[00:43] bdmurray, sure [00:43] oh, it's actually a post mortem ACK ;) [00:43] thekorn: yeah, I found the irclog of when we talked about it earlier ;-) [00:44] bdmurray, thanks for doing all the house keeping here === yofel_ is now known as yofel [07:01] good morning [07:01] does any one get stack when go to guest session and then chose switch user? [08:06] any help with guest session problem? [08:06] Damascene: define "stack" [08:06] user > guest session >switch> user = crash [08:06] it works fine here [08:06] stuck maybe :) [08:06] user > guest session >switch(don't close)> user = crash [08:08] I mean stuck not crash [08:08] of course it almost never restores the screen when I switch users for me - I have to type xgamma -gamma 1.0 blindly [08:08] s/for me// [08:08] really? [08:08] so it's known? [08:08] sure [08:09] at least if you have the same problem :) [08:09] no need to report then. it's already reported. right? [08:09] no idea, check bug 555870 [08:09] Launchpad bug 555870 in gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Gamma values are not being set properly after a second fade out resulting in a black screen (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/555870 [08:09] but it's not going to get fixed probably [08:09] why? [08:10] because we lack manpower [08:10] it should be disabled then [08:10] it's not broken for everybody [08:10] half of the reason why it's not getting fixed [08:10] mmm [08:12] that bug does not seem related [08:12] I'll try to switch user now [08:14] strange now it didn't happen [08:14] only happens sometimes maybe [09:28] Its seems like gnome bug watches are now enabled. Good thing [09:30] om26er, except for the mail floor [09:30] *flood [09:30] it got enabled yday [09:47] nigelb, ah, was not here. The advantage here is now I dont have to subscribe to all upstream bug reports. [09:48] ah [12:00] hi, i've found on my ubuntu 9.10 exactly this bug: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/08/17/gnome-power-manager-and-blanking-removal-of-bodges/ [12:14] Hello, I have registered 2 bugs few days ago that I no more reproduced since I update my lucid ubuntu. I guess the bug status should be changed, maybe a triager can quickly take a look? [12:14] bug #558759 [12:14] Launchpad bug 558759 in synaptic (Ubuntu) "Freeze when using "File>Save markings as" (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/558759 [12:14] bug #546136 [12:14] Launchpad bug 546136 in udev (Ubuntu) "Removable storage device not detected as block device (affects: 4) (heat: 20)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/546136 [12:33] jfi: so the bugs do not affect you in lucid? [12:34] bencrisford, I confirm that the 2 bugs do not affect me (since I updated my lucid this morning) [12:35] jfi: oh, ok i see, if they affect an earlier build but no longer affect anything then i *think* it should be invalid [12:35] however, if it still affects karmic (or earlier) [12:35] bencrisford, #546136 does not affect karmic [12:36] ok [12:36] I have a computer under karmic and my usb drive is ok [12:36] the bug has been introduced during lucid alpha [12:36] ok, im not sure what the status should be to be honest, i misunderstood and thought you meant that since you upgraded from karmic it has stopped affecting you [12:36] i understand now [12:37] but like i say, im not sure [12:37] * bencrisford tries to find an appropriate wiki page [12:37] if a bug is fixed in lucid but still an issue for karmic it should be "fix released" [12:37] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status [12:37] kermiac: that's not my case, let me resume it:) [12:37] karmic: no bug [12:38] lucid alpha and beta: bug [12:38] uptodate lucid (this morning): no bug [12:38] for both or just 546136? [12:38] for #546136 [12:38] I did not test the other issue on karmic [12:40] 546136 should be fix released if the issue is not present in karmic [12:40] Ok, I did the test of 558759 on karmic and I don't reproduce it [12:40] is not present in lucid [12:41] 546136 should be fix released if the issue was present in karmic but is not present in lucid [12:42] 558759 should be invalid if you can't reproduce & it wan't fixed by an update. just explain that you can no longer reproduce & it may have been a configuration issue [12:43] ok, thanks for the explanation kermiac [12:44] np jfi. the wiki page I linked above has all the relevant info regarding bug status :) [12:51] nice way to say 'rtfm' :-) [12:51] jfi: nice explanation on the bug reports :) [12:53] well, I wan't exactly trying to say rtfm... I just thought the wiki page would come in handy for future reference ;) [12:55] new info on bug 504956, any JS hackers here that actually understand that? ^^ [12:55] Launchpad bug 504956 in launchpad-gm-scripts "partially hidden comment in bug report (affects: 6) (dups: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/504956 [12:56] yofel, for now, avoid highlighting [13:00] I know, it's disabled here, but it sure would be nice to have it working... [13:00] oh, that way :) [14:15] Anyone else having problems with the latest version of gwibber (2.30.0.1-0ubuntu1) and displaying messages from twitter, bug #565250 [14:15] Launchpad bug 565250 in gwibber (Ubuntu) "Gwibber doesn't display messages (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/565250 [14:18] mdevenish, can try deleting your account and adding again? [14:22] nigelbabu: tried that, but still have same problem. Tried refresh, but still doesn't work. [14:28] mdevenish, please set the bug to confirmed and also add that you've tried deleting your twitter account and adding back [14:33] nigelbabu: ok, done that. [14:33] mdevenish, thank you. someone should get to it on monday or so === thekorn__ is now known as thekorn [14:56] hi,is there a app to triage bugs? i dont like opening my web browser :P [14:57] something apart from bughugger as its not working here === bencrisford is now known as bencrisford_ === bencrisford_ is now known as bencrisford [17:34] .away === yofel_ is now known as yofel [18:35] last week i tried upgrading my wubi install to lucid... unfortunately it broke, i tried to find a solution asking around to no avail... in the end i decided to file a bug report... but, even if i never did it before, now i'm giving up trying to fix it and will instead do it the quick and dirty way: reinstalling ubuntu... the problem is: [18:36] my bug report is only a summary of what i did, what it happened to me and what i tried... without any file attached whatsoever [18:37] (usually i always use ubuntu-bug to collect these, but i obviously couldn't do that with an unbootable system) [18:37] that's an interesting predicament :-/ [18:38] so, before reinstalling i'm going to at least provide some hopefully useful files [18:38] aside from grub.cfg, what should i fetch from my dead system? [18:39] (ah, yes... it's a grub2 bug afaik... didn't mention that before) [18:51] as of now, i've only found this page concerning debugging the boot process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelBoot unfortunately it's only referring to kernel bugs [18:52] Tiibiidii: Oh that. [18:53] Tiibiidii: I think that's because grub2 can't read beyond a certain number of bits. [18:53] mhn, i don't think that's the problem [18:53] that was a karmic bug [18:53] in lucid it's been solved [18:53] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/477104 [18:53] Launchpad bug 477104 in lupin (Ubuntu Karmic) (and 6 other projects) "After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install (affects: 162) (dups: 11) (heat: 834)" [Undecided,Fix committed] [18:53] yesyes [18:53] that's the very reason i decided to upgrade early to lucid :D [18:54] Oh right, sorry. [18:54] (trust me, even a grub2 dev believed that was the issue... and i went all the way to check the version provided with lucid... it doesn't have that issue anymore) [18:54] nope [18:55] but do you know what files could be useful to debugging/triaging it? [18:55] (aside from grub.cfg) [18:57] No, I personally don't use Wubi. [18:58] ok, thanks anyway [19:00] (i'll attach the output of lspci, not sure if it'll help... the kernel never kicks in, so maybe that's not truly relevant) === radoe_ is now known as radoe [21:21] can i ask if i have a bug to report here?