820:49
gavinto get a list of changes between the two builds20:49
LLStarkswhat would be some keywords to search for?20:50
LLStarksgavin, how can get older mozilla-central build?20:52
LLStarks*builds20:52
LLStarks*can i20:52
gavinhttp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/20:52
gavin(the mozilla-central ones)20:52
LLStarksthanks again20:53
LLStarkswindow is shrinking21:01
LLStarkstedious and fun21:01
LLStarksdamnit. this is harder than i though. as soon i think i've cornered the bug, it pops in the build i think is pre-regression21:11
micahgasac: ping21:15
bdrungasac: ping (too)21:16
* micahg waits for asac_the_second to pop in :)21:16
bdrunglet's clone him. then everyone can have his own asac ;)21:17
LLStarksgavin: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=2cc5ad2cf917&tochange=5108c4c2c04321:22
bdrungasac: https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/ubufox/m-d-0.21/+merge/2297321:23
LLStarksdo i have to go commit-by-commit for further drill down?21:23
LLStarksjeez. these tinderbox builds are huge.21:26
LLStarks80mb+21:26
LLStarksi have a hunch that the textarea focus commit is the culprit21:28
micahgLLStarks: there are several in that range21:28
LLStarkswhere can i get commit binaries?21:29
LLStarksthe gzip i dl'ed is source21:29
LLStarksat least we have a good range21:30
=== BUGabundo is now known as tellari
=== tellari is now known as BUGabundo
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_dinner
gavinLLStarks: yeah, I would suspect one of ehsan's changes22:04
gavinCC him on your bug?22:04
gavin:ehsan22:04
LLStarksah22:06
LLStarksyou suspect the focus one too?22:06
LLStarkscork and i figured as much22:06
jdstrandasac, chrisccoulson: unless you guys object, I am going to be publishing USN 927-3 for tbird within the next few minutes22:08
chrisccoulsonjdstrand, i'm ok with that22:09
=== BUGabundo_dinner is now known as BUGabundo
jdstrandcool22:10
asacjdstrand: bug reporter confirmed the fix?22:10
micahgchrisccoulson: BTW, asac said we can drop noscript as it's a target that moves too quickly22:10
asacyes22:10
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, thanks. i will get that removed tomorrow22:10
micahgasac: what to do about sugar?22:10
jdstrandasac: I confirmed it. the bug reporters all just removed libnss3-0d and went on their way22:11
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - thanks for sorting it btw22:11
jdstrandasac: if it were my original update, I would publish22:11
jdstrandie, I am satisfied it is fixed22:12
asack22:12
jdstrandchrisccoulson: sure, though you should really be thanking asac :)22:12
asace?22:12
asacme?22:12
chrisccoulsonthanks asac too :)22:12
asacdidnt do much ;)22:12
asacmicahg: i dont know22:12
jdstrandI just kind of pushed the bug along :)22:12
chrisccoulsoni took my laptop out with me today, but ended up not being able to get 3G coverage, else i would have helped push it along today22:13
asacheh22:13
asac3g22:13
jdstrandno worries22:13
asacmicahg: in the end its chrisccoulson's call. imo its too late to add something like the pyxpcom22:13
chrisccoulsonasac - yeah, i thought i'd give my 3G dongle some proper use, but i ended up in an area with no coverage :(22:13
chrisccoulsonelse i would have been around much earlier ;)22:14
jdstrandheheh22:14
asacmicahg: whats the package that requires it?22:14
micahgasac:  sugar-hulahop which has some other sugar packages depending on it22:15
chrisccoulsonmicahg / asac - i agree, it's too late to be working on introducing new packages now, we already have enough to be working on to get lucid in to shape22:15
micahgchrisccoulson: the problem is sugar is useless w/out it22:15
* micahg is trying to get vlc sorted out with upstream xul192 fixes along with galeon in haryd22:16
micahg*haryd22:16
micahg*hardy22:16
LLStarksmicahg, do any of the umd packages lorentz code?22:19
LLStarks*contai22:19
LLStarks**contain22:19
micahgLLStarks: both should22:21
LLStarks3.6 and 3.7?22:21
LLStarksany way i can check?22:21
micahgLLStarks: the code seems to be there22:22
mahfouzwhy are there freezes now for 3.6?22:38
mahfouzit used to be only for 3.722:38
micahgmahfouz: lorentz landed on 3.622:38
mahfouzyou mean the dom.ipc stuff?22:38
micahgmahfouz: I suggest switching to firefox-stable22:38
micahgmahfouz: yes22:38
mahfouzah, i see22:39
mahfouzyeah, I can work around it22:39
mahfouzwas just wondering22:39
micahgmahfouz: we'll probably have a call for testing later this month once we figure out why we're crashing and upstream isn't for 3.622:39
micahgasac: do you remember why you uploaded thunderbird locales w/out an orig.tar.gz?  is that because it's not released upstream like that?22:45
asacmicahg: yeah22:45
asacwe have all assembled on our own22:45
micahgasac: ok, can we do one more upload before releasE?22:46
asacprobably22:46
asacshould be before freeze22:46
skipper_asac: i uploaded m-d 0.22 and finished ubufox. please have a look at the later.22:47
=== skipper_ is now known as bdrung
LLStarksdammit bindwood22:48
LLStarksstop sucking22:48
micahgasac: should I prepare an upload in a PPA after I test?22:48
micahgLLStarks: BTW, reporters in Bugzilla always get copied22:49
micahgLLStarks: assuming you have your prefs set that way22:49
LLStarks?22:51
micahgLLStarks: you keep adding yourself to the CC list on your own bugs :)22:52
LLStarksoh22:52
LLStarksi'm just anal22:52
bdrungwhat is a .jsm file?22:52
asacjavascript module?22:53
bdrungaha22:53
bdrungi wonder why /usr/share/xul-ext/bindwood/modules/bindwood.jsm must be executable22:54
LLStarkswhat is m-d?22:55
bdrungLLStarks: mozilla-devscripts22:55
bdrung*the* tool for packaging xul extensions22:56
chrisccoulsonbdrung - it shouldn't, that's my mistake ;)22:58
chrisccoulsoncouchdb_env.sh needs to be executable22:58
bdrungchrisccoulson: m-d makes couchdb_env.sh executable automatically23:06
chrisccoulsonbdrung - ok. i still need to keep that patch i added though to stop it from changing permissions at run-time23:07

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!