[00:08] fta: you know the bug I filed for ctrl+b not opening bookmark tab? [00:08] its now ctrl+shift+b [00:09] I'm telling you, I'm dropping ch [00:09] its wortheless [00:09] they change even more stuff then canonical, and don't care of what we say [00:17] <[reed]> ch == chrome? [00:28] [reed]: yes [00:29] [reed]: this is my most nagging bug right now http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=40865#c18 [00:29] and the bookmark one the is second [00:35] night [01:01] weird... back button doesn't work in Minefield for me. [01:03] working for me =) [01:07] weird... must be one of my extensions. [01:08] ah, it's Tab Mix Plus that was doing it. [01:08] Updating the extension seems to have fixed it. [01:09] the joys of using minefield, haha [01:12] http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=1727175 [01:12] Search box: even if I disable the indexer, from time to time Thunderbird's search box returns to the default "Search everywhere" mode which is annoying. I don't know if they fixed it in 3.01. [01:12] For me, it's not just "from time to time"... it's "every damn time I start thunderbird". [02:04] weird... csr.com is also freezing my browser. [02:07] /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.3a4pre/mozilla-runtime: error while loading shared libraries: libxpcom.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [02:07] http://pastebin.com/SFcUkV4R [02:27] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/513887 [02:27] Launchpad bug 513887 in firefox "Flash, Java, etc. does not work with out of process plugins and causes Firefox to become unresponsive" [High,Triaged] [02:34] mmmmyeah [02:45] /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.3a4pre/mozilla-runtime: error while loading shared libraries: libmozalloc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [02:46] it can't find ANY thing that's in the same xulrunner dir. [02:58] hey asac, why do self-compiled and tarball'd firefox builds have such terrible subpixel and hinting? [02:59] umd seems to be the only build environment getting things right [02:59] better question, who is at fault? ubuntu or mozilla. [06:53] * micahg is trying to remember if anything was forgotten tonight === dpm-afk is now known as dpm [08:43] the tuggs say Hi [11:17] LLStarks: noone is at fault [11:17] the guy building it [11:17] ;) [12:06] fta: ok enable lucid dailies again for now [12:09] is it? [12:09] * BUGabundo_remote checks [12:18] BUGabundo_remote: is what? the dailies are disabled because doko started a late rebuild ;) [12:18] and wants more builders [12:18] but that isnt really moving forward imo [12:26] bdrung - any joy with stumbleupon licensing? [12:26] chrisccoulson: no [12:26] still no answer [12:27] bdrung - ok, thanks. if we can't resolve it for final freeze, then we should probably consider dropping it :( [12:31] chrisccoulson: whats the dropping status? [12:31] chrisccoulson: can we go and drop whatever isnt ported yet? [12:31] iirc gluezilla needs a sync [12:31] asac - the big one is sugar [12:31] i dont see that moving forward: [12:31] unless someone can find the time to package pyxpcom between now and tomorrow [12:31] a) python-xpcom is unlikely to happen [12:32] b) i dont know if anyone would wnat to add pyxpcom to the package that needs it [12:32] i think sugar should die ;) [12:32] * asac happy that i wont get the whips ;) [12:32] asac - i agree, but i was afraid to take the unpopular decision ;) [12:33] problem is that mozilla decides things for us ... they are the ones that dont want stable APIs/ABIs [12:33] and everyone using them is doomed [12:33] so the compromise is: a) make developers hapy now [12:33] or b) ensure that users dont get regressions in the mniddle of lucid when pyxpcom doesnt work anymore or something [12:33] or c) ensure that users still get security updates [12:34] my heart is bleeding on this since a long time [12:34] its a tough decision. [12:36] it is ;) [12:37] so, i think that the only way forward at the moment then is to drop sugar [12:38] chrisccoulson: right. can we get a list of what we dropped? [12:38] besides extensions that is [12:38] one goal was to reduce the rdepends load on xulrunner [12:38] i want to check if we need to take other unpopular decisions [12:38] problem is that if we dont drop anything else its even harder to communicate ;) [12:39] asac - i'll try and find out what we dropped. i tried to do that yesterday and then realised it's quite difficult to do, as sometimes i just ping pitti about it [12:39] is there anywhere i can check a record of packages that get removed? [12:39] chrisccoulson: good question :( ... [12:39] chrisccoulson: maybe the OP pitti runs produces a log? [12:40] i'll try and find out [12:40] good [12:40] i think we might also want to drop more stuff ... especially that stuff that is working with setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the scripts [12:40] e.g. not properly ported to xpcom glue [12:52] enigmail uploaded [12:52] (with source format 1.0) [13:11] hello asac, just tested enigmail (from your ppa) and the sent messages were copied to the "Sent" folder w/o any problems. [13:11] asac: sorry about the noise [13:14] al-maisan: thanks for following up [13:14] np [13:14] asac: thank you for packaging it :) [13:15] its even in lucid now ;) [13:16] great! [13:19] * al-maisan installs it on his other laptop [15:34] chrisccoulson: I noticed a few bugs that were still open for Lucid, you got a minute? [15:36] * gnomefreak thinks firefox is still broken [15:36] gnomefreak: you'd be correct :) [15:36] at least in the dailies [15:36] yep [15:36] archive version should be good at this point [15:37] * micahg goes off to compile 3.6.4~build1 [15:37] eh i still have 3.7 [15:42] well 3.7 is even more broken goes to useing chromium i guess [15:43] hi micahg [15:43] what sort of bugs? [15:44] hi chrisccoulson [15:44] regression-potential [15:44] bug 533739 [15:44] Launchpad bug 533739 in firefox "ubuntu package search searchengine missing from firefox" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/533739 [15:44] and bug 543064 [15:44] Launchpad bug 543064 in thunderbird "ensure that x-www-browser is used if no http handler is found through gnome integration" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543064 [15:45] micahg - i've not really had time to look at those yet [15:47] chrisccoulson: k, wanted to make sure they were on your radar as you said you were doing uploads today [15:57] micahg - i've not forgotten about them, i've just not really had time to look at them yet [15:57] chrisccoulson: k, that's fine...like I said, just wanted to make sure they're on your radar [16:08] micahg - ok, i'm going to do a firefox upload in a minute. is there anything you want to get in there? [16:09] chrisccoulson: the only thing that I think is left is that Ubuntu search engine bug [16:11] which bug is that? [16:14] chrisccoulson: bug 533739 [16:14] Launchpad bug 533739 in firefox "ubuntu package search searchengine missing from firefox" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/533739 [16:18] chrisccoulson, micahg: were you guys aware that in lucid UNE the firefox icon is the default gnome one (ie, the 'gears') rather than upstream? [16:18] at least it is and has been for me for some time [16:18] jdstrand, no, i wasn't aware of that [16:18] jdstrand: I wasn't aware either [16:19] ok, let me purge and install anew, and I'll file a bug [16:19] 17:18 < asac> anyone has a hotmail account ;) [16:19] 17:18 < asac> whats the url to go to to get to the inbox? [16:19] hotmail? no way man [16:19] :P [16:19] heh [16:19] damn. i hoped security was subscribed to that [16:20] hehe [16:20] micahg - oh, ok. i'm not too concerned about that one. do you think it's worth having? [16:21] chrisccoulson: I used to use it, but there's the LP plugin, so it's not as critical IMHO, I was really wondering if it was by accident or on purpose that it was dropped [16:21] i had a hotmail account but i dont recall login info :( [16:22] i'm not sure if it was dropped by accident or not [16:22] hotmail+thunderbird was never good together [16:27] asac, done (bot) [16:29] fta: nice ;) [16:29] we tweaked the scheduling so rebuilds can get a better share for now [16:29] asac: can we add the thumb2 patch from FF to TB? [16:29] micahg: yes, we should do that [16:30] chrisccoulson: did you do the TB upload yet? [16:30] * asac on a call [16:31] micahg - i've not done it just yet [16:31] chrisccoulson: can you wait until I get the armel patch in? [16:32] micahg - yeah, no problem [16:47] chrisccoulson: ok, thunderbird should be ready now [16:51] micahg - ok, i will look at that when my laptop becomes usable again [17:07] chrisccoulson, micahg: re UNE> local issue. no bug [18:53] chrisccoulson: should we have a firefox-kde metapackage? [18:57] chrisccoulson: asac: any objection for me to do Seamonkey 2 tonight? [18:58] micahg - that's essentially what kmozillahelper already is [18:59] chrisccoulson: well, the problem is people who install firefox from the archive and not kubuntu-firefox-installer doesn't know about kmozillahelper [18:59] well, sort of [18:59] bug 559154 [18:59] Launchpad bug 559154 in firefox "KDE users installing Firefox from archive don't know about kmozillahelper" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559154 [19:04] micahg - we could probably do that, but that can wait until next cycle now. the issue is though that users will still install the firefox package rather than firefox-kde, and will still complain about not having kmozillahelper by default when they install firefox ;) [19:04] much like gnome users install thunderbird without installing thunderbird-gnome-support [19:04] chrisccoulson: k [19:04] chrisccoulson: what about seamonkey? [19:04] micahg - if you have time, then feel free ;) [19:04] * micahg wants to file the FFe if we're going to do it [19:05] we're cutting it a bit fine though... [19:05] chrisccoulson: well, I don't really have time, but I don't see anyone else having time either [19:05] chrisccoulson: otherwise we have to drop it [19:06] yeah, that's why i mentioned dropping it a couple of days ago, but couldn't remember if that had already been discussed or not [19:06] chrisccoulson_: it was as a last result [19:06] chrisccoulson_: if I get the FFe, we have another week to get it in [19:07] well, final freeze is tomorrow [19:07] chrisccoulson_: yes, but I don't think it's seeded anywhere [19:07] that's true, but once we're a few days in to final freeze it will be hard to get anything in, as we need to keep the builders free [19:08] chrisccoulson_: right, but it would give me the weekend if I can't do it tonight [19:09] and if I can get it 95% working, we can push and do an SRU after release for the rest [19:09] ok, i don't mind too much then if you want to work on that [19:09] chrisccoulson_: ok [19:09] chrisccoulson_: I think I'm doing alright on the hardy porting anyways [19:11] micahg - ok, that's good then === dpm is now known as dpm-afk === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:42] chrisccoulson: thanks for the lucid fix for bug #559881 [21:42] Launchpad bug 559881 in nss "libnss3-1d 3.12.6-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 breaks ssl/fips support in firefox" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559881 [21:42] jdstrand - no worries. i will apply the same fix for jaunty xulrunner next === nikolam_ is now known as ninkolam [21:44] chrisccoulson: can we switch back to system NSS/NSPR for firefox 3.6 or is that set already? [21:44] micahg - i don't think we should change that now [21:45] (and this is more aligned with upstream builds anyway) [21:45] doko has a workaround for the icedtea plugin issue [21:46] chrisccoulson: k, so I guess that I can close my bug about it [21:46] micahg - yeah, you can do for now. but, we can revisit that again in maverick if it causes any other issues [21:47] evening 'p [21:47] hi BUGabundo [21:56] micahg - i'm just doing a test build of thunderbird, and then i will get that uploaded [22:07] chrisccoulson: great, thanks === dpm-afk is now known as dpm [23:07] asac: do you want to add AOL mail to desktop-webmail? [23:21] chrisccoulson: who should I set as approver for a blueprint for mozilla team stuff? [23:22] chrisccoulson: I forgot to do a TB-locales update... [23:24] chrisccoulson_: ^^^ [23:25] micahg - i'm not sure about the blueprints. i'll try and find out [23:25] chrisccoulson: if I prepare a TB-locales update, can we still get it in? [23:26] micahg - yeah, we should just be able to get that in still [23:38] chrisccoulson: should be ready in a few minutes [23:39] micahg - thanks [23:42] bdrung: you broke my thunderbird-locales with the mozilla-devscripts updates :P [23:43] micahg: what did i break exactly? [23:43] bdrung: xul-ext path [23:43] bdrung: I'm fixing it... [23:43] micahg: you can set override the path [23:44] bdrung: should I? [23:44] let me check. apt-get source? [23:44] bdrung: is there any risk to throwing the xpis in the new dir? [23:45] micahg: not that i am aware of (we link to this dir) [23:46] bdrung: k, I don't want to break anything on this upload :) [23:47] micahg: wtf? native package? [23:47] bdrung: yeah, debian doesn't have this AFAIK [23:47] but native? [23:47] bdrung: there's no official upstream tarball [23:47] 3.0-0ubuntu2 -> not native [23:48] debuild complains and lintian will complain too [23:48] * micahg didn't touch the old numbering scheme [23:50] micahg: fix it! create a .orig file! [23:51] bdrung: asac said no [23:51] bdrung: that's what I originally did [23:51] micahg: to fix the package you should use the -i directory, --install-dir=directory parameter for install-xpi [23:51] micahg: why? [23:52] bdrung: is that /path/to/extension-folder or /path/to/folder-above? [23:52] bdrung: also, will old mozilla-devscripts ignore the -i option? [23:52] /path/to/extension-folder [23:53] micahg: the old one has this option too (let me check) [23:57] micahg: the parameter exists since version 0.19 [23:58] bdrung: k, thanks [23:58] asac: around? [23:59] micahg: i think thunderbird-locale should stay were they are and not put into xul-ext [23:59] bdrung: k, I made the change