[02:05] <nigelbabu> vish: friday for desktop team hits only in the afternoon :)
[08:11] <dholbach> good morning
[10:58] <keffie_jayx> hey guys
[10:58] <keffie_jayx> I had a look at some of the bugs with patches and some of the stuff there is Really old.
[10:58] <persia> Hey keffie_jayx
[10:58] <persia> Yep.
[10:59] <persia> But *really old* doesn't always mean *doesn't work*
[10:59] <persia> We still need to check if it's a bug, if the patch fixes it, etc.
[10:59] <persia> Many of them probably end up as patch-needswork, but ...
[10:59] <keffie_jayx> ok
[11:00] <keffie_jayx> I wanted tocheck first, I though I saw some people sayin, "hey this is too old go a ceck if it still happens in X release"
[11:00] <persia> That's just laziness.
[11:00] <persia> Lots of stuff doesn't get fixed for years.
[11:01] <persia> That said, old patches may well not apply, but if they do, and they fix the bug, upstream wants to know.
[11:02] <keffie_jayx> got it
[11:07] <keffie_jayx> there is also package upgrade request... ignore those?
[11:07] <keffie_jayx> ore remove the patch tag?
[11:07] <keffie_jayx> example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meld/+bug/417369
[11:07] <ubot3> Malone bug 417369 in meld "update meld to 1.3.1 " [Unknown,Fix released]
[11:10]  * persia looks
[11:12] <persia> keffie_jayx: I'd mark that patch-accepted-debian and then let it sit for a couple weeks.
[11:14] <keffie_jayx> in this one there is no upstream patch to send because it was precisely an upgrade from their pacckage
[11:14] <keffie_jayx> coming from upstream
[11:14] <persia> RIght, so no need for patch-submitted-upstream or patch-submitted-debian because it's already there.
[11:15] <persia> patch-accepted-upstream is meaningless, because it's a new version.  patch-accepted-debian is useful because it gets the right tag for us to push through during maverick merges.
[11:16]  * persia is expecting those of us who can upload to push through the patch-accepted-debian stuff in a hurry at the start of the maverick cycle, just to close them.
[11:17] <keffie_jayx> welll do count on little ants like me, I am still scavaning the 2000~ bugs
[11:38] <keffie_jayx> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at/+bug/433545
[11:38] <ubot3> Malone bug 433545 in at "at command ignores savings time when given UTC time" [Unknown,Confirmed]
[11:38] <keffie_jayx> I am not sure debian acceped it
[11:38] <keffie_jayx> the bug is filed and confirmed there
[11:38] <keffie_jayx> the patch was submitted
[11:42] <keffie_jayx> I already got patch-forwarded-debian
[11:42] <keffie_jayx> but should I check to see if the patch is in the new version?
[11:42] <keffie_jayx> the patch still applies btw
[15:15] <bjernas_tresno> ?
[15:57] <nigelbabu> grrr! Why is linux package patches getting into review queue again :/
[16:34] <nigelbabu> hyperair: what are you doing on Monday?
[16:34] <nigelbabu> will be able to spare a few hours?
[16:34] <hyperair> nigelbabu: exams.
[16:34] <nigelbabu> oh.  ah.
[16:34] <hyperair> hours no, minutes yes, as long as it's under 15 ;-)
[16:35] <nigelbabu> hyperair: basically just review a patch or 2 and flesh out ease of use of review guide
[16:37] <nigelbabu> bdmurray: did I mess up the patch subscription script?  It seems to be subscribing 'linux' pacakge now
[16:41] <bdmurray> nigelbabu: do you have an example?
[16:41] <nigelbabu> bug 325581
[16:41] <ubot3> Malone bug 325581 in xserver-xorg-input-evdev "kensington pocket mouse model #72237 USB 0d62:1000 not working under 8.10" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/325581
[16:42] <nigelbabu> ah, grr
[16:43] <nigelbabu> its that multiple packages on same bug issue
[16:43] <bdmurray> nigelbabu: yep
[16:43] <bdmurray> I think that's the right thing to do
[16:43] <nigelbabu> it is, I wishe there was a way to hide one of the tasks
[16:44] <bdmurray> or associate the patch with a package? ;-)
[16:44] <nigelbabu> yeah.
[16:45] <nigelbabu> probably smething like the new sponsorship list looks like.
[16:45] <nigelbabu> It should make things easier for review.
[16:47] <nigelbabu> dholbach: what language the sponsorship list written in?
[16:48] <hyperair> nigelbabu: i don't think i can make time for that, sorry.
[16:48] <nigelbabu> hyperair: no problem :)
[16:48] <dholbach> nigelbabu: python: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-sponsoring
[16:48] <nigelbabu> dholbach: thank you.  I'm thinking of something similar for review.  lemme see what I can come up with :)
[16:49] <dholbach> ROCK :)
[16:51] <nigelbabu> dholbach: I can get something done by June.  the code looks easy enough to hack for us :)
[16:52] <dholbach> nice
[16:52] <dholbach> so we'll improve slowly but steadily
[16:52] <dholbach> I look forward to Monday
[16:52] <nigelbabu> me too.  I'll try to take a day off work to be around te whole day :)
[17:23] <nigelbabu> dholbach: doubt.
[17:24] <nigelbabu> wht does your commit come in blue and mine in black?
[17:24] <nigelbabu> https://code.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-review-overview/trunk
[17:24] <nigelbabu> https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/ubuntu-sponsoring/trunk
[17:54] <dholbach> maybe to show that's where it was branched
[17:54] <dholbach> but I need to rush off now
[17:54] <dholbach> have a great day
[17:54] <dholbach> see you!