[08:08] <dholbach> good morning
[11:32] <nigelbabu> dholbach: Evening. Overall, yday was very productive.  yes?
[11:33] <dholbach> nigelbabu: I think we answered a bunch of open questions and maybe even got a few patches sorted out
[11:36] <nigelbabu> my laptop display crashed.  BRB.
[11:37] <dholbach> ugh, all the best with that
[11:59] <nigelbabu> ok, this is better.  Its flickering like crzy, but I can read some text.
[11:59] <nigelbabu> dholbach: over the week I'll work on getting the getting started page a little more detailed and oriented to geginners and keep the review guide on a separate page.
[12:03] <dholbach> awesome - when I get more ideas, I'll add stuff
[12:30] <persia> I don't understand bug #445370, which makes it hard to know what to do with it.  Does anyone else?
[12:30] <ubot3> Malone bug 445370 in eglibc "nscd terminates with assertion in prune_cache" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/445370
[12:38] <nigelbabu> persia: something to do with a bad upgrade?
[12:38] <nigelbabu> i.e upgrades create a mess in that package or somethin
[12:40] <persia> Hrm.  In that case, I'll try to remember to do a jaunty install and upgrade to karmic and break it post-release.  I don't think this one goes upstream.
[12:42] <nigelbabu> well, we can't use that much, can we?
[12:42] <persia> Can't use what?
[12:43] <nigelbabu> i.e. is it worth an SRU?
[12:44] <nigelbabu> do we fix things like these ?
[12:44] <persia> Dunno.  If it breaks also lucid, I'll ask someone who's worked with that package.
[12:44] <nigelbabu> hm
[12:44] <persia> If so, it would probably get fixed in maverick, then SRU to lucid and karmic.
[12:44] <persia> It's unlikely to be approved for lucid today (I suspect it would delay release)
[12:45] <nigelbabu> we can get an SRU for lucid I believe.  If its breaking badly
[12:52] <persia> Yeah, but it needs a test install of jaunty: that's for pointing out it's an upgrade thing: I was a bit confused since I started by looking at the patch :)
[12:52] <nigelbabu> ah
[12:54] <persia> Err, s/that's/thanks/
[12:54] <nigelbabu> I did guess that :D
[13:46] <dholbach> persia, nigelbabu: you're familiar with BlackZ' work? BlackZ wants to join ~ubuntu-reviewers
[13:47]  * persia does a quick bit of checking
[13:48] <dholbach> BlackZ: generally you can do work as part of the team as you like - I'll have a quick look too
[13:48] <dholbach> BlackZ: the only thing is unsubscribing the team
[13:49]  * dholbach just reviewed a couple of bugs - I'm happy
[13:49] <persia> We generally like folks to be in Bug Control, but I've no specific objections.
[13:50] <dholbach> ok
[13:50]  * dholbach goes ahead
[13:50] <dholbach> BlackZ: are you aware of the bug control process?
[13:50] <dholbach> can somebody link him up?
[13:50] <persia> nigelbabu: How strongly do you feel about the Bug Control requirement?
[13:50] <dholbach> BlackZ: done
[13:50] <dholbach> BlackZ: and thanks for helping out
[13:50] <BlackZ> dholbach: thank you!
[13:51] <persia> BlackZ: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl
[13:51] <dholbach> thanks persia
[13:52] <BlackZ> persia: I will apply for.
[13:53] <dholbach> where are our bug graphs again?
[13:53] <persia> BlackZ: Thanks.  It's not that I don't think you're suitable, but that we like folks to have already been familiar with bug triage and handling, and most folks who are familiar are easily accepted into Bug Control: saves us having a complex approvals process.
[13:53] <dholbach> ah found them
[13:53] <persia> The script finished?  I thought it was still under construction.
[13:54] <BlackZ> persia: :)
[19:34] <nigelbabu> persia: bug control =  no questions asked.  less, we'd like +1 from someone in the team.
[19:35] <nigelbabu> bdmurray: the patch mailing list only mails when the 'patch' tag is added?
[19:39] <nigelbabu> persia: there is already graphs.  brian updates it daily I think.
[19:39] <nigelbabu> persia: see /topic for the linky
[20:06] <bdmurray> nigelbabu: the patch mailing list only lets me post (I believe)