[00:05] <Kangarooo> is possible with one IDE conect to LP to login search projects dl project make change to new/existing branch upload change make commit see other ppl work. work together the same time? auto see diff when others work?
[00:16] <humphreybc> hi chaps, take a look at this please
[00:16] <humphreybc> https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/launchpad-translator-communication
[00:18] <wgrant> humphreybc: It's Saturday night in Europe -- Translations people are much more likely to be around during the European working day.
[00:18] <humphreybc> fair nuff'
[00:18] <wgrant> KDesk: What's your Launchpad username?
[00:18] <humphreybc> i'll see if I can catch them next week
[00:19] <humphreybc> if you know of anyone going to UDS who this would pertain to, could you subscribe them?
[00:19] <KDesk> wgrant: it is g-christ
[00:20] <wgrant> KDesk: And you're sure the changes file is signed with 0D6E38AA?
[00:20] <wgrant> humphreybc: I would recommend filing a bug rather than using a blueprint just yet; they have comments and will actually notify people.
[00:21] <KDesk> wgrant: yes, I did use this: debuild -S -sa -k0D6E38AA
[00:21] <humphreybc> wgrant: ah that's probably a good idea
[00:21] <humphreybc> is it under the rosetta package?
[00:21] <humphreybc> ah "Launchpad Translations"
[00:22] <wgrant> humphreybc: The rosetta project, right.
[00:22] <wgrant> KDesk: And you're sure you uploaded to ftp://ppa.launchpad.net/g-christ/ppa/ubuntu?
[00:24] <KDesk> wgrant: i did: dput my-ppa phonon-backend-vlc_0.0+git20100417-5aa4fb2c-1-ppa1_source.changes   my  .dout.cf file has this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/416372/
[00:24] <humphreybc> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/rosetta/+bug/565668
[00:26] <wgrant> KDesk: I'd recommend returning some time during the week, when people with log access will be around.
[00:26] <KDesk> ok wgrant, thank you for your time!
[00:58] <goundy> Hi
[00:58] <goundy> guys, no news about lp wiki support ?
[02:24] <sproaty> just noticed the auto export as .mo functionality for translatinos. Is there a way this can generate the mo from the pos in a given branch?
[02:25] <sproaty> seems to indicate currently that it imports all MOs from the branch -- I want it to import my POs and create the MOs from there
[04:05] <Lachesis> Hello. Is anybody else having trouble adding or editing OpenPGP keys in launchpad?
[04:06] <wgrant> Lachesis: What happens when you try?
[04:07] <Lachesis> wgrant: I never receive the email they claim to send me.
[04:07] <wgrant> Lachesis: Which page are you usinG?
[04:08] <Lachesis> https://launchpad.net/~eswanson/+editpgpkeys
[04:08] <Lachesis> hold on, i might have trouble with my mail host
[04:14] <Lachesis> yeah, i think that was it
[04:14] <keturn> Lachesis: earlier today I got an error page on launchpad when adding a key
[04:14] <Lachesis> sorry to bother you
[04:14] <keturn> I then tried edge and it worked okay
[04:15] <Lachesis> it seems to be a bit finicky -- if your fingerprint isn't on the Ubuntu keyserver, it throws an unintelligible error
[04:15] <Lachesis> also, if you've just canceled validation, it takes a few seconds to clear the fingerprint
[10:23] <kermiac> is there any known issues with launchpad atm? I'm trying to mark a bug as private for another member of bug control but it keeps timing out for both of us
[10:23] <kermiac> i disabled edge redirect, but there was no change
[10:24] <wgrant> kermiac: Which bug?
[10:24] <kermiac> wgrant: bug 562259
[10:25] <kermiac> ddecater (from bug control) just asked me to try setting it to private for him as it was timing out.
[10:26] <wgrant> That may be because of the large number of structural subscriptions.
[10:27] <wgrant> Since as of $NOT_VERY_LONG_AGO, each subscription probably sends an email from the appserver.
[10:27]  * wgrant tries.
[10:29] <kermiac> yes, could be... anything we can do about it apart from simply deleting the coredump, setting as invalid & asking the reporter to file a new private bug?
[10:30] <geser> does somebody have an idea why LP informs me about an translation template import I didn't do? neither were the source packages uploaded recently
[10:32] <wgrant> geser: Probably the bug where translations from the rebuild archive are being inappropriately uploaded.
[10:32] <wgrant> It's fixed in trunk, but I'm not sure if it's on production yet.
[10:33] <kermiac> wgrant: it timed out for you too?
[10:36] <geser> wgrant: sounds like it, the timestamps when the copy archive build finished match the ones mentioned in that mails
[10:40] <kermiac> thanks for trying anyway wgrant :)
[13:14] <Kangarooo> is possible with one IDE conect to LP to login search projects dl project make change to new/existing branch upload change make commit see other ppl work. work together the same time? auto see diff when others work?
[13:15] <Kangarooo> so in other words- IDE with witch easy start developing some of LP project?
[14:17] <Phurl> hey
[14:17] <Phurl> where can i see the ppa packages i dput?
[14:22] <Phurl> Already uploaded to ppa on ppa.launchpad.net
[14:22] <Phurl> Doing nothing for traindirector_0.1-1_i386.changes
[14:36] <geser> Phurl: you need to upload *_source.changes which you get when you only build the source package (debuild -S)
[14:36] <Phurl> i got it
[14:36] <Phurl> thanks
[14:36] <Phurl> i got a mail
[16:57] <donri> How do I upload a source archive?
[17:01] <donri> Found it, sorry.
[17:04] <RoboTux> Hi
[17:05] <RoboTux> I have a problem creating my launchpad account, should I tell you my problem there or send an email to feedback@launchpad.net ?
[17:14] <nigelb> RoboTux, if its something one of the volunteers can help, you can say it here
[17:16] <RoboTux> I think so
[17:16] <RoboTux> No, in fact I don't know
[17:16] <RoboTux> Well, I tried creating an account but the email I get doesn't give me a validation link
[17:17] <RoboTux> Instead, it says I may have forgotten my password, as if the account already exist
[17:18] <RoboTux> I tried resetting the password but then it says me that launchpad can't reset password for a deactivated account
[17:18] <RoboTux> So I feel myself a bit deadlocked :)
[17:19] <nigelb> RoboTux, ah, so you're account seems to be deactivated.  You need to ask someone tomorrow (EU working hours have a good chance of someone being here).
[17:19] <nigelb> i.e. someone who can look into it
[17:25] <RoboTux> Ok
[17:25] <RoboTux> Should I ask here ?
[17:26] <nigelb> yes
[17:28] <RoboTux> Ok thanks
[17:28] <RoboTux> But in the mean time, maybe you could help me
[17:28] <RoboTux> I'd like to mark a bug as existing in Debian
[17:29] <RoboTux> I would take just a second to do it, could you make it ?
[17:29] <nigelb> bug #?
[17:29] <RoboTux> The debian bug is #549100
[17:29] <nigelb> and ubuntu bug?
[17:29] <RoboTux> and ubuntu bug: #500296
[17:30] <nigelb> debian bug 549100 ubuntu bug 500296
[17:30] <RoboTux> ubottu: You're fast
[17:30] <RoboTux> Oh, a bot, nice :)
[17:31] <nigelb> done.  check Ubuntu bug now :)
[17:32] <RoboTux> Thanks
[17:32] <nigelb> thank you for pointing it out :)
[17:32] <RoboTux> Perfect
[17:32] <RoboTux> You're welcome
[17:32] <RoboTux> And I have a last question
[17:33] <RoboTux> How does sync works between Debian and Ubuntu ?
[17:33] <nigelb> package syncs?
[17:33] <RoboTux> Yep
[17:34] <RoboTux> I added a LP: entry in the package to close the Ubuntu bug but how much time will it take for the package to get into Ubuntu ?
[17:35] <nigelb> Before the import freeze, new versions of packages will be automatically imported from Debian unstable where they have not been customized for Ubuntu, that is when the version number of the package in the current Ubuntu development branch does not contain the substring "ubuntu" and there is a newer version in Debian. Entirely new packages (those not in Ubuntu at all) are also automatically imported prior to this date. The import is done by copying
[17:35] <nigelb>  the source package verbatim from Debian and building fresh binary packages on the Ubuntu autobuilders.
[17:35] <nhandler> RoboTux: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess (keep in mind, we are pretty frozen right now in preparation for lucid)
[17:35] <nigelb> so, it will enter maverick quite easily.  Lucid, well, slim chances.
[17:38] <RoboTux> Yeah, it's not really a critical package :)
[17:39] <nigelb> In that case, you can just put into a PPA
[17:41] <RoboTux> I prefer to leave it up to Ubuntu people
[17:42] <RoboTux> Maybe nobody is interested in that upload (except the submitter of the bug)
[17:44] <nigelb> well, I see its already in a PPA
[17:45] <RoboTux> I doubt this is the exact same package :)
[19:04] <nhandler> What is the reasoning behind forcing people to sign the CoC before being able to use PPAs? Most of the stuff in the CoC is not really applicable imo.
[19:07] <hyperair> nhandler: what isn't applicable? i think there needs to at least be some terms and conditions that basically say "i won't use the PPA to screw people over"
[19:08] <nhandler> hyperair: I agree with that. Along with some info about respecting copyrights and stuff like that. But I think it would be better for everyone if LP simply forced you to read and check a box saying you accept the terms of use for PPAs.
[19:09] <hyperair> nhandler: why so?
[19:09] <hyperair> nhandler: they're going to need a GPG key either way.
[19:10] <nhandler> hyperair: I just had a DD trying to build a package for Ubuntu. The CoC is what caused him not to use a PPA
[19:10] <hyperair> nhandler: heh? really? exactly what about this CoC goes against his principles?
[19:10] <hyperair> nhandler: it is really that hard to say "i'll be nice to everyone, i won't screw people over" ?
[19:12] <nhandler> That isn't what it says
[19:13]  * hyperair re-reads the CoC
[19:16] <hyperair> nhandler: so... which part is it that is so hard to agree with?
[20:25] <ddecator> i've been trying to mark a bug private for a few days now, and every time i try it times out. i had someone else try last night and they had the same issue. happens in Firefox, Chrome, and Opera. not sure if others are running into this with other bug reports or not
[21:09] <goundy> hi
[21:09] <goundy> guys, no news about lp wiki support ?
[21:09] <idnar> that's bug #240067 I believe
[21:10] <nhandler> hyperair: You're asking the wrong person ;) I've agreed to it. But it is an extra hassle to have to download sign and upload the CoC to be able to build a package.
[21:11] <hyperair> nhandler: i suppose it is.
[21:47] <lfaraone> Can anybody who's interested in maintaining project entries in Launchpad join ~registry?
[21:47] <sinzui> lfaraone, no, the registry is a group with some special permissions
[21:49] <sinzui> lfaraone, I hope to land changes in the next two months that will make membership in the group irrelevant. Community members should have permission to update projects that are common to many communities
[21:50] <sinzui> lfaraone, This will also fix another problem where the project is not owned by ~registry, but communities need to fix the project information
[21:51] <sinzui> lfaraone, what problems do you want to fix?
[21:53] <lfaraone> sinzui: there's nothing particular at the moment, I just often create LP projects for upstream projects, assign them to registry, and occasionally want to go fix something.
[21:53] <sinzui> yes, that is the reason I want to change the rules for updating projects
[21:54] <sinzui> In general, if the project is owned the ~registry, a community should be permitted to update the information, and if the project is owned by someone else, community members can provide missing information.
[21:55]  * sinzui has been adding license info to ~registry project for the last 7 hours
[21:58] <sinzui> lfaraone, until the permissions are fixed, you are welcome to suggest fixes via answers or ping me. You may also take ownership of a project if you like.
[21:59] <lfaraone> sinzui: okay, thanks.
[23:53] <persia> So, both buttercup and crabapple appear to be building openoffice.org, but different versions.  is there any way to halt a build-in-process once it becomes superceded, or is that only manual?