/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/04/16/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

sebnerasac: is firefox-qt still alive? :P00:00
micahgchrisccoulson: idr00:00
micahgsebner: install kmozillahelper :)00:00
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, i will carry on with that again tomorrow00:00
chrisccoulsonbut i'm starting to officially hate gjs :)00:00
asacsebner: i think most understand that native qt doesnt give much over a good qt theme engine ;) ... but adds loads of maintenance effort00:00
micahgchrisccoulson: k, let me know if I need to look at it this weekend00:00
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, now worries00:01
chrisccoulsonthanks00:01
chrisccoulsons/now/no00:01
sebnerheh00:01
sebnerasac: btw, have I ever told you that you work far too much? :P (assuming you are currently in the same timezone as I am)00:02
asacyes00:02
asac;)00:02
sebner:D00:02
DanaGweird... 3.7 build still seems broken.00:42
micahgDanaG: xul didn't bui;d00:42
DanaGDang.00:42
micahgDanaG: hopefully new 3.6 builds in about 12 hourss00:42
micahgidk if I can fix xul193 tonight00:43
DanaGhmm, perhaps I should try wrapping mozilla-runtime with an sh script that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH.00:43
micahgDanaG: already exists00:43
DanaGWell, somehow mozilla-runtime isn't getting it, or something.00:44
DanaGyay, making my own wrapper worked.00:49
micahgDanaG: ??00:49
DanaGI dpkg-diverted mozilla-runtime out of the way, and made a #!/bin/sh script with this:00:49
DanaGexport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.3a4pre/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH00:49
DanaGenv > /dev/stderr00:49
DanaGexec /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.3a4pre/mozilla-runtime.distrib $@00:49
DanaGenv for debug, of course.00:50
DanaGinteresting... it seems mozilla-runtime gets a very minimal environment.00:51
DanaGIt'd be nice if the "plugin has crashed" showed the logo of the plugin or of the creator.00:52
DanaGSuch as Flash / Adobe, or Silverlight / Microsoft.00:52
DanaGhttp://blog.mozilla.com/dolske/2010/02/10/crashed-plugin-ui/00:53
LLStarksi'd prefer a full-on kernel panic than have to worry about EVERY SINGLE PLUGIN00:56
LLStarksgeneric image = KISS00:57
LLStarksasac, fta. can we get umd build that is newer than changeset 68737c373aba? bugzilla 558690 was an ubuntu-only bug and it just got fixed.00:59
LLStarks*umd 3.7 build01:00
micahgLLStarks: I'll get to it when I can :)01:00
micahgLLStarks: first priority is 3.6 so we can get ipc testing01:00
LLStarksgood call. i'm quite fond of oopp.01:00
LLStarksbtw, how can i make my builds have proper hinting?01:01
LLStarkscairo is sucking hard.01:01
micahgLLStarks: if we knew that, I don't think we'd have an issue :)01:01
micahgLLStarks: there are some workarounds in the old bug for hinting01:02
LLStarkswhat is the heart of the problem that makes hinting break with official mozilla tarballs?01:02
LLStarksand how does umd circumvent that issue?01:02
micahgDanaG: I'll look into the wrapper and make sure we're setting everything we should01:02
micahgLLStarks: we don't know and how does it01:02
DanaGNow my only issue is "This report does not apply to a packaged program".01:02
DanaG... since I overrode mozilla-runtime.01:03
LLStarkswell, fta must know something that i don't.01:03
LLStarks:)01:03
micahgLLStarks: I'm mising something01:03
micahgDanaG: 'tis ok, I have enough info now01:03
micahgDanaG: you can attach wrapper and comments to bug 51388701:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 513887 in firefox "Flash, Java, etc. does not work with out of process plugins and causes Firefox to become unresponsive" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51388701:04
LLStarksmicahg, umd builds have proper hinting. i also think 3.6 in main does too.01:04
micahgLLStarks: ah, hinting is fixed, smoothing is not01:05
micahgLLStarks: for 3.6 we're using in source libs, for 3.7 we are not01:06
micahgLLStarks: I'll work on getting Firefox 3.7 to work like 3.6 after UDS01:07
LLStarkssource libs?01:07
micahgLLStarks: libraries that mozilla ships vs system libs01:07
LLStarksaside from stray bugs, 3.7 works the same as 3.6 as far i'm concerned. no hinting errors.01:08
micahgoh, maybe latest cairo fixes it idk01:09
LLStarks3.6 uses system cairo, right?01:09
micahgLLStarks: no01:09
asacLLStarks: for lucid we run dailies again01:10
asacbut its probably broken ;)01:10
asace.g. fails to build01:10
LLStarksh01:11
LLStarks*ah01:11
LLStarksasac, i'm getting striped pngs with 3.6 main.03:05
LLStarkshttp://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2558/stripe.png03:07
LLStarkslibpng acting up?03:07
LLStarksmicahg, ever see anything like this in 3.6 main?03:14
LLStarkshttp://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2558/stripe.png03:14
LLStarkscertain pngs not rendering properly03:14
LLStarksrenders normally in chromium03:15
micahgLLStarks: no, you have the link so I can try?03:15
LLStarkshttp://shinigamifaqs.com/Themes/default/images/theme/main_block.png03:16
micahgLLStarks: looks fine to me03:16
micahgLLStarks: what graphics driver?03:16
LLStarksintel03:16
* micahg too03:16
LLStarksnot all pngs do that03:16
micahgLLStarks: idk, are you running the latest kernel?03:17
LLStarksyeah03:18
LLStarks2103:18
micahgLLStarks: also, there have been a couple intel driver updates in the past couple days03:18
LLStarksif that was the case, why only certain pngs?03:18
LLStarksalpha channel?03:18
LLStarksfor what it's worth, i am running xorg-edgers and alpha pngs are looking fine03:19
LLStarksapng too03:19
micahgLLStarks: could be there's a bug in xorg-edgers drivers, I'm running hte intel driver from archive lucid03:20
LLStarkshmm.03:20
LLStarkscertain jpegs are also doing this when not zoomed03:20
LLStarkshttp://img191.imageshack.us/img191/9499/lovesgv.jpg03:21
LLStarkslooks fine when zoomed03:21
LLStarkshere's how i see it: http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/7241/lovescreenshot.png03:22
micahgLLStarks: try archive drivers03:22
LLStarkswill do.03:23
LLStarksbrb03:23
ddecatoris spidermonkey in lucid in any way?07:48
dr3mrohey is there an ubuntu ppa for lucid as they removed spidermonkey from there repositories07:58
BUGabundo_remotehi hi kangoro08:59
ddecatorhey BUGabundo_remote08:59
asacchrisccoulson: you gave tbird back?11:52
asacdo you have the build failure log somewhere still?11:56
asaci need that to get doko look into it11:56
gnomefreakthe bot works again :)12:41
gnomefreakis firefox safe to use or is it still broken?12:43
gnomefreak3.7 == no browser 3.6 keeps locking up on me and others12:44
asacgnomefreak: daily?12:49
gnomefreaknope 3.6 is still broken12:50
gnomefreakasac: yes12:50
asacwas there a daily today or yesterday?12:50
asaclast build before was in the middle of a the plugin transition12:50
asacso we want to check latest today before going crazy12:50
gnomefreakasac: i got updates a little while ago. sometime in the last 18 hours or so12:50
gnomefreakasac: version 3.6.5~hg20100414r34076+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd212:51
asachmm12:51
asacyeah12:51
* asac upgrades too12:51
asacto see12:51
asacif there are hangups we should check12:51
asacotherwise we wiill be hit hard by 3.6.412:51
gnomefreakthe last couple of weeks has had this issue12:52
* gnomefreak tries running 3.7 from term12:52
gnomefreak3.7 o0utput from term is gnomefreak@Development:~$ firefox-3.712:53
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Development:~$ ps aux |grep firefox12:53
gnomefreak1000      4262  0.0  0.2   1856   580 pts/1    S+   07:52   0:00 grep firefox12:53
asacnot sure12:53
* gnomefreak sick of using chromium it doesnt print correctly12:53
chrisccoulsonhey asac, sorry i had to go out for an appointment13:13
chrisccoulsonno, i didn't give thunderbird back13:13
chrisccoulson(i'm not allowed to for stuff in main)13:14
gnomefreakok firefox froze so i killed the process but why are there 4 processes, seems like a lot for just a browsere13:25
gnomefreaks/browsere/browser13:25
gnomefreak^^^ maybe causes the "slow/freeze" not sure what word to use13:26
asacchrisccoulson: yeah13:29
asacchrisccoulson: i found out who by now ;)13:29
asacchrisccoulson: how is the 3.6 build1 for security ppa project going?13:29
chrisccoulsonasac - oh, micahg has already updated the branch for that?13:42
chrisccoulsonexcellent :)13:43
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, i will get that in to the PPA this afternoon13:44
chrisccoulsonwe just go through the normal release process for that? (ie, tag it 3.6.4+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1)13:44
* gnomefreak getting tired of getting up to change cd player. need to get a battery for remote13:48
* gnomefreak hates filing wishlist bugs13:59
gnomefreakfile a bug on liferea and i get the following output13:59
gnomefreakOpenOffice path before fixup is '/usr/lib/openoffice'13:59
gnomefreakOpenOffice path is '/usr/lib/openoffice'13:59
gnomefreakand it never closes14:00
gnomefreaki thought we were adding support to apport for PPA packages?15:15
gnomefreakwell ubuntu-bug fails but apport-collect bug# works15:56
chrisccoulsonasac - is OOPP meant to be enabled in 3.6.4?16:06
asacchrisccoulson: yes16:08
asacchrisccoulson: thats why we need to get build1 up now16:08
asacand call for testing16:08
asacso we can tell them: no, that needs to stay disabled ... ;)16:08
asacbased on real feedback16:08
chrisccoulsonasac - it's disabled in build116:08
asacit is?16:08
asacok16:08
chrisccoulsonwell, disabled as in "dom.ipc.plugins.enabled" is set to false16:08
asacthen i didnt see that they changed their plans16:08
chrisccoulsonbut it's a resounding failure when i enable it :(16:08
chrisccoulsonit just crashes and hangs16:08
asacyeah16:08
asacso they probably noticed it ;)16:09
asachowever, afaik the code landed16:09
asacand they dnt know if it causes regressions even with disabled16:09
asaciirc16:09
asacso lets get it up ;)16:09
chrisccoulsonok, so we leave it disabled for now then, it's practically unusable with it enabled16:09
asacchrisccoulson: we shouldnt enable without them16:10
asacwe ride whatever they do16:10
asacbut they landed that ode16:11
chrisccoulsonasac - so, for the 3.6.4 update, i just tag it for release like i would with any other upload before i put it in the PPA? (sorry, i'm a bit unsure as I didn't upload the last security updates until after the mozilla release)16:22
chrisccoulsoni don't want to mess up the version numbers in the ppa ;)16:22
asacchrisccoulson: yes. you just use the _BUILD1 tag and use +build1 as the upstream version16:23
asacand you document it like that16:23
asacchrisccoulson: also you get the USN for that for this upload16:23
asacbecause in case its good we dont need to upload again16:23
asaci think there are other BUILD1 uploads a bit further down in the changelog16:23
asac(otherwise look on stable branches like hardy)16:23
chrisccoulsonasac - cool, that's ok then, i will get that sorted now16:25
asacnice16:26
asacchrisccoulson: also setup a blog... get on planet. blog about it.16:26
asactell me so i can forward that call for testing on my blog ;)16:27
asace.g. lets get started on getting more folks again on the ppa16:27
asacchrisccoulson: http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/146-new-firefox-securitystability-upgrade-available-for-testing.html16:27
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, no problem . the other thing i've been looking at today is bug 543064, but i'm not sure how that's meant to work on tb216:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 543064 in thunderbird "ensure that x-www-browser is used if no http handler is found through gnome integration" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54306416:27
chrisccoulsoni can't find any preference for it, and if i remove the handler specified in gconf, then it fails to open any links just like in tb316:28
chrisccoulsoni tried following the code in tb3, and i think we'd need a patch if we were to make it use x-www-browser as a fallback. i'm just wondering if i should fix bug 543060 as a priority instead, as that would make most of the issue go away16:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 543060 in thunderbird "thunderbird - gnome integration should work even without -gnome-support" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54306016:30
ftaasac or anyone, do you think i should make the chromium lang packs mandatory for everyone? or just keep it like it is16:46
ftawrt bug 56162416:46
ubottuLaunchpad bug 561624 in chromium-browser "Create meta-package with dependencyes like in google-chrome" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56162416:46
asacfta: no16:55
asacfta: langpacks should get integrated in language selector16:56
asactalk to arnegoetje16:56
asacif we can do that for universe packages (e.g. if we see its installed also pull in langpacks)16:56
ftai guess it's too late for lucid16:57
* micahg thought universe packages ship their own translations16:57
ftathe thing is that those langpacks *must* be in sync with ch. otherwise, it's all messed up17:01
asacgood point to note down17:01
asacfta: in that case we probably have to ship all langpacks in the chromium package itself17:01
micahgasac: why not just do a binary depends on the lang package deb?17:02
ftaasac, "depends" or drop the all-arch package?17:02
ftaok, uploading like it is17:06
micahgasac: do you want to file the bug to drop xul191 from Lucid?17:08
ftachrisccoulson, uploaded17:08
chrisccoulsonfta - excellent, thanks :)17:08
micahgchrisccoulson: was my fix good enough for thunderbird?  people still complain that they can't start (I guess asac was right and no one reads the NEWS)  I added the text to the master bug17:09
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i've not had any issues with it at all17:09
micahgchrisccoulson: right, because you followed the instructions I"m sure :)17:10
micahgasac: chrisccoulson: does someone want to file the drop xul191 from Lucid bug?17:10
chrisccoulsonwhat is still depending on it now? (other than sugar, that we're going to drop)17:11
chrisccoulsonit's probably best to add xul191 plus the remaining rdepends to the same bug17:11
micahgchrisccoulson: only gjs, but we already have a bug to fix that17:11
chrisccoulsonyeah, i need to try and fix that17:12
micahgchrisccoulson: I just got a package I needed for libjdic-java sync'd so I"ll upload the diff for it a little later17:19
chrisccoulsonmicahg - do you know which of the dailies needs fixing most urgently?17:52
asacchrisccoulson: he is off17:54
asacchrisccoulson: everything is red ;)17:54
chrisccoulsonasac - oh, i didn't notice he'd gone17:54
asaclet me check17:54
chrisccoulsonasac - am i looking in the wrong PPA?17:54
chrisccoulsonhttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+packages17:54
chrisccoulsoni see quite a bit of green too ;)17:55
asacso firefox 3.6 on hardy is borken17:55
asacthen ffox 3.7/1.9.317:55
chrisccoulsonok, i had a quick glance at ff3.6 on hardy. i suspect our cairo patch is what breaks that17:55
asacsorry i get picked up17:56
asachave to run down17:56
asacchrisccoulson: could be17:56
chrisccoulsoni'll have a look at that then and see what i can do to make it build on hardy17:56
chrisccoulsonasac - so, ff3.6.4 is building in the u-m-s PPA now. i'm just testing xulrunner too, and will upload that in a bit18:50
micahgbdrung: does the eclipse package with the .ini have a binary depends on xul192?19:16
micahgbdrung: nm, it does seem to19:17
micahgchrisccoulson: what's going on?19:38
micahgchrisccoulson: why are you release xul194?19:38
chrisccoulsonmicahg - xul1.9.2.4?19:38
micahgchrisccoulson: yes19:39
chrisccoulsonmicahg - asac wanted to get it in to the u-m-s PPA so we can get people testing it19:39
micahgchrisccoulson: it's not ready yet19:39
micahgchrisccoulson: we still have a bug with OOPP19:39
chrisccoulsonwhat isn't ready?19:39
chrisccoulsonmicahg - OOPP is disabled isn't it?19:39
chrisccoulson(it seems to be disabled here anyway)19:40
micahgchrisccoulson: no, not entirely19:40
chrisccoulsoni tried enabling it ;)19:40
chrisccoulsonit didn't work very well19:40
micahgchrisccoulson: right, and it should be shipping by default in 3.6.419:40
micahgI think that someone might have stumbled on the key19:41
chrisccoulsonso there's going to be another upload for final 3.6.4 anyway?19:41
micahgchrisccoulson: not before release19:41
chrisccoulsonyou mean lucid release?19:41
* micahg is confused19:41
chrisccoulsonme too :)19:41
micahgOOPP is shipping upstrea, by default in 3.6.4 most likely19:42
* micahg does not want 3.6.4 in Lucid release19:42
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, i get that bit.19:42
chrisccoulsondon't worry, it's not in lucid release19:42
chrisccoulsonit's targetted for the lucid-security pocket, and in the u-m-s PPA19:42
micahgchrisccoulson: there's info in bug 513887 if you want to look into it now19:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 513887 in firefox "Flash, Java, etc. does not work with out of process plugins and causes Firefox to become unresponsive" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51388719:42
micahgchrisccoulson: I think it's a packaging issue19:43
chrisccoulsonmicahg - but you say that OOPP will be enabled for the final release? (which implies that we are going to do another upload for the security release anyway)19:43
micahgchrisccoulson: I was going to look into it this weekend19:43
micahgchrisccoulson: it is for flash by default19:43
chrisccoulsonit's not in the current release though is it? (i tried youtube and didn't see it run in another process)19:44
jdstrandchrisccoulson, micahg: so this next ff release will be the first with the process separation for plugins?19:44
micahgjdstrand: yes19:44
chrisccoulsonjdstrand, yeah, that's right19:44
jdstrandcool. I am a fan of that btw19:44
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah, I saw that also19:44
chrisccoulsonbut it's disabled at the moment19:44
micahgchrisccoulson: I need to discuss with upstream, but there will definitely be a build 219:44
jdstrandchrisccoulson, micahg: we should be sure to test the apparmor profile with that configuration19:45
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, that's fine. i'm happy with people testing build1 right now19:45
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - i'm wondering if that's not the cause of the current issue ;)19:45
jdstrandhopefully it'll all just work, but we might need some finetuning19:45
chrisccoulsonit doesn't work at all atm19:45
jdstrandchrisccoulson: look in kern.log19:45
chrisccoulsonfirefox just hangs19:45
micahgchrisccoulson: I'm not, because security PPA uploads IMHO should be free of known issues19:45
chrisccoulson1 second19:45
jdstrandchrisccoulson: but the profile is disabled by default19:45
jdstrandso if that is a fresh install, then it shouldn't b19:45
jdstrande19:45
chrisccoulsonjdstrand, oh, i've not actually enabled it anyway19:46
jdstrandchrisccoulson: you can be super sure by looking at the output of aa-status19:46
jdstrand(run with sudo)19:47
jdstrandchrisccoulson: once you have a build you are starting to feel comfortable about, we should test the the profile on19:47
micahgjdstrand: can you make the apparmor notification system show blocks with the profile in complain mode or is that a bad idea?19:47
jdstrandmicahg: apparmor-notify doesn't care if it is enforce or not19:48
jdstrandwhile testing in complain mode is valid, enforce mode still needs to be done19:48
micahgjdstrand: it seems to19:48
chrisccoulsonjdstrand, i don't see the FF profile when i run aa-status19:48
jdstrandchrisccoulson: k, then it is disabled19:48
jdstrandmicahg: oh, maybe the string is different...19:49
micahgjdstrand: should I file a bug?19:49
jdstrandmicahg: yes please. it may not get fixed in lucid, but it might19:49
jdstrand(it should be a teeny change)19:49
jdstrandmicahg: in the bug, please give dmesg output that should have been caught19:50
micahgjdstrand: k, I was also thinking, can we get an abstraction for feed readers in apparmor?19:50
micahgjdstrand: k19:50
jdstrandmicahg: you mean like liferea?19:50
micahgjdstrand: liferea, akregator, and the like19:50
micahgjdstrand: akregator is blocked, that's what spurred the thought19:51
micahgchrisccoulson: I was planning on trying to fix the OOPP issue in firefox over the weekend19:51
jdstrandmicahg: yes, we can, but not for lucid. we can add akregator to the profile19:51
micahgjdstrand: k, I'll file 2 bugs then19:51
jdstrandmicahg: if another ff upload is planned for lucid, we can put it in there19:52
jdstrandand then abstract it out in maverick19:52
micahgjdstrand: not planned before release19:52
micahgAFAIK19:52
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - barring any major show-stopper, there won't be another upload for release19:53
chrisccoulsonmicahg - do you already have an idea what causes the hang?19:53
micahgchrisccoulson: seems to be LD_LIBRARY_PATH19:53
micahgchrisccoulson: it's set in the run-mozilla.sh script IIRC, but something seems to not be right in our current env19:55
ftadamn, chromium still doesn't appear in the ubuntu software center as a result for chrome20:10
ftachrisccoulson, ^^ do you happen to know what the search engine of that stuff is looking for?20:11
chrisccoulsonfta - i'm not too sure, but i can ask mvo when he's around again20:12
ftawould be nice20:12
micahgfta: I think software-center's data is cached20:28
ftamicahg, "more info" seems up-to-date20:29
micahgfta: maybe it's just the .desktop info that's cached20:29
micahgthunderbird shows up under mail now \o/20:29
ftafirefox is not in web browser though20:31
ftaabrowser is20:31
micahgfta: that's not good :(20:32
micahgwe might need one more upload then20:32
micahg:(20:32
micahgthey look the same20:33
micahgfta: it's because kubuntu-firefox-installer is replacing the .desktop file in app-install-date20:36
ftabad20:37
micahgfta: yep, I need to talk to mvo about what the fix should be20:37
micahgchrisccoulson: can I add the flash OOPP bug to the title in the channel as I forsee a lot of bugs from the security upload?21:09
chrisccoulsonmicahg - feel free, but are people going to enable it though?21:38
micahgchrisccoulson: that's what I was trying to tell you before, flash is enabled by default21:38
chrisccoulsonhmmmm. flash is working fine here (and i don't get it running in a new process)21:39
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I'll test this weekend and see what I get...weird21:39
* micahg is wondering if it's the people sharing profiles with 3.6 and 3.7 that had issues21:40
chrisccoulsonmicahg - if i change "dom.ipc.plugins.enabled" to true, then flash does fail badly21:41
chrisccoulsonbut that is set to false by default, and flash seems to be working normally21:41
micahgchrisccoulson: do you hvae a dom.ipc.plugins.flash?21:41
chrisccoulsonmicahg - dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.libflashplayer.so21:41
chrisccoulsonwhich is set to true21:41
chrisccoulsonhmmmm21:41
BUGabundoasac: micahg: chrisccoulson: something is fishy in FF 3.7... all new links tend to open in a new window, not tab! :(22:02
BUGabundospecially from google reader22:02
micahgBUGabundo: any other site?22:02
micahgBUGabundo: BTW, ff37 is an old build ATM22:03
BUGabundoMozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a4pre) Gecko/20100407 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Minefield/3.7a4pre22:03
BUGabundomicahg: not sure! I almost don't use FF this days22:03
BUGabundoonly for greader cause of one addon: nosquint22:04
BUGabundonothing like it for chromium yet22:04
Mannequinhi. On Lucid Linx Beta, after adding the PPA and running a 'safe-upgrade', I got an unbranded Firefox version, named Namoroka (and using a blue icon)22:44
Mannequinbut the Thunderbird version is still using the official brand (is that expected too?)22:45
MannequinI've been told to ask micha, but it seems that user isn't logged in22:45
chrisccoulsonmicahg - ok, i got OOPP working now22:54
chrisccoulsonah22:54
chrisccoulsonhe already left22:54
DanaGweird... icedtea-plugin makes firefox segfault even in safe mode.22:54
chrisccoulson"The Adobe Flash Plugin has crashed"22:57
chrisccoulsonrock on!22:57
DanaGNow it just needs to show either the Adobe logo, or the Flash logo.22:58
DanaGhere's my icedtea crash: http://pastebin.com/ERTF7BE122:59
chrisccoulsonlooks like an openjdk issue to me23:00
mityahi gents Can I ask here about thunderbird ?23:02
mityaI have a fresh 10.4 (64bit) with thuderbird and lightning-extension installed, but lightning plugin does not appear for some reason23:03
mityaany ideas whet I missed ?23:03
mitya*what23:04
JanCmitya: is it compatible with that thunderbird version?23:06
mityaJanC: hmm, not sure, how can I check it ?23:07
mityaI thought that if it is in the standard repo, than it is23:07
JanCmitya: well, 10.04 is still beta, so you might want to file a bug about it...23:08
mityaJanC: ok, I'll take a deeper look.. thanks23:09
chrisccoulsonthe version in the archive is not supported by the latest thunderbird23:09
JanCmitya: you could also try to uninstall the package and install a version from mozilla's addin site (or wherever it can be found)23:10
mityaJanC: ok, I will try, but I read somewhere that I need to compile it for 64bit, and I was happy when I saw in within the standard repo... it seems that I can't avoid the compilation23:11
mityachrisccoulson: thx23:12
mityatry to find an other way23:12
JanCmitya: compilation?23:16
JanCshould be just a .xpi23:16

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!