BUGabundo | asac: fta: what was that about:confix to reeanble process separation ? | 00:07 |
---|---|---|
asac | chrisccoulson: isnt libnss3-0d empty? | 00:55 |
asac | hmm. the .0d links are in there | 00:56 |
ripps | Does google do anything different when it builds google-chrome compared to how chromium-browser is built? After trying both, (both the same -dev version number) I think that google-chrome is just a tiny bit faster. This is a completely subjective comparison, but I was wondering if google did anything special with it's builds, like how firefox uses profiling with it's windows builds. | 02:00 |
asac | ripps: only thing that is probably differentis that they use a different gcc version or something | 02:13 |
cwillu_at_work | asac, moments away from tests :) | 03:13 |
cwillu_at_work | it only took 24 hours longer | 03:13 |
* cwillu_at_work waits for ff to install | 03:28 | |
* cwillu_at_work waits for ff to launch | 04:10 | |
cwillu_at_work | seems to be working | 04:23 |
cwillu_at_work | asac, karmic's 3.5.3 built from source shows the extra scrollbars in google maps | 04:24 |
cwillu_at_work | asac, amusingly, the error console is _missing_ its scrollbar : | 04:26 |
cwillu_at_work | although that may be related to my build more than anything | 04:28 |
cwillu_at_work | performance with the patch seems quite a bit better; I'll do some proper a/b testing tomorrow | 04:54 |
cwillu_at_work | patched firefox gets the slower beagle :) | 04:54 |
lonejack | hi, I've some problems with sites made with silverlight. I tryed to install the moonlight plugin by synaptic but the version is too much old (1.x). So, I tryed to install the new version directly from novell site... So, does anybody know if exist any reason why the ff should not work? | 08:34 |
micahg | lonejack: lots of reasons | 08:35 |
micahg | lonejack: which Ubuntu version? | 08:35 |
lonejack | What make me wonder is that I've a friend that work with debian and his system works wery well. VErsion 9.10 | 08:36 |
micahg | lonejack: it might work | 08:38 |
lonejack | micahg: but it doesn't. Can we investigate why? | 08:40 |
micahg | lonejack: which version of Firefox? | 08:41 |
lonejack | 3.5.9 | 08:41 |
lonejack | 64 bit | 08:41 |
lonejack | ubuntu | 08:42 |
lonejack | Novell moonlight 2.2 | 08:42 |
micahg | I'm not sure what the compatability status of moon 2.2 with Firefox 3.5 is | 08:42 |
micahg | we've actually had some problems with 3.6 as well | 08:44 |
micahg | what version was your friend using? | 08:45 |
lonejack | I understand but, after moonlight synaptic installation, what other choose did I have? | 08:45 |
micahg | lonejack: idk, I'm just saying that I don't know offhand the compatability of the upstream moon | 08:46 |
micahg | I know that 2.2 is in Lucid and we are having a few issues with Firefox 3.6 | 08:46 |
lonejack | Squeeze | 08:47 |
micahg | ? | 08:48 |
lonejack | in beta version | 08:48 |
micahg | Lucid != Squeeze | 08:48 |
lonejack | Do I told Lucid? | 08:50 |
micahg | ? | 08:50 |
DanaG | Anyone know if the ubuntu-mozilla-daily packages are supposed to have the Lorentz crash-isolation feature? | 08:53 |
lonejack | micahg: why U wrote "Lucid != Squeeze"? I know that my friend works with debian in beta version and he can see a lot of sites make with silverlight.... | 08:53 |
DanaG | When I last tried the PPA (a few hours ago), it didn't. | 08:53 |
micahg | lonejack: ah, ok, I thought you were saying Lucid is Squeeze | 08:53 |
ddecator | DanaG: FF 3.7 has had it for a while, but it hasn't worked (since i last tested) | 08:53 |
micahg | DanaG: 3.6 and 3.7 should | 08:54 |
DanaG | The version of Mozilla's own releases is 3.6.3plugin1 | 08:54 |
DanaG | The version on PPA is 3.6.4pre.... yet it didn't isolate plugin crashes. | 08:54 |
micahg | DanaG: yes, bit should | 08:54 |
micahg | DanaG: what happens? | 08:54 |
DanaG | google for "flashcrash" -- that page about "bug hasn't been fixed in years". | 08:55 |
DanaG | Firefox just freezes. | 08:55 |
DanaG | Doesn't crash.... just freezes. | 08:55 |
ddecator | it's been doing that for a while.. | 08:55 |
micahg | DanaG: yeah, seems like we have the same problem in 3.6 as 3.7 now | 08:55 |
DanaG | The official beta 3.6.3plugin1 does isolate those crashes. | 08:55 |
ddecator | when you use the source? | 08:56 |
micahg | which isn't good because upstream thought it was a separate xulrunner -> firefox issue, but 3.6 has its own xul | 08:56 |
micahg | DanaG: yeah, we need to track down the issue | 08:56 |
DanaG | Oh, and the thunderbird 3.0 dailies still don't allow non-integer layout.css.csspixelsperdevpx | 08:56 |
DanaG | 147 DPI display... means I need that to be 1.5. | 08:56 |
micahg | DanaG: i don't remember when that was fixed | 08:57 |
* micahg goes to look | 08:57 | |
* micahg thought upstream fixed that in trunk | 08:58 | |
micahg | DanaG: does it work in Firefox 3.6 or 3.7? | 08:58 |
DanaG | hmm, which issue now... dpi, or crash-isolation? | 09:00 |
ddecator | dpi | 09:00 |
micahg | DanaG: dpi | 09:00 |
DanaG | It's fixed in Firefox 3.6; now only Thunderbird is left to fix. | 09:01 |
micahg | DanaG: then it will get fixed in Thunderbird 3.1 | 09:01 |
DanaG | Cool. | 09:01 |
lonejack | but in general these problems with moonlight when will be solved? | 09:11 |
micahg | lonejack: well, squeeze and karmic have the same version of moon | 09:12 |
micahg | lonejack: maybe before release, maybe after | 09:13 |
lonejack | micahg, your advice is to remove the plugin and install the one that stays on repo? | 09:14 |
micahg | lonejack: i don't know if I have any advice ATM | 09:15 |
lonejack | micahg, exsuse me what it means ATM? | 09:17 |
ddecator | lonejack: At The Moment | 09:17 |
micahg | lonejack: at the moment | 09:17 |
ddecator | whoa | 09:17 |
micahg | ddecator: exactly at the moment ;) | 09:17 |
lonejack | every time is the right time to learn something new... | 09:18 |
ddecator | lonejack: well said | 09:18 |
lonejack | ok, last question. is there a difference between install FF pluging from repo or directly from direct download? | 09:23 |
ddecator | repo has more testing and is generally more compatible | 09:24 |
ddecator | but generally a lot of them are more for ease of install | 09:24 |
ddecator | you shouldn't notice a difference | 09:25 |
micahg | lonejack: we're dropping a lot of the addons from lucid | 09:26 |
lonejack | micahg, ddecator: there is a new(beta) version on moonlight. is it wasted time to try to install it? | 09:35 |
micahg | lonejack: idk | 09:36 |
micahg | lonejack: they say it works | 09:38 |
micahg | lonejack: I'd say give it a try | 09:38 |
lonejack | this moonlight plugin has something mystic. | 09:39 |
lonejack | also the 3.0 doesn't work... | 09:40 |
micahg | lonejack: try a new profile: firefox -ProfileManager | 09:41 |
lonejack | today it's sunday not christmas | 09:41 |
ddecator | ..what? | 09:42 |
lonejack | micahg, I launched that cmd from terminal. It has opened a new ff window | 09:42 |
lonejack | is it correct? | 09:42 |
micahg | lonejack: no, you have to close firefox first, or use: MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 firefox -ProfileManager | 09:43 |
lonejack | micahg, something has chaged I obtain a message from terminal: "(firefox:3887): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times" | 09:46 |
lonejack | then a dialog choose user profile | 09:47 |
ddecator | lonejack: that's normal | 09:47 |
ddecator | create a new profile | 09:47 |
lonejack | i did. so I went on a page written in silverlight... It show me a message that inform me that is necessary to install moonlight... Click here??? Moonlight is already installed!!! | 09:50 |
lonejack | No I did a mistake. The moonlight disappered.. | 09:51 |
ddecator | that's what creating a new profile does | 09:52 |
ddecator | it's a clean version, no add-ons, default settings | 09:52 |
lonejack | at this point what I have to do? Install it doing click or synaptic? | 09:53 |
ddecator | (you launch the profile manager again later to switch back to your normal profile) | 09:53 |
ddecator | not sure what micahg wanted you to do | 09:53 |
micahg | lonejack: wanted to see if a clean profile helped moon | 09:54 |
lonejack | micahg, this is a test, ok: what U prefer: Install it doing click or synaptic? | 09:54 |
micahg | lonejack: either | 09:55 |
* micahg needs to go to sleep though, so catch me later with the results | 09:55 | |
lonejack | ok, direct download first. | 09:57 |
lonejack | micahg, it works | 09:59 |
ddecator | lonejack: that means that there is likely an add-on or a setting on your default profile causing the issue | 10:00 |
* ddecator would guess an add-on | 10:00 | |
ddecator | lonejack: if you run "firefox -ProfileManager" again, you can select your normal profile again, then disable your add-ons one at a time to see which one(s) is/are conflicting with moon | 10:02 |
lonejack | Ok. but before I prefer to try to install the plugin from synpatic... | 10:06 |
ddecator | ok. i'm not sure if the version in synaptic is the latest stable they have on their site.. | 10:07 |
ddecator | you said you're running 9.10? | 10:07 |
lonejack | yes | 10:08 |
lonejack | it doesn't work | 10:09 |
ddecator | karmic is still using 1.0.1, yes? | 10:09 |
lonejack | forthermor the moonlight(after synaptic installation) isn't shown in the FF extension... | 10:10 |
ddecator | the synaptic one should show up under plugins as silverlight | 10:10 |
lonejack | 1.0.1, right | 10:10 |
ddecator | so 2.x works, just not the 1.0.1 in the repo | 10:11 |
lonejack | from synaptic I installed libmoon,moonlight-pligin-core/mozilla | 10:12 |
lonejack | but on FF extension isn't shown | 10:12 |
ddecator | do you see silverlight under FF plugins? | 10:12 |
ddecator | or it might say moonlight, i can't remember for sure. but the synatpic one should be under FF plugins | 10:14 |
lonejack | ok, now I undestand what you mean. When I installed the 2.2 from downlonad the moonlight was appearing on the extensions, instead now it appear as Silverlight plugin... | 10:15 |
ddecator | right. from website = extension. from synaptic = plugin. | 10:15 |
ddecator | moonlight 2.2 is in lucid already | 10:16 |
ddecator | for karmic, you can continue to use the version from the site | 10:16 |
lonejack | Ok. Now I've SL plugin installed but on the site I'm looking "please install ML.." | 10:16 |
ddecator | right, the one from synaptic is outdated and doesn't seem to work right | 10:17 |
lonejack | So it seems that on the next UBUNTU version (probably) it should work... | 10:17 |
ddecator | -should-, but according to micah there are reports of it not working for some people with FF 3.6 and 3.7 | 10:18 |
ddecator | but that might be due to moonlight being behind silverlight, so it can't handle everything | 10:19 |
micahg | ddecator: more likely an issue with the migration to xul192 | 10:19 |
lonejack | is a nightmare... | 10:19 |
* micahg is out for real now | 10:19 | |
ddecator | whoa | 10:19 |
ddecator | well there's your answer, haha | 10:20 |
lonejack | ddecator, thank you very much for your help!!! | 10:20 |
ddecator | lonejack: np =) | 10:20 |
lonejack | So have you a good sunday... | 10:21 |
lonejack | bye | 10:21 |
ddecator | you too, cya | 10:21 |
* cwillu gets out a stick and prepares to pokes asac with it | 14:04 | |
asac | cwillu_at_work: ho | 14:05 |
asac | whats up? | 14:05 |
cwillu | finally got a root image booting up | 14:06 |
cwillu | haven't tried the karmic's stock firefox yet, but my 3.5.3 rebuild shows scrollbars on gmaps | 14:06 |
cwillu | and also by virtue of not having tried karmic's stock firefox, I haven't done a proper a/b test between the rebuild with the bitdepth patch, but the rebuild sure as hell feels alot faster | 14:07 |
cwillu | i.e., it feels responsive while scrolling a page of text, | 14:08 |
cwillu | I'm heading off to work in an hour or so, and then I'll poke you for real :p | 14:08 |
jdstrand | asac: good morning/afternoon | 14:10 |
jdstrand | chrisccoulson_: good morning/afternoon | 14:11 |
jdstrand | asac, chrisccoulson_: so, what's the verdict? | 14:11 |
asac | chrisccoulson_: there? | 14:26 |
asac | chrisccoulson_: whats your eval? is the P.*FromOrigin Function broken and doesnt check if a link exists? | 14:26 |
asac | chrisccoulson_: so what we should do before droppin the links is checkkng the binary extensions like traybiff and enigmail if they link against the .0d thing | 14:38 |
=== skipper_ is now known as bdrung | ||
cwillu_at_work | asac, firebug shows the extra scrollbars in its ui | 15:11 |
cwillu_at_work | asac, overflow: hidden seems to trigger an separate scrollbar | 15:12 |
cwillu_at_work | asac, that's odd: in firebug on a bugger element: background: url(...image) no-repeat scroll 0 0; | 15:18 |
cwillu_at_work | if I remove scroll, it pops back in | 15:18 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: yeah-. | 15:18 |
asac | feels odd | 15:18 |
cwillu_at_work | hmm, does the same thing on my desktop | 15:19 |
asac | on your desktop you get a scrollbar? | 15:20 |
cwillu_at_work | no | 15:20 |
cwillu_at_work | but the same behaviour of it popping back in after I delete it | 15:20 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: you said you see the same in chrome? | 15:20 |
asac | or just html? | 15:20 |
cwillu_at_work | firebug had an extra scrollbar, yes | 15:20 |
asac | hmm. | 15:20 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: what element is that? | 15:21 |
asac | hmm. mxr is slow | 15:21 |
cwillu_at_work | the html tab | 15:21 |
cwillu_at_work | it went away at some point, not sure when | 15:21 |
asac | jdstrand: ok so ... did chris upload that to -security ppa? | 15:21 |
asac | otherwise let me do and then test | 15:21 |
asac | in hardy thats reproducible right? | 15:22 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: ok. the tab could be a valid one? | 15:22 |
jdstrand | asac: there is no new tbird in ppa | 15:22 |
cwillu_at_work | don't believe so | 15:22 |
jdstrand | asac: the version of nss is still 3.12.6-0ubuntu0.9.10.2 | 15:22 |
jdstrand | asac: ie, the one with the fips cleanup | 15:23 |
asac | kk | 15:23 |
asac | i was talking about tbird | 15:23 |
asac | jdstrand: thats hardy to karmic? | 15:23 |
jdstrand | asac: karmic. hardy-jaunty didn't get a new nss | 15:23 |
asac | kk | 15:24 |
jdstrand | asac: and presumably lucid | 15:24 |
jdstrand | asac: though it has tbird 3 so I don't know | 15:24 |
asac | jdstrand: do you have the tbird bug id at hand` | 15:25 |
asac | ? | 15:25 |
jdstrand | asac: 559918 | 15:25 |
asac | jdstrand: lucid is a new branch. that hasnt the problem | 15:25 |
jdstrand | cool | 15:25 |
asac | bug 559918 | 15:25 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 559918 in nss "Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d 3.12.6 is installed" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559918 | 15:25 |
jdstrand | that the one | 15:26 |
asac | jdstrand: what heading line should i use in changelog? | 15:28 |
asac | "Regression upload for nss3 security/stability update - USN-910-2" ? | 15:29 |
asac | oh thats the wrong usn ;) | 15:29 |
jdstrand | asac: you don't need a USN. | 15:29 |
jdstrand | asac: how about "Regression upload for recent nss3 security/stability update" | 15:30 |
jdstrand | asac: with the LP number | 15:30 |
asac | i just skipped it | 15:31 |
asac | oh i failed | 15:31 |
asac | so let me use that | 15:31 |
asac | ' * fix LP: #559918 - Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d > 3.12.6 is installed; we drop the dangling .so.0d links that became obsolete when we moved to non-versioned SONAMES for nss3 and nspr4 - update debian/thunderbird.links' --fixes 'lp:559918' | 15:32 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 559918 in nss "Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d 3.12.6 is installed" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559918 | 15:32 |
asac | thats what it is now ;) | 15:32 |
jdstrand | asac: excellent | 15:32 |
asac | http://pastebin.com/7jzH2U0a | 15:33 |
jdstrand | asac: huge thanks :) | 15:33 |
asac | thats the diff | 15:33 |
asac | heh. not too early | 15:33 |
asac | lets first get this properly tested ;) | 15:33 |
asac | (and built) | 15:33 |
jdstrand | :) | 15:33 |
* asac found he doesnt have the right orig ,) | 15:33 | |
* asac goes for launchpad | 15:34 | |
asac | so ... killing my decades old irc server from my internal net made my normal bandwith go up ;) | 15:34 |
asac | get 1.2M/s now when downloading from lp | 15:35 |
jdstrand | heheh | 15:35 |
asac | i replaced it with mini 10 with poulsbo chip ;) | 15:36 |
asac | let me screen the recent tbird bug noise quick | 15:37 |
asac | bug 559923 | 15:37 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 559923 in thunderbird "package thunderbird 2.0.0.23 build1 nobinonly-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/thunderbird', which is also in package thunderbird-mozilla-build 0:3.0.4-0ubuntu1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559923 | 15:37 |
asac | hmm | 15:37 |
asac | is that a moz build? | 15:37 |
asac | or some random guy? | 15:37 |
jdstrand | I've confirmed that the nss upload fixes fips. another guy confirmed performing the debian/rules stuff manually on libnssdbm3.so fixes it | 15:39 |
jdstrand | I'm going to upload that | 15:39 |
jdstrand | err... publish that | 15:39 |
asac | yeah. missing .chk should be safe | 15:40 |
asac | if we see and improvement somewhere its probably and improvement for everyone ;) | 15:40 |
jdstrand | chrisccoulson_ also tested it and said it worked | 15:40 |
asac | goodie | 15:41 |
* asac pushes now | 15:41 | |
asac | well in two seconds ;) | 15:41 |
asac | [PPA ubuntu-mozilla-security] [ubuntu/karmic] thunderbird 2.0.0.24+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.2 (Accepted) | 15:52 |
cwillu_at_work | asac, further testing will have to wait an hour or two, my sd card just self-destructed | 15:56 |
cwillu_at_work | protip: don't buy surplus intelligence agency storage devices, they're not a bargain | 15:56 |
jdstrand | asac: looks like i386 is queued to start in an hour. amd64 is building now. I'm going to go afk for a while | 15:58 |
jdstrand | nss is pocket copied, and I'm just waiting on the publisher to finish before I publish nss SUN-927-2 | 15:59 |
jdstrand | s/SUN/USN/ | 15:59 |
asac | SUN ;) | 16:00 |
asac | enjoy | 16:00 |
asac | 09:25 < ogra> asac, same image as mentioned on friday ... http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/lucid-netbook-armel+omap.img | 16:01 |
asac | oops | 16:01 |
asac | ;) | 16:01 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: ^^^ | 16:01 |
asac | you can try that image ;) | 16:01 |
cwillu_at_work | the image isn't the problem :p | 16:01 |
asac | but tats lucid ;) | 16:02 |
asac | just for next time ... | 16:02 |
micahg | asac: can you look at the pyxpcom bug to see if sugar really needs it | 16:02 |
cwillu_at_work | I'm writing two new cards right now | 16:03 |
cwillu_at_work | and it's hard for me to express how little javascript performance matters to me before I can scroll the screen at better than 5 fps :p | 16:03 |
asac | micahg: i am sure sugar needs it for some parts | 16:04 |
micahg | asac: so the question is do we get sugar in archive for Lucid? | 16:04 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: well. do what you want. i would just suggest to use most recent stuff | 16:04 |
cwillu_at_work | duh :p | 16:05 |
asac | micahg: you mean: are we ok to drop it ? | 16:05 |
asac | i assume its in | 16:05 |
cwillu_at_work | but I'm only going to change one thing at a time | 16:05 |
micahg | asac: no, it's out ATM because it can't be built | 16:05 |
asac | thats fine then imo | 16:05 |
cwillu_at_work | it's gonna be a few months before we release anything on top of lucid anyway | 16:05 |
asac | cwillu_at_work: kk. what are you working on if i might ask? | 16:06 |
asac | or secret sauce ;)? | 16:06 |
micahg | asac: ScottK wanted to get some version of sugar in for Edubuntu | 16:07 |
cwillu_at_work | industrial hci | 16:07 |
cwillu_at_work | applied real-time-strategy games, basically :p | 16:07 |
asac | nice ;) | 16:07 |
cwillu_at_work | I'm actually planning an isometric system overview screen later this year :) | 16:08 |
asac | micahg: do you understand what pyxcpom is needed for exactly? | 16:08 |
micahg | asac: I think they use it for their web browser | 16:08 |
micahg | asac: not exactly, I can try to track down one of the maintainers | 16:09 |
asac | yeah | 16:09 |
asac | that would probably be ok | 16:09 |
micahg | asac: does that mean we should try to get it in? | 16:10 |
asac | no | 16:11 |
asac | first understanding what the are using it for | 16:11 |
micahg | asac: ok | 16:11 |
asac | and if they can stop doing that ;) | 16:11 |
asac | (if its risky) | 16:11 |
micahg | lfaraone: are you familiar with Sugar's usage of python-xpcom? | 16:13 |
micahg | asac: BTW, fennec and prism built for Hardy :) | 16:14 |
micahg | asac: on another note, not really sure about IPC in 3.6.4 | 16:15 |
lfaraone | micahg: yes, it's depended on by hulahop iirc. | 16:15 |
micahg | lfaraone: is there a way around it? | 16:15 |
lfaraone | micahg: well, the Browse activity is a Python + GTK wrapper around it. | 16:15 |
micahg | lfaraone: can we use python-gtkmozembed? | 16:16 |
lfaraone | micahg: I don't think so. Hulahop gives access to the whole xpcom API to its clients, and I think Browse uses more than gtkmozembed provides. | 16:17 |
lfaraone | I'll check with upstream. | 16:17 |
micahg | lfaraone: ok, thanks, please let us know | 16:18 |
micahg | asac: I don't think we should have IPC on the release CD if we can avoid it | 16:18 |
lfaraone | micahg: from a cursory reading of http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/mainline/blobs/master/browser.py ( a small component of Browse :)), it looks like that is the case, unfortunately. | 16:22 |
micahg | asac: ^^^ | 16:22 |
lfaraone | micahg: if I had a month to rewrite it, and a few years more PyGTK experience, I might be able to write a reduced-functionality version which accomplishes the same thing, but final freeze is shortly approaching. | 16:24 |
asac | lfaraone: micahg: is that "just" one package requiring it? | 16:28 |
micahg | asac: it seems to be one package that uses it and the otehrs depend on it | 16:29 |
asac | maybe that packag ecan build in-source pyxpcom or something? | 16:32 |
asac | usually upstreams already include that in their tree | 16:32 |
asac | micahg: lfaraone ? | 16:32 |
micahg | will be back in an hour | 16:35 |
lfaraone | asac: sorry. Uh, sure, we could embed pyxpcom in hulahop, but pyxpcom will need to be rebuilt (I think) whenever there's a change to xulrunner. | 16:44 |
lfaraone | ++-+- | 16:46 |
lfaraone | ~. | 16:47 |
lfaraone | . | 16:47 |
cwillu_at_work | hunspell or myspell? | 16:47 |
lfaraone | asac: is it not feasible to enable building pyxpcom in xulrunner? I think debian's xulrunner has it. | 17:25 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
jdstrand | asac, chrisccoulson_: fyi-- just tested tbird on amd64 and it works fine. I can connect using pop3s with libnss3-0d installed. with old version I could not. | 18:20 |
jdstrand | asac, chrisccoulson_: see my comment in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss/+bug/559918/comments/13 | 18:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 559918 in thunderbird "Thunderbird cannot initialize the security component when libnss3-0d 3.12.6 is installed" [High,Fix committed] | 18:21 |
jdstrand | asac, chrisccoulson_: waiting on armel, i386 and ia64 to finish building (all have started) | 18:22 |
* jdstrand -> afk for a bit | 18:22 | |
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_snack | ||
micahg | asac: just wondering why you used source format 3 for enigmail | 19:01 |
bdrung | micahg: because it's great ;) | 19:01 |
micahg | bdrung: we're going to need to backport it though | 19:02 |
bdrung | not good | 19:02 |
micahg | bdrung: which, source format 3 or the need to backport? | 19:03 |
bdrung | micahg: the combination: the need to backport a 3.0 (quilt) formatted package | 19:03 |
micahg | bdrung: that's why we can | 19:09 |
micahg | 't migrate the mozilla stack to 3.0 | 19:09 |
fta | micahg, fyi, per doko's request, i've suspended all the dailies | 19:09 |
micahg | fta: oh, so his rebuild can finish? | 19:09 |
fta | yep | 19:09 |
micahg | fta: how long? | 19:10 |
fta | until it's done :P | 19:10 |
micahg | fta: would we be able to do just firefox once I figure out why IPC doesn't work? | 19:10 |
fta | should be ok | 19:11 |
micahg | fta: ok, thanks, I'll let you know | 19:11 |
micahg | lfaraone: pyxpcom is a different upstream source now | 19:15 |
=== BUGabundo_snack is now known as BUGabundo | ||
BUGabundo | wow | 19:46 |
BUGabundo | fta: chromium is *eating* http:// from the URL bar | 19:46 |
LLStarks | hey guys, would a text area input bug be filed under "form controls"? | 20:39 |
gavin | are you asking about bugzilla.m.o ? | 20:40 |
LLStarks | yah | 20:40 |
gavin | it depends. what's the bug? | 20:40 |
LLStarks | text areas only work 25% of the time with 3.7 nightlies | 20:40 |
LLStarks | sometimes you need to click or type elsewhere first | 20:40 |
LLStarks | ridiculously annoying | 20:41 |
LLStarks | if you use message boards | 20:41 |
gavin | does it happen for all textareas or only specific ones? | 20:43 |
gavin | is it a recent regression? | 20:43 |
micahg | it sounds familiar for some reason | 20:44 |
LLStarks | gavin, i really don't know how to distinguish text areas | 20:44 |
LLStarks | for example, ubuntuforums is affected | 20:44 |
gavin | well, I mean does it happen on multiple sites, or just ubuntuforums? | 20:44 |
LLStarks | a lot of sites | 20:44 |
LLStarks | with message boards | 20:45 |
gavin | do those sites use the same message board software? | 20:45 |
LLStarks | doesn't matter if phpbb, smf, vb, etc | 20:45 |
gavin | ok | 20:45 |
LLStarks | micahg, i've brought it up before, never bothered to file a bug yet. | 20:45 |
micahg | LLStarks: ah, that's why | 20:46 |
micahg | LLStarks: does it happen with upstream builds? | 20:46 |
LLStarks | latest nightlies | 20:46 |
LLStarks | has been like this for a week or two | 20:47 |
LLStarks | haven't tested outside of umd | 20:47 |
gavin | go ahead and file it in Core : General | 20:47 |
gavin | if yo can find a 1-day regression range using nightlies, that'd be perfect | 20:47 |
micahg | LLStarks: that's why I asked if upstream builds were affected | 20:47 |
LLStarks | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.3a4pre) Gecko/20100407 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.7a4pre - Build ID: 20100331033712 | 20:48 |
gavin | feel free to CC me too (gavin.sharp) | 20:48 |
LLStarks | what do i regress against? xulrunner 1.9.3? | 20:48 |
LLStarks | or better yet, what's that site that lists changes for zeroing in for regression testing | 20:49 |
gavin | not sure what you mean - I assumed by "latest nightlies" you meant "latest mozilla.org firefox nightlies" | 20:49 |
LLStarks | i remember it being a mercurial site | 20:49 |
gavin | https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ | 20:49 |
LLStarks | bingo | 20:49 |
LLStarks | thanks | 20:49 |
gavin | if you get the changeset IDs from the relevant builds using about:buildconfig, you can enter them into http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=1b944ebb5ca6&tochange=35059e8e8ce8 | 20:49 |
gavin | to get a list of changes between the two builds | 20:49 |
LLStarks | what would be some keywords to search for? | 20:50 |
LLStarks | gavin, how can get older mozilla-central build? | 20:52 |
LLStarks | *builds | 20:52 |
LLStarks | *can i | 20:52 |
gavin | http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/ | 20:52 |
gavin | (the mozilla-central ones) | 20:52 |
LLStarks | thanks again | 20:53 |
LLStarks | window is shrinking | 21:01 |
LLStarks | tedious and fun | 21:01 |
LLStarks | damnit. this is harder than i though. as soon i think i've cornered the bug, it pops in the build i think is pre-regression | 21:11 |
micahg | asac: ping | 21:15 |
bdrung | asac: ping (too) | 21:16 |
* micahg waits for asac_the_second to pop in :) | 21:16 | |
bdrung | let's clone him. then everyone can have his own asac ;) | 21:17 |
LLStarks | gavin: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=2cc5ad2cf917&tochange=5108c4c2c043 | 21:22 |
bdrung | asac: https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/ubufox/m-d-0.21/+merge/22973 | 21:23 |
LLStarks | do i have to go commit-by-commit for further drill down? | 21:23 |
LLStarks | jeez. these tinderbox builds are huge. | 21:26 |
LLStarks | 80mb+ | 21:26 |
LLStarks | i have a hunch that the textarea focus commit is the culprit | 21:28 |
micahg | LLStarks: there are several in that range | 21:28 |
LLStarks | where can i get commit binaries? | 21:29 |
LLStarks | the gzip i dl'ed is source | 21:29 |
LLStarks | at least we have a good range | 21:30 |
=== BUGabundo is now known as tellari | ||
=== tellari is now known as BUGabundo | ||
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_dinner | ||
gavin | LLStarks: yeah, I would suspect one of ehsan's changes | 22:04 |
gavin | CC him on your bug? | 22:04 |
gavin | :ehsan | 22:04 |
LLStarks | ah | 22:06 |
LLStarks | you suspect the focus one too? | 22:06 |
LLStarks | cork and i figured as much | 22:06 |
jdstrand | asac, chrisccoulson: unless you guys object, I am going to be publishing USN 927-3 for tbird within the next few minutes | 22:08 |
chrisccoulson | jdstrand, i'm ok with that | 22:09 |
=== BUGabundo_dinner is now known as BUGabundo | ||
jdstrand | cool | 22:10 |
asac | jdstrand: bug reporter confirmed the fix? | 22:10 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: BTW, asac said we can drop noscript as it's a target that moves too quickly | 22:10 |
asac | yes | 22:10 |
chrisccoulson | micahg - ok, thanks. i will get that removed tomorrow | 22:10 |
micahg | asac: what to do about sugar? | 22:10 |
jdstrand | asac: I confirmed it. the bug reporters all just removed libnss3-0d and went on their way | 22:11 |
chrisccoulson | jdstrand - thanks for sorting it btw | 22:11 |
jdstrand | asac: if it were my original update, I would publish | 22:11 |
jdstrand | ie, I am satisfied it is fixed | 22:12 |
asac | k | 22:12 |
jdstrand | chrisccoulson: sure, though you should really be thanking asac :) | 22:12 |
asac | e? | 22:12 |
asac | me? | 22:12 |
chrisccoulson | thanks asac too :) | 22:12 |
asac | didnt do much ;) | 22:12 |
asac | micahg: i dont know | 22:12 |
jdstrand | I just kind of pushed the bug along :) | 22:12 |
chrisccoulson | i took my laptop out with me today, but ended up not being able to get 3G coverage, else i would have helped push it along today | 22:13 |
asac | heh | 22:13 |
asac | 3g | 22:13 |
jdstrand | no worries | 22:13 |
asac | micahg: in the end its chrisccoulson's call. imo its too late to add something like the pyxpcom | 22:13 |
chrisccoulson | asac - yeah, i thought i'd give my 3G dongle some proper use, but i ended up in an area with no coverage :( | 22:13 |
chrisccoulson | else i would have been around much earlier ;) | 22:14 |
jdstrand | heheh | 22:14 |
asac | micahg: whats the package that requires it? | 22:14 |
micahg | asac: sugar-hulahop which has some other sugar packages depending on it | 22:15 |
chrisccoulson | micahg / asac - i agree, it's too late to be working on introducing new packages now, we already have enough to be working on to get lucid in to shape | 22:15 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: the problem is sugar is useless w/out it | 22:15 |
* micahg is trying to get vlc sorted out with upstream xul192 fixes along with galeon in haryd | 22:16 | |
micahg | *haryd | 22:16 |
micahg | *hardy | 22:16 |
LLStarks | micahg, do any of the umd packages lorentz code? | 22:19 |
LLStarks | *contai | 22:19 |
LLStarks | **contain | 22:19 |
micahg | LLStarks: both should | 22:21 |
LLStarks | 3.6 and 3.7? | 22:21 |
LLStarks | any way i can check? | 22:21 |
micahg | LLStarks: the code seems to be there | 22:22 |
mahfouz | why are there freezes now for 3.6? | 22:38 |
mahfouz | it used to be only for 3.7 | 22:38 |
micahg | mahfouz: lorentz landed on 3.6 | 22:38 |
mahfouz | you mean the dom.ipc stuff? | 22:38 |
micahg | mahfouz: I suggest switching to firefox-stable | 22:38 |
micahg | mahfouz: yes | 22:38 |
mahfouz | ah, i see | 22:39 |
mahfouz | yeah, I can work around it | 22:39 |
mahfouz | was just wondering | 22:39 |
micahg | mahfouz: we'll probably have a call for testing later this month once we figure out why we're crashing and upstream isn't for 3.6 | 22:39 |
micahg | asac: do you remember why you uploaded thunderbird locales w/out an orig.tar.gz? is that because it's not released upstream like that? | 22:45 |
asac | micahg: yeah | 22:45 |
asac | we have all assembled on our own | 22:45 |
micahg | asac: ok, can we do one more upload before releasE? | 22:46 |
asac | probably | 22:46 |
asac | should be before freeze | 22:46 |
skipper_ | asac: i uploaded m-d 0.22 and finished ubufox. please have a look at the later. | 22:47 |
=== skipper_ is now known as bdrung | ||
LLStarks | dammit bindwood | 22:48 |
LLStarks | stop sucking | 22:48 |
micahg | asac: should I prepare an upload in a PPA after I test? | 22:48 |
micahg | LLStarks: BTW, reporters in Bugzilla always get copied | 22:49 |
micahg | LLStarks: assuming you have your prefs set that way | 22:49 |
LLStarks | ? | 22:51 |
micahg | LLStarks: you keep adding yourself to the CC list on your own bugs :) | 22:52 |
LLStarks | oh | 22:52 |
LLStarks | i'm just anal | 22:52 |
bdrung | what is a .jsm file? | 22:52 |
asac | javascript module? | 22:53 |
bdrung | aha | 22:53 |
bdrung | i wonder why /usr/share/xul-ext/bindwood/modules/bindwood.jsm must be executable | 22:54 |
LLStarks | what is m-d? | 22:55 |
bdrung | LLStarks: mozilla-devscripts | 22:55 |
bdrung | *the* tool for packaging xul extensions | 22:56 |
chrisccoulson | bdrung - it shouldn't, that's my mistake ;) | 22:58 |
chrisccoulson | couchdb_env.sh needs to be executable | 22:58 |
bdrung | chrisccoulson: m-d makes couchdb_env.sh executable automatically | 23:06 |
chrisccoulson | bdrung - ok. i still need to keep that patch i added though to stop it from changing permissions at run-time | 23:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!