| === KB1JWQ is now known as PFY | ||
| === PFY is now known as KB1JWQ | ||
| === kamalm is now known as kamalm-away | ||
| Sarvatt | Keybuk: did you ever have a bug filed about your RS600 problem? | 03:55 |
|---|---|---|
| Keybuk | Sarvatt: RS600 ? | 04:00 |
| Keybuk | that sounds like a kind of bike | 04:00 |
| Sarvatt | latitude XT? | 04:00 |
| Keybuk | oh, the Radeon thing? | 04:01 |
| Sarvatt | yeah | 04:01 |
| Keybuk | no, I don't think I ever filed a bug | 04:01 |
| Sarvatt | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/544590 | 04:02 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 544590 in linux "[RS600] video freeze with KMS (X and plymouth) (upstream patches available)" [High,Triaged] | 04:02 |
| Sarvatt | was that commit I linked in there the same one that they put together for ya to fix it? | 04:03 |
| Sarvatt | drm/radeon/kms: initialize set_surface_reg reg for rs600 asic | 04:03 |
| Keybuk | not sure, the laptop and my notes are 5000 miles away | 04:03 |
| Keybuk | but it sounds familiar | 04:03 |
| Keybuk | I don't think I ever actually got around to testing it | 04:03 |
| Sarvatt | ahh ok | 04:03 |
| Keybuk | got distracted by the nvidia which needed more active help from me | 04:04 |
| Keybuk | remind me when I'm not in SF | 04:04 |
| Sarvatt | that GPU is like the rarest of the rare of ATI's, they pulled them from the market during the AMD/ATI merger | 04:04 |
| Sarvatt | (and it's unusable with lucid without nomodeset at the moment) | 04:04 |
| Sarvatt | it's ok, got 2 testers to build kernels for to be sure the fixes work :) | 04:05 |
| Keybuk | yeah, that's what I was told upstream | 04:06 |
| RAOF | Sarvatt: That's the GPU with GTT issues where it'll eventually corrupt all your ram, isn't it? | 04:08 |
| Sarvatt | yup | 04:08 |
| artnay | any chance to include new files into linux-firmware? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/560306 | 10:18 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 560306 in linux "[lucid] ATI hd5xxx cards wrongly doing kms?" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 10:18 |
| apw | artnay, whats the issue? | 13:53 |
| artnay | apw: there are several setups (seems like affected are only i5/i7 and 5xxx users) which don't even boot using live CD. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/560306 has the details and links. | 13:56 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 560306 in linux-firmware "[lucid] ATI hd5xxx cards wrongly doing kms?" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 13:56 |
| artnay | if you compare the output of "dpkg -L linux-firmware | grep radeon" and http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git;a=tree;f=radeon;h=3dc32482fcf179c43e2fcc0b30303f231774820a;hb=HEAD it seems that 5xxx series is missing firmware files (which probably would help with the boot issue) | 13:57 |
| artnay | I could be totally wrong but that's the only way I see it at the moment. | 13:58 |
| artnay | the bug was filed against linux but I moved it against linux-firmware (where it belongs AFAIK) | 13:59 |
| apw | artnay, ta | 14:00 |
| tgardner | apw, I synced with dwmw2/linux-firmware before I left. Seems that he's added a few new files. | 14:02 |
| tgardner | apw, here it is: 'radeon: add evergreen family microcode.' | 14:03 |
| apw | yeah looks like a rebase may be in order before release | 14:04 |
| apw | _if_ we can confirm it doesn't change any files at least | 14:04 |
| apw | otherwise selective picks at least | 14:04 |
| tgardner | apw, I'm thinking I'll on;y add the evergreen stuff. there are lots of other changfes, but we should SRU them after the fact | 14:04 |
| apw | fair enough | 14:05 |
| === kamalm-away is now known as kamalm | ||
| mjg59 | Is Jerone around? | 18:38 |
| mjg59 | I've just sent a patch for the Lenovo USB resume problem | 18:38 |
| mjg59 | Thinko in the PCI resume code | 18:38 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| apw | mjg59, to kernel-team@ ?? | 19:45 |
| apw | or upstream, or :) | 19:45 |
| mjg59 | apw: Upstream | 19:47 |
| mjg59 | Should be on -acpi and -pci | 19:47 |
| apw | cool ... thanks for the heads up | 19:47 |
| apw | kamalm, your patch was miss categorised cause i missed removing the SRU: prefix | 20:29 |
| apw | i'll fix that up and repush it | 20:30 |
| kamalm | apw: thank you sir. I must admit that I was^Wam confused about which [TAGS] and TAGS: to add or not add, and what purpose they all serve | 20:31 |
| apw | kamalm, yet another thing which is not well documented. we tried to clean up the templates, and they are a hell of a lot better but they are not right still | 20:32 |
| kamalm | apw: well, we have in debian/commit-templates: sauce-patch and upstream-patch (but no just "patch" as the wiki claims). I think I added [Lucid] and SRU: manually, following examples I'd seen, but I felt like I was mostly just guessing (and hoped some kindly human would fix it before a script got its mitts on it). | 20:34 |
| apw | putting things in [] are good as they get stripped automatically on applicaiton and [SRU Lucid] is probabally an appropriate prefix | 20:35 |
| apw | but yes its all a bit broken and i've added it to our next sprint agenda for review | 20:35 |
| apw | tgardner, do i remember correctly that you were looking at the radeon firmware issue? | 20:49 |
| tgardner | apw, yep, I uploaded a PPA linux-firmware this morning for the Evergreen series and asked for test results. | 20:51 |
| tgardner | bug 560306 | 20:51 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 560306 in linux-firmware "[lucid] ATI hd5xxx cards wrongly doing kms?" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/560306 | 20:51 |
| apw | excellent, then i can forget about it :) | 20:52 |
| kamalm | cking: around? I still get no joy from the acpi_osi workaround for bug 539477 | 21:50 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 539477 in gnome-settings-daemon "Video out hot key sends super + p + return on many upcoming Dell & HP systems" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539477 | 21:50 |
| cking | kamalm, care to send me your DSDT again and I will see why it fails | 22:01 |
| kamalm | cking: again? I never sent it to you before (but will be happy to do so) -- lets make sure I'm even using the workaround correctly. I've tried booting with acpi_osi="Windows 2006" and acpi_osi="!Windows 2009" but neither helps -- is that syntax proper (i.e. the quotes and the !) ? | 22:02 |
| cking | kamalm, my fail, try this acpi_osi=\"!Windows 2009\" | 22:05 |
| cking | kamalm, if that fails, send me your dmesg output | 22:06 |
| kamalm | cking: okay, that *does* work (yay!) | 22:07 |
| kamalm | cking: perhaps you would like to post a comment to the bug with this new and improved workaround? The last post on the matter suggest using "Windows 2006". | 22:08 |
| cking | kamalm, well !Windows 2009 will work until a new version appears and the kernel picks it up, then it will fail again | 22:14 |
| kamalm | cking: it'll do for now anyway -- I note that jerone's comment #20 in that bug recommends acpi_osi="Windows 2006" (with no backslashes) so it would not get processed correctly -- but I find that \"Windows 2006\" isn't helpful anyway. | 22:18 |
| cking | kamalm, the Windows 2006 method may/may not work depending on the order and how the OSI probes are handled in ACPI. It's ugly and broken | 22:27 |
| cking | I've update the bug | 22:27 |
| kamalm | cking: thank you (for the update, and for the workaround!) | 22:28 |
| cking | kamalm, thank ppetraki for this one | 22:28 |
| cking | I like comment | 22:29 |
| cking | oops, I like the penultimate comment on the bug report | 22:29 |
| kamalm | thank you ppetraki :-) | 22:29 |
| kamalm | cking: yup. I call first swing with the bat! | 22:31 |
| cking | I'm scared of them getting back to me | 22:31 |
| cking | ;-) | 22:31 |
| cnd | xrandr | 22:45 |
| cnd | oops | 22:45 |
| cnd | wrong kb | 22:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!