[00:20] <bdmurray> ScottK: I just uploaded ipython do you need something more from me?
[00:32] <ajmitch> queuebot must get confused, 0.14-1 is the current binary package version, 0.14-2 is FTBFS in lucid there
[04:27] <ScottK> ajmitch: queuediff got it right.  Thanks for taking care of it.  Accepted
[07:26]  * stgraber is rsyncing the latest edubuntu DVD image from the train on a 7Mb/s 3G network ! yeah for europe ;) (I wouldn't do that in Canada as the image is 4 times my monthly quota but the prepaid 3G in switzerland (5$/day) is unmeterred :))
[07:37] <ajmitch> stgraber: to do that here wouldprobably cost several hundred $ :)
[13:55] <james_w> ScottK: shall I just do a pass over all the eligible sync requests, or do you want to pass me a filtered list?
[14:51] <ScottK> james_w: I can take a quick look and let you know if I think there are any that should not go in.
[15:09] <ScottK> james_w: 569435 567208 568742 566933 are all good to go in.
[15:10] <ScottK> slangasek: Would you please have a look at the sync requests in 569528 and 569531?  I think they should clearly go in, but they are my requests, so I think it's better if you (or another release team) member reviews.
[15:50] <ScottK> Looks like no lzma cut the OOo build time on armel in ~half.
[16:05] <nhandler> ScottK: 569528 looks fine to me
[16:14] <nhandler> ScottK: Go ahead with 569531 as well
[16:15] <ScottK> james_w: ^^^
[16:57] <slangasek> ScottK: ah, I see nhandler's addressed it now, good - sorry, I'm pretty jet lagged right now so am not much good for reviews; it took my last bit of consciousness to get plymouth uploaded to the queue just now
[16:57] <slangasek> (which it would be great to have someone's review of :)
[17:04] <ScottK> OK.  I guess just waiting for james_w to have some time now.
[21:19] <elmo> someone remind me when we usually have a candidate image by?
[21:19] <elmo> slangasek/cjwatson: ^--
[21:28] <ScottK> elmo: I think the plan is to have a first crack at one tomorrow.
[21:33] <elmo> ScottK: ok
[23:16] <james_w> syncs done
[23:25] <Laney> there's 568850. Don't know if it needs RM approval.
[23:30] <cjwatson> d-i rebuild on its way (I was going to update translations too, but none of them changed); would appreciate it being nudged through
[23:30]  * cjwatson goes to catch his princely 5.5 hours of sleep before heading to London
[23:32] <james_w> Laney: I just processed ones that ScottK had ACKed. Someone should get it tomorrow
[23:32] <Laney> ok
[23:32] <Laney> (it's a removal)
[23:32] <james_w> ah
[23:35] <slangasek> cjwatson: will look - btw, there's a plymouth in the queue and there'll be a mountall shortly, I expect you should sleep rather than looking at it now, but for the morning then :)
[23:37] <cjwatson> lessee if it's easy
[23:37] <slangasek> probably not, it's a cumulative upload of a number of subtle fixes
[23:38] <cjwatson> mm, this requires brain, will look over morning coffee I guess
[23:38] <slangasek> ok, thanks :)
[23:39] <cjwatson> is get_next_node; remove_node verifiably safe?  I assume so from the careful ordering but seems like something to check
[23:39] <cjwatson> anyway, yeah - zonk
[23:39] <cjwatson> see you in London :)
[23:40] <slangasek> indeed!