[03:07] <thumper> hello mister reviewer: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~thumper/launchpad/really-send-reviewer-email-to-teams/+merge/24094
[03:07] <thumper> mwhudson: a simple branch that actually sends code review email to team reviewers
[03:33] <mwhudson> thumper: looking
[03:33] <thumper> mwhudson: good news
[03:34] <mwhudson> thumper: oh?
[03:34] <thumper> just QAed my scanner change
[03:34] <thumper> and it records the merged revno
[03:34] <thumper> \o/
[03:34] <mwhudson> thumper: \o/
[03:34] <thumper> for merged proposals
[03:34] <thumper> hows the branch you are preparing for me going?
[03:34] <mwhudson> thumper: i think i just need to push it up and propose them
[03:35] <mwhudson> thumper: there's three pipes left :)
[03:35] <mwhudson> two are small though
[03:35] <thumper> ok
[03:35] <thumper> I'm spending time looking into the core publication mechanism
[03:35] <thumper> I'm trying to make testing breadcrumbs easier
[03:35] <thumper> gary thinks it is too hard to do
[03:35] <thumper> but I don't take no for an answer
[03:36] <thumper> I just haven't found the right place to hook in
[03:54] <thumper> ha
[03:54] <thumper> I think I found it
[04:16] <thumper> nope, not yet
[04:30] <thumper> ah, now I've found it
[04:30] <thumper> now to disect
[04:30] <thumper> or should I say, later to disect
[04:31] <thumper> mwhudson: thanks for the review
[04:31]  * thumper afk for a bit
[04:47] <thumper> mwhudson: I'm going to attempt to use a gym without killing myself or pulling any muscles
[04:48] <thumper> mwhudson: I'll get to your branches later this afternoon/tonight
[04:48] <mwhudson> thumper: good luck with that
[04:48] <mwhudson> thumper: sounds fine
[04:48] <thumper> mwhudson: I'll make sure they're all reviewed for tomorrow morning
[04:48] <mwhudson> thumper: awesome
[04:48] <thumper> mwhudson: will this make everything go? all tests pass?
[04:49] <mwhudson> thumper: all tests passed on friday night, i guess changes in db-devel may have broken something
[04:49] <mwhudson> but i doubt it
[04:49] <thumper> hopefully not
[04:49] <thumper> I found the code I need to tackle for the breadcrumb work
[04:49] <thumper> I should have read salgado's comment as he mentions it in the code :)
[09:53] <noodles775> intellectronica: Hi! Will you be around today for reviews? Otherwise I'll try to organise a swap :)
[13:35] <intellectronica> noodles775: i think that the description of a boolean should take the form of a question, so instead of "Whether the build should be treated as private." I'd do "Should the build be treated as private?"
[13:36] <noodles775> intellectronica: ok.
[13:36] <intellectronica> noodles775: what do you think? i don't care deeply about this, just wanted to mention.
[13:37] <noodles775> intellectronica: Although I personally prefer the first option, I'm not fussed either way, so would just go with whatever the defacto standard is.
[13:37] <intellectronica> ‏‎noodles775: on line 395 of the diff there's a trailing , which i think you can remove
[13:37] <noodles775> Aha.
[13:37] <intellectronica> noodles775: if you prefer the first option keep it
[13:49] <intellectronica> noodles775: r=me
[13:50] <noodles775> intellectronica: thanks.
[14:21] <bac> intellectronica: can i add a very small one to your queue?  https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bac/launchpad/bug-524778-2/+merge/24060
[14:21] <intellectronica> bac: if it's very small i'll do it right now
[14:21] <bac> intellectronica: itty bitty
[14:22] <intellectronica> bac: r=me
[14:22] <bac> thanks tom
[15:38] <gary_poster> hi.  Could I get a review for https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gary/launchpad/bug562828/+merge/24044 ?
[15:41] <abentley> gary_poster, sure.
[15:42] <gary_poster> Thank you abentley
[15:47] <abentley> gary_poster, It seems like this solution would be problematic if the librarian could ever contain symlinks.  That's unlikely, right?
[15:48] <gary_poster> abentley: you mean, if its purpose were to (occasionally) store symlinks, rather than it being merely organized with symlinks?
[15:48] <abentley> gary_poster, right.
[15:49] <gary_poster> Yeah, that's unlikely.  I'll be happy to get a more confident answer from flacoste.
[15:49] <abentley> gary_poster, when I first read "tree", I thought you were talking about the launchpad source tree, which does have symlinks, and thought we were storing the contents of the source tree in the librarian.
[15:50] <flacoste> gary_poster, abentley: the librarian doesn't create or manage symlinks
[15:50] <flacoste> gary_poster, abentley: now if an admin does that...
[15:50] <flacoste> don't :-)
[15:50] <gary_poster> :-)
[15:51] <abentley> gary_poster, approved.
[15:51] <gary_poster> thank you abentley
[16:49] <mrevell> intellectronica, Do you have time to review my branch at https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~matthew.revell/launchpad/bug-heat-help-bug-544799/+merge/24016
[16:50] <intellectronica> mrevell: sure
[16:55] <intellectronica> mrevell: r=me. don't forget that the actual heat changes are in db-devel, so you might want to delay landing this branch until the end of the cycle
[16:56] <intellectronica> mrevell: or even better, make it a db-devel branch (which will require you to only merge in the relevant changes and not all the revisions from devel preceding it).
[16:58] <mrevell> intellectronica, So, do I just land it on db-devel or do I need to re-branch from db-devel?
[16:58] <mrevell> Thanks for the r=intellectronica, btw :)
[16:58] <intellectronica> mrevell: you need to re-branch from db-devel and then merge into your new branch only the changes relevant to this bug from the existing branch
[16:59] <mrevell> thanks intellectronica
[17:00] <bac> intellectronica, abentley: i have another insanely easy branch:  https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/launchpad/bug-568659/+merge/24131
[17:00] <intellectronica> bac: i'll take it
[17:01] <bac> intellectronica: pace yourself!  :)
[17:01] <intellectronica> bac: r=me