[02:47] <ScottK> Nice job everyone.  Sorry $WORK took me out of the game this week.
[05:30] <pitti> cjwatson: release meeting> that was meant to be "can I rather go out with my wife this evening", not "oh please let's have one" :-)
[05:30] <pitti> slangasek: enjoy London!
[07:27] <ogra> pitti, cjwatson, could one of you publish ports ? we get requests in #ubuntu-arm
[07:27] <pitti> right, that's on my TODO list
[07:27] <ogra> good :)
[07:27] <pitti> I hope I won't screw it up
[07:28] <ogra> it has to end up on cdimage but dont ask me which folder :P
[07:28] <pitti> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/10.04/ I presume
[07:28] <pitti> I'll compare with http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/9.10/release/
[07:28] <ogra> might be, but it caould also be http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/$flavour/ports/releases/10.04/
[07:29] <pitti> sure
[07:29] <ogra> i think both exist
[07:29] <pitti> is there any way to know which ones were tested? (like powerpc+ps3)
[07:29] <ogra> which makes it a bit confusing
[07:29] <pitti> or are these best-effort?
[07:30] <ogra> i can only tell that all omap ones were tested and that only imx and omap of kubuntu-netbook should be released (dove is broken)
[07:30] <ogra> no idea about non ARM
[07:31] <ogra> (the channel could probably be unmuted again too)
[07:32] <pitti> ogra: that's just for netbook, or regular ubuntu images for arm as well?
[07:33] <ogra> we only build ubuntu-netbook, d-i netinstall and ubuntu-server
[07:33] <ogra> imx51 and dove netbook are in the official release
[07:33] <ogra> the rest goes to cdimage
[07:33] <ogra> (arm arches are omap, imx51 and dove)
[07:35] <ogra> if you find any desktop images for either of these arch you can keep them :) (they shouldnt be built since a while though)
[07:35] <ogra> i sadly cant reach cdimage to give you any links ... always times out
[07:35] <pitti> bah, cdimage is totally clogged
[07:42] <pitti> ogra: ok, so you want those:
[07:43] <pitti> netbook armel+omap
[07:43] <pitti> {alternate,desktop,server} armel+{omap,imx51,dove}
[07:43] <pitti> ?
[07:43] <ogra> not alternate,desktop
[07:43] <ogra> only server
[07:44] <pitti> ah, ok
[07:44] <ogra> and kubuntu-netbook armel+{omap,imx5}
[07:44] <pitti> and netbook armel+omap?
[07:44] <ogra> yes
[07:44] <pitti> ogra: do you happen to know what CDIMAGE_NO_PURGE=1 is?
[07:44] <pitti> first time that I see it (on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseProcess)
[07:45] <ogra> nope
[07:46] <ogra> smells like "do not remove dailies" but i could be wrong
[07:46] <pitti> but publish-release never has
[07:46] <ogra> we should probably wait for colin
[07:46] <ogra> he knows the scripts in and out
[07:48] <pitti> ARCHES="armel+omap" for-project ubuntu publish-release ubuntu-netbook/ports/daily-live 20100427.1 netbook yes
[07:48] <pitti> hm, so that did nothing
[07:48] <ogra>  netbook yes ?
[07:48] <ogra> shouldnt that be ubuntu-netbook ?
[07:49] <pitti> yes is the "release" argument
[07:49] <pitti> ogra: I copied that from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseProcess
[07:49] <pitti> it said
[07:49] <pitti> Constructing release trees ...
[07:49] <pitti> Copying netbook-armel+omap image ...
[07:49] <pitti> Making armel+omap zsync metafile ...
[07:49] <pitti> Creating torrent for /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/www/simple/lucid/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img ...
[07:49] <pitti> but there are no new files at all in www, compared to my www.prev backup
[07:50] <ogra> hmm
[07:50] <pitti> hm, let's wait for cjwatson, before I screw up stuff
[07:50] <pitti> CDIMAGE_NO_PURGE=1 didn't make a difference either
[07:51] <ogra> isnt simple/ what goes to releases.u.c ?
[07:51] <ogra> iirc it shoudl stay on www/full/
[07:51] <pitti> ah, right
[07:52]  * pitti reverts back to previous www dir
[07:55] <pitti> +./full/releases/lucid/release/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img
[07:55] <pitti> ah, how's that
[07:55] <pitti> +./torrent/releases/lucid/release/netbook/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img
[07:55] <pitti> it created those two
[07:57] <pitti> I don't see an equivalent torrent for karmic, though
[07:57] <pitti> sorry, I don't feel I can drive that reliably
[08:06] <ogra> pitti, there was no omap in karmic ... i started implementing it 4 weeks ago :)
[08:07] <pitti> ogra: right, but there is no /torrent/releases/karmic/release/netbook/ at all
[08:07] <ogra> ah, k
[08:07] <ogra> i thought you referred to omap
[08:08] <ogra> i see /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/www/torrent/
[08:09] <ogra> we probably didnt release the netbook flavour for karmic in ports
[08:09] <ogra> (armel definately only had desktop back then, not sure about ppc or other ports)
[08:16] <pitti> ok, I'll play with that a little bit
[08:24] <pitti> ogra: hm, so my server images look good
[08:24] <pitti> +./full/ports/releases/lucid/release/ubuntu-10.04-server-armel+omap.img
[08:24] <ogra> yay
[08:24] <pitti> and so on
[08:24] <pitti> but netbook is still wrong
[08:24] <pitti> +./full/releases/lucid/release/ubuntu-10.04-netbook-armel+omap.img
[08:24] <ogra> weird
[08:24] <pitti> it's not on ports
[08:24] <pitti> ARCHES="armel+omap" for-project ubuntu publish-release ubuntu-netbook/ports/daily-live 20100427.1 netbook named
[08:25] <ogra> i wonder if there is something missing in publish-release
[08:25] <pitti> cjwatson: ^ this doesn't seem to move it to ports; am I forgetting a flag here?
[08:25] <pitti> cjwatson: it does work with server: ARCHES="armel+omap armel+dove armel+imx51 ia64 powerpc powerpc+ps3 sparc" for-project ubuntu publish-release ubuntu-server/ports/daily 20100428 server named
[08:40] <ogra> pitti, did you try "for-project ubuntu-netbook" for the omap one ?
[08:40] <ogra> thats usually the project name for the netbook images
[08:40] <pitti> as I said, I copied that from the release wiki page
[08:40] <ogra> hmm
[08:53] <slangasek> pitti, cjwatson, ogra: ok, I'm running through the ports publishing now
[08:54] <pitti> slangasek: is above the correct command for ubuntu-netbook armel+omap?
[08:54] <ogra> given the reachability of cdimage it seems there is no hurry anyway :)
[08:54] <pitti> slangasek: or is it for-project ubuntu-netbook?
[08:54]  * pitti still puzzled why they don't land on /ports/
[09:06] <slangasek> pitti: the rune in the wiki was intended for publishing to releases.u.c; I'm not sure why omap is landing where it is
[09:06] <pitti> slangasek: right, but the for-project argument should be the same for both?
[09:12] <slangasek> pitti: for publishing to releases.u.c, we explicitly *don't* want armel under a separate ports tree :)
[09:12] <pitti> I thought it should go to cdimage only?
[09:12] <slangasek> I believe what we're seeing is that publish-release treats ^ports/ and ^ubuntu-server/ports/ specially
[09:12] <slangasek> and maps those to ports/releases
[09:12] <slangasek> but doesn't do this for ubuntu-netbook/
[09:12] <pitti> full/releases/ is cdimage only
[09:13] <pitti> ah
[09:13] <slangasek> yes
[09:13] <slangasek> yes, omap should go to cdimage only, which is why the rune from the wiki doesn't apply
[09:14] <pitti> I just updated yes->named, and the version number
[09:14] <pitti> I'm not sure what CDIMAGE_NO_PURGE=1 does
[09:15] <slangasek> that's so when you run two separate publishing runs of netbook images to the same directory on releases for different archs, it doesn't nuke your torrents for i386
[09:15] <pitti> ah, thanks
[09:44] <slangasek> pitti: ok, have adjusted publish-release locally to let us publish omap under ports/releases/lucid/release; I still have a handful of ports images to publish yet, but have to go catch a plane, so I'll follow up on those later
[09:44] <slangasek> but omap-netbook is done
[10:08]  * ogra hugs slangasek 
[11:47] <lool> cjwatson, slangasek: lucid-netbook-armel+omap.img doesn't seem to be in http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/lucid/
[11:48] <lool> well it would be under a different name there obviously
[11:49] <lool> oh was just reported earlier
[11:49] <slangasek> lool: correct; it's now under cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/lucid/release/
[11:49] <slangasek> I could move it if you prefer, then I wouldn't have to worry so much about the mess I'm making of publish-release
[11:50] <lool> slangasek: I personally would prefer a consistent scheme too; not sure if it's ok to move these around still
[11:50] <lool> slangasek: Perhaps davidm to decide?
[11:50] <slangasek> consistent with what, though?
[11:50] <slangasek> currently it's consistent with what we publish to releases.u.c at release time
[11:51] <slangasek> and consistent with ubuntu-server publishing
[11:51] <slangasek> if I change it, it'll be consistent with our daily publishing instead
[11:51] <lool> $project/$ports/$release/...
[11:51] <lool> slangasek: I wouldn't mind either way
[11:52] <lool> Just would like either all in /ports/releases and /releases or all in $project/releases $project/ports/releases
[11:52] <lool> can we kill the empty full/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/10.04 dir?
[11:53] <lool> slangasek: safe flight BTW
[11:54] <slangasek> full/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases/10.04 nuked
[11:55] <lool> (you can even kill the full/ubuntu-netbook/ports/releases if you like -- but that one isn't confusing :-)
[11:56] <slangasek> yah, also nuked
[11:56] <slangasek> ok, need to head toward the plane
[11:56] <lool> safe flight again
[11:57] <slangasek> thanks!
[12:01] <pitti> slangasek: save travels!
[12:01] <pitti> 'safe'
[12:12] <lool> can't find the omap server image on cdimage
[12:35] <lool> ogra: ^ any idea where that one went?
[12:36] <lool> find full -iname \*server\*omap\* only yields the daily
[12:39] <lamont> slangasek: any reason not to put oldking back into existance again (cleaner, but tosses yesterday's post-swap activity) - I have a ticket to figure out why newking didn't surprise us with speed, and need to benchmark terranova, and both kings (and reinstall newking cleanly)
[12:40] <lamont> oh meh. any other RM types have thoughts on that, since the planeward one isn't going to answer.
[12:40] <lamont> cjwatson: ?
[12:41] <cjwatson> lamont: no reason, we won't be using it for a few days
[12:42] <lamont> cjwatson: it'd be more of (1) reversion of what speedup we got, and (2) yesterday's post-swap activity goes *poof* when I reinstall newking cleanly, anyway
[12:43] <cjwatson> we'll be in no rush for a while
[12:43] <lamont> right. I, OTOH, get to do a bunch of benchmarking before you do rush me
[12:43] <lamont> ta
[13:13] <ogra> lool, isnt published yet ... some ports are some arent
[13:17] <ogra> lool, slangasek said he would care later (he is traveling atm)
[14:20] <Mirv> thanks, eventually got also finnish remix released within 20 minutes of release announcement
[20:19] <lamont> doko: the tarballs you want are there now