[04:49] <dsnyders> Why am I suddenly being flagged as being vulnerable to DCC Exploits?
[07:51] <dholbach> good morning
[07:51] <bazhang> hi
[12:11] <jrib> ha, I know your real ip now dholbach
[12:11]  * jrib commences phase 2
[13:07] <gnomefreak> what is the name of the channel that we use for releases? im thinking its something like #ubuntu-releaseparty but i dont recall
[13:09] <elky> #ubuntu-release-party
[13:09] <gnomefreak> elky: thanks
[13:10] <elky> I was a slightly trapped in hospital last time. Does it still work well?
[13:10] <gnomefreak> lucid?
[13:14] <elky> gnomefreak, the party channel.
[13:14] <popey> nuts as usual
[13:14] <gnomefreak> elky: ah
[13:14] <popey> is it out is it out is it out etc ad infinitum
[13:16] <gnomefreak> i havent been in there for ~1 year other than popping in for a few minutes
[13:59] <ikonia> guys I hope we are going to learn from the last release party and not give ubuntu member cloaks ops in that channel
[13:59] <ikonia> (and gals - sorry,)
[14:01] <elky> ikonia, it went that well, eh?
[14:01] <Tm_T> ikonia: uhhuh, what happened?
[14:02] <elky> ikonia, although technically you were correct the first time. there's no gals on the IRCC.
[14:02]  * Tm_T has been wise and stayed mostly away from that channel
[14:02] <Tm_T> elky: topyli has long hair, if that counts
[14:02]  * Tm_T hides
[14:03] <elky> Tm_T, it was good the first few times. Then a certain other channel was formed and someone decided to harrass certain folk about /inviting/ her simply because she was not banned.
[14:03] <Tm_T> elky: ye, I was there long time ago and it was nice, but when it become too crowded...
[14:04] <elky> oh it was always crowded.
[14:04] <Tm_T> not too crowded though
[14:08] <gnomefreak> when are we planning on opening up #ubuntu-release-party? atm its invite only
[14:09] <Pici> Probably the week of release.
[14:09] <elky> gnomefreak, usually not until like 72-48hrs before
[14:09] <gnomefreak> elky: Pici thanks
[14:10] <Pici> jpds: ping. Got a question regarding an archive mirror.
[14:11] <jpds> Pici: Hi.
[14:13] <Pici> jpds: in.archive.ubuntu.com seems to have mysteriously changed the path for where they sync the archives to (i.e. fqdn/ to fqdn/ubuntu/ubuntu/, so everyone is getting 404 errors.  Where would I file a bug for that?
[14:14] <jpds> Pici: Yes, I told them to do that.
[14:15] <jpds> Pici: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaa
[14:15] <Pici> jpds: hm? What about all the people who have just 'http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/' in their sources.list ? And https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/ubuntuarchive.hnsdc.com-archive hasn't been updated to reflect the new location.
[14:16] <jpds> Pici: "http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/" was wrong.
[14:16] <jpds> http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ sound match http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
[14:16] <jpds> should*
[14:16] <jpds> Clearly they've done something daft.
[14:16]  * jpds emails.
[14:17] <Pici> jpds: Will using the software sources tool to pick the server again update it with the correct archive location? or do we need to tell people to just stick ubuntu/ in their sources.list?
[14:18] <jpds> Pici: No, software sources will be broken.
[14:20] <jpds> Pici: Emailed.
[14:21] <jpds> What a mess.
[14:21] <jpds> Pici: And I've corrected the Launchpad page.
[14:21] <Pici> jpds: Thanks
[14:24] <jpds> Pity apt-get didn't support redirects until Jaunty.
[14:27] <elky> jpds, for serious?
[14:27] <jpds> elky: Ubuntu Mirror dude at your service.
[14:28] <elky> jpds,  i mean re: apt-get not supporting redirects until jaunty.
[14:28] <elky> that's kinda heartbreaking :(
[14:29] <jpds> elky: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/18645
[14:29] <Pici> jpds: so, will people running Jaunty+ and pointing at in.a.u.com/ need to reconifgure to in.a.u.com/ubuntu/  or will there be a redirect in place?
[14:29] <elky> something so simple...
[14:29] <Tm_T> wasn
[14:29] <Tm_T> 't needed before?
[14:32] <jpds> elky: It was more to do with security, then someone realized that they could just check the GPG sigs from the redirect.
[15:14] <ikonia> !council
[15:14] <ikonia> !irccc
[15:14] <ikonia> !ircc
[18:13] <jpds> bug #563893
[18:14] <Tm_T> that's nice
[18:14] <jpds> Tm_T: Quite right.
[19:20] <genii> Is anyone actually seriously considering adding medical conditions to !o4o factoid?
[19:20] <Tm_T> ?
[19:20] <Pici> no.
[19:20] <genii> Tm_T:  #u-ot discussion at the moment
[19:20] <Pici> Can I add "don't be an idiot" to o4o?
[19:21] <Tm_T> genii: oh, you did fit "seriously" to -ot ... (;)
[19:21] <genii> Pici: I wouldn't complain :)
[19:22] <Tm_T> Pici: o4o should contain "be silly"
[19:22] <Tm_T> yes, without the "don't" in case of -ot
[19:22] <Pici> Tm_T: :D
[22:07] <topyli> who is ACKT1C on -ot? mc44 thinks he's banned
[22:08] <topyli> he usually knows better than i :)
[22:11] <topyli> @mark ACKT1C ban evading on -offtopic
[22:12] <topyli> @mark ACKT1C #ubuntu-offtopic ban evading on -offtopic
[22:12] <topyli> grr
[22:22] <ikonia> who is he?
[22:24] <topyli> he's no-one special. i was too clever and looked for an ip ban, while he was actually banned by ident
[22:25] <topyli> been dodging before
[22:27] <topyli> bazhang, many hits in bantracker if you search for the nick