[04:12] Should I remove the intrepid builds from my gmpc/mpd ppas? [04:15] Up to you. It's supported for another 12-15 hours :) [04:15] But I suspect that there will be some mass-disablement at some point (much like there are no longer gutsy PPAs). [04:31] persia: ripps: I think that's just the builders, not the PPA archvie [04:32] micahg: Then why aren't there gutsy PPAs anymore? [04:33] persia: you can't build, but if it's built, I think it satys [04:33] * persia definitely remembers them existing in the past [04:34] Ah, interesting. And one has to hack the URL to see them (e.g. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mobile/+a)rchive/ppa?field.series_filter=gutsy [04:34] Anyway, probably does no harm to just leave them then. [04:35] as long as there aren't any security issues IMHO [04:35] Right. obsolete-distroseries.py only does primary/partner. [08:37] hi [08:37] will all the official builders from the build farm be reallocated to the PPAs later? [08:37] https://launchpad.net/builders [08:38] KIAaze: The PPA builders are currently busy serving Ubuntu releases. [08:38] ah ok [08:38] and what are thoe preivate builds? [08:38] "private source" [08:38] Probably security updates. [08:39] ok [08:39] everything will be back to normal on 2010-05-01? [08:39] Probably not. [08:39] But what do you mean by "all the"? [08:39] :/ [08:39] There are three official i386 builders, and only two amd64 ones. [08:39] Not many. [08:40] well, there are a lot of "private source" builds listed there [08:40] and the rest is marked as idle [08:40] Note that most of those builders are for obscure non-PPA architectures. [08:41] true [08:41] can they switch architecture? [08:42] Not without incredibly, incredibly slow emulation. [08:42] everything feels slowed down when a new ubuntu release comes out. ^^ [08:44] on wednesday, packages started to build within a few minutes, now it looks like a 2-6 days queue. I'm guessing a lot of rebuilding against the new lucid repositories. [09:00] Isn't it possible to mark a merge proposal superseded? [09:00] I don't see it now. [09:01] A merge proposal was superseded by a different branch. For now it was marked 'Rejected', but that's not ideal. [09:10] The Superseded state exists, but I think is only set by submitting a new merge proposal for the same branch. [09:11] So in your case Rejected is probably as close as it gets :/ [09:11] (Unless maybe the launchpad APIs let you set it?) === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ === jsk-afk is now known as jsk [11:14] hi, is it possible to upload files via email? [11:14] like the upload-python script, but via mail? === noodles785 is now known as noodles775 [12:21] FloSoft: for bugs, yes https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface#Attaching%20files%20to%20bugs [12:23] hi [12:23] maxb: ping [12:24] tsimpson: and for "release"s? [12:24] FloSoft: There is no email interface for them. [12:24] there may be a way with the LP API, but not via email [12:25] okay i have a python script which does not work correctly [12:25] which uploads it via lp api [12:25] I created a new ssk-key with seahorse, removed the old ssh key and added the new one but I just get ssh thopiekar@bazaar.launchpad.net -> Permission denied (publickey). [12:25] why? [12:33] thopiekar: did you remove your old key from your system? [12:33] yep [12:33] and I think I found the problem.. [12:34] the using bzr it is using the default .id_rsa [12:34] but my ssh key for lp is in .id_rsa_1 [12:35] you can change that in your ~/.ssh/conf [12:35] found a article about that here: http://20y.hu/20081012/how-to-use-different-ssh-keys-for-different-services-smoothly.html [12:35] yep [12:35] * ~/.ssh/config [12:35] you should add that to the launchpad / bzr wiki [12:35] it is [12:35] :O [12:35] https://help.launchpad.net/Code/UploadingABranch#Pushing%20your%20Bazaar%20branch%20to%20Launchpad [12:35] :) [12:51] I've been meaning to ask something, are "bug nicknames" used any more? [12:51] where you could assign a bug a "memorable name" [12:58] I have been pointed in this direction to ask, I have done 'dget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xindy/xindy_2.4~pre1-3.dsc' which gives me a *.orig.tar.gz *.diff.gz and a *.dsc. This is all from debian but is not in ubuntu due to a build fail. I would like to put it all in a ppa, how ever i don't know how to make a *.changes file for it. (source is here : http://packages.debian.org/source/stable/xindy ) [12:59] does any one know how to make the *.changes file? [13:00] "debuild -S" from the extracted directory should do it [13:00] dpkg-source -x *.dsc; cd dir-name; debuild -S [13:00] altough this recreates the *.dsc file too [13:00] thanks tsimpson and akheron I will give it ago [13:01] or dpkg-genchanges [13:02] but then you'd need to "debsign" the changes files to upload [13:05] wow tsimpson and akheron, thank you two days of pain solved. (on another problem as well) === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann === qense_ is now known as qense [13:15] It worked with xindy but with texlive-base i get this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/425217/ any suggestions? [13:16] install quilt [13:19] doh! thats obvious thanks. the xindy package got rejected http://paste.ubuntu.com/425219/ any thoughts? [13:20] change "unstable" to "lucid" in the debian/changelog [13:20] or just bump the version with dch -i [13:22] ok thanks I will give it a go [13:41] they have been excepted now thanks tsimpson. === jsk is now known as jsk-afk [14:02] hi uh [14:02] do I report launchpad bugs on launchpad? [14:02] kromagg: yes [14:03] I actually came here to ask if there was a problem with launchpad but it just came through so [14:03] bug report it is then [14:04] kromagg, you can report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone [14:04] kromagg, if you file against launchpad itself it gets moved to malone eventually, but it's slightly quicker of you file on malone. [14:05] okay thanks, I was having trouble finding the exact project to report against [14:06] In case you're interested, I got an OOPS-1581D1213 on reporting a bug against xorg [14:06] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1581D1213 === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [14:07] I'm assuming it's because of the crapload of attachments xorg adds [14:07] ah the number is a uniqid [14:09] it's already in there though, #357907 [14:09] thanks for the hint [14:10] that oops hasn't propogated yet, sorry [14:14] eventually managed to report the bug anyway so nps [14:14] the original one, that caused the oops [14:50] Just wondering - how is it possible to assign multiple people to a single blueprint? === bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: bac | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [14:52] rdb: there is a single assignee, which can be a person or team [15:11] am I having maverick hallucinations or we have amel ppa now? [15:12] xnox: Yes. [15:12] WOW [15:12] amazing thank you =) [15:19] armel ppa? wh00t! [15:24] How can it be enabled? [15:24] armel will be reserved, it's not for general use [15:24] Oh, OK. [15:24] way too flaky apparently [15:25] What defines the lucky elite that is priviledged to make armel builds? [15:25] Who do I have to sleep with to get an armel ppa? [15:25] right now, just the Canonical OEM team [15:26] Hmm... OK. Well, still an interesting development. =) [15:32] rdb, I love the "who do I have to sleep with" test =) [15:33] =) [15:43] Are patches accessible via the API in the bug.attachments collection, or do they have their own entry point? [15:46] qense: those include patches too, you can see if it's a patch from the type attribute [15:46] tsimpson: OK, thanks [15:46] it will be either "Patch" or "Unspecified" [15:46] ok, great! === EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-lunch === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [17:13] hiya everyone, who should I speak to about build machines? === yofel_ is now known as yofel === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === fta_ is now known as fta === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [22:44] Could somebody delete a project registered by me on launchpad ? It was a test. === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [22:45] BlackZ: you need to file a request on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [22:45] tsimpson: OK, thanks [22:46] btw, if you want to test things out you should use https://staging.launchpad.net/ [22:46] it's database gets reset daily [22:49] Well, not quite daily these days. [22:50] well, it non-permanent anyhow [22:56] http://paste.ubuntu.com/425505/ [22:57] apt won't install anything. :( [22:58] brax: This channel is for launchpad support & questions only. Please ask in #ubuntu . [23:00] I asked in ubuntu and they told me to ask g=here... :C [23:01] brax: either another package manager is running, or you have a more serious problem that might be fixed by simply restarting the computer [23:01] but, it's a #ubuntu question for sure [23:04] when they said check LaunchPad, they meant http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu [23:05] oh, he left anyway [23:16] From https://code.launchpad.net/~drizzle-developers/drizzle/development I click on "All revisions" but keep getting "Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server" [23:45] <_habnabit> So it looks like the code browser is down. [23:45] <_habnabit> It said wait a minute or two, but it's been about half an hour for me. [23:46] LOSAs: ^^