[00:00] That's probably not what you want. [00:00] It's a combination of other open source software of many licenses. I would use Other/Open Source and specify that. === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha-afk [04:55] is there some way I can use ~/.bazaar/locations.conf to save me from typing out a full branch URL when I'm branching a new branch? [04:56] ie. I'd like to be able to do something along the lines of "cd .../Project; bzr branch test-code-refactoring-2244" [05:03] idnar: yes [05:03] hang on [05:03] idnar: what exactly do you want? [05:04] thumper: if I create a new branch locally, I can immediately do "bzr push" with no destination, because I've set push_location appropriately [05:04] ok [05:04] I have that set up [05:04] is that the magic you want? [05:04] thumper: I'd like something similarly convenient for new remote branches that I would like to branch locally [05:04] sort of the revers of bzr push / push_location [05:04] ah [05:05] *reverse [05:05] Not builtin, but there was a plugin along those lines. [05:05] no, don't know of anything [05:05] best ask in [05:05] #bzr [05:05] oh, oops, I actually meant to ask in #bzr originally [05:05] it's one window to the right [05:05] Would let you define a prefix along the lines of the lp: prefix. [05:05] I forget the name of it, though. [05:12] spiv: bookmarks [05:13] spiv: perhaps [06:05] Hi, is it possible to assign a separate maintainer to two different branches of a private project? Trivial use case: programmers want to commit to lp:~my_team/dev/trunk and artists want to commit artwork to lp:~/art_team/dev/trunk, while both branches "belong" to the same commercial project so they pick up the private branch status. [06:05] (and it doesn't make sense in terms of business rules to give the artists write access to the code, in this example) [06:08] allquixotic: sure, who can write to the branch is determined by the team ownership [06:10] mwhudson: How do I associate the second team with the project though? [06:10] allquixotic: you don't have to [06:20] mwhudson: I made a new team and tried to create a branch for my private project using that team, and it said I'm not allowed to create branches there. only the "maintainer" team is. [06:21] allquixotic: oh [06:21] allquixotic: well if you create it as a personal branch, you'll be able to reassign the branch to the new team afterwards [06:21] i think, anyway... [06:21] thumper: ^^ [06:28] I was experimenting with trying to reassign a branch like mwhudson said: I made an empty private branch owned by the team that maintains the commercial project. E.g. lp:~dev-team/myproject/test. Then I went to edit details and changed the branch owner to the newly created team that is not the maintainer. Then I got this oops! (Error ID: OOPS-1580O531) [06:28] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1580O531 [06:28] allquixotic: oops indeed [06:29] allquixotic: i guess you can have both your programmer team and your art team being subteams of the "maintainer team" [06:30] Doesn't it just need a branch privacy policy defined for the art team too? [06:30] that's one approach, but if you have people who are members of both teams, that can get very confusing [06:31] The business rules that everyone has agreed upon is that the programmers can R/W all resources, but the art people can only R/W the artwork branch. So if the "maintainer" the project has to have R/W to everything in the project, that's fine. [06:32] I can of course make individuals a member of both teams if it isn't possible to give the development team R/W to the art team's branches. [06:33] it isn't a very huge team, so managing individual team memberships should be feasible. [07:04] mwhudson: So I'm blocked on this issue of team management as stated above. If I make the art team a subteam of the maintainer team, will that give the art team read-write access to the code branches too? [07:06] allquixotic: yes [07:07] hmm, that kind of defeats the purpose then... [07:07] allquixotic: seriously, i think you want to have an overall company team, which would be the privacy team in the project policy [07:07] allquixotic: and have art and developer subteams of that [07:08] and have the developer team be a subteam of the art team too, if they should be able to write to the art team branch [07:08] mwhudson: Following that pattern, the art team won't be able to write to the branches owned by the developer team? [07:09] allquixotic: correct [07:09] Great! [07:09] I'll try that. [07:09] allquixotic: but the company team will be subscribed to all branches you push, which will mean they can see the branches [07:10] mwhudson: So the one person owning the company team will be able to see all the subteams' branches... that's fine [07:11] As long as I don't add individuals to the top-level team, members of the two subteams won't be able to see one another's branches, is how I understand it [07:11] no [07:11] i thought you wanted everyone to see everyone elses branches? [07:12] oh -- you mean anyone who's a member of any subteam of the top-level team will have (at least) read-only access to all branches/ [07:12] ?* [07:12] allquixotic: yes [07:12] that is actually not a problem [07:12] I think this will work. :) [07:14] mwhudson: To set up a proper "subteam", do I just set the team owner of a new team to be the top-level team? [07:14] allquixotic: no [07:15] you just invite/add the team like you would any other user [07:15] allquixotic: teams are people in launchpad [07:18] mwhudson: Yep, this is working! Thanks again for your help. :) [07:19] allquixotic: np === noodles785 is now known as noodles775 === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [13:27] when I'm exposing bugs via api, anyway not to count duplicates (like when 2 tasks in same bug) === salgado changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: salgado | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [13:41] bug 13661 keeps having mails bounced back from a user (again) [13:41] Launchpad bug 13661 in synaptic "get proxy config from gnome configuration" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/13661 [13:41] this users account keeps doing that, can you not just remove it? [13:45] hey is the new administer archive feature uploaded to edge? [13:47] bigjools, ^ [13:47] ah yes.. bigjools :) === kshadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer [13:48] chrisccoulson, done [13:48] salgado, thanks === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [13:59] shadeslayer: are you talking about deletion [13:59] ? [13:59] bigjools: yeah [14:01] shadeslayer: I missed the edge rollout today so it'll be available tomorrow at ~0800 UTC [14:05] bigjools: ok :) [14:05] no problem :P === oubiwann is now known as Wooster_ === Wooster_ is now known as oubiwann [15:43] salgado: something wrong with edge? [15:43] query via api giving me erros [15:43] httplib2.ServerNotFoundError: Unable to find the server at api.edge.launchpad.net [15:44] nigelbabu, that's a DNS error, but I can connect just fine to api.edge.lp.net [15:44] something only at my end? [15:44] may be a problem with your ISP's DNS server; hopefully temporary [15:45] ajmitch had the same problem on ubuntuwire servers [15:45] he was running it for me there initially [15:45] Their DNS is completely unrelated, except for being also hosted in London,. [15:46] wgrant: so where is the problem? [15:46] mine or lp? [15:46] nigelbabu: Probably yours. [15:46] wgrant: how come I'm getting the same error he hit on ubuntuwire then (the dns won't be related at all) [15:47] nigelbabu: It's working fine for me. [15:47] hitting api.edge.launchpad.net on my browser gives me Request is missing an OAuth consumer key. [15:47] That's normal. [15:47] which means dns is resolving? [15:48] wgrant: what do you make of http://paste.ubuntu.com/424641/ ? [15:49] nigelbabu: dig api.edge.launchpad.net [15:50] wgrant: erm dig? [15:50] nigelbabu: dig [15:51] wgrant: git answer [15:51] got [15:52] http://paste.ubuntu.com/424642/ [15:54] nigelbabu: dig @ns1.canonical.com api.edge.launchpad.net [15:55] wgrant: got answer again. Want a pastebin? [15:56] nigelbabu: Please. [15:57] http://paste.ubuntu.com/424645/ [15:57] nigelbabu: So, there's nothing wrong on Canonical's end. [15:58] And your local DNS server is returning SERVFAIL. [15:58] what? where? [15:59] Line 3 of your first paste. [15:59] Er, line 4. [16:00] Now its NOERROR [16:00] ah, its flickering between servfail and noerror === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [16:43] hi, I accidently subscribed someone to https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-m-upgrade-and-install-testing (user ~ara, displayed as mprasodjo). is there a way to unsubscribe the user again? [16:43] I don't want him to get mails just because I looked up the wrong name [16:44] mvo: sorry, there isn't, but they can unsubscribe themselves === Ursinha is now known as isitoutyet === isitoutyet is now known as Ursinha === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Ursinha is now known as IsItOutYet [18:01] d'oh! amd64 3 2935 jobs (five days) [18:03] how can i delete my PPA ? [18:04] piju: wait until tomorrow and there's a beta test of PPA deletion coming on edge [18:04] bigjools; i want to delete my PPA at launchpad account [18:04] my pkg is broken [18:04] fta: yeah,all the DC machines get commandeered to push CDs out [18:04] piju: patience [18:04] bigjools; tq === IsItOutYet is now known as itsNOTout === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [18:14] oh, *that's* what they're doing [18:16] piju: Why would you want to delete your entire archive just because a package in it was broken? That makes no sense. [18:17] the pkg is obsolete [18:17] So delete the package, not the entire PPA [18:18] how? [18:18] my entire PPA only have 1 pkg [18:19] From the root page of the PPA, click on "View package details" (top right), and then "Delete packages" (top right) [18:20] maxb; how can i delete the pkg folder ? [18:20] Explain what you mean by "pkg folder" [18:21] all PPA names [18:21] I don't understand [18:21] delete packages is only deleting the pkg [18:21] yes.... [18:21] so what? [18:21] i want to delete to url to the pkg [18:22] Paste this url [18:22] my archieve [18:22] sorry archive [18:23] Why do you care? [18:23] yes i do [18:24] hi I'm new in bzr and get this message when pushing my code to my "branch".. http://pastebin.com/1LR1RkJt [18:24] * thopiekar has just used svn before === oubiwann is now known as Wooster_ === itsNOTout is now known as LucidIsOut [18:29] thopiekar, have you registered your ssh key in Launchpad? === Wooster_ is now known as oubiwann === oubiwann is now known as Wooster_ === Wooster_ is now known as oubiwann_ === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann [18:36] jep [18:37] also worked with ppa's that's why I needed the ssh key.. [18:37] here I want to push https://code.launchpad.net/~thopiekar/mopedix/trunk and my profile https://launchpad.net/~thopiekar [18:38] thopiekar, have you done a 'bzr launchpad-login'? [18:38] thopiekar: You do not need an SSH key to work with PPAs. You need a GPG key for that. They're quite different. [18:38] yep [18:38] eugh, edge is sloooow [18:39] maxb: hmm I'll check my profile [18:39] right, you do have a ssh key there. [18:40] Run "sh thopiekar@bazaar.launchpad.net" - it should print "No shells on this server" - if it doesn't, your basic ssh communication isn't working [18:40] got the ssh key also here on my pc [18:40] http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/2489/plasmadrop2imageshack96.png [18:40] sorry, that's "ssh thopiekar@bazaar.launchpad.net" [18:41] thopiekar@thopiekar-ubuntu:~/Projekte/mopedix$ ssh thopiekar@bazaar.launchpad.net -> Permission denied (publickey). [18:41] Right, so we have eliminated bzr as part of the problem [18:43] maxb: what about the message on page https://code.launchpad.net/~thopiekar : lp:mopedix -> This branch has not been pushed to yet. [18:46] thopiekar: None of the keys visible in your "Passworter und Verschlusselung" are the same as the key you have registered in your launchpad profile === LucidIsOut is now known as Ursinha [18:52] Hi all, did bzr stop to work? [18:52] ah no sorry, it's just damed slow! [18:52] maxb: huch. ok so the problem is that I need to update my ssh key? [18:52] l3on: what? [18:55] thopiekar: Correct. You need to have a ssh private key locally corresponding to a public key registered on your launchpad profile [18:55] maxb: thank you for helping me [18:55] :) [19:07] aargh, "Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server. " [19:07] :D [19:07] This is likely to be a semi-persistent issue for the next several hours, due to increased load. [19:07] that's what me broght here [19:08] just think of it as a release day holiday [19:11] what the hell in a "BadAtom" Error? does anyone know? [19:29] what's wrong with launchpad.net?? [19:29] network load? [19:29] blackxored, yes, Lucid was released [19:29] gazillion of hits all over the place [19:30] beuno, you're kidding me, hehehe yeah I know, but is launchpad hosted on the same server that www [19:30] ??? [19:30] I couldn't tell why there is so much launchpad load [19:30] * blackxored hopes isn't people mass-reporting bugs [19:31] blackxored, no, but Launchpad is used for many things, so the number of visits increases dramatically [19:31] and they do share datacenter [19:31] beuno, interesting [19:31] lets just say it's a non-trivial amount of traffice :) [19:31] ok, I'll skip contributing to the ubuntu-manual for when the server is a little bit more responsive [19:32] blackxored, yeah, I'd say give it until tomorrow for things to calm down [19:33] beuno, truly real ;) hehehe [19:33] beuno: so the "internal server error" that is back is now because of the release? [19:34] ahasenack, that would be my guess, but I'd talk to a losa about it [19:34] I'm already on lucid through updates, I think I'll wait till monday for getting isos [19:39] all hi! there`s some problems with LaunchPad! Error 500 [19:39] CyberMan, yes, it's currently under very heavy load [19:40] need to reseave CD with LTS) [19:48] now cannot cange password [19:59] Are there any issues with vault.canonical.com being authorized with launchpad? [19:59] For the last few days I've been trying to re-download a software order from the canonical store and it keeps giving me a blank page on the authorization. [20:00] vadi2, yes, we're working on some log-in issues [20:00] sorry about that [20:00] okay [20:00] should be more stable in a little while [20:03] launchpad login failed: internal server error 500 [20:03] lysi: server overloaded [20:03] Year, tried 8 times until I could login! [20:04] vadi2: thanks [20:05] btw. noscript error console output during login procedure: login.launchpad.net : potentially vulnerable to CVE-2009-3555 [20:05] The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attacke [20:06] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3555 [20:06] The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attacke [20:15] Launchpad Login Service says: There's no page with this address in the Launchpad Login Service service. Check that you entered the address correctly and try again. (Error ID: 1580roseapple67) [20:23] CVE-2009-3555 also for answers.launchpad.net and launchpadlibrarian.net [20:23] The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attacke === piju is now known as piju[QRX] [20:38] am having problems logging in to launchpad - anyone else? Or is it just me? [20:38] ringer, yes, the servers are under heavy load [20:39] beuno, hmm I wonder why ;) [20:40] ringer, no idea, completely unexpected [20:41] beuno, nothing to do with the launch of 10.04 then? [20:41] ringer, I'm kidding, of course it's due to 10.04 :) [20:41] :) [20:42] beuno, sorry - it's hard to tell on irc when people are being dead straight or not [20:43] ringer, yeah, apologies about that [20:45] beuno, while you're here, and I can't log on to ubuntu forums, do you have a script to right-click in Nautilus to open a terminal in that folder? [20:46] When I read the status header one might get the impression that lp is under heavy construction period. ;-) http://identi.ca/launchpadstatus [20:46] ringer, I do not [20:47] beu, ok - bit of a longshot wasn't it [20:48] beuno, hmm - could have sworn I typed b then e then u then TAB [20:48] Hi, Would someone know if bug tags are in use ? This is in relation to this Junior task bug --> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-bots/+bug/407402 [20:48] Launchpad bug 407402 in ubuntu-bots "[Bugtracker] ubottu does not recognise bugs with nicknames" [Wishlist,Triaged] [20:49] ringer: install extension nautilus-open-terminal [20:50] lysi, thanks - will now have to look up how to install extensions in N - linux is all good fun, eh? [20:52] ringer: tehre is a package [20:53] ringer: install via Synaptic, search for the package name: nautilus-open-terminal [20:53] just install it and restart nautilus [20:53] ok thanks guys [20:53] restart might require you to kill it (log out & back in works too of course) [20:54] ringer: http://library.gnome.org/users/user-guide/stable/gosnautilus-440.html.en [20:55] installing it now [21:01] JanC, lysi installed it but 'open in terminal' is only available through the file menu and not right-click. is that correct? [21:02] ringer: where do you right-click? [21:03] JanC, ona file in a folder - ah - maybe I need to right clcik on the folder [21:03] it's not there when you right-click a file [21:03] folder or free space [21:03] you can't open a file in a terminal ;) [21:03] JanC, yeah - just found that out. Thanks. [21:04] and in doing all this, I just realised I missed an ebay item I was watching! === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [21:36] Before I go searching--where in the Launchpad code is the duplicate-detection algorithm that's used when filing a bug? [21:38] mkanat: it's in postgres, mostly [21:38] mwhudson: It's PL/SQL or something? [21:38] mkanat: it's a postgres full text search extension [21:38] mwhudson: Ahhh. Could I see it somewhere? [21:38] (may not be an extension any more, actually) [21:38] mkanat: probably, you know about as much as me now [21:39] mwhudson: Hahaha, okay. [21:39] mwhudson: I want to implement the same thing generically in Bugzilla. [21:39] mkanat: well, it's pretty much the same algorithm as used for bug searcing [21:40] mhudson: just uses the proposed summary as the search query? [21:41] mwhudson: Oh, so perhaps I could just OR all the terms together and do a fulltext search and take the relevance. [21:42] how can i dl lubuntu lynx? [21:43] zebastian_: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download [21:44] L ubuntu [21:44] lubuntu === salgado changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [22:01] zebastian_: ask in #lubuntu === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [22:24] Is this an appropriate place to report spam in launchpad? [22:25] https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/266436/comments/5 [22:25] Launchpad bug 266436 in mailman "deceptive listinfo "to post a message..."" [Medium,New] === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [22:31] I need to file a bug against launchpad, most of the bugs that have been reported in the last day or so are showing up twice for no reason on this page: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-datecreated&field.status%3Alist=New&field.importance%3Alist=Undecided&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.owner=&field.component=1&field.component=2&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=o [22:31] n&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_no_package.used=&search=Search [22:32] how do I go about doing this? === piju[QRX] is now known as piju [22:38] sorry my internet connections is not working very well, if anyone answered me could you please resend? [22:55] bbordwell: you need to use bit.ly or something for that URL [22:56] but you can report launchpad bugs using launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad