[02:05] vish: friday for desktop team hits only in the afternoon :) === keffie_jayx_ is now known as keffie_jayx [08:11] good morning [10:58] hey guys [10:58] I had a look at some of the bugs with patches and some of the stuff there is Really old. [10:58] Hey keffie_jayx [10:58] Yep. [10:59] But *really old* doesn't always mean *doesn't work* [10:59] We still need to check if it's a bug, if the patch fixes it, etc. [10:59] Many of them probably end up as patch-needswork, but ... [10:59] ok [11:00] I wanted tocheck first, I though I saw some people sayin, "hey this is too old go a ceck if it still happens in X release" [11:00] That's just laziness. [11:00] Lots of stuff doesn't get fixed for years. [11:01] That said, old patches may well not apply, but if they do, and they fix the bug, upstream wants to know. [11:02] got it [11:07] there is also package upgrade request... ignore those? [11:07] ore remove the patch tag? [11:07] example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meld/+bug/417369 [11:07] Malone bug 417369 in meld "update meld to 1.3.1 " [Unknown,Fix released] [11:10] * persia looks [11:12] keffie_jayx: I'd mark that patch-accepted-debian and then let it sit for a couple weeks. [11:14] in this one there is no upstream patch to send because it was precisely an upgrade from their pacckage [11:14] coming from upstream [11:14] RIght, so no need for patch-submitted-upstream or patch-submitted-debian because it's already there. [11:15] patch-accepted-upstream is meaningless, because it's a new version. patch-accepted-debian is useful because it gets the right tag for us to push through during maverick merges. [11:16] * persia is expecting those of us who can upload to push through the patch-accepted-debian stuff in a hurry at the start of the maverick cycle, just to close them. [11:17] welll do count on little ants like me, I am still scavaning the 2000~ bugs [11:38] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at/+bug/433545 [11:38] Malone bug 433545 in at "at command ignores savings time when given UTC time" [Unknown,Confirmed] [11:38] I am not sure debian acceped it [11:38] the bug is filed and confirmed there [11:38] the patch was submitted [11:42] I already got patch-forwarded-debian [11:42] but should I check to see if the patch is in the new version? [11:42] the patch still applies btw === jussi01 is now known as jussi [15:15] ? [15:57] grrr! Why is linux package patches getting into review queue again :/ [16:34] hyperair: what are you doing on Monday? [16:34] will be able to spare a few hours? [16:34] nigelbabu: exams. [16:34] oh. ah. [16:34] hours no, minutes yes, as long as it's under 15 ;-) [16:35] hyperair: basically just review a patch or 2 and flesh out ease of use of review guide [16:37] bdmurray: did I mess up the patch subscription script? It seems to be subscribing 'linux' pacakge now [16:41] nigelbabu: do you have an example? [16:41] bug 325581 [16:41] Malone bug 325581 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev "kensington pocket mouse model #72237 USB 0d62:1000 not working under 8.10" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/325581 [16:42] ah, grr [16:43] its that multiple packages on same bug issue [16:43] nigelbabu: yep [16:43] I think that's the right thing to do [16:43] it is, I wishe there was a way to hide one of the tasks [16:44] or associate the patch with a package? ;-) [16:44] yeah. [16:45] probably smething like the new sponsorship list looks like. [16:45] It should make things easier for review. [16:47] dholbach: what language the sponsorship list written in? [16:48] nigelbabu: i don't think i can make time for that, sorry. [16:48] hyperair: no problem :) [16:48] nigelbabu: python: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-sponsoring [16:48] dholbach: thank you. I'm thinking of something similar for review. lemme see what I can come up with :) [16:49] ROCK :) [16:51] dholbach: I can get something done by June. the code looks easy enough to hack for us :) [16:52] nice [16:52] so we'll improve slowly but steadily [16:52] I look forward to Monday [16:52] me too. I'll try to take a day off work to be around te whole day :) [17:23] dholbach: doubt. [17:24] wht does your commit come in blue and mine in black? [17:24] https://code.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-review-overview/trunk [17:24] https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/ubuntu-sponsoring/trunk [17:54] maybe to show that's where it was branched [17:54] but I need to rush off now [17:54] have a great day [17:54] see you! === yofel_ is now known as yofel