| === andrewPCT is now known as andrew | ||
| === andrewPCT is now known as andrew | ||
| === kamalm is now known as kamalm-away | ||
| === bladernr is now known as bladernr_ | ||
| ScottK | Nice job everyone. Sorry $WORK took me out of the game this week. | 02:47 |
|---|---|---|
| pitti | cjwatson: release meeting> that was meant to be "can I rather go out with my wife this evening", not "oh please let's have one" :-) | 05:30 |
| pitti | slangasek: enjoy London! | 05:30 |
| ogra | pitti, cjwatson, could one of you publish ports ? we get requests in #ubuntu-arm | 07:27 |
| pitti | right, that's on my TODO list | 07:27 |
| ogra | good :) | 07:27 |
| pitti | I hope I won't screw it up | 07:27 |
| ogra | it has to end up on cdimage but dont ask me which folder :P | 07:28 |
| pitti | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/10.04/ I presume | 07:28 |
| pitti | I'll compare with http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/9.10/release/ | 07:28 |
| ogra | might be, but it caould also be http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/$flavour/ports/releases/10.04/ | 07:28 |
| pitti | sure | 07:29 |
| ogra | i think both exist | 07:29 |
| pitti | is there any way to know which ones were tested? (like powerpc+ps3) | 07:29 |
| ogra | which makes it a bit confusing | 07:29 |
| pitti | or are these best-effort? | 07:29 |
| ogra | i can only tell that all omap ones were tested and that only imx and omap of kubuntu-netbook should be released (dove is broken) | 07:30 |
| ogra | no idea about non ARM | 07:30 |
| ogra | (the channel could probably be unmuted again too) | 07:31 |
| pitti | ogra: that's just for netbook, or regular ubuntu images for arm as well? | 07:32 |
| ogra | we only build ubuntu-netbook, d-i netinstall and ubuntu-server | 07:33 |
| ogra | imx51 and dove netbook are in the official release | 07:33 |
| ogra | the rest goes to cdimage | 07:33 |
| ogra | (arm arches are omap, imx51 and dove) | 07:33 |
| ogra | if you find any desktop images for either of these arch you can keep them :) (they shouldnt be built since a while though) | 07:35 |
| ogra | i sadly cant reach cdimage to give you any links ... always times out | 07:35 |
| pitti | bah, cdimage is totally clogged | 07:35 |
| pitti | ogra: ok, so you want those: | 07:42 |
| pitti | netbook armel+omap | 07:43 |
| pitti | {alternate,desktop,server} armel+{omap,imx51,dove} | 07:43 |
| pitti | ? | 07:43 |
| ogra | not alternate,desktop | 07:43 |
| ogra | only server | 07:43 |
| pitti | ah, ok | 07:44 |
| ogra | and kubuntu-netbook armel+{omap,imx5} | 07:44 |
| pitti | and netbook armel+omap? | 07:44 |
| ogra | yes | 07:44 |
| pitti | ogra: do you happen to know what CDIMAGE_NO_PURGE=1 is? | 07:44 |
| pitti | first time that I see it (on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseProcess) | 07:44 |
| ogra | nope | 07:45 |
| ogra | smells like "do not remove dailies" but i could be wrong | 07:46 |
| pitti | but publish-release never has | 07:46 |
| ogra | we should probably wait for colin | 07:46 |
| ogra | he knows the scripts in and out | 07:46 |
| pitti | ARCHES="armel+omap" for-project ubuntu publish-release ubuntu-netbook/ports/daily-live 20100427.1 netbook yes | 07:48 |
| pitti | hm, so that did nothing | 07:48 |
| ogra | netbook yes ? | 07:48 |
| ogra | shouldnt that be ubuntu-netbook ? | 07:48 |
| pitti | yes is the "release" argument | 07:49 |
| pitti | ogra: I copied that from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseProcess | 07:49 |
| pitti | it said | 07:49 |
| pitti | Constructing release trees ... | 07:49 |
| pitti | Copying netbook-armel+omap image ... | 07:49 |
| pitti | Making armel+omap zsync metafile ... | 07:49 |
| pitti | Creating torrent for /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/www/simple/lucid/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img ... | 07:49 |
| pitti | but there are no new files at all in www, compared to my www.prev backup | 07:49 |
| ogra | hmm | 07:50 |
| pitti | hm, let's wait for cjwatson, before I screw up stuff | 07:50 |
| pitti | CDIMAGE_NO_PURGE=1 didn't make a difference either | 07:50 |
| ogra | isnt simple/ what goes to releases.u.c ? | 07:51 |
| ogra | iirc it shoudl stay on www/full/ | 07:51 |
| pitti | ah, right | 07:51 |
| * pitti reverts back to previous www dir | 07:52 | |
| pitti | +./full/releases/lucid/release/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img | 07:55 |
| pitti | ah, how's that | 07:55 |
| pitti | +./torrent/releases/lucid/release/netbook/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img | 07:55 |
| pitti | it created those two | 07:55 |
| pitti | I don't see an equivalent torrent for karmic, though | 07:57 |
| pitti | sorry, I don't feel I can drive that reliably | 07:57 |
| ogra | pitti, there was no omap in karmic ... i started implementing it 4 weeks ago :) | 08:06 |
| pitti | ogra: right, but there is no /torrent/releases/karmic/release/netbook/ at all | 08:07 |
| ogra | ah, k | 08:07 |
| ogra | i thought you referred to omap | 08:07 |
| ogra | i see /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/www/torrent/ | 08:08 |
| ogra | we probably didnt release the netbook flavour for karmic in ports | 08:09 |
| ogra | (armel definately only had desktop back then, not sure about ppc or other ports) | 08:09 |
| pitti | ok, I'll play with that a little bit | 08:16 |
| pitti | ogra: hm, so my server images look good | 08:24 |
| pitti | +./full/ports/releases/lucid/release/ubuntu-10.04-server-armel+omap.img | 08:24 |
| ogra | yay | 08:24 |
| pitti | and so on | 08:24 |
| pitti | but netbook is still wrong | 08:24 |
| pitti | +./full/releases/lucid/release/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img | 08:24 |
| ogra | weird | 08:24 |
| pitti | it's not on ports | 08:24 |
| pitti | ARCHES="armel+omap" for-project ubuntu publish-release ubuntu-netbook/ports/daily-live 20100427.1 netbook named | 08:24 |
| ogra | i wonder if there is something missing in publish-release | 08:25 |
| pitti | cjwatson: ^ this doesn't seem to move it to ports; am I forgetting a flag here? | 08:25 |
| pitti | cjwatson: it does work with server: ARCHES="armel+omap armel+dove armel+imx51 ia64 powerpc powerpc+ps3 sparc" for-project ubuntu publish-release ubuntu-server/ports/daily 20100428 server named | 08:25 |
| ogra | pitti, did you try "for-project ubuntu-netbook" for the omap one ? | 08:40 |
| ogra | thats usually the project name for the netbook images | 08:40 |
| pitti | as I said, I copied that from the release wiki page | 08:40 |
| ogra | hmm | 08:40 |
| slangasek | pitti, cjwatson, ogra: ok, I'm running through the ports publishing now | 08:53 |
| pitti | slangasek: is above the correct command for ubuntu-netbook armel+omap? | 08:54 |
| ogra | given the reachability of cdimage it seems there is no hurry anyway :) | 08:54 |
| pitti | slangasek: or is it for-project ubuntu-netbook? | 08:54 |
| * pitti still puzzled why they don't land on /ports/ | 08:54 | |
| slangasek | pitti: the rune in the wiki was intended for publishing to releases.u.c; I'm not sure why omap is landing where it is | 09:06 |
| pitti | slangasek: right, but the for-project argument should be the same for both? | 09:06 |
| slangasek | pitti: for publishing to releases.u.c, we explicitly *don't* want armel under a separate ports tree :) | 09:12 |
| pitti | I thought it should go to cdimage only? | 09:12 |
| slangasek | I believe what we're seeing is that publish-release treats ^ports/ and ^ubuntu-server/ports/ specially | 09:12 |
| slangasek | and maps those to ports/releases | 09:12 |
| slangasek | but doesn't do this for ubuntu-netbook/ | 09:12 |
| pitti | full/releases/ is cdimage only | 09:12 |
| pitti | ah | 09:13 |
| slangasek | yes | 09:13 |
| slangasek | yes, omap should go to cdimage only, which is why the rune from the wiki doesn't apply | 09:13 |
| pitti | I just updated yes->named, and the version number | 09:14 |
| pitti | I'm not sure what CDIMAGE_NO_PURGE=1 does | 09:14 |
| slangasek | that's so when you run two separate publishing runs of netbook images to the same directory on releases for different archs, it doesn't nuke your torrents for i386 | 09:15 |
| === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ | ||
| pitti | ah, thanks | 09:15 |
| === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara | ||
| slangasek | pitti: ok, have adjusted publish-release locally to let us publish omap under ports/releases/lucid/release; I still have a handful of ports images to publish yet, but have to go catch a plane, so I'll follow up on those later | 09:44 |
| slangasek | but omap-netbook is done | 09:44 |
| * ogra hugs slangasek | 10:08 | |
| lool | cjwatson, slangasek: lucid-netbook-armel+omap.img doesn't seem to be in http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/lucid/ | 11:47 |
| lool | well it would be under a different name there obviously | 11:48 |
| lool | oh was just reported earlier | 11:49 |
| slangasek | lool: correct; it's now under cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/lucid/release/ | 11:49 |
| slangasek | I could move it if you prefer, then I wouldn't have to worry so much about the mess I'm making of publish-release | 11:49 |
| lool | slangasek: I personally would prefer a consistent scheme too; not sure if it's ok to move these around still | 11:50 |
| lool | slangasek: Perhaps davidm to decide? | 11:50 |
| slangasek | consistent with what, though? | 11:50 |
| slangasek | currently it's consistent with what we publish to releases.u.c at release time | 11:50 |
| slangasek | and consistent with ubuntu-server publishing | 11:51 |
| slangasek | if I change it, it'll be consistent with our daily publishing instead | 11:51 |
| lool | $project/$ports/$release/... | 11:51 |
| lool | slangasek: I wouldn't mind either way | 11:51 |
| lool | Just would like either all in /ports/releases and /releases or all in $project/releases $project/ports/releases | 11:52 |
| lool | can we kill the empty full/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/10.04 dir? | 11:52 |
| lool | slangasek: safe flight BTW | 11:53 |
| slangasek | full/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/10.04 nuked | 11:54 |
| lool | (you can even kill the full/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases if you like -- but that one isn't confusing :-) | 11:55 |
| slangasek | yah, also nuked | 11:56 |
| slangasek | ok, need to head toward the plane | 11:56 |
| lool | safe flight again | 11:56 |
| slangasek | thanks! | 11:57 |
| pitti | slangasek: save travels! | 12:01 |
| pitti | 'safe' | 12:01 |
| lool | can't find the omap server image on cdimage | 12:12 |
| lool | ogra: ^ any idea where that one went? | 12:35 |
| lool | find full -iname \*server\*omap\* only yields the daily | 12:36 |
| lamont | slangasek: any reason not to put oldking back into existance again (cleaner, but tosses yesterday's post-swap activity) - I have a ticket to figure out why newking didn't surprise us with speed, and need to benchmark terranova, and both kings (and reinstall newking cleanly) | 12:39 |
| lamont | oh meh. any other RM types have thoughts on that, since the planeward one isn't going to answer. | 12:40 |
| lamont | cjwatson: ? | 12:40 |
| cjwatson | lamont: no reason, we won't be using it for a few days | 12:41 |
| lamont | cjwatson: it'd be more of (1) reversion of what speedup we got, and (2) yesterday's post-swap activity goes *poof* when I reinstall newking cleanly, anyway | 12:42 |
| cjwatson | we'll be in no rush for a while | 12:43 |
| lamont | right. I, OTOH, get to do a bunch of benchmarking before you do rush me | 12:43 |
| lamont | ta | 12:43 |
| === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann | ||
| ogra | lool, isnt published yet ... some ports are some arent | 13:13 |
| ogra | lool, slangasek said he would care later (he is traveling atm) | 13:17 |
| === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening | ||
| Mirv | thanks, eventually got also finnish remix released within 20 minutes of release announcement | 14:20 |
| lamont | doko: the tarballs you want are there now | 20:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!