/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/04/14/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

akgranerapw, getting ready to look at the kernel now - I had a talk tonight 6 hour drive round trip and the meeting lasted 2.5 hours :-(04:56
jjohansenouch04:57
EruditeHermithello, is there a way to build kernels and only have make build modules that have changed/been patched?05:59
EruditeHermitI am currently using these instructions06:03
EruditeHermithttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/GitKernelBuild06:03
EruditeHermitis there a better way?06:03
=== amitk-afk is now known as amitk
akgranerapw, ping09:27
apwakgraner, hi09:29
akgranerso I installed the Kernel and haven't had any heat issues09:30
akgraneris there anything you need me to run to stress the CPU more - I have noticed though I don't hear the fans as much but that could just be me09:31
apwif your tem stays arround 45 then all is good09:33
apwthough that patch still breaks mac books, so we still don't have it in the lucid kernel ... grrr09:33
akgranerapw, alrighty - I'll keep my eyes open and watch that  - but I haven't gotten above 48 in the last few hours09:37
apwakgraner, perfect thanks ... i'll let you know when i have something more to test, likely after freeze now09:38
apwand we'll have to ram the fix through the freeze if we are allowed09:38
akgranerapw cool  - just let me know what if anything you will need from me :-)  I help where I can!  Thanks again!!09:40
mdzJFo: I have confirmed bug 535315, which seems to have a stack of duplicates10:35
ubot3Malone bug 535315 in linux "WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/sched/sch_generic.c:261 dev_watchdog+0x262/0x270()" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53531510:35
=== jussi01 is now known as jussi
JFomdz, thanks :)13:38
JFoI have seen several similar ones with a lot of duplicates too13:39
JFoone in particular from the last 48 hours is an ath9k issue13:39
JFoit is now on my list for review13:41
mdzJFo: thanks14:29
JFomy pleasure mdz14:29
=== ricotz is now known as ricotz_
=== ricotz_ is now known as ricotz
reficso.. um.. where are the headers-*_all -packages from latest mainline builds?15:00
JForefic, I don't know what you mean. I have just looked and they are all there15:06
JFoin fact, I am looking now15:06
reficI must be blind then15:08
JFoah wait15:08
JFoI am misreading your statement15:08
JFoyou are looking for the _all.deb I was thinking header...deb15:08
JFosorry15:08
reficyeah :)15:08
JFo:)15:09
reficnp, good to know I'm not blind after all15:09
JFono, they are gone15:09
JFoapw, any reason we no longer have _all.deb in the Kernel PPA?15:10
JFoI vaguely recall a conversation about it, but I can't recall now the reason15:10
JFobug 562742 your bug refic?15:12
ubot3Malone bug 562742 in linux "r8169 ethernet MAC address changes in 2.6.32 kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56274215:12
JFogrrr, wrong bug number15:12
JFothat is what I get for trying to type it in15:13
JFooh, err looking at the wrong bug too.15:13
JFobug 56289915:13
ubot3Malone bug 562899 in linux "linux-headers-*_all.deb is missing on latest mainline builds" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56289915:13
JFothat one ^15:13
reficnope, just found it15:14
JFoiirc there was some issue building them or some such. I just can't remember15:15
JFowe will find out refic 15:15
reficgreat, thanks15:16
JFonp15:17
gnomefreakwhy is it saying that "linux is not a genuine package" when i try to report a bug?15:20
gnomefreakLucid15:21
mdzgnomefreak: I believe there are cases where that actually means "you aren't running the latest kernel"15:23
gnomefreakah yes because i cant15:23
mdzI don't think apport can tell the difference between an obsolete package and a non-Ubuntu package15:23
gnomefreak2.6.32-20-generic is broken15:24
mdzgnomefreak: I believe you can override it by editing the problem report in /var/crash15:27
mdztry deleting the UnreportableReason line15:27
gnomefreakmdz: thanks15:27
mdzJFo: it might be worth looking into the issue gnomefreak mentioned, since it's quite common with the kernel (due to its changing package name)15:27
JFognomefreak, when did you update?15:27
JFomdz, I agree15:28
JFoI think he may be suffering from the issue we worked yesterday15:28
gnomefreakJ a little while ago but that is first time in a week 15:28
JFognomefreak, hmmm15:28
JFoare you able to boot at all gnomefreak?15:28
gnomefreakJFo: i get plymouth but gdm never loads15:29
JFognomefreak, ok, thanks15:29
gnomefreakdumped into TTY15:29
JFohmm15:29
mdzJFo: the problem is: user tries to boot x.y.z-2, it fails, so they boot back to x.y.z-1, and then can't report the bug15:32
mdz(and they get a confusing error)15:32
gnomefreakmdz: i dont have a crawsh report for this issue15:32
mdzgnomefreak: ah, of course15:38
mdzgnomefreak: in that case, maybe you could report the bug using a browser, and then run apport-collect to add the details15:39
gnomefreakmdz: i will do it in a minute, thanks15:39
JFomdz, I have added the kernel reporting issue to my notes for our next meeting15:41
ograhmm, whats the kernel-img.conf option i need to make the kernel postinst create links in / ?15:41
JFoI'll bring it up before then, but we will discuss specifically at the meeting15:41
mdzJFo: thanks. if you can work out what the correct behavior should be, it should be possible to fix it in apport15:42
JFognomefreak, just let me know the bug number once you have it15:42
JFomdz, I agree. I'll rely on ogasawara's experience with apport. i'm still new to the tool15:43
gnomefreakJFo: will do. you want a bug for apport reporting and the gdm not loading?15:44
JFognomefreak, actually yes, if you don't mind15:45
gnomefreakJFo: not at all15:45
JFothanks15:45
apwBug #54674315:48
ubot3Malone bug 546743 in linux "Blank screen at first boot with ATI ES1000 and 10.04 server" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54674315:48
ograsigh, is there any way to tell the kernel package to not create a backup link for the old kernel ? 15:49
mdzogra: man kernel-img.conf15:50
ogramdz, which package is that in ? i dont seem to have it 15:50
ogra(was indeed the first i tried before asking :) )15:50
mjg59ES1000 with KMS is generally miserable15:50
mdzogra: kernel-package15:50
ograah15:50
mjg59It's a horrible part with all kinds of random quirks in the DDX15:51
* ogra somehow needs to convince the kernel to be installable in vfat /boot 15:51
JFobrb, rebooting15:52
ograhrm, no option that helps me to avoid the linking of backup kernels :/15:54
apwogra, what stops it being so installable15:54
ogradpkg: error processing /linux-image-2.6.33-500-omap_2.6.33-500.5_armel.deb (--install):15:54
ogra unable to make backup link of `./boot/vmlinuz-2.6.33-500-omap' before installing new version: Operation not permitted15:54
ograapw, if it would mv instead of linking that would solve it15:55
mdzapw: vfat doesn't support symlinks15:55
mdzor hardlinks for that matter15:55
mdzogra: I thought you were talking about something else15:55
apwseems unusual to want to do that15:55
ogramdz, no, i'm trying to get omap working 15:55
mdzogra: that's not the maintainer script; that's dpkg itself15:55
ograoh15:56
apwmost systems which need to use FAT too contain their bootable kernels15:56
apwinstall them into a normal /boot and then cp them into the fat at 'flash' time15:56
mdzyes, I think a vfat /boot is perhaps not the best solution15:56
apwogra, yeah thats dpkg ... i doubt that is ever going to work15:57
ograhmm15:57
apwon efi systems i used to work on they mounted the efi /boot thingy onto /boot/efi and did magic to get them into there at 'grub-install' type time15:57
mdzdpkg needs to do that in order to safely replace the file15:57
ograwell, sadly kernel-img.conf preinst_hook seems deprecated 15:58
ograelse that could call something that mv's 15:59
mdzI don't think it will help you anyway15:59
ograeffectively the vmlinuz file is never used anyway15:59
ogramdz, if i manually mv it i can dpkg -i linux-image-...15:59
mdzogra: then why do you need a vfat partition?15:59
ograthe only prob is that its a link 15:59
mdzogra: yes, but if you mv it, you are reintroducing the race condition that dpkg is trying to avoid16:00
ogramdz, because u-boot on beagle doesnt support any other FS16:00
ograit needs to read uImage from a vfat partition ... 16:00
mdzogra: surely it's using the vmlinuz file though?16:00
ograand that also needs to essentially be the first one on the SD16:00
ogracurrently its using nothing ... i havent written the flash-kernel code for that yet 16:01
mdzogra: it sounds to me like you just want to mount your vfat partition somewhere other than /boot16:01
ograbut by default it treis to run boot.scr which in turn loads uImage16:01
apwogra, so why can't we mount that on /boot/efi; cp uImage* /boot/efi; umount /boot/efi as part of the flash part16:01
ogramdz, and copy uImage there ? 16:01
mdzas apw says16:01
ograwell, we surely can 16:01
apws/efi/something sane/16:01
ograuboot 16:01
mdzor even leave it mounted, and just copy as needed16:01
ogranow i'm scared ... that requires a partman module ...16:02
ogranot what i was hoping for last minute before freeze :)16:02
ograbut yes, that sounds very sane 16:02
gnomefreakJFo: bug 563094 and bug 56310216:12
ubot3Malone bug 563094 in linux "unable to report a "linux" bug using ubuntu-bug" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56309416:12
ubot3Malone bug 563102 in linux "Unable to get any GUI other than Plymouth" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56310216:12
JFothanks gnomefreak 16:15
gnomefreakJFo: np16:15
apwbug #54220816:18
ubot3Malone bug 542208 in linux "Please blacklist i830 from Kernel mode-setting" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54220816:18
amitkapw: around?17:18
apwamitk, 17:27
amitkapw: fsl-imx51 has control-scripts directory inside debian.fsl-imx51 with all the prerm/postrm, etc. Should it? mvl and ti don't.17:30
apwamitk, yes, cause its 'old-school' 2.6.31 way of doing things17:31
apwmvl and ti are both new-school and share one17:31
apwamitk, thats on my radar for 'soon' as i want to pull back the new debian abstraction to karmic and thus to the .31 branches17:31
amitkaah, keep forgetting17:31
apwyeah its a nightmare and one reason i want to roll it back ... so it _is_ the same and not confusing17:32
hggdhjjohansen: still getting the oops on -21.3118:11
jjohansenhggdh: :(18:11
hggdhjjohansen: want me to run a mailine?18:12
jjohansenhggdh: sure18:12
hggdhjjohansen: which one? Any prefs?18:12
jjohansenhggdh: not at the moment18:12
hggdhjjohansen: will go to the latest 2.26.33, then. 2.26.34 would not even boot on my machine18:13
jjohansenhggdh: actually it would be good to try 32 and 3318:13
hggdhjjohansen: OK. latest .32 and latest .3318:14
jjohansenyes please18:14
hggdhwill do18:14
JFobug 56315618:22
ubot3Malone bug 563156 in linux "laptop runs hot, shorter battery life, fan always on - lucid beta2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56315618:22
johanbrthe mainline headers build still looks broken18:27
johanbrlinux-headers-2.6.34-020634rc4-generic depends on linux-headers-2.6.34-020634rc418:27
johanbrand the latter doesn't exist18:27
hggdhjjohansen: 2.6.32-11-lucid does not install the headers, missing a package18:29
jjohansenhggdh: hrrmm, okay I'm not sure what is up there will have to poke what of 2.6.3318:30
apwyeah some headers are missing from the mainline builds at the mo, not had a chance to look why18:35
apwits on  my list, but its freeze today ... so ... not today18:36
tumbleweedfirmware request: this should be easy enough to fix, the firmware is in gregkh's git repo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50874619:12
ubot3Malone bug 508746 in linux "rtl819xE:request firmware fail!" [Low,Confirmed] 19:12
apwtumbleweed, its 3 hours to freeze its unlikely anything will change before then19:21
tumbleweedapw: yeah, somebody just gave me a laptop to look at that, which was suffering from that bug 5 hours ago :019:30
ubot3tumbleweed: Error: Could not parse data returned by Malone: list index out of range19:30
tumbleweed:)19:30
apwheh19:30
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== BalSak is now known as kern00b
kern00bhi guys. I'm not really a very big kernel expert, so I would rather ask the pro's. I have a box that's presently in production, and I/we had to manually roll in the NIC driver/module. If/when I dist-upgrade the kernel, would I have to manually re-roll the driver into the new kernel, or will it get ported in the upgrade?22:54
jjohansenkern00b: if the new kernel doesn't include the driver you will need to re-roll it23:01
jjohansenthe new kernel may have the driver you need though23:01
jjohansenbasically each kernel gets its own set of modules23:01
kern00bjjohansen: thanks23:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!