[04:40] <nigelbabu> Total patches: 2062
[04:40] <nigelbabu> To review patches: 171
[04:40] <nigelbabu> Await upstream input: 4
[04:40] <nigelbabu> Await Debian input: 1
[04:40] <nigelbabu> Patches resolved upstream: 16
[04:40] <nigelbabu> Total review queue: 1569
[04:40] <nigelbabu> ajmitch: ^ result of query
[04:46] <ajmitch> ok
[04:47] <ajmitch> getting the bug #s for the first few should be easy, looking at the script
[04:47] <persia> I don't really trust those numbers, as I expect the data changed whist the queries were being made.
[04:47] <ajmitch> such as the resolved upstream count
[04:49] <nigelbabu> The first few data is generated very fast
[04:49] <nigelbabu> its the last query which takes time
[08:43] <dholbach> good morning
[08:45] <nigelbabu> morning
[08:46] <dholbach> hey nigelbabu
[08:47] <nigelbabu> dholbach: I have a very important number for you
[08:48] <nigelbabu> 1569
[08:48] <nigelbabu> That's the number of bugs that would be in review queue if we did not put a date on the patch subscription script, basically, the number of bugs we have in backlog
[08:52] <dholbach> holy shit
[08:52] <dholbach> that's a lot better than 2000, eh?
[08:52]  * dholbach hugs nigelbabu
[08:52] <nigelbabu> dholbach: its better and worse
[08:52] <dholbach> why worse?
[08:52] <nigelbabu> we really have to go through each of the 1569.  No skipping there
[08:52] <nigelbabu> Its a solid number
[08:53] <dholbach> we'll do ti
[08:53] <dholbach> it
[08:53] <dholbach> it'll be fine
[08:53] <nigelbabu> but its only 10 bugs per member of ~ubuntu-dev
[08:53] <nigelbabu> ^ thats the good part
[09:02] <nigelbabu> persia: did you notice we dont have a filled review day chart?
[09:03] <nigelbabu> i.e. lot more empty spaces for review leads
[10:16] <ajmitch> a belated good morning, dholbach
[10:17] <dholbach> hola ajmitch :)
[11:14] <nigelbabu> ajmitch: you wanna fill in a few spaces as review lead for patch day?
[11:16] <nigelbabu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay/
[13:50] <nigelbabu> cyphermox: heya
[13:51] <cyphermox> hey!
[13:52] <nigelbabu> cyphermox: remember I'd talked to you about patch day?
[13:53] <cyphermox> yes, that's why I stick around here a lot ;) I meant to talk to you about it again, but I've been quite busy with a new job :)
[13:54] <nigelbabu> cyphermox: oh! you moved out of canonical or moved internally?
[13:54] <cyphermox> no, just starting at canonical
[13:54] <nigelbabu> aaah :)
[13:55] <cyphermox> iso testing and hardware certification takes a lot of my time, not totally used to everything yet
[13:55] <cyphermox> brb
[13:58] <cyphermox> so I've been (quietly) following what was going on here
[13:58] <nigelbabu> heh
[13:58] <nigelbabu> patch day is next week a table half emtpy is staring at me
[13:59] <nigelbabu> so I'm just using my negotiation and smooth talking skills to fill it up :)
[13:59] <cyphermox> table?
[13:59] <nigelbabu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay/
[13:59] <nigelbabu> ^ there is a table there.  that table
[14:00] <cyphermox> ah, that table :)
[14:00] <cyphermox> let me do the UTC <--> EST conversion and I'll add stuff
[14:00] <nigelbabu> awsome thanks :)
[14:01] <nigelbabu> you are in bug control right?
[14:03] <cyphermox> yep
[14:03] <nigelbabu> so you can just ask dholbach to accept you in the team :)
[14:03] <dholbach> which one?
[14:04] <nigelbabu> ~ubuntu-reviewers
[14:05] <dholbach> cyphermox: your launchpad id is?
[14:05] <cyphermox> ~mathieu-tl
[14:06] <dholbach> cyphermox: merci beaucoup
[14:06] <dholbach> done
[14:06] <cyphermox> dholbach, bitte!
[14:06] <dholbach> :-)
[14:08] <BlackZ> cyphermox: welcome!
[14:08] <cyphermox> BlackZ, thanks! :)
[14:08] <cyphermox> I'll do my best
[14:09] <nigelbabu> yaay! :)
[14:18] <nigelbabu> dholbach: so how do I htmlify from python and how do you code that sorting algorithm?
[14:18] <nigelbabu> I didn't understand that from the sponsorship-overview code
[14:33] <dholbach> nigelbabu: the sorting is just javascript
[14:34] <nigelbabu> dholbach: I finally just saw that
[14:35] <ajmitch> jquery tablesorter plugin = nice :)
[14:35] <nigelbabu> dholbach: you write some beautiful code
[14:35] <nigelbabu> Its alll OOP
[14:35] <nigelbabu> and now I'm working how much of hacked like mine looks
[14:36] <dholbach> it's not beautiful - the sponsorship overview really isn't :)
[14:36] <nigelbabu> Im taking about the actual code :)
[14:36] <dholbach> me too
[14:37] <nigelbabu> seen mine?
[14:37] <nigelbabu> then you'll know what Im talking about :D
[14:37] <dholbach> nigelbabu: I think I would split up the summary functionality and the subscription functionality
[14:38] <dholbach> just generating the summary should be much quicker
[14:51] <nigelbabu> dholbach: can you explain again? I didn't get you
[14:54] <yofel> hi, does anyone know  if .ddeb is an ubuntu invention? Just wondering if I should send bug 568404 to debian (aside from reworking the debdiff)
[14:54] <ubot3> Malone bug 568404 in bash-completion "dpkg completion should support ddeb" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/568404
[14:56] <dholbach> yofel: it is
[14:56] <dholbach> yofel: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash
[14:57] <dholbach> nigelbabu: afaiui the script 1) generates a summary, 2) subscribes the right team
[14:57] <dholbach> nigelbabu: for generating the summary it probably doesn't need to go and touch every single bug, which would speed up the business a lot
[14:58] <nigelbabu> dholbach: what I'm writing doesn't do any subscription
[14:58] <nigelbabu> It only generates the report
[14:59] <dholbach> oh sorry
[14:59] <dholbach> nevermind
[15:00] <dholbach> just ignore me
[15:00] <dholbach> I misunderstood things
[15:00] <nigelbabu> hehe
[15:18] <nigelbabu> I need a break. Hitting the bed early today
[15:28] <dholbach> nigelbabu: have a great evening
[15:33] <dholbach> nigelbabu: I put a bit of work into the script - I'll upload it in a bit
[15:33] <dholbach> http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/patch-overview
[15:34] <dholbach> nigelbabu: I didn't do much - just tried to speed it up a little bit