[00:00] \sh, awesome, I was planning to look into that to try to get it for Maverick [00:00] mathiaz, what kind of other alternatives? [00:01] RoAkSoAx: well - whatever you need to do to register a puppet client [00:01] RoAkSoAx: I don't have a specific example [00:01] RoAkSoAx: as I would use the cloud-config support for puppet [00:03] mathiaz, I see then... i'll look into it then. And btw.. would that work with regular KVM's? or Only for the Cloud instances? [00:03] RoAkSoAx: only UEC/EC2 images [00:03] RoAkSoAx: it also depends what you use to run your kvm [00:04] RoAkSoAx: for now the necessary information is brought via the user-data option [00:05] mathiaz, well I would like to test it on my local machine without having to implement a UEC [00:05] RoAkSoAx: it == ? [00:06] mathiaz, ?? :/ [00:06] what do you mean [00:07] RoAkSoAx: you wanna test *what* without the cloud? [00:08] mathiaz, i mean auto registration of the puppet client [00:08] as if they were running in the cloud [00:08] but they would be running on a local machine on KVM [00:09] RoAkSoAx: well - that wouldn't work since the work done is to enable automatic registration in the cloud [00:10] mathiaz, that is managed by puppet... correct? [00:11] RoAkSoAx: the cloud? no it's not managed by puppet [00:12] mathiaz, no i the integration of puppet to EC2/UEC will allow a puppet server to register to a puppet master that are both running in the cloud? [00:13] s/puppet server/puppet client [00:13] which also means that the instance will be registering to the cloud, correct? [00:16] RoAkSoAx: well - it's the other way around [00:17] RoAkSoAx: the cloud starts an instance [00:17] RoAkSoAx: and the instance will be able to register to any puppet master [00:17] RoAkSoAx: I need to jet out [00:17] RoAkSoAx: I'd suggest to read up the series of blog post I made about puppet-UEC/EC2 integration [00:18] mathiaz, i will thanks :) [00:18] RoAkSoAx: http://ubuntumathiaz.wordpress.com [00:19] debug6 hggdh [00:20] hggdh, i've never seen that error. sigh. [00:23] smoser: heh. which error? ;-) [00:23] red only filesystem [00:23] read even [00:24] smoser: yeah, this sucks... I just opened bug 565101 about that [00:24] Launchpad bug 565101 in eucalyptus "walrus reports java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/565101 [00:24] smoser: could you prepare a debug6-compatible image for the RC? [00:25] hggdh, you mean take the rc image and enable some debug ? [00:25] heres the problem with that. [00:25] bug 566793 [00:25] Launchpad bug 566793 in eucalyptus "euca-get-console-output gives first 64k of output, not most recent" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/566793 [00:26] the reason that is a problem is that if you turn upstart debugging on, output is so verbose that you don't get the end of it [00:27] i worked around that here by ssh'ing to the NC and getting the console log from there, but in your situation with multiple NC, it'd be harder [00:27] <\sh> hggdh, is tomcat somehow involved? [00:31] \sh I do not think so [00:31] smoser: yes, have the debug code on the RC -- but only if we will learn something new from it, I guess [00:32] damm, gave the wrong bug # on the console thingy [00:32] the readonly FS is bug 567592 [00:32] Launchpad bug 567592 in cloud-init "rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/urandom/random-seed': Read-only file system" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/567592 [00:33] \sh no tomcat (just checked) [00:34] <\sh> hggdh, well, the bug sounded like a long time hanging tomcat bug regarding "re-starting/re-deploying" tomcat webapps.. [00:39] hggdh, ok. i have registered 3 amis now [00:39] euca-describe-images | grep "emi.*20100420" [00:39] lucid-20100420-debug-upstart/lucid-server-uec-amd64.img.manifest.xml [00:39] lucid-20100420/lucid-server-uec-amd64.img.manifest.xml [00:40] lucid-20100420-debug-upstart-loud/lucid-server-uec-amd64.img.manifest.xml [00:40] debug-upstart-loud has debug at 'info' [00:40] debug-upstart actually has no upstart debug, but does have some from cloud-init [00:49] smoser: thank you. I will see what happens with them ;-) [00:50] but as i said, hggdh, due to that console output bug, if you don't capture the whole console output, its not that useful [00:51] but for this read-only one, i have mountall debug on [00:51] so that might help [00:51] ah. wait. [00:51] we've seen this before [00:51] the plymouth not available [00:51] kirkland was moaning about this in -devel the other day [00:52] kirkland, did you open an issie on this ? [00:58] smoser: as far as I can remember pretty much all failed instances (I took out the console output for success) seem to have a plymouth barfing [00:58] yes, but in this case mountall decided to do something about it :) [00:58] thats the difference [00:58] heh [00:58] which image has mountall at debug? [00:59] both [00:59] both the debug ones [00:59] the -loud has upstart to [00:59] stick with the non loud [01:00] yes, sounds like a very good idea. [01:00] there we go :-) [01:00] i just instaleld the -debug0 package that i put together for your other bug [01:01] hggdh, i have to run [01:01] sorry === sferry is now known as sammah [01:03] smoser: thank you, and have a nice evening === sammah is now known as samferry [02:24] anyone here? [03:11] hi! [03:11] anyone seeing apparmor related oops on install ? http://p.defau.lt/?nBDkcPAlmAk_DmALqzZzag [03:13] domas: I haven't seen anything like that, but jjohansen will be interested. [03:13] I'm having troubles running installer on 2x6 core opteron boxes [03:13] thats brand new CPU, so may be related :) [03:14] though managed to install one box :) [03:14] domas: can you file that in a bug [03:15] have to figure out how can I contact canonical support :)) [03:15] domas: also which kernel? [03:15] 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu [03:15] what are you trying to install? [03:15] different oops now: http://p.defau.lt/?FSq_675qXqvJxQDZLdwATw [03:16] karmic [03:16] this is unattended install, that succeeds on all our other machines [03:16] just this class of machines fails [03:17] domas: hrmm, strange [03:17] I installed one :) [03:18] tried karmic, failed, tried hardy ,failed, succeeded with next karmic install :) [03:18] domas: have you tried Lucid? [03:18] I'm not sure I have network image for that one around [03:19] is it released yet? [03:19] ah, few more weeks [03:20] domas: its RC so very close, its kernel would probably better support that rig [03:21] domas, there are dailies. [03:23] anyway [03:23] pure magic is that I have it installed on one box ;-) [03:23] let me retrace the steps ;-))) [03:28] hardy kernel was locking up on all older machines of this type too :) [03:30] hmmm, now hardy installer is working [03:32] btw, is there a way to create stripe-aligned (or 1MB-aligned) partitions with automated installer? :) [03:43] domas: not that I know of, but then I don't play with that stuff much [04:05] I've specified a directory on my new mail server that I would like to mount separately from the rest of the file system (along with a couple of others that do work correctly). I am specifying the directory as this in fstab: /dev/sdm /var/spool/mail/virtual ext3 defaults,noatime,noacl,data=ordered 1 2…. it shows up as /var/mail/virtual …. http://pastebin.com/LmvZBMWr [04:38] hi, what is a good way to monitor a server load for a period of time? [04:42] * deslector wonders if it is possible to monitor power consumption too [04:42] you can monitor power consumption, if your chassis supports that :) [04:42] hi [04:42] hehe [04:43] actual_power = 300 [04:43] when sending a message with the command mail, can I set the sender's address ? [04:43] maxagaz: use 'sendmail' and provide headers [04:48] domas, hmm... I don't know, but don't think so... this is one of the cheap ProLiants [04:48] I'll check into it, though... [04:51] hmm... pwrkap may be what I want [05:36] New bug: #567701 in ntp (main) "Date not updated by ntp when network interfaces started" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/567701 [08:03] guys, I have two NIC interface configured on different subnets on my ubuntu server [08:03] one on 192.168.44.x and the other on 192.168.45.x [08:04] please confirm if the gateway used by these interfaces should be different [08:04] when i do a 'route -n' , i see that the gateway for both is 0.0.0.0... which then is 192.168.44.2 [08:05] so.. is this a problem? [08:05] please advise [08:05] That entirely depends on the network configuration. [08:05] But unless you're doing something especially fancy, there should only be one route to 0.0.0.0 on a host. [08:05] persia... how can a 192.168.45.x subnet us a 192.168.44.2 gateway? [08:06] persia... shouldn't 192.168.45.x use itself is the gateway? [08:06] Because your host routes packets from 192.168.45.x to the 192.168.44.x interface to go to the 192.168.44.2 device, which then routes them somewhere else. [08:06] No. [08:07] persia.. that's what I dont want.. I done want packets to go from 192.168.45.x to 192.168.44.x [08:07] Assuming you have a single-gateway network, *other* hosts on 192.168.45.0/24 (assuming that's your network size) should use 192.168.45.x as a gateway. [08:07] Can we use numbers? Your use of "x" confuses me. Let's call them 17 and 23. [08:07] So 192.168.44.17 uses 192.168.44.2 as a gateway. [08:08] 192.168.44.17 is the same host as 192.168.45.23 [08:08] packets originating from that host should be routed to the internet through 192.168.44.2 [08:08] it is? [08:08] 192.168.45.19 is a compeltely different host. [08:09] It uses 192.168.45.23 as a gateway. [08:09] If you want the dual-homed host to *not* route IPv4 packets, fiddle with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward [08:09] yes.. I dont want the packets sent via 192.168.45.x to go through 192.168.44.x [08:09] how do i guarantee that? [08:10] So you want 192.168.45.19 to not have access to the internet? [08:10] echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward [08:10] persia... say I ping another machine on the 192.168.45.0/24 network [08:10] from where? [08:10] it should go via 192.168.45.x on this machine [08:11] * persia waits for an example that *doesn't* use "x" to continue responding [08:12] (fake numbers are fine: I don't need the specifics, but I need something to usefully reference to distinguish the dual-homed host from other hosts) [08:14] swift: you only have one default gw that reaches 0.0.0.0 (e.g. internet) [08:14] (usually) [08:14] for 192.168.45.0/24 you want a route that points to 192.168.45.0 [08:14] persia: right, for his case [08:14] right. [08:15] so you should have: [08:15] Destination Gateway mask Iface [08:15] 192.168.44.0 * eth0 [08:15] 192.168.45.0 * eth1 [08:15] default 192.168.44.2 eth0 [08:16] forgot the mask in there.. [08:16] 255.255.255.0 for the first 2, and 0.0.0.0 for the last one [08:23] if 192.168.45.10 is pinging 192.168.45.11(other machine)... it should use the 192.16845.x gateway... [08:24] <_ruben> no, it shouldnt (need to) use a gateway at all [08:24] Yes, and it ought do it automatically (assuming 192.168.45.10 is the dual-homed machine) [08:25] yes.. [08:25] but on the server the route shows it uses 192.168.44.2 as the gateway [08:25] That's correct. [08:25] So "gateway" has a couple potential interpretations. The simplest one is that it's the route used to get to 0.0.0.0 [08:25] <_ruben> "the gateway" is kind of ambiguous (sp?) [08:25] Hi [08:27] swift: So I wouldn't worry much about 192.168.45.10: that machine sounds like it can get everywhere in all the correct ways. Check from 192.168.45.11 to verify it can ping 192.168.45.10 and can't ping 192.168.44.2 [08:27] (where 192.168.45.11 should use 192.168.45.10 for 0.0.0.0) [08:28] how can i use that interface? [08:28] forgot ping syntax [08:28] :D [08:29] On 192.168.45.11 run `ping 192.168.44.2` [08:31] persia.. I can see that it can ping a .44 IP on another machine!! [08:31] i do 'ping -I eth1 192.168.44.13' [08:31] it pings [08:31] From 192.168.45.11? [08:31] where eth1 is 192.168.45.11 [08:31] yes [08:31] OK. So, is this what you want? [08:32] will I have to put a route there [08:32] No, if you can ping, it already works. [08:32] no... I shouldn't be able to communicate with 192.168.44.x network [08:32] from 192.168.45.11... I should only be able to ping another 192.168.45.x IP [08:32] OK, in that case, you want to disable IPv4 forwarding on 192.168.45.10. [08:33] * _ruben votes for a graphical network diagram and clear description of what should and should not be possible/allowed ;) [08:33] *OR* remove the route to 0.0.0.0 through 192.168.45.10 on 192.168.45.11. For extra points, do both. [08:37] The topic's tinyurl appears to be broken. [08:38] <_ruben> seems to be cut off indeed [08:38] <_ruben> adding "er" to it does work [08:39] Oh! I thought it was intentionally missing. :) [08:39] But is that really the intended page? It redirects to a blog post, rather than “doc and resources”. [08:40] <_ruben> wouldnt know ;) [09:24] hi all. any idea why /etc/postfix/main.cf seems to be missing in lucid? [09:25] RoyK: I have it on a relatively fresh install for which I've done only minimal postfix configuration (setting up satellite system in the prompts). Did you maybe say "no configuration" on initial setup? [09:26] I didn't install the box, but perhaps the guy who did so chose that - wouldn't surprise me [09:26] RoyK: I just tested a fresh lucid postfix install in a chroot, and indeed, if one selects "No Configuration", no main.cf is produced (which seems like the correct behaviour to me). [09:27] Try `dpkg-reconfigure postifx` [09:30] persia: that was indeed the problem - the guy had just chosen "no config" because he didn't understand what to do and didn't bother to read those five lines [09:32] RoyK: That's actually probably the safest thing that could have been done, and it makes it easy to fix (with dpkg-reconfigure). [09:34] yeah [10:04] hi there [10:04] plymouth seems to be blocking startup on lucid [10:04] anybody witnessed that? [10:18] raphink: That's almost never actually plymouth. What's the specific issue? [10:18] when we reboot the server [10:18] almost no service is started [10:18] except ntp [10:18] syslog-ng is not started for example [10:18] and plymouthd keeps running [10:18] after I log in ssh [10:19] deactivating plymouth in /etc/init seemed to help with quite a few services [10:19] Odd. All plymouth should be doing is IO multiplexing (and maybe some screen draws). [10:20] Are you sure something else isn't hanging on IO, and it gets a bit further when it crashes on an IO failure when plymouth isn't around? [10:22] I've tried to put bootchart [10:22] to log what's happening during the boot [10:22] but it doesn't generate the png [10:22] it crashes quite badly [10:24] Can you get the bootlog info, and then generate the graphics post-boot? [10:25] Also, have you filed a bug? This doens7t happen for my serers, and it sounds potentially serious. [10:27] empathy crashed ;-) [10:28] Heh. You're having great luck today :) [10:28] Have you filed a bug yet? [10:28] (about the boot) [10:29] no, I've been searching through the bugs on LP [10:29] ideally, we'd get rid of plymouth [10:29] but there's a bug that is marked as invalid about too strict deps on plymouth [10:30] No, plymouth is essential. Nothing else handles boot-time IO. Using text mode, it doesn't even do much GUI stuff. [10:31] I'd recommend filing a bug against upstart: it shouldn't half-start a system without giving you useful output. [10:31] well currently we haven't checked the console output [10:32] we'll go to the machine room this afternoon hopefully to have a look at it [10:34] That's worth checking: I suspect that it will give you a better target for the bug report. [10:35] ok [10:35] thanks for your time === diehaai is now known as thefish [11:17] what would one enable on apache to get .htaccess stuff working? i just need to pass protect a certain folder [11:18] <_ruben> AllowOverrides [11:19] <_ruben> and you dont need .htaccess for that per se, can be done in (global) config just as well [11:23] _ruben, yes i see, seems everything is configured, but still not working [11:29] <_ruben> not working? tell it to get a job then [11:29] _ruben: /etc/glusterfs/store01-tcp.vol 8.1T 116M 8.1T 1% /mnt/storage [11:29] working with the lucid packages ;) [11:30] <_ruben> binBASH: nice, i should run some tests with it as well, might have some usecases for it [11:30] _ruben: Well I only run it with 100 Mbit though [11:30] provider doesn't have gbit :p [11:31] so only 5.8 MB /sec for writes [11:31] but I don't need fast storage [11:31] can live with that. [11:37] _ruben, i have some other users, that cannot access global conf, so i'd like this to work via htaccess [11:37] anything wrong with this http://pastebin.com/fq9ZVSwP ? === libertiy is now known as libertiy|away [11:40] <_ruben> bronto2: looks good, tho it being only a partial config, cant say anything definitive about it [11:41] hmm, there is no AllowOverrides directive in apache2.conf [11:41] but should defaults to ALL right? [11:43] <_ruben> a sane config sets the default to None === libertiy|away is now known as libertiy [13:20] mdz, fyi, i found a bug that had us not un-publishing our daily images, which caused the ramp up [13:20] in ec2 images as reported by cloudmarket [13:21] smoser, nice work [13:21] might save us a few pennies on our S3 bill too ;-) [13:48] hello, runing hardy + samba 3.0.28 I have an error log like [13:48] create_builtin_users: Failed to create Users [13:48] any idea to fix this please ? [13:50] smoser: any reason why "Ubuntu Server EC2 EBS (Europe) amd64 (ami-8b705aff)" has no registered results so far ? [13:50] humans suck [13:50] i tested, just didn't record [13:51] ttx, fixed [13:51] smoser: thanks ! [13:52] smoser: I hit the "no ssh connection" issue on amd64 UEC images quite a few times, I confirm it looks like a timing issue, the slower i386 image didn't hit it in my tests [13:53] ttx, did you get console logs ? [13:53] because there are 2 possible issues [13:53] and one i have much less understanding on [13:54] smoser: yes, I have it, let me pastebin it [13:55] smoser: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/419841/ === ogra_ is now known as ogra [13:55] it's the test with your test userdatafile [13:55] is that system u p? [13:55] smoser: shows hello world alright [13:55] smoser: no longer [13:56] i can reproduce it if need be though [13:56] thats bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/565018 [13:56] Launchpad bug 565018 in cloud-init "instance is not reachable via ssh" [Undecided,New] [13:56] and i have been extremely unsuccessful in reproducing it with some debug on [13:56] i've run probably 2000 instances trying to [13:57] smoser: it's also a metadata service issue ? [13:57] no. i dont think so. [13:57] i have no clue on this. [13:57] try 19/20 ? [13:57] wait, where ? [13:58] smoser: in your bug comments [13:58] (note, the 19/20 stuff is just bad, it zero based counting) [13:59] ttx, the comment... the 25 cases that have that in their logs are *not* your bug [13:59] that you're sseeing, and that i can't reproduce easily [13:59] i have some info i'd like to get if it reproduces [13:59] 1.) want to collect successfully the error messages from ssh when you connect [14:00] I can reproduce it if you need [14:00] 2.) want to try ssh-keyscan and get those errors [14:00] 3.) ideally turn debug on in upstart, but that seems to reduce likelyhood of error [14:00] ttx, for 1 and 2 if you can get a recreate, please collect [14:01] on my way [14:01] for 3 if you can install the cloud-init from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/566792 [14:01] Launchpad bug 566792 in eucalyptus "UEC guests sometimes fail on consuming user data (metadata service isn't ready)" [High,Confirmed] [14:01] when you dpkg -i that, it will tell you how to enable upstart debug [14:02] the problem with upstart debug is that due to bug 566793 you can't get all the console data if you use upstart debug [14:02] Launchpad bug 566793 in eucalyptus "euca-get-console-output gives first 64k of output, not most recent" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/566793 [14:02] its too verbose [14:05] smoser: hm, can't reproduce it now [14:05] maybe you need to change the way you're sitting in your seat [14:06] :-( [14:06] New bug: #527933 in bacula (main) "wuiso" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/527933 [14:06] i would really like to get debug on this, because I can't come up with any idea as to why its not working. it seems to me that the cloud-init-cfg stuff is just not getting started (ie, upstart jobs not running) [14:07] * ttx grumbles [14:09] * ttx scraps his topology3 setup that now works like a clockwork and tries a topology 2 [14:10] ttx, for this i really dont think its topology based at all [14:10] i think its racey inside the image itself [14:12] smoser: sure, but I need to cover the missing ISo tests more than I need to chase heisenbugs [14:12] because cloud-init ran, and sshd ran (runs on 'filesystem' event, same as the cloud-init-cfg events) [14:12] one never knows, it might reappear and be time-since-registration-sensitive [14:12] or due to having '.tar' regex in the manifest name :) [14:12] smoser: do I detect some sarcasm ? :) [14:15] how can you tell, looking at the console logs, the difference between bug 565018 and bug 566792 ? [14:15] Launchpad bug 565018 in cloud-init "instance is not reachable via ssh" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/565018 [14:15] smoser: ^ [14:15] Launchpad bug 566792 in eucalyptus "UEC guests sometimes fail on consuming user data (metadata service isn't ready)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/566792 [14:16] ttx, look at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44832884/guest-error.log and http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44479315/console.fail.1.txt [14:16] firs is the "fail on consuming" [14:17] see, it falls all over the place , all the cloud-init-cfg stuff runs, but fails because its got no metadata [14:17] in the second, the stuff either runs quietly to success or not at all [14:17] smoser: it's that verbose even with the default image ? [14:17] there are no python trace [14:17] yeah... the python throws error [14:18] ok, then I definitely have been hitting 565018 [14:18] I don't remember ever seeing those python stacktraces in console logs [14:18] * ttx fixes iso test results accordingly [14:19] well, if/when you do, please get 'ssh -v instance-ip 2>err.txt 1>out.txt' and 'ssh-keyscan instance-ip 2>err.keyscan 1>out.keyscan' please [14:19] ttx, well, you shoudln't see them :) [14:19] excellent. [14:20] kirkland/nijaba: RH has produced the library "netcf" [https://fedorahosted.org/netcf/] for configuring/polling network configuration. This library is (in theory) distribution-agnostic, but lacks a backend for Ubuntu/Debian. The library is used by libvirt to support advanced (remote) network configuration/usage, and virt-manager now expose this as well. There is also talk about using it in NetworkManager [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Shared_N [14:20] "Someone" should write a new backend for Netcf so that libvirt in Ubuntu can use these new features. It is written in C, and will need a developer that also is knowledgeable in network configuration "the Debian way". [14:20] I propose that this is written up for discussion at UDS. I do not think the community will develop this, due to it being so tightly coupled with the distribution. [14:20] (Okay, this is possibly ML material, but I don't really hang around in them much.. :-)) [14:21] zul: could you cover the amd64/printserver and amd64/postgresql ISO tests ? [14:21] ttx: yep [14:31] in fstab for lvm do you use /dev/lvm-raid/shares or the /dev/mapper device? [14:34] baffle: thanks, answered in #ubuntu-virt, though I will copy here for everyone else's benefit [14:34] nijaba: baffle: hi guys, I am familiar with netcf, i'm tracking its progress [14:34] nijaba: baffle: I'd very much like to see it packaged and used in Ubuntu in Maverick [14:34] nijaba: baffle: that's not a commitment, though [14:34] nijaba: baffle: but I will put together a spec [14:34] kirkland: Wunderbar (from #ubuntu-virt) [14:35] baffle: ;-) [14:35] baffle: what's your LP id? [14:35] baffle: i'll subscribe you to the blueprint (once I get around to writing it) [14:37] kirkland: Hmm. Either dag-stenstad, or dag.stenstad@ventelohosting.no or baffle. :-) Not sure wich is my ID, really. OpenID is https://launchpad.net/~dag-stenstad [14:37] baffle: cheers [14:40] kirkland: I'm so confused! Wich is my ID? :) [14:40] baffle: s/^.*~// [14:40] baffle: dag-stenstad [14:46] hi everybody! does anyone knows a channel for wxpython without the need to get a registry? [15:01] smoser: meeting time ? [15:01] (nm) [15:11] kirkland, where do we register our test results? also, sounds like UEC testings is high priority for lucid release. [15:12] osmosis: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ [15:16] New bug: #494141 in samba (main) "CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/494141 [15:26] kirkland, the oops... its the emulated scsi device [15:26] smoser: oh, is it? [15:26] smoser: well that's not a kernel thing then [15:27] yeah. i duped hggdh's to my bug that i'd previously opened on that. [15:27] searching for numbers [15:27] bug 564924 is dupe of bug 546458 [15:27] Launchpad bug 564924 in linux "UEC guest sometimes gets kernel OOPS (dup-of: 546458)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/564924 [15:27] Launchpad bug 546458 in qemu-kvm "kernel NULL pointer in -virtual (-server) kernel" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/546458 [16:12] hummm what am i looking for [16:12] !lucid [16:12] Lucid Lynx is the codename for Ubuntu 10.04, due April 29th, 2010 - Lucid is NOT released and is NOT stable - Discussion and support only in #ubuntu+1 - Development Schedule: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidReleaseSchedule [16:13] not what i want either [16:13] anyone have a link to where i can get the beta 2 of ubuntu server [16:17] kirkland, smoser, ttx: fyi, I added an fd leak check to test-libvirt.py in QRT. it only tests start/destroy, but more can be added if needed [16:17] that will hopefully help moving forward [16:17] jdstrand: neat :-) [16:17] 8 days :D [16:18] RC tomorrow [16:18] eagles05138785: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current/ [16:18] ty guntbert [16:19] eagles05138785: you're welcome :-) [16:19] Jeeves_: would rather get it now and have something to install with then wait till release when everyone is fighting for a piece of lucid [16:19] fighting for a piece of the lynx haha [16:19] heh [16:19] * cloakable will wait a bit [16:20] team: need help on nfs client [16:20] cloakable: regardless of it being the beta u install with or the rc you still get the same updates [16:20] thanks again guntbert :) [16:20] My share is disconnected intermettenlt [16:20] y [16:20] need help on finding the casue [16:21] eagles05138785: Yeah, but I'd rather wait for stable, then the first round of updates to make sure it's stable :P [16:21] everyone to their own so i say hehe [16:21] eagles05138785: I'm allready running it for about 5 months [16:21] ya been on it since early alphas [16:21] since late alphas on my server early alphas on vm on my desktop running kubuntu [16:21] would rather do a clean install on my server then upgrading so i dont have any reminants of karmic around hehe [17:02] what have they improved in ubuntu server 10.4? [17:07] kirkland: really, eucalyptus is not doing garbage collection. Memory usage at the CC and CLC is still high, after 5+ hours of idling [17:07] kirkland: I noticed you said that you wanted to fix bug #562266 [17:07] Launchpad bug 562266 in libvirt "Make virt-pki-validate usable on Ubuntu" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/562266 [17:09] kirkland: fyi: ubuntu26 is already in the queue and it might be nice to fix bug #565380 in the process [17:09] jdstrand: what do you think? [17:09]