[01:00] <_0R10N> <hggdh>: hey, you're there?
[01:03] <hggdh> _0R10N: yes, I am
[01:04] <_0R10N> <hggdh> I applied a few hours to become a member of the bugsquad.. and you declined me. Apparently I missed one or more steps, I would like to know, if it's not much asking, what did I miss?
[01:04] <hggdh> hum. What is your LP id?
[01:06] <_0R10N> augusto-orion
[01:06] <_0R10N> <hggdh> augusto-orion
[01:07] <hggdh> _0R10N: oh, OK. You did not sign the CoC (Code of Conduct)
[01:07] <_0R10N> <hggdh> yeahp! I least I think I did
[01:08] <hggdh> let me check again
[01:08] <hggdh> _0R10N: no, you did not
[01:08] <hggdh> :-)
[01:08] <_0R10N> :(
[01:09] <_0R10N> <hggdh> ok, I'll start over!
[01:09] <hggdh> _0R10N: https://launchpad.net/codeofconduct
[01:09] <_0R10N> <hggdh> many thanks!!!
[01:09] <hggdh> if you sign it now (and subscribe to the ML) I will aprove you
[01:10] <_0R10N> <hgghd> great!!!
[01:10] <_0R10N> <hggdh> it's like a 5 minutes offer??? lol
[01:14] <hggdh> _0R10N: a bit more ;-)
[01:16] <_0R10N> <hggdh>I hope so!!!... I'm just submitting the content of the signed file I've created
[01:16] <_0R10N> <hggdh> I think it's done!
[01:21] <_0R10N> <hggdh> :)
[01:24] <hggdh> _0R10N: checking now
[01:25] <_0R10N> <hggdh> great!!!
[01:25] <hggdh> _0R10N: you are all set. Thank you for helping :-)
[01:26] <_0R10N> <hggdh> many thankssssss!!!! I'm so happy!!!
[01:26] <_0R10N> I'll be back in 5
[01:26] <_0R10N> :)
[01:26] <_0R10N> :)
[01:26] <_0R10N> :)
[01:26] <hggdh> _0R10N: rest assured that *we* are also happy. All help is welcome
[01:38] <_0R10N> I'm back now! I had to go to the store
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[05:13] <ddecator> is selecting "Normal" or "Extra" from visual effects supposed to prompt the installation of compiz if it isn't already on the system?
[05:38] <Mblackwell> Sorry if I seem a bit off. I'm posting from text messages. Buddy of mine can't boot. Last messages are ureadahead terminating with status 5, udevd failing to create queue file, and udev terminating with status 1, respawing, then terminating with status 2
[05:38] <Mblackwell> he'd just upgraded, and done a reboot
[05:38] <Mblackwell> he can't get a console without a live cd, and he's already chrooted the partitions
[05:38] <Mblackwell> and checked against the repository list
[05:38] <Mblackwell> (as well as reinstalled udev, plymouth, different stock kernels, etc)
[05:38] <Mblackwell> Anyone have a thought?
=== alvin_ is now known as alvin
[08:34] <BUGabundo_remote> ping-pong, Moon-Sun \o/
[08:56] <kklimonda> hey BUGabundo_remote
[08:57] <BUGabundo_remote> hey hey kk
[10:04] <maja87> hi
=== alvin_ is now known as alvin
[11:50] <jarnos> How do you  report a bug concerning the installer of ubuntu lucid? (I use desktop cd)
[11:51] <alvin> I think the package is called ubiquity. Not sure, I always use the alternate cd
[11:53] <yofel> live disk: ubuntu-bug ubiquity
[11:53] <yofel> alternate uses debian-installer
[12:03] <alvin> I'd like to attract a bit of attention to bug 563895. Some servers will die tomorrow and that's not pretty.
[12:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 563895 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "Disk not found when booting mdadm RAID1 with snapshotted lvm volume (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/563895
[12:04] <nigelbabu> alvin: please do not confirm your own bugs.
[12:04] <nigelbabu> just because it happens on another server doesn't mean its not something specific to you.
[12:05] <alvin> I have sought out people to do it, but have now just build another server. In this case, I'm very sure.
[12:05] <nigelbabu> Used the same isntallation media?
[12:05] <alvin> After all, it's fresh install, and 1 command (lvcreate) after the install. Very easy to reproduce.
[12:05] <alvin> No
[12:05] <nigelbabu> same image?
[12:05] <alvin> One server was fresh (RC1) install, the other is an upgrade from karmic
[12:06] <alvin> What I'm saying is: tomorrow, upgrades will kill servers with RAID1
[12:08] <nigelbabu> hm
[12:08] <alvin> Feel free to set the bug to new again. After all, I did confirm myself, but there is another person who has mentioned it affected him.
[12:10] <nigelbabu> if you can ask him to confirm it would be great.
[12:10] <nigelbabu> then I can set an importance for the bug
[12:11] <alvin> I'll just ask in the bug. I think it was persia or jordan_U that reproduced it. Can't reach them on IRC now
[12:11] <nigelbabu> p e r s i a should be around
[12:12] <alvin> Ah, good. You already asked in the bug
[12:12] <persia> I've had hardware issues with the machine on which I wanted to reproduce that, and I'm unwilling to go through the reinstall and upgrade on theo other machines.
[12:12]  * persia still intends to reproduce, and hopefully track down, but would welcome someone else trying.
[12:14] <alvin> I'll ask on the ubuntu-server mailinglist
[12:15] <nigelbabu> great :)
[12:39] <yofel> seb128: could you take a look at bug 465681 if you have time? wouldn't it be possible to stick the packgages together?
[12:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 465681 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Menu item not removed by removing "evolution" (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/465681
[12:48] <seb128> yofel, no
[12:49] <seb128> yofel, not sure what would be an elegant way to fix the issue
[12:50] <seb128> yofel, we should have the desktop entry in the same binary than the software but that doesn't solve the issue of having the data binary not being cleaned when uninstalling the software
[12:50] <yofel> ah
=== greg_g is now known as greg-g
[14:49] <_0R10N> Hi everybody!!!
[14:52] <BUGabundo_remote> hey _0R10N
[14:52] <BUGabundo_remote> what can we do for you today0?
[14:53] <_0R10N> <BUGabundo_remote>I joined the squad yesterday...
[14:53] <BUGabundo_remote> cool
[14:53] <BUGabundo_remote> welcome
[14:53] <BUGabundo_remote> keep up the good work then
[14:53] <bullgard4> Iforgot what package to report a bug to that did not occur in Karmic but occurs in Lucid after '~sudo update-manager -d'?
[14:53] <_0R10N> <BUGabundo_remote>: thank you!!!
[14:54] <yofel> bullgard4: what's the bug?
[14:54] <yofel> if anything that should be tagged as 'regression-potential' and change it into regression-release if it's still there tomorrow
[14:55] <bullgard4> yofel: My computer reports a floppy disk present while I do not have a floppy disk drive.
[14:55] <yofel> that one... I heard of it, but I don't know what causes it
[14:55] <bullgard4> yofel: I consider this a regression.
[14:57] <_0R10N> bullgard: the bug is already reported -> Bug #459950
[14:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 459950 in linux (Ubuntu) "Detects "Floppy Drive" but no floppy drive in computer (affects: 7) (dups: 2) (heat: 52)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/459950
[14:57] <_0R10N> ubot: lol
[14:57] <bullgard4> yofel: I do not know what to do with your statement: "if anything that should be tagged as 'regression-potential' and change it into regression-release if it's still there tomorrow." I consider this error a regression. But my question was: "What package should I direct my error report to?"
[14:58] <yofel> well, what I meant is that it should be tagged, but I have no idea what package that would be in as I don't know enough about the issue (linux sounds plausible though)
[14:59] <yofel> _0R10N: what about ubot?
[15:00]  * yofel pats ubot4
[15:00] <_0R10N> bullgard4: if your problem consist in removing the icon from the panel, try this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1456915
[15:01] <_0R10N> yofel: nothing.. we both reply to XX, addressing the same bug report...
[15:01] <yofel> _0R10N: he is triggerd by a 'bug xxxx' statement
[15:01] <yofel> bug 459950
[15:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 459950 in linux (Ubuntu) "Detects "Floppy Drive" but no floppy drive in computer (affects: 7) (dups: 2) (heat: 52)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/459950
[15:06] <bullgard4> _ORION, yofel Thank you very much for your help.
[15:07] <_0R10N> bullgard4: you're welcome!
=== yofel is now known as yofel_
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel__
=== yofel__ is now known as yofel
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
[16:52] <duleep> hi
[16:53] <duleep> any tool there bugs report
[16:53] <duleep> in ubuntu
[16:54] <duleep> i have problem in network connection
[16:54] <BUGabundo_remote> duleep: $ubuntu-bug network-manager
[16:57] <duleep> thanks thats great one
[17:04] <BUGabundo_remote> np
[17:04] <BUGabundo_remote> duleep: and ping asac with the bug id
[17:08] <duleep> ok
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck[afk]
[17:34] <caravena> Hello JFo
[17:34] <JFo> hi caravena
[17:35] <caravena> JFo, see my bug please pedro_ is my friend of Chile https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15839
[17:35] <ubot4> bugzilla.kernel.org bug 15839 in Power-Sleep-Wake "Not work hibernate and suspend in Sony Vaio VGN-NS130FE" [Normal,Reopened]
[17:37] <caravena> JFo, my bug reference en LP:	 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568655
[17:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 568655 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Not work hibernate and suspend in Sony Vaio VGN-NS130FE (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[17:39]  * JFo looks
[17:43] <JFo> caravena, I see John Linville has reopened the upstream report
[17:44] <JFo> I've set your bug to Confirmed/Medium
[17:44] <JFo> is there more you were wanting from me caravena?
[17:45] <caravena> not, JFo thanks =)
[17:46] <JFo> caravena, my pleasure :-)
=== EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-lunch
=== radoe_ is now known as radoe
=== Edwin-lunch is now known as EdwinGrubbs
[20:41] <Azoff> hello
[20:42] <Azoff> What can I do to help resolving this issue? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/570700
[20:42] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 570700 in lirc (Ubuntu) "lirc-modules-source-0.8.6-0ubuntu4: lirc_dev-2.6.33.patch breaks lirc-nct677x-src (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]
[20:47] <baptistemm_> hi ladies & gentlemen
[20:52] <baptistemm_> how should I proceed to propose a fix for lucid-proposed?
[20:53] <micahg> baptistemm: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[20:54] <baptistemm_> thanks micahg
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk]
[21:59] <arand> Bug #571407  Should this one be Fix Released and have a confimed Karmic taget instead?
[21:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 571407 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "Grub 1.97 doesn't parse the 1.98 grub.cfg correctly (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/571407
=== deryck[afk] is now known as deryck
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf