=== KB1JWQ is now known as PFY
=== PFY is now known as KB1JWQ
=== kamalm is now known as kamalm-away
[03:55] <Sarvatt> Keybuk: did you ever have a bug filed about your RS600 problem?
[04:00] <Keybuk> Sarvatt: RS600 ?
[04:00] <Keybuk> that sounds like a kind of bike
[04:00] <Sarvatt> latitude XT?
[04:01] <Keybuk> oh, the Radeon thing?
[04:01] <Sarvatt> yeah
[04:01] <Keybuk> no, I don't think I ever filed a bug
[04:02] <Sarvatt> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/544590
[04:02] <ubot3> Malone bug 544590 in linux "[RS600] video freeze with KMS (X and plymouth) (upstream patches available)" [High,Triaged] 
[04:03] <Sarvatt> was that commit I linked in there the same one that they put together for ya to fix it?
[04:03] <Sarvatt> drm/radeon/kms: initialize set_surface_reg reg for rs600 asic
[04:03] <Keybuk> not sure, the laptop and my notes are 5000 miles away
[04:03] <Keybuk> but it sounds familiar
[04:03] <Keybuk> I don't think I ever actually got around to testing it
[04:03] <Sarvatt> ahh ok
[04:04] <Keybuk> got distracted by the nvidia which needed more active help from me
[04:04] <Keybuk> remind me when I'm not in SF
[04:04] <Sarvatt> that GPU is like the rarest of the rare of ATI's, they pulled them from the market during the AMD/ATI merger 
[04:04] <Sarvatt> (and it's unusable with lucid without nomodeset at the moment)
[04:05] <Sarvatt> it's ok, got 2 testers to build kernels for to be sure the fixes work :)
[04:06] <Keybuk> yeah, that's what I was told upstream
[04:08] <RAOF> Sarvatt: That's the GPU with GTT issues where it'll eventually corrupt all your ram, isn't it?
[04:08] <Sarvatt> yup
[10:18] <artnay> any chance to include new files into linux-firmware? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/560306
[10:18] <ubot3> Malone bug 560306 in linux "[lucid] ATI hd5xxx cards wrongly doing kms?" [Undecided,Confirmed] 
[13:53] <apw> artnay, whats the issue?
[13:56] <artnay> apw: there are several setups (seems like affected are only i5/i7 and 5xxx users) which don't even boot using live CD. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/560306 has the details and links.
[13:56] <ubot3> Malone bug 560306 in linux-firmware "[lucid] ATI hd5xxx cards wrongly doing kms?" [Undecided,Confirmed] 
[13:57] <artnay> if you compare the output of "dpkg -L linux-firmware | grep radeon" and http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git;a=tree;f=radeon;h=3dc32482fcf179c43e2fcc0b30303f231774820a;hb=HEAD it seems that 5xxx series is missing firmware files (which probably would help with the boot issue)
[13:58] <artnay> I could be totally wrong but that's the only way I see it at the moment.
[13:59] <artnay> the bug was filed against linux but I moved it against linux-firmware (where it belongs AFAIK)
[14:00] <apw> artnay, ta
[14:02] <tgardner> apw, I synced with dwmw2/linux-firmware before I left. Seems that he's added a few new files.
[14:03] <tgardner> apw, here it is: 'radeon: add evergreen family microcode.'
[14:04] <apw> yeah looks like a rebase may be in order before release
[14:04] <apw> _if_ we can confirm it doesn't change any files at least
[14:04] <apw> otherwise selective picks at least
[14:04] <tgardner> apw, I'm thinking I'll on;y add the evergreen stuff. there are lots of other changfes, but we should SRU them after the fact
[14:05] <apw> fair enough
=== kamalm-away is now known as kamalm
[18:38] <mjg59> Is Jerone around?
[18:38] <mjg59> I've just sent a patch for the Lenovo USB resume problem
[18:38] <mjg59> Thinko in the PCI resume code
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[19:45] <apw> mjg59, to kernel-team@ ??
[19:45] <apw> or upstream, or :)
[19:47] <mjg59> apw: Upstream
[19:47] <mjg59> Should be on -acpi and -pci
[19:47] <apw> cool ... thanks for the heads up
[20:29] <apw> kamalm, your patch was miss categorised cause i missed removing the SRU: prefix
[20:30] <apw> i'll fix that up and repush it
[20:31] <kamalm> apw: thank you sir.   I must admit that I was^Wam confused about which [TAGS] and TAGS: to add or not add, and what purpose they all serve
[20:32] <apw> kamalm, yet another thing which is not well documented.  we tried to clean up the templates, and they are a hell of a lot better but they are not right still
[20:34] <kamalm> apw: well, we have in debian/commit-templates:  sauce-patch and upstream-patch  (but no just "patch" as the wiki claims).   I think I added [Lucid] and SRU: manually, following examples I'd seen, but I felt like I was mostly just guessing (and hoped some kindly human would fix it before a script got its mitts on it).
[20:35] <apw> putting things in [] are good as they get stripped automatically on applicaiton and [SRU Lucid] is probabally an appropriate prefix
[20:35] <apw> but yes its all a bit broken and i've added it to our next sprint agenda for review
[20:49] <apw> tgardner, do i remember correctly that you were looking at the radeon firmware issue?
[20:51] <tgardner> apw, yep, I uploaded a PPA linux-firmware this morning for the Evergreen series and asked for test results.
[20:51] <tgardner> bug 560306
[20:51] <ubot3> Malone bug 560306 in linux-firmware "[lucid] ATI hd5xxx cards wrongly doing kms?" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/560306
[20:52] <apw> excellent, then i can forget about it :)
[21:50] <kamalm> cking: around?  I still get no joy from the acpi_osi workaround for bug 539477
[21:50] <ubot3> Malone bug 539477 in gnome-settings-daemon "Video out hot key sends super + p + return on many upcoming Dell & HP systems" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539477
[22:01] <cking> kamalm, care to send me your DSDT again and I will see why it fails
[22:02] <kamalm> cking: again?  I never sent it to you before (but will be happy to do so) -- lets make sure I'm even using the workaround correctly.  I've tried booting with acpi_osi="Windows 2006" and acpi_osi="!Windows 2009" but neither helps -- is that syntax proper (i.e. the quotes and the !) ?
[22:05] <cking> kamalm, my fail, try this acpi_osi=\"!Windows 2009\"
[22:06] <cking> kamalm, if that fails, send me your dmesg output
[22:07] <kamalm> cking: okay, that *does* work (yay!)
[22:08] <kamalm> cking: perhaps you would like to post a comment to the bug with this new and improved workaround?  The last post on the matter suggest using "Windows 2006".
[22:14] <cking> kamalm, well !Windows 2009 will work until a new version appears and the kernel picks it up, then it will fail again
[22:18] <kamalm> cking: it'll do for now anyway -- I note that jerone's comment #20 in that bug recommends acpi_osi="Windows 2006" (with no backslashes) so it would not get processed correctly -- but I find that \"Windows 2006\" isn't helpful anyway.
[22:27] <cking> kamalm, the Windows 2006 method may/may not work depending on the order and how the OSI probes are handled in ACPI. It's ugly and broken 
[22:27] <cking> I've update the bug
[22:28] <kamalm> cking: thank you (for the update, and for the workaround!)
[22:28] <cking> kamalm, thank ppetraki for this one
[22:29] <cking> I like comment 
[22:29] <cking> oops, I like the penultimate comment on the bug report
[22:29] <kamalm> thank you ppetraki :-)
[22:31] <kamalm> cking: yup. I call first swing with the bat!
[22:31] <cking> I'm scared of them getting back to me
[22:31] <cking> ;-)
[22:45] <cnd> xrandr
[22:45] <cnd> oops
[22:45] <cnd> wrong kb