| === nikolam_ is now known as nikolam | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| mahfouz | is chromium from the beta channel the same as the one in lucid repos? | 15:57 |
|---|---|---|
| mahfouz | I mean the beta ppa | 15:58 |
| fta | mahfouz, yes | 16:17 |
| GuitarInc1 | how does ubuntu deal with EOL firefox packages? | 17:17 |
| micahg | GuitarInc1: we're upgrading them :) | 17:30 |
| GuitarInc1 | Firefox 3.6 will be supported for the entire lifecycle of 10.04? | 17:30 |
| micahg | GuitarInc1: no, it'll most probably be upgraded to 3.7 and maybe 4.0 | 17:31 |
| GuitarInc1 | will 3.6 users be prompted to upgrade to 3.7/4.0? | 17:32 |
| micahg | GuitarInc1: yes, the package itself will be upgraded so it will be seamless | 17:32 |
| GuitarInc1 | oh | 17:32 |
| GuitarInc1 | wow | 17:32 |
| GuitarInc1 | very slick :-) | 17:32 |
| micahg | we're actually upgrading hardy and jaunty soon to 3.6 | 17:33 |
| GuitarInc1 | what if there are installed plug-ins that are incompatible with future firefox releases? | 17:33 |
| micahg | GuitarInc1: we'll upgrade them if we can | 17:34 |
| micahg | GuitarInc1: generally by the time a version is EOL, > 80% of the addons have been upgraded | 17:35 |
| GuitarInc1 | sounds about right | 17:36 |
| GuitarInc1 | micahg: one more question: is the alpha 64-bit flash player available in the ubuntu repository? Or do I have to manually grab it from adobe's website? | 17:39 |
| micahg | GuitarInc1: we don't package it because there are no guaranteed security updates, depending on your chipset, 32 bit + nspluginwrapper works fine | 17:40 |
| GuitarInc1 | micahg: okay, thnx for the info :-) | 17:41 |
| LLStarks | my god | 17:47 |
| LLStarks | that addons manager is fugly | 17:47 |
| LLStarks | no gnome | 17:47 |
| LLStarks | breaks extensions | 17:47 |
| LLStarks | micahg, fta, did they back it out yet? | 17:48 |
| micahg | LLStarks: yes | 17:53 |
| micahg | LLStarks: but I think fta suspended the daily builds until we get more PPA builders back | 17:54 |
| ddecator | micahg: was lorentz introduced in ff 3.6 with .3 or .4? | 19:45 |
| micahg | ddecator: will be in .4 | 19:51 |
| ddecator | micahg: alright, thanks | 19:51 |
| === BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_fewd | ||
| mahfouz | fta, I was just wondering if it would stay like this that chromium beta ppa is the same as ubuntu repos | 20:09 |
| mahfouz | because if so, we wouldn't need a beta ppa anymore | 20:09 |
| fta | it's needed at least for hardy to karmic | 20:10 |
| fta | and the ppa is also the staging ground for the official repos | 20:11 |
| fta | also, the plan is to follow the stable channel once it's available for linux | 20:11 |
| mahfouz | ok, i see | 20:14 |
| LLStarks | jeez, 3.7 is like charleston chew right now | 20:44 |
| mahfouz | LLStarks, is that good or bad? :) | 20:45 |
| LLStarks | bad | 20:45 |
| ddecator | LLStarks: yah, a few things broke...anything specific you're having trouble with? | 20:46 |
| mahfouz | well, the ipc stuff is still broken, right? | 20:47 |
| mahfouz | flash stuff | 20:47 |
| LLStarks | i want to castrate the person that pushed the addons manager | 20:47 |
| ddecator | LLStarks: that double scrollbars? haha | 20:47 |
| LLStarks | it removed the ability to add menus to the addon list | 20:48 |
| ddecator | mahfouz: lorentz is working in 3.7 now | 20:48 |
| mahfouz | ddecator, havent tried last week | 20:48 |
| mahfouz | thx | 20:48 |
| mahfouz | maybe put that here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/513887 | 20:49 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/513887) | 20:49 |
| micahg | LLStarks: we can't get a 3.7 build again until we get the PPA builders back | 21:03 |
| LLStarks | well, then teach me. i need to learn the cold reality of debian packaging and compiling programs as if they'd be shipped with ubuntu. | 21:07 |
| micahg | LLStarks: I can ask fta to push it, but it'll be 2 to 5 days before they' | 21:12 |
| micahg | re done | 21:12 |
| fta | i think they'll reassign the builders tomorrow | 21:12 |
| * micahg will bbiab | 21:15 | |
| === BUGabundo_fewd is now known as BUGabundo | ||
| skierpage | I run nightly 64-bit Firefox from http://ftp.mozilla.org in Kubuntu Lucid, but System Settings > Default Applications and other KDE machinery are unaware. I assume I need to integrate a .desktop file... How? | 22:03 |
| skierpage | Might the kubuntu-firefox-installer package integrate Firefox nightly better with Kubuntu? It seems it just triggers installation... | 22:04 |
| micahg | skierpage: Mozilla builds are not made for KDE yet, if you want a KDE integrated build, please use the one in the lucid archvie | 22:13 |
| skierpage | micahg Hey there! I understand the less bleeding-edge ubuntu packages have integration, but I'm committed to firefox nightly. I'm just looking for the simple integration steps. | 22:16 |
| skierpage | micahg I'm going to grab the firefox.desktop from kubuntu-firefox-installer and tweak it. | 22:17 |
| skierpage | micahg BTW, how goes the thunderbird-3.1 ? ;-) Thanks for all you do. | 22:17 |
| micahg | skierpage: the installer does nothing, it's the patches and kmozillahelper | 22:19 |
| micahg | skierpage: probably won't have 3.1 done until after UDS | 22:20 |
| micahg | I might get 3.2 running fist | 22:21 |
| micahg | *first | 22:21 |
| skierpage | micahg , I believe the firefox.desktop (with mods) will at least put Firefox nightly into menus and Default Applications. | 22:22 |
| micahg | skierpage: we have a nightly build as well, but not with KDE integration | 22:22 |
| skierpage | micahg I know, I got started with a mozilla.org 64-bit build and stuck with it for 500 Help > Check for Updates :-) Are there any functional differences between the ubuntu nightly package and http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly ? | 22:27 |
| micahg | skierpage: install in menu? | 22:27 |
| micahg | we push updates as well | 22:28 |
| skierpage | ok thanks, maybe I'll switch. Gotta go, bye | 22:29 |
| sebner | micahg: in TB my spam folder has the option: Look for new messages which is unchecked, why do I get mails then? Didn't happen in the past | 22:36 |
| micahg | sebner: you get new messages in your spam foldeR | 22:38 |
| sebner | micahg: right, but I don't want them downloaded to TB | 22:40 |
| micahg | sebner: where is this option? | 22:41 |
| sebner | micahg: right click on SPAM folder, Properties | 22:43 |
| * micahg doesn't have a SPAM fodler | 22:44 | |
| micahg | *folder | 22:44 |
| sebner | heh | 22:44 |
| micahg | oh, I see the option on my Junk folder | 22:44 |
| micahg | I don't think I get updates for it, but I don't know | 22:45 |
| micahg | sebner: not for just spam | 22:50 |
| micahg | sebner: ok, so the checkbox means to poll the server for new messages in that folder | 22:51 |
| sebner | micahg: I guess, and it's unchecked .. | 22:51 |
| micahg | sebner: not that new messages won't be moved there | 22:51 |
| sebner | hm, | 22:51 |
| micahg | sebner: the only time you would need that checked is if you're using server side filters and want to poll multiple folders | 22:51 |
| sebner | ah | 22:52 |
| sebner | micahg: so my only option is to delete the SPAM folder in TB? | 22:52 |
| micahg | sebner: what are you trying to do? | 22:52 |
| sebner | micahg: Not getting anymore spam messages into my SPAM TB folder | 22:53 |
| micahg | sebner: where do you want your SPAM to go | 22:53 |
| micahg | sebner: you can configure the account settings to move it to the trash or delete if you like | 22:53 |
| sebner | micahg: uhh, I'll take a look, just strange because before the fresh ubuntu/TB install I didn't have this problem | 22:54 |
| micahg | sebner: idk, maybe TB2 had other defautls | 22:54 |
| sebner | micahg: ehm, I used TB3 also before the reinstall ;D | 22:55 |
| micahg | sebner: maybe your settings changed? | 22:55 |
| sebner | micahg: nope, I never change anything. Mail account created (or copy old .tb folder) and go go go | 22:56 |
| micahg | sebner: idk then | 22:56 |
| sebner | micahg: I found the option in the properties, thanks anyways | 22:57 |
| micahg | sebner: k | 22:57 |
| micahg | bbiab | 22:57 |
| sebner | micahg: wow, you really like this net-slang, hmm? ^^ | 22:57 |
| micahg | sebner: I got it from asac | 23:23 |
| micahg | asac: ping | 23:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!