[00:53] <stochastic> rlameiro, yup, what's up?
[00:55] <rlameiro> hey
[00:55] <rlameiro> :DDDDDD
[00:55] <rlameiro> long time
[00:55] <rlameiro> stochastic: so you could make it to the interview
[00:56] <TheMuso> Looks like Debian already has jack2 packaging.
[00:56] <stochastic> rlameiro, nope, I slept through my alarm.  Working nights and early morning interviews just don't work well together.
[00:57] <rlameiro> stochastic: yea..
[00:57] <rlameiro> did you looked at my wiki?
[00:57] <stochastic> rlameiro, nope
[00:57] <rlameiro> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/ControlsRedesign
[00:58] <stochastic> rlameiro, I really don't have time right now to discuss this, but I will get back to you soon about it
[00:59] <rlameiro> np
[00:59] <rlameiro> TheMuso: what would be need to use jack and dbus?
[01:00] <TheMuso> rlameiro: Depends on how Debian build it and go from there basically. It just requires configure arguments I believe.
[01:02] <rlameiro> so, will it be easy to put it on maverick?
[01:02] <rlameiro> just packages?
[01:02] <TheMuso> Ah. Debian are using dbus.
[01:03] <TheMuso> The packages in Debian use the same namespace, so it shouldn't be too difficult.
[01:03] <rlameiro> nice
[02:17] <ScottL> TheMuso, that is surprisingly good news, hopefully it transitions smoothly
[02:25] <TheMuso> ScottL: It should, and yes I agree, great news.
[04:02] <panmanphil> hey can anybody tell me what the plans are for an rt kernel for lucid?
[04:05] <ScottL> panmanphil, i think that a -rt kernel will not be available in the official repositories for the 2.6.32 kernel for lucid release
[04:05] <panmanphil> that what i have been reading
[04:06] <ScottL> however, i think that a -lowlatency (or something similar, I can't recall) will be available for the amd64 architectural kernel
[04:06] <ScottL> but only a -generic kernel will be for the i386 kernel
[04:06] <panmanphil> Yeah I've tried it but way to many xruns, even for practice
[04:07] <ScottL> that said, both the ubuntu studio ppa and abogani's ppa have additional kernels in them that you may find helpful :)
[04:07] <panmanphil> does this mean the ubuntu studio will be kind of crippled like it was in the 8 version?
[04:07] <ScottL> panmanphil, i've run the -generic kernel on i386 and found it more than acceptable for recording audio
[04:08] <ScottL> panmanphil, which version is the 8 version?
[04:08] <panmanphil> Yeah, I've been trying some. the beta 10.04 generic kernel has the neuvous (sp) driver which works great for my laptop + extra monitor
[04:09] <panmanphil> I can't remember the ubuntu name .... two versions ago where the rt kernel had heavy cpu use problems. 
[04:09] <TheMuso> Intrepid?
[04:09] <panmanphil> one sec....
[04:09] <ScottL> i wouldn't say it will be crippled as you can always use the ubuntu studio ppa or abogani's ppa for other kernels
[04:09] <ScottL> also the 2.6.31 -rt is always available as well in the official repositories
[04:09] <panmanphil> hardy
[04:10] <ScottL> i didn't find Hardy to be crippled, but perhaps i'm only remembering updated kernels after release
[04:10] <panmanphil> I am using the 2.6.31 and audio is good. I have a headphone jack sense problem though so i can't really use my jacks. Also, the video driver is really flaky
[04:11] <panmanphil> right, that is what I did as well, updated my kernel after the release. I was using some other kernel modules though, cisco vpn at the time, so updates were more of a pain than I liked
[04:12] <ScottL> heh
[04:13] <panmanphil> are any of you using the nouveau video driver? 
[04:17] <ScottL> i'm currently testing lucid and running the default driver at the moment
[04:18] <TheMuso> yes with generic amd64 kernel.
[04:18] <panmanphil> it is working much better than the previous one for me, and handles the two monitors setup very nicely. 
[05:08] <persia> Grr.  Silly autojoin.  jussi01: I thought you said there was some appropriate redirects for #ubuntu-studio-devel and #ubuntustudio-devel
=== jussi01 is now known as jussi
[11:57] <ScottL> for those who are interested, last Saturday I did an interview with the Open Source Musicians (#opensourcemusicians) guys about Ubuntu Studio
[11:57] <ScottL> while i didn't go to heavy about it i did mention that we could use help, primarily in testing and documentation, but mainly testing
[11:58] <ScottL> from the live streaming interview i've already gotten two emails with offers to help
[11:58] <persia> Cool!
[11:59] <ScottL> hopefully when the interview is edited and available on their website there will be more :)
[12:01] <abogani> ScottL: Yes it is very cool!
[12:02]  * abogani is wondering if is Lead role is already assigned....
[13:27] <abogani> So no I suppose... :-)
[16:20]  * abogani would want recall you that comments are very welcomed on my wiki page (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlessioIgorBogani/linux-rtPPUApplication). So if you are used linux-rt and you find that I have done a good job please help me to obtain per-package rights on linux-rt package adding a little comment on my above-mentioned wiki page (Comments section). Thanks!
[18:43] <abogani> persia: Are you around?
[18:45] <abogani> No you can't at 2.45pm :)
[18:56] <persia> But I can at 2:56 :)
[19:01] <scott-work> hi persia, abogani  :)
[19:02] <persia> hey scott-work.
[19:02] <abogani> persia: I would want let you notice that DMB Agenda report next meeting at 27 April instead your email into -devel-announce report 17 April. What is the right?
[19:03] <abogani> scott-work: Hi Scott!
[19:05] <persia> abogani: 27th.
[19:05] <abogani> persia: Ok. Sorry for disturb.
[19:07] <persia> You didn't disturb me at all.  If I wasn't around, I wouldn't have responded.
[21:01] <ScottL> abogani, i just saw your comment about the lead role, no i don't think it is assigned as neither cory or luis are active and they were the last "official" project leads
[21:02] <ScottL> but to say who...i don't know, i suspect anyone wanting to step up and help, much like any other position i would imagine
[21:02] <ScottL> if you do it, then probably by default you will be it
[21:03] <abogani> ScottL: No absolutely.