| bryceh | I'm getting an error about loom.branch when trying to run 'make schema': http://pastebin.com/d8i40sE1 | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| bryceh | any ideas? I tried installing bzr-loom but that made no difference. Am I missing something else? | 00:03 |
| mwhudson | bryceh: what's in sourcecode/ ? | 00:10 |
| mwhudson | launchpad doesn't use the system plugins for bzr | 00:10 |
| bryceh | from bzrlib.plugins.loom.branch import ( | 00:10 |
| bryceh | BzrBranchLoomFormat1, BzrBranchLoomFormat6) | 00:10 |
| bryceh | from lp-branches/devel/lib/lp/code/bzr.py | 00:10 |
| mwhudson | sigh | 00:11 |
| mwhudson | bryceh: there's a directory called sourcecode in the launchpad tree | 00:11 |
| mwhudson | bryceh: what's in there? | 00:11 |
| bryceh | bryce@cardport:~/launchpad/lp-branches/devel$ ls sourcecode/ | 00:12 |
| bryceh | bzr-git dulwich mailman pygpgme subvertpy | 00:12 |
| bryceh | cscvs launchpad-loggerhead Makefile shipit testresources | 00:12 |
| mwhudson | that's an odd mix | 00:12 |
| mwhudson | bryceh: run ./utilities/update-sourcecode | 00:12 |
| bryceh | mwhudson, ok will give that a shot | 00:13 |
| bryceh | hmm, that gives this error: http://pastebin.com/nraERpsX | 00:14 |
| * bryceh tries deleting the .bzr dir | 00:15 | |
| wgrant | You probably have to delete the entire shipit directory. | 00:18 |
| bryceh | wgrant, thanks, seems to be proceeding now | 00:27 |
| * thumper heads to lunch | 00:52 | |
| thumper | bryceh: welcome | 00:52 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| lifeless | can I get someone to land a patch for me ? | 07:00 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| lifeless | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~lifeless/launchpad/merge/+merge/23523 | 07:02 |
| StevenK | lifeless: PQM is in RC | 07:03 |
| lifeless | oh | 07:04 |
| lifeless | what does that mean | 07:04 |
| StevenK | lifeless: release-critical fixes only | 07:05 |
| spm | lifeless: fwiw, unless it's like ZOMG STOP THE PRESS urgent; hasn't got a hope of getting in todays release. | 07:11 |
| lifeless | spm: oh clearly | 07:12 |
| lifeless | just keeping the inventory low | 07:12 |
| spm | heh | 07:12 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Option 1: violate separation of concerns in an already hackish script. Option 2: respect separation of concerns slightly more, and make your service look even less reliable and attractive than its already bad reputation. | 07:34 |
| lifeless | wgrant: doing the revisions at the same time would make the script take much much longer to run | 07:35 |
| lifeless | doing the scan staggered, so that new work happens fast but the new branches do get scanned, would allow the branches to be available more quickly. | 07:35 |
| adeuring | good morning | 08:17 |
| mrevell | Goodly morning | 09:00 |
| allenap | Good morning mrevell. | 09:02 |
| mrevell | yo allenap | 09:03 |
| allenap | mrevell: Today I am lanscallenape | 09:03 |
| mrevell | allenap, Oh! Man. Congrats :) | 09:04 |
| === thekorn is now known as _thekorn | ||
| === _thekorn is now known as thekorn | ||
| === henninge changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: Launchpad Development Channel | Week 4 of 10.04 | PQM is closed | https://dev.launchpad.net/ | Get the code: https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting | On-call review in irc://irc.freenode.net/#launchpad-reviews | Use http://paste.ubuntu.com/ for pastes | staging is down! | ||
| === henninge changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: Launchpad Development Channel | Week 4 of 10.04 | PQM is closed | https://dev.launchpad.net/ | Get the code: https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting | On-call review in irc://irc.freenode.net/#launchpad-reviews | Use http://paste.ubuntu.com/ for pastes | ||
| leonardr | i need to have a conversation with someone who knows a lot about how launchpad uses apache. i don't want to bother a losa about this since it's development work, but if a losa is free i'd love to talk | 11:36 |
| leonardr | jml, can you recommend someone? | 11:36 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| jml | leonardr: flacoste or BjornT would be my two guesses | 12:32 |
| mwhudson | so... | 12:37 |
| mwhudson | code hosting hasn't imploded? | 12:37 |
| wgrant | Does this mean we're running hostedless? | 12:38 |
| jml | umm | 12:39 |
| jml | it probably hasn't imploded, but there have been some weird email behaviours: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+question/109575 | 12:39 |
| jelmer | jml: fwiw I received that email as well | 12:40 |
| james_w | jam apparently just proposed a moloolaba branch when I assume he is in bed, so presumably not an isolated incident | 12:41 |
| wgrant | I haven't got any. | 12:41 |
| james_w | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jameinel/bzr-fastimport/mooloolaba/+merge/14894 | 12:41 |
| jelmer | jml: I've seen jam's fastimport proposal as well, but IIRC those are the only two. | 12:42 |
| james_w | Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 10:32:28 -0000 | 12:42 |
| mwhudson | there's a new job script to send merge proposal email | 12:42 |
| mwhudson | maybe there were some odd old jobs in the db for some reason | 12:42 |
| mwhudson | jml: i notice https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jml/zope.testing/subunit-error has a strange error message | 12:44 |
| * mwhudson goes to bed | 12:45 | |
| jml | mwhudson: yeah, that is weird. sleep well. | 12:45 |
| james_w | jml: it seems that special permissions for source package branches have broken, but the code looks fine to be in lp:launchpad/devel at least | 12:49 |
| james_w | is there somewhere else I should be checking? | 12:49 |
| james_w | at least BranchMergeProposalEdit is no longer granted to uploaders, but that could be because they have lost EditBranch | 12:50 |
| jml | james_w: hmm. | 12:50 |
| jml | james_w: I'm dead certain that I added a unit test to check that uploaders have edit on official package branches. | 12:50 |
| jml | james_w: so, I guess I'd look for that test and make sure it was still valid | 12:51 |
| james_w | I'm dead certain I added a similar unit test to check that uploaders have edit on merge proposals too | 12:51 |
| jml | james_w: I don't know which branch most accurately represents the code that's on Launchpad. | 12:51 |
| jml | james_w: I'd recommend finding someone who is supposed to have upload permissions and getting them to try changing a branch's status and try pushing up to a branch. | 12:53 |
| gary_poster | mrevell: hi. :-) did you notice during rollout if we can mark https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+bug/553171 qa-ok? | 13:06 |
| mup | Bug #553171: "LP is read-only" and similar messages still point to old maintenance page <qa-needstesting> <trivial> <ui> <Launchpad Foundations:Fix Released by matthew.revell> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/553171> | 13:06 |
| mrevell | gary_poster, Looked good to me :) | 13:08 |
| james_w | jml: they have edit permissions, and the code looks good in all the lp:launchpad branches | 13:08 |
| mrevell | gary_poster, updated | 13:08 |
| gary_poster | thanks mrevell :-) | 13:08 |
| jml | james_w: so it's just merge proposals? | 13:09 |
| james_w | I think so | 13:09 |
| james_w | I'm going to check further | 13:09 |
| jtv | gary_poster: hi! How do I run the doctest for lazr.batchnavigator? I'd like to verify my fix for that oops I reported. | 13:12 |
| gary_poster | jtv: great, thank you! I hope ``bin/test`` will do the trick. | 13:13 |
| gary_poster | It is supposed to | 13:13 |
| jtv | gary_poster: I didn't see a bin in that branch, and the LP test runner doesn't seem to exercise it either. | 13:13 |
| gary_poster | jtv, acknowledging that this sucks and that we have a slow-burning process to make it better, did you see https://dev.launchpad.net/HackingLazrLibraries ? | 13:16 |
| jtv | gary_poster: just found it | 13:17 |
| gary_poster | great | 13:17 |
| jtv | running bootstrap... looks like that'll take a while | 13:18 |
| gary_poster | jtv, next time se the "Global cache" instructions | 13:18 |
| gary_poster | that makes subsequent efforts a lot faster | 13:18 |
| jtv | gary_poster: ok, thanks! | 13:18 |
| james_w | jml: not a regression, it's just that the check says that they can't upload to lucid now, but we have no way to propose the creation of a lucid-proposed branch with the changes. This will require some discussion. | 13:20 |
| leonardr | flacoste, bjornt, when you get a minute i'd appreciate your thoughts on bug 574697 | 13:20 |
| jml | james_w, gnarr | 13:20 |
| mup | Bug #574697: Launchpad strips incoming TE header <Launchpad Foundations:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/574697> | 13:20 |
| jml | james_w, you right to arrange that discussion? | 13:21 |
| james_w | yeah | 13:21 |
| jml | ta | 13:22 |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| jtv | gary_poster: all done & ready for review... note: the hacking page says to merge your branches directly into trunk, but doesn't mention pushing. | 13:47 |
| jtv | Oh, that's further down. | 13:48 |
| jtv | No, it's not. | 13:48 |
| flacoste | leonardr: didn't we established that it was apache that removed those headers | 14:00 |
| flacoste | ? | 14:00 |
| flacoste | leonardr: if i recall, we had put a work-around in place for that behaviour? | 14:00 |
| leonardr | flacoste: i don't remember encountering this before | 14:08 |
| leonardr | we have a workaround for apache's treatment of Content-Encoding, but apache's behavior stops the workaround from ever happening | 14:08 |
| gary_poster | jtv: hacking page: it means bzr co the trunk and then merge and commit | 14:10 |
| gary_poster | jtv: forward me the review email when you get a chance | 14:11 |
| flacoste | leonardr: i'd suggest sending an email cc launchpad-dev to our local resident proxy expert: lifeless | 14:44 |
| leonardr | ok | 14:50 |
| === manish_ is now known as manish | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| mars | henninge, ping, looking for a CHR swap? | 15:36 |
| henninge | mars: Hi. Yes, I am. | 15:36 |
| henninge | mars: What can you offer? ;) | 15:36 |
| mars | henninge, how about Monday May 24th? That's a National Holiday here in Canada. | 15:37 |
| mars | henninge, and I will be looking to swap it | 15:37 |
| henninge | mars: although it's a Monday, it should be fine ... ;) | 15:38 |
| mars | yeah, sorry about that :) | 15:38 |
| mars | henninge, great, I'll tell the list | 15:38 |
| henninge | last month was a Monday too, but it wasn't too bad. | 15:39 |
| henninge | mars: yes, please do. | 15:39 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === leonardr is now known as leonardr-afk | ||
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| rockstar | abentley, should we allow recipes to be based of junk branches? | 17:05 |
| abentley | rockstar, I have no strong opinion. | 17:06 |
| abentley | rockstar, I guess so? | 17:07 |
| rockstar | abentley, I was thinking we shouldn't. If they want to do that, they should create a project. | 17:10 |
| jml | rockstar, personally, I'd allow it. | 17:11 |
| rockstar | jml, rationale? | 17:13 |
| abentley | rockstar, or create the sourcepackage? | 17:14 |
| jml | rockstar, there's no compelling reason to forbid them that I know of. it requires work on our part to add the restriction. it requires work on their part to work around the restriction | 17:15 |
| maxb | It may be useful for people to experiment with the functionality in an obviously personally-sandboxed way | 17:17 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| rockstar | jml, why not allow merge proposals on junk branches then? | 17:22 |
| jml | rockstar, partly because it makes the UI harder for us and harder for the user | 17:22 |
| jml | which branch do you merge into by default? how do you see the list of active reviews? | 17:23 |
| maxb | I think MPs ought to be allowed on +junk branches, if only to keep consistency, and allow people to play around with the feature when learning | 17:24 |
| maxb | default branch: none, they have to specify. list of reviews: only for a specific branch | 17:24 |
| jml | maxb, regarding junk branches, what I want before absolutely anything else is a dead simple way to turn them into the trunk branch of a new project | 17:25 |
| maxb | That would be nice. Bring back the ability to rename branches across projects | 17:25 |
| jml | in general, the reason why we make junk branches less awesome is to encourage people to use projects as the basis for collaboration | 17:26 |
| jml | (so bugs can be filed, translations done, related branches found etc) | 17:26 |
| rockstar | jml, so recipes would be an exception to that rule? | 17:34 |
| jml | rockstar, they'd buck the trend, certainly. I mean, you could also argue that "capable of being owned by teams" breaks the rule. | 17:35 |
| rockstar | jml, yes, I think it does to some extent. | 17:35 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === henninge is now known as henninge-afk | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha | ||
| mrevell | Night | 18:12 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === leonardr-afk is now known as leonardr | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Jorjao | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === Jorjao is now known as Ursinha | ||
| leonardr | james_w, your wadllib code is present in the new version of wadllib | 20:47 |
| james_w | leonardr: great, thanks | 20:57 |
| kfogel | sinzui: if possible bug in Answers, should question assignee be ~launchpad-registry? This is re https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/109538/ (that question is not an example of the bug, but it describes the bug's manifestation in 109518, which is a confusingly similar number) | 21:40 |
| sinzui | kfogel, I do not have an immediate answer. retarget it to launchpad-answers (not registry). One of us will get to it | 21:43 |
| kfogel | sinzui: no such team 'launchpad-answers' (that was my first try) | 21:43 |
| sinzui | kfogel, you do not need to assign teams or person in answers. We have an answer contact system | 21:44 |
| sinzui | kfogel, All the contacts get the email. I may not be the first person to answer the question | 21:44 |
| kfogel | sinzui: I am very confused by what just happened. | 21:45 |
| sinzui | kfogel, I get about 10 questions a week because I am a contact | 21:45 |
| kfogel | sinzui: I first tried to retarget to launchpad-answers, and got an "invalid" sign underneath. I wish I'd saved that screenshot. So then I tried to re*assign* to a team of that name, but no such team. | 21:45 |
| kfogel | sinzui: now I re-blanked assignee and retargeted again, and this time it worked | 21:45 |
| sinzui | target not assign | 21:45 |
| kfogel | sinzui: right, that was the order I tried in. And now it's wroking. | 21:46 |
| sinzui | assign is for actions that require a *specific* person or role. That is to say, assignee to not providing an answer but completing a task | 21:46 |
| kfogel | sinzui: so, nm, but that was very confusing. No doubt I filled in a wrong field somewhere, but my memory has "corrected" that. | 21:46 |
| sinzui | I get 15 questions a weeks for the projects I am contact for and I answer within the hour | 21:47 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| kfogel | sinzui: thanks for the quick response to that question (109538) | 22:03 |
| thumper | what do we tag things that can't be QAed? | 22:04 |
| thumper | like test fixes? | 22:05 |
| thumper | do we just remove the qa-needstesting tag? | 22:05 |
| salgado | qa-untestable | 22:05 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| gary_poster | bac, ping | 22:53 |
| bac | hi gary_poster | 22:53 |
| gary_poster | hey bac. OK, I have unit tests and changes for bug574493. I only have theoretical proof that it should actually do what we want. What else needs to be dine: | 22:54 |
| gary_poster | done | 22:54 |
| bac | gary_poster: skip lunch? Freudian slip? | 22:55 |
| gary_poster | :-) | 22:55 |
| gary_poster | - actually verify that it does what we want. Maybe you can do this on a dev machine, but I'd be more tempted to do it on staging, if possible | 22:55 |
| gary_poster | - get reviewed | 22:55 |
| gary_poster | - get landed | 22:55 |
| gary_poster | - get CP'd | 22:56 |
| gary_poster | bac, so, if you are willing, I need you to take over most of that. What I can do is pass off the branch to you with reviewer notes. We could do that verbally looking ata diff or something else like that | 22:57 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!