| nigelbabu | vish: friday for desktop team hits only in the afternoon :) | 02:05 |
|---|---|---|
| === keffie_jayx_ is now known as keffie_jayx | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 08:11 |
| keffie_jayx | hey guys | 10:58 |
| keffie_jayx | I had a look at some of the bugs with patches and some of the stuff there is Really old. | 10:58 |
| persia | Hey keffie_jayx | 10:58 |
| persia | Yep. | 10:58 |
| persia | But *really old* doesn't always mean *doesn't work* | 10:59 |
| persia | We still need to check if it's a bug, if the patch fixes it, etc. | 10:59 |
| persia | Many of them probably end up as patch-needswork, but ... | 10:59 |
| keffie_jayx | ok | 10:59 |
| keffie_jayx | I wanted tocheck first, I though I saw some people sayin, "hey this is too old go a ceck if it still happens in X release" | 11:00 |
| persia | That's just laziness. | 11:00 |
| persia | Lots of stuff doesn't get fixed for years. | 11:00 |
| persia | That said, old patches may well not apply, but if they do, and they fix the bug, upstream wants to know. | 11:01 |
| keffie_jayx | got it | 11:02 |
| keffie_jayx | there is also package upgrade request... ignore those? | 11:07 |
| keffie_jayx | ore remove the patch tag? | 11:07 |
| keffie_jayx | example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meld/+bug/417369 | 11:07 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 417369 in meld "update meld to 1.3.1 " [Unknown,Fix released] | 11:07 |
| * persia looks | 11:10 | |
| persia | keffie_jayx: I'd mark that patch-accepted-debian and then let it sit for a couple weeks. | 11:12 |
| keffie_jayx | in this one there is no upstream patch to send because it was precisely an upgrade from their pacckage | 11:14 |
| keffie_jayx | coming from upstream | 11:14 |
| persia | RIght, so no need for patch-submitted-upstream or patch-submitted-debian because it's already there. | 11:14 |
| persia | patch-accepted-upstream is meaningless, because it's a new version. patch-accepted-debian is useful because it gets the right tag for us to push through during maverick merges. | 11:15 |
| * persia is expecting those of us who can upload to push through the patch-accepted-debian stuff in a hurry at the start of the maverick cycle, just to close them. | 11:16 | |
| keffie_jayx | welll do count on little ants like me, I am still scavaning the 2000~ bugs | 11:17 |
| keffie_jayx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at/+bug/433545 | 11:38 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 433545 in at "at command ignores savings time when given UTC time" [Unknown,Confirmed] | 11:38 |
| keffie_jayx | I am not sure debian acceped it | 11:38 |
| keffie_jayx | the bug is filed and confirmed there | 11:38 |
| keffie_jayx | the patch was submitted | 11:38 |
| keffie_jayx | I already got patch-forwarded-debian | 11:42 |
| keffie_jayx | but should I check to see if the patch is in the new version? | 11:42 |
| keffie_jayx | the patch still applies btw | 11:42 |
| === jussi01 is now known as jussi | ||
| bjernas_tresno | ? | 15:15 |
| nigelbabu | grrr! Why is linux package patches getting into review queue again :/ | 15:57 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: what are you doing on Monday? | 16:34 |
| nigelbabu | will be able to spare a few hours? | 16:34 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: exams. | 16:34 |
| nigelbabu | oh. ah. | 16:34 |
| hyperair | hours no, minutes yes, as long as it's under 15 ;-) | 16:34 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: basically just review a patch or 2 and flesh out ease of use of review guide | 16:35 |
| nigelbabu | bdmurray: did I mess up the patch subscription script? It seems to be subscribing 'linux' pacakge now | 16:37 |
| bdmurray | nigelbabu: do you have an example? | 16:41 |
| nigelbabu | bug 325581 | 16:41 |
| ubot3 | Malone bug 325581 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev "kensington pocket mouse model #72237 USB 0d62:1000 not working under 8.10" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/325581 | 16:41 |
| nigelbabu | ah, grr | 16:42 |
| nigelbabu | its that multiple packages on same bug issue | 16:43 |
| bdmurray | nigelbabu: yep | 16:43 |
| bdmurray | I think that's the right thing to do | 16:43 |
| nigelbabu | it is, I wishe there was a way to hide one of the tasks | 16:43 |
| bdmurray | or associate the patch with a package? ;-) | 16:44 |
| nigelbabu | yeah. | 16:44 |
| nigelbabu | probably smething like the new sponsorship list looks like. | 16:45 |
| nigelbabu | It should make things easier for review. | 16:45 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: what language the sponsorship list written in? | 16:47 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: i don't think i can make time for that, sorry. | 16:48 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: no problem :) | 16:48 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: python: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-sponsoring | 16:48 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: thank you. I'm thinking of something similar for review. lemme see what I can come up with :) | 16:48 |
| dholbach | ROCK :) | 16:49 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: I can get something done by June. the code looks easy enough to hack for us :) | 16:51 |
| dholbach | nice | 16:52 |
| dholbach | so we'll improve slowly but steadily | 16:52 |
| dholbach | I look forward to Monday | 16:52 |
| nigelbabu | me too. I'll try to take a day off work to be around te whole day :) | 16:52 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: doubt. | 17:23 |
| nigelbabu | wht does your commit come in blue and mine in black? | 17:24 |
| nigelbabu | https://code.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-review-overview/trunk | 17:24 |
| nigelbabu | https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/ubuntu-sponsoring/trunk | 17:24 |
| dholbach | maybe to show that's where it was branched | 17:54 |
| dholbach | but I need to rush off now | 17:54 |
| dholbach | have a great day | 17:54 |
| dholbach | see you! | 17:54 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!