cjohnston | MTecknology: did you see the email re: moving from drupal to wp? | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
MTecknology | cjohnston: where at? | 00:01 |
stas | cjohnston: link plz :) | 00:18 |
cjohnston | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news-team/2010-April/000953.html | 00:19 |
stas | cjohnston: great news, imho wordpress is a far better platform for that kind of job, plus it's much easier to extend it | 00:23 |
cjohnston | I agree.. although not all do | 00:23 |
stas | cjohnston: what are the main issues people are concern of? | 00:24 |
cjohnston | stas: looks like learning curve is a big one | 00:25 |
stas | hmm, i had a chat on #wordpress a couple of weeks ago, where I asked the dev team about their rush in changes to the UI | 00:26 |
cjohnston | are they making major ui changes again? | 00:27 |
stas | and the answer was that the current UI won't suffer changes in the nearest future and the main focus will be on the functionalities they introduce in 3.0 and security | 00:27 |
cjohnston | they just did that in 2.8 didnt they | 00:27 |
stas | yes they did it twice during last year or two | 00:27 |
stas | but not anymore afaik | 00:27 |
cjohnston | hmm | 00:28 |
stas | cjohnston: https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-gsoc&day=2010-03-29#m139 | 00:29 |
stas | here's the chatlog | 00:29 |
stas | yep, here it is: janewells | 00:31 |
stas | we don't plan to do any major ui overhauls like happened in 2.5 and 2.7 anytime in the next few years, and will just make small imrovements over time | 00:31 |
stas | so it seems to be safe for adoption | 00:32 |
MTecknology | I don't like wordpress much | 00:37 |
MTecknology | for some jobs it's great - but for most jobs it just doesn't do it for me | 00:37 |
Agafonov | Hi! http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct contains outdated link to CoC (points to 1.0.1, current is 1.1, according to https://launchpad.net/codeofconduct/). Am I to fill a bug somewere? | 11:11 |
MTecknology | newz2000: you catch that? | 13:05 |
newz2000 | Agafonov: go ahead and file a bug, I'll have to look into what needs to be done | 14:37 |
newz2000 | thanks | 14:37 |
cjohnston | newz2000: bug 568347 | 14:39 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 568347 in ubuntu-artwork "about:home uses old branding" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/568347 | 14:39 |
cjohnston | is it start-page that if affects? i forget | 14:39 |
newz2000 | cjohnston: that would likely be ubufox the firefox plugin | 14:46 |
Agafonov | newz2000: Bug #568424 | 14:48 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 568424 in ubuntu-website "Outdated link to CoC" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/568424 | 14:48 |
newz2000 | thanks Agafonov | 14:48 |
cjohnston | im causing too much spam to myself | 15:02 |
=== l3on_ is now known as l3on | ||
cjohnston | newz2000: another bug was filed for the broken link | 17:48 |
l3on | newz2000: around ? | 17:51 |
newz2000 | hey | 18:28 |
newz2000 | l3on: what's up? | 18:28 |
cjohnston | newz2000: ping | 20:04 |
cjohnston | or anyone else.. what is the RC link on the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidReleaseSchedule page supposed to point to? | 20:05 |
cjohnston | this is the link from Steve's email: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004 | 20:06 |
newz2000 | cjohnston: hey, I'm back | 20:06 |
cjohnston | hey | 20:07 |
cjohnston | im over the 4 bugs that have been reported today already for that link | 20:07 |
newz2000 | that or http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004overview1 | 20:07 |
newz2000 | oops, http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004overview | 20:07 |
newz2000 | I'm not sure which, This link I posted has the download locations on it | 20:08 |
cjohnston | ok then if i change to your link on the wiki page? | 20:08 |
newz2000 | I think so | 20:08 |
newz2000 | Just leave a comment in the change log so the release team doesn't freak | 20:08 |
cjohnston | Replacing ReleaseCandidate link with a working link | 20:09 |
cjohnston | good? | 20:09 |
newz2000 | sorry, phone rang | 20:14 |
newz2000 | that link is wrong, use the 2nd one I sent | 20:15 |
newz2000 | cjohnston: ^ | 20:15 |
cjohnston | I did | 20:15 |
cjohnston | i thought | 20:15 |
cjohnston | It has the second link you posted | 20:20 |
stas | guys anyone had a look at single sing-on service? aka canonical identity provider? | 22:35 |
stas | i can't get it, is that another openid implementation or something new? | 22:36 |
stas | looks like openid and oauth | 22:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!