[04:07] <slangasek> fader_: mythbuntu being respun - sorry, I should've marked it as such on the tracker once I knew
[06:55] <ara> morning
[07:10] <ara> my internet connection is slow today :(
[07:11] <mvo> hey ara, good morning
[07:11] <ara> morning mvo :)
[11:01] <davmor2> morning all
[11:02] <ara> morning davmor2
[14:00] <davmor2> morning fader_ cr3
[14:00] <davmor2> ara: I'm going for the wubi tests now
[14:05] <fader_> davmor2: Hey dude
[15:01] <davmor2> wubi 32 pass
[16:56]  * ara tries to sync Ubuntu DVD with today's unreliable connection
[16:56]  * ara crosses her fingers
[17:13]  * ara remembers the testing community that there is a set of Generic Tests that also requires coverage
[17:13] <ara> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/4056
[17:20] <mcas1> is  there any problem with testing at the moment?
[17:21] <ara> mcas1, no, go ahead :)
[17:21] <mcas1> i am on it ara ;-)
[17:21] <mcas1> but i feel like i am alone ;-)
[17:21] <mcas1> so i want to ask if there is a new build planed or so
[17:22] <charlie-tca> you are never alone here.
[17:22] <persia> mcas1: You aren't: when you have questions, just ask here.  There are lots of folks testing (based on testing reports I see in several channels)
[17:22] <charlie-tca> No, there is no new build planned at this moment
[17:22] <mcas1> ok :-D
[17:23] <mcas1> i am doing server -i386 tests
[17:23] <charlie-tca> yay!
[17:23] <charlie-tca> We can never have too many tests, so even if someone else ran the test, feel free to run another one.
[17:23] <mcas1> but last release i think there were more testers
[17:24] <charlie-tca> just seems that way
[17:24] <mcas1> ok
[17:24] <ara> mcas1, also check in the tracker what it hasn't been covered yet, like ubuntu studio
[17:25] <mcas1> ok ara
[17:25] <mcas1> i can run 2 more test, the others i can not test at the moment
[17:25] <mcas1> then i want to help out with kubuntu tests
[17:26] <persia> ubuntustudio is *always* short i386 testers, unfortunately.
[17:26] <mcas1> ok i try ;-)
[18:13] <davmor2> ara:  Right ubuntu and kubuntu wubi killed hopefully wolverhampton will retain enough electric for me to cover xubuntu and m-a
[18:16] <mcas1> ok it looks like i found a problem
[18:16] <mcas1> can someone please test server i386 preseed with virtualbox ?
[18:16] <mcas1> after a reboot virtualbox dies
[18:18] <mcas1> or should i directly fill a bug report?
[18:20] <charlie-tca> Sounds like a bug to me
[18:21] <ara> davmor2, nice
[18:22] <mcas1> k charlie-tca i will fill a bug report
[18:23] <charlie-tca> I would attempt to confirm it, but my system is testing xubuntu 64bit right now. It would be several hours away
[18:24] <ara> mcas1, also, make sure to report back to the iso tracker (including the bug number)
[18:25] <mcas1> ara sure
[18:25] <ara> mcas1, thanks!
[18:27] <mcas1> ok stop
[18:27] <mcas1> charlie-tca: ara reading logs helps ... i had to enable PAE support
[18:30] <mcas1> my fault
[18:35] <ratte_> Hi, I'm testing Ubuntu R.C. i386 and the right card slot of "Acer Aspire One ZG5 AOA-150"(netbook) does not work!
[18:49] <davmor2> ara, slangasek: There's no wubi on xubuntu
[18:51] <davmor2> charlie-tca: can you confirm that there is no wubi.exe on xubuntu cd's please
[18:52] <ara> davmor2, oops
[18:52] <charlie-tca> Let me look
[18:54] <charlie-tca> I don't see it on 386, at least
[18:55] <charlie-tca> It was there an image or two back on the dailies
[18:55] <davmor2> I'm just checking on amd64
[18:55] <davmor2> no wubi there either
[18:56] <charlie-tca> help... Xubuntu needs wubi on the images
[19:03] <ara> 22 minutes left to sync Ubuntu DVD... almost there
[19:11] <davmor2> meh forgot I can't file a fail without a bug but I don't want to write a bug if it is fixed in a respin
[19:12] <charlie-tca> yup
[19:12] <ara> davmor2, have you confirmed that xubuntu is going to be respin?
[19:13] <davmor2> I'm assuming that slangasek will want the RC to be as close to final release as possible
[19:13] <davmor2> ara: still waiting on a reply though
[19:13] <ara> davmor2, ok
[19:30] <sbeattie> bah, I thought the fglrx failures on upgrade had been fixed?
[19:32] <ara> sbeattie, which one are you experiencing: bug 559587 or bug 552782
[19:32] <ara> or non of the above
[19:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 559587 in fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) "package fglrx (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/ati/signature', which is also in package xorg-driver-fglrx 2:8.721-0ubuntu8 (affects: 33) (dups: 5)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559587
[19:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 552782 in fglrx-installer (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "package fglrx (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-divert: mismatch on package (affects: 122) (dups: 22)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/552782
[19:32] <ara> both are supposed to be fixed
[19:33] <sbeattie> ara: one sec, looking at the logs.
[19:37] <sbeattie> ara: it's a dpkg-diversion failure, but slightly different than the in 552782
[19:38] <sbeattie> it's complaining about overwriting libdri.so in the diversion rather than removing the diversion.
[19:42] <ara> sbeattie, I can't see any similar bug, so you'd better file a new one :(
[19:44] <sbeattie> argh, launchpad oops.
[19:45] <davmor2> sbeattie: :(
[19:50] <sbeattie> argh, three attempts at filing this bug and all failed.
[19:51] <davmor2> sbeattie: are you doing it through ubuntu-bug or not?
[19:52] <davmor2> sbeattie: if you're filing direct try zzzzzz as the description
[19:54] <sbeattie> davmor2: through ubuntu-bug; I get the duplicate check, and am able to enter details/tags/blah blah blah, and then when I submit the bug, ker-boom; timeout error with an oops id.
[19:54] <davmor2> :(
[19:54] <sbeattie> I reported it in #launchpad but they're not the most responsive bunch.
[19:55] <davmor2> sbeattie: you didn't report it attached to a cattle prod that the issue there ;)
[20:04] <sbeattie> Bah, finally got it to go through: bug 567425 is it.
[20:04] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 567425 in fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) "package fglrx (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/567425
[21:44] <rlameiro> hi ther, where do my test case fits? I installed the alternate and set it to install on the remaining free space?
[21:44] <charlie-tca> guided resize?
[21:45] <rlameiro> charlie-tca: no, just using the freespace on the disk
[21:46] <charlie-tca> manual
[21:46] <rlameiro> if i recall well, was something like use the biggest continuos free space
[21:46] <rlameiro> i had 400gb on a 500 gb
[21:46] <rlameiro> and it worked as it should so do i put it on the manual?
[21:48] <charlie-tca> actually, I don't know
[21:48] <rlameiro> yeah, i was looking at the test cases info and none fits my install :D
[21:48] <charlie-tca> ara?
[21:49] <ara> charlie-tca, yes?
[21:49] <charlie-tca> rlameiro has a question you might be able to answer
[21:49]  * ara reads backlog
[21:49] <charlie-tca> installed using biggest continous free space,
[21:50] <charlie-tca> where does that fit?
[21:50] <rlameiro> yeah ara, it doesnt fit any test case
[21:50] <rlameiro> i am on ubuntu studio
[21:50] <ara> rlameiro, it does not fit any, but put it in full disk and specify under comments, please
[21:51] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[21:51] <rlameiro> ok ara thanks
[21:51] <ara> rlameiro, np
[21:51] <ara> rlameiro, it would be great if you could test some more ubuntu studio test cases, if you have time (even in a VM)
[21:52] <rlameiro> can i do it in a vm???
[21:52] <rlameiro> well, like that i will make all of them :D
[21:52] <ara> rlameiro, that would be awesome!
[21:53] <rlameiro> ada well, now that i have a 64 bit, i can now run 64 VM :D
[21:54] <ara> rlameiro, hw it is always better, but virtual machines are also OK
[21:54] <ara> rlameiro, it would be nice to specify that in the comments as well (whenever you are using VM)
[21:54] <ara> rlameiro, thanks for testing!
[21:56] <rlameiro> okok
[21:56] <rlameiro> well need to get the train.
[21:56] <charlie-tca> rlameiro: good luck, and thank you
[23:32] <slangasek> edubuntu marked for respin, per highvoltage / stgraber
[23:32] <fader_> slangasek: Were the mythbuntu respins due to the bugs I filed yesterday or were there other issues causing that?
[23:33] <fader_> I saw your message in my scrollback this morning but wasn't quite sure what to make of it :)
[23:33] <slangasek> fader_: it was because mythplugins needed a reupload to let us get rid of mysql-dfsg-5.0 from the archive
[23:33] <charlie-tca> slangasek: what about xubuntu - missing wubi - respin ?
[23:33] <fader_> slangasek: Ah, okay, then I won't panic if I see them again :)  Thanks.
[23:33] <highvoltage> slangasek: thanks, from here on I think we'll be good
[23:33] <slangasek> fader_: sorry, knew it was coming much earlier than it did and should have marked it
[23:34] <fader_> No worries, it keeps me in practice ;)
[23:34] <slangasek> charlie-tca: will look as soon as I have a chance to give edubuntu its push
[23:34] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[23:51] <slangasek> charlie-tca: please clarify what you mean when you say "wubi isn't on the images"
[23:51] <slangasek> charlie-tca: I couldn't find the bug, so I just checked the ISO file list and it's there
[23:52] <slangasek> $ grep -i wubi xubuntu/daily-live/current/*.list
[23:52] <slangasek> xubuntu/daily-live/current/lucid-desktop-amd64.list:/wubi.exe
[23:52] <slangasek> xubuntu/daily-live/current/lucid-desktop-i386.list:/wubi.exe
[23:52] <charlie-tca> When you try to install using wubi, it does not appear in any menu
[23:53] <charlie-tca> You can not select it on 368 or 64bit images
[23:53] <slangasek> what menu?
[23:53] <charlie-tca> davmor2 did not file the bug until we heard from you
[23:53] <charlie-tca> I put the desktop cd in the drive, there is no wubi to select
[23:54] <slangasek> while running Windows?
[23:54] <charlie-tca> yup
[23:54] <slangasek> you don't see it when browsing the CD?
[23:54] <charlie-tca> nope
[23:55] <slangasek> ok; I'm going to have to download the ISO locally to pick this appart, so it's going to be a while
[23:55] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[23:55] <charlie-tca> Even if we respin the rest of the tests should be okay
[23:57] <slangasek> they'll still need to be retested with the new image, we don't trust that things stay the way they should this close to RC
[23:57] <slangasek> like, for instance, wubi disappearing :)
[23:57] <charlie-tca> Oh, okay
[23:57] <charlie-tca> I'll run them again