doctormo | I can't seem to a get my own users email address vis the launchpad api | 00:04 |
---|---|---|
Bodsda | Hello - How can I change the maintainer of a project? | 01:24 |
lfaraone | bernie: you do realize I packaged rainbow for Debian, right? (there is no bitfrost package as far as I can tell, only implementations of it :) | 03:03 |
lfaraone | bernie: or is this more than rainbow? | 03:04 |
bernie | lfaraone: there's the bitfrost package in fedora, which comes directly from the bitfrost repo at olpc | 03:05 |
bernie | lfaraone: it's for olpc-os-builder, which uses other stuff in bitfrost that rainbow doesn't use such as bitfrost.util.urlparser.py | 03:06 |
lfaraone | bernie: would it be useful for me to include in Debian? (if so, let me know and I'll file a ITP) | 03:07 |
bernie | lfaraone: the only things I know that use it are: rainbow, OLPC's crazy initrd with python stuff in it and olpc-os-builder | 03:11 |
bernie | lfaraone: how did you do with rainbow? did you include selected parts of bitfrost? | 03:11 |
lfaraone | bernie: I based off mstone's olpc-security repo. | 03:12 |
lfaraone | bernie: it had no external dependencies. | 03:12 |
lfaraone | (other than what's already packaged) | 03:13 |
bernie | lfaraone: ah. I think this is an up to date version of it: http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/bitfrost/ | 03:13 |
lfaraone | bernie: okay. I don't think rainbow depends on it but maybe I can get it and OOB submitted. | 03:14 |
bernie | lfaraone: ah of course | 03:15 |
bernie | lfaraone: now I get it | 03:15 |
lfaraone | bernie: let me know when you figure it out :) | 03:16 |
bernie | lfaraone: bitfrost is a specification for two things: 1) bios lockdown and 2) activity isolation | 03:16 |
bernie | lfaraone: the security repo contains (2) | 03:16 |
bernie | lfaraone: the bitfrost repository contains support code for (1) | 03:16 |
lfaraone | aha. mk then. | 03:17 |
micahg | is codehosting down? | 03:50 |
wgrant | micahg: Looks good to me. | 04:01 |
micahg | wgrant: I get an internal server error here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.6.head/revision/581 | 04:02 |
wgrant | Oh, that's just Loggerhead. | 04:02 |
wgrant | It's often broken :( | 04:02 |
micahg | ah, ok, is that down? :) | 04:03 |
wgrant | Looks like it's rather broken, yes. | 04:09 |
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
Nivex | I'm seeing some weirdness with a LP bug that is linked to a Debian bug. The Debian bug has been marked as Done, but LP says the Deb bug no longer exists. | 04:53 |
Nivex | I'd like to get it closed and off my list. | 04:53 |
Nivex | It's LP#31272 | 04:53 |
Nivex | never mind, figured out how to close it out by hand. | 05:01 |
ddecator | you can do it by hand, but is there any kind of syncing available for debian bugs? i would still like to know that | 05:06 |
Ursinha | ddecator, yes, there is, don't know if it's working properly though | 05:08 |
nigelbabu | there is syncing | 05:08 |
Ursinha | bug 31272 | 05:08 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 31272 in wvstreams "wvdial modem detection hangs dapper installer" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/31272 | 05:08 |
Ursinha | oh, he's gone | 05:08 |
nigelbabu | See bug 496884 | 05:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 496884 in galrey "No images to process..." [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/496884 | 05:09 |
nigelbabu | it works | 05:09 |
ddecator | and so it does, thanks nigelbabu and Ursinha | 05:09 |
wgrant | It sometimes works. | 05:19 |
nigelbabu | wgrant: It sometimes works (tm). | 05:25 |
nigelbabu | ;) | 05:25 |
cemc | hi. I have a ppa and uploaded a package with dput. that package had a source tarball. Now I'm trying to upload an updated package, but the tarball has changed (version is the same). it was an error on my part I guess... but now it rejects the package. can I somehow make it forget about the old source tarball? | 09:05 |
tsimpson | cemc: you'll have to update the version | 09:32 |
tsimpson | something like 1.2.3a or 1.2.3-rebuild | 09:33 |
wgrant | cemc, tsimpson: It should ideally not have a hyphen in it -- perhaps something like 1.2.3+repack1. | 09:41 |
wgrant | But why did the tarball change? | 09:41 |
wgrant | It is the original upstream tarball. It logically cannot change. | 09:41 |
cemc | wgrant: I know... now it is the original tarball, before it was a tarball repacked from bz2 to tgz, as it was some rc tarball | 09:55 |
cemc | wgrant: but I managed to upload it, after deleting all the old packages from the ppa | 09:56 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
goundy | hi | 12:56 |
bilalakhtar | people, lp is working very slowly. edge.launchpad.net is working quite fast | 15:44 |
bilalakhtar | I can't find any disruption on identica page | 15:44 |
bilalakhtar | fine, its ok now | 15:45 |
ecanto | ih guys | 16:11 |
ecanto | hi. | 16:11 |
ecanto | :-) | 16:12 |
doctormo | lfaraone: Morning, how are you today? | 17:02 |
lfaraone | doctormo: fine, thanks. | 17:05 |
doctormo | lfaraone: I'm sure I don't want to push you on what must be a busy day, but what can I do to help you for ground control? | 17:07 |
lfaraone | doctormo: well, I'm just wondering A) what changes were made in 1.6.5, and B) whether 1.6.5 is ready to upload. | 17:07 |
lfaraone | doctormo: tagging releases in bzr would greatly help with A :) | 17:07 |
* lfaraone will be back in 20 minutes or so, lunch., | 17:08 | |
doctormo | lfaraone: I should learn how to do that at some point. | 17:08 |
lfaraone | doctormo: it's one of the more straightforward things you can do: http://wiki.bazaar.canonical.com/Tag | 17:09 |
doctormo | A) 1 (fixes to login), 2 (fixes to fixes, overlooked), 3 (fixes to missing config), 4 (fixed to update-notifier), 5 (fixes to graphic that got messed up) | 17:09 |
lfaraone | thanks. | 17:10 |
doctormo | I pressed lots of people to get testing done, so I wasn't surprised that I needed to release a couple of a times in my ppa. | 17:11 |
doctormo | So B) Yes, I 95% certain that the release is functional and contains no show-stopping bugs. | 17:12 |
tim | hi, i am trying to create a debug package for an application. i have added the `dh_strip --dbg-package=my-package-dbg" into the debian/rules file, and the binaries are actually striped, but the dbg package is empty (apart from the changelog file). any idea, what i am doing wrong? | 17:42 |
EyesAndEars | blueprint submission seams to be down: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/turnkeylinux/+addspec | 18:06 |
wvd | When trying to view a branch I'm getting a "please try again" error - is this normal? | 20:00 |
=== zekopeko__ is now known as zekopeko | ||
ersoy | j #ubuntu | 20:44 |
ersoy | sorry | 20:44 |
ersoy | hello, how can i stop mail for @bugs.launchpad.net | 20:45 |
luke-jr | is there a sane way to list all branches on LP under the armagetronad project? | 21:14 |
mdke | luke-jr: I suppose it depends on your definition of sane, but isn't https://code.launchpad.net/armagetronad what you are looking for? | 21:16 |
luke-jr | mdke: for a script :) | 21:16 |
mdke | I don't know about that | 21:18 |
wgrant | luke-jr: Have you looked at launchpadlib? | 22:16 |
askhl | Hi, I have a ppa package supporting two ubuntu series and want to apply an upstream upgrade. I have followed the normal procedure to upgrade the karmic package to the new upstream version. Since the jaunty/karmic/lucid versions are related to each other in terms of a package copy, I would like to generate an updated lucid package by copying the updated karmic package. But LP complains that there are already binaries, i.e. I can't overwrite. Should I do t | 22:20 |
wgrant | askhl: You need to copy the binaries as well. | 22:21 |
wgrant | (after verifying that they work on Lucid) | 22:21 |
askhl | wgrant, I asked for them to be recompiled | 22:21 |
askhl | wgrant, should I just choose the copy option without recompile? I guess that would work, but I didn't want to break anything (I'm not that experienced with packaging), so I thought it safer to ask for a recompile | 22:22 |
wgrant | askhl: You can't. They would have the same version number as the old ones, which is impossible. | 22:23 |
askhl | Sorry, can't what exactly? Copy without recompile? | 22:24 |
wgrant | You can't copy and recompile. | 22:24 |
wgrant | You need to copy without recompiling. | 22:24 |
askhl | Ah, okay. So I ask for a copy without then. And it should work, provided that dependencies haven't changed between the series - is that correct? | 22:25 |
wgrant | Probably. | 22:25 |
askhl | wgrant, in an ideal world I should probably generate the package on my own lucid system and test it, right? | 22:26 |
wgrant | askhl: Rather download the existing binaries from your PPA and try them on a Lucid system. | 22:27 |
askhl | wgrant, ah, of course. So I install the karmic package on the lucid system, and if it works, do the copy. | 22:28 |
askhl | So that's great then. Thanks! | 22:28 |
wgrant | Right/ | 22:29 |
c_korn | is bazaar.launchpad currently broken ? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~debfactory-devs/debfactory/devel/revision/114 | 23:21 |
wgrant | mwhudson/thumper: ^^ It's been broken for a couple of days. | 23:22 |
thumper | loggerhead? | 23:23 |
thumper | morning wgrant | 23:23 |
mwhudson | it's not generally broken | 23:23 |
thumper | sometimes I want to stab loggerhead through the heart | 23:23 |
thumper | perhaps I'll just have to read the damn code | 23:23 |
wgrant | Morning thumper. | 23:23 |
mwhudson | it seems to be the revision pages for that branch which are broken | 23:24 |
wgrant | mwhudson: Hm, it was generally broken over the weekend, at least. | 23:24 |
c_korn | you might to add a notice in /title to prevent people from asking again and again | 23:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!