[03:44] <ScottK> slangasek: Thanks to seb128 syncing schroedinger at sabdfl's direction earlier today, we now need a MIR for orc.
[03:45] <slangasek> ScottK: open an incomplete MIR bug, assign it to seb128?
[03:46] <ScottK> Sure.
[03:51] <ScottK> Bug #562735
[10:21] <segler> hi, could somebody help me with a freeze exception? i created a bug report and added the necessary things, but nothing is happening and release is getting closer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox-radio-browser/+bug/544416
[12:07] <segler> hi, could somebody help me with a freeze exception? i created a bug report and added the necessary things, but nothing is happening and release is getting closer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox-radio-browser/+bug/544416
[12:28] <Riddell> slangasek, cjwatson: I don't seem to be able to commit to ~ubuntu-cdimage but https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jr/debian-cd/ubuntu/+merge/23381 will bring in the new Kubuntu logo
[12:46] <cjwatson> Riddell: bzr+ssh://antimony/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/bzr/debian-cd/ is the branch for commits
[12:47] <cjwatson> the ~ubuntu-cdimage one is just a mirror
[12:47] <cjwatson> feel free to commit to antimony
[12:48] <Riddell> aah, thanks, will do
[13:01] <segler> nobody responded, maybe i am at the wrong place, would somebody push me in the right direction?
[13:09] <Riddell> segler: for gnomey stuff probably seb128 can point you in the right direction
[14:32] <james_w> anyone have an opinion on the suitability of https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~arnegoetje/ubuntu/lucid/ttf-indic-fonts/merge-from-sid/+merge/23333 for this point in the release
[14:32] <james_w> I'm not sure what's considered to be a new feature in a font packages
[18:04] <lamont> slangasek: can I have a livecd-rootfs build attempt on acorn pls?
[18:33] <nigelb> epiphany-extensions has a new upstream version.  it is possible to sync this from debian?  since the current epiphany-extensions doesn't work with the current epiphany-browser
[18:39] <nigelb> slangasek, thoughts on ^?
[19:14] <micahg> can I get an FFe ack on bug 461864
[19:21] <slangasek> james_w: there's already been a FFe for the font stuff, bug #535582
[19:23] <slangasek> lamont: running
[19:23] <slangasek> nigelb: epiphany-extensions> yes, that should be possible, please follow FFe process
[19:23] <lamont> slangasek: either that works, or we hurt someone. :-D
[19:24] <nigelb> slangasek, I'm unsure if we need to do it or not :(
[19:25] <nigelb> it seems we're going to end up with some broken package anyway..
[19:25] <slangasek> nigelb: why?
[19:25] <nigelb> currently epiphany-extensions and epiphany-extensions-more are broken.
[19:26] <nigelb> after the sync, epiphany-extensions-more would still remain broken, since debian doesn't have the new version yet
[19:26] <slangasek> ah, ok.  anyway, the FreezeExceptionProcess page is supposed to be complete in its explanation of when an FFe is or isn't needed; what part should we make clearer?
[19:27] <nigelb> its pretty clear.
[19:28] <slangasek> micahg: where does seamonkey fall on the "decide what xulrunner revdeps we're supporting or not" list?
[19:28] <micahg> slangasek: well, seamonkey has its own xul copy ATM
[19:29] <slangasek> does that mean it avoided being on the radar?
[19:29] <micahg> slangasek: well, upstream is entirely new and no one has had time to package it yet
[19:30] <micahg> slangasek: it's been on my mind for months, but I've been busy porting other stuff
[19:30] <slangasek> so you, at least, think we should keep it rather than drop it?
[19:31] <micahg> slangasek: it seems there is an interest in it
[19:31] <micahg> I had someone else wanting to make a seamonkey2 in universe which I already said no to
[19:32] <slangasek> ScottK: ^^ you've voiced your concerns about release-maintainability of mozilla bits in universe; do you have an opinion on seamonkey?
[19:33] <micahg> slangasek: I guess I should point out that sometime during the Lucid cycle we will have to jump to Seamonkey 2.1 which will be based on xulrunner-1.9.3
[19:34] <micahg> slangasek: so, we'll need an SRU exception for new functionality if we keep it...
[19:36] <slangasek> right; if we let it into lucid we should apply the same SRU/security policy as for other mozilla packages
[19:40] <micahg> slangasek: does dropping an unnecessary option in an apache config require an FFe?
[19:43] <slangasek> micahg: sounds like a cosmetic, low-urgency bugfix, so no; but we'll come for your head if it breaks something ;)
[19:44] <micahg> slangasek: k, just wanted to know how urgently I need to get phpmyadmin sync'd from debian :)
[20:00] <james_w> slangasek: aha, thanks
[20:00] <james_w> slangasek: is the freeze expected to start at ~midnight UTC, or will I have chance to squeeze these in tomorrow morning?
[20:02] <slangasek> james_w: midnight UTC; doesn't mean you can't try to squeeze things through tomorrow morning, just means they'll need a hand
[20:02] <james_w> yeah, I'd prefer to save the extra work
[20:02] <james_w> perhaps not quite in the spirit of it though :-)
[20:25] <segler> i need a motu for uploading, but at #ubuntu-motu nobody is responding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox-radio-browser/+bug/544416 it is already approved
[20:57] <ScottK> slangasek: I worry about all the mozilla stuff.  Seamonkey probably less because aiui there aren't the same coordination requirements due to trademark restrictions.
[20:57] <ScottK> slangasek: It probably makes sense to update and stay ~ in sync.
[20:57]  * ScottK hasn't studied the matter in any detail.
[20:58] <slangasek> ScottK: do you think it needs more study, or can micahg take that as an FFe?
[20:59] <ScottK> slangasek: That was a barely informed opinion.  I'm unlikely to have more time today to give it more consideration.  If you think that's enough for an FFe, then please tell him to go ahead.
[21:00]  * micahg is available for any questions :)
[21:41] <micahg> slangasek: so, I guess you have the final call
[21:44] <slangasek> micahg: go ahead; I'll follow up to the bug in a bit
[21:44] <micahg> slangasek: ok, my plan is to have it in by Monday since it's unseeded
[22:07] <ScottK> Any ideas why new builds aren't getting dispatched for powerpc, ia64, and sparc?
[22:11] <slangasek> lamont: ^^?
[22:12] <slangasek> lamont: also, the acorn build died; some error message about tax advise for pimps?
[22:12] <slangasek> (I may be paraphrasing an error message that wasn't actually emitted)