[00:21] how can I find bugs opened by me, which are now fixed? [00:27] ari-tczew: advanced search, you as reporter, Fix Released [00:28] micahg: nice! thanks man! === thumper changed the topic of #launchpad to: Delays occurring with pulling and scanning branches due to new maverick branches | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: bac | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [03:16] The builders are back =)!!!!!!!!!!!! HORAY =) [04:26] something is weird with the builders they show idle even thought there is a queue of packages to build [04:37] "Delays occurring with pulling and scanning branches ..." ok, but is it expected that "delay" means 20+ hours? https://code.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.1-release [04:38] if expected, when is operation planned to be back to normal ? [04:38] xnox: the builders show as "idle" when they are clearing out the chroot [04:39] tsimpson, ok cool =) [04:39] awesome stuff with ppa's though =) thanks to all [04:40] this branch was updated later: lp:~maria-captains/maria/5.3-subqueries ... so probably the update to the other branch was just lost? Hopefully it will recover on next push [04:40] tsimpson, will bulding out of the branches land in 10.4? [04:41] todays rollout? [04:41] anywho can't wait [05:08] Guys, come on now. Are you ever going to fix those oopses? [05:09] I reported one about three months ago, revisited it from time to time and it's still not fixed [05:09] today's oops: OOPS-1585H297 one of the earlier oopses: OOPS-1513K110 wgrant at one point suggested this may be bug 508302 [05:09] Launchpad bug 508302 in malone "NotImplementedError OOPS when reporting a bug" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/508302 [05:09] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585H297 [05:09] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1513K110 [05:10] I'm not trying to report a bug, but convert a bug into a question [05:11] It appears that above bug is now marked fixed, so apparently that wasn't the one I was hitting ;-) [05:11] Laibsch, I don't think you gonna get answers here on the release day =) [05:11] all of them busy preparing roll-out [05:48] release day? [05:48] I thought the release has been out for a few days now [05:48] xnox: what kind of release are you referring to here? [05:48] Laibsch, launchpad release =) [05:49] 10.4 rolling out to stable [05:49] the launchpad 10.4 [05:49] FWIW, edge oopses as well (as expected): OOPS-1585EB490 [05:49] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585EB490 [05:49] well you gonna get the db-devel database schemas today on edge [05:49] cause edge is only getting UI rollouts [05:50] xnox: I wasn't aware that LP had a release schedule as well. seems to be coupled to the release of the OS itself? [05:51] Laibsch, https://dev.launchpad.net/Releases/2010Calendar [05:51] s / M / Maverick [05:52] Aha, monthly releases [05:58] well... monthly releases in the sense that's when all services get updated; but edge gets updated daily. [07:02] <_habnabit> Is there a list of branch formats that launchpad supports somewhere? It doesn't seem to like my 2a-format branch. [07:03] _habnabit: lp is scanning all of maverick [07:03] <_habnabit> Noted. I read the topic. [07:03] it will get to your branch in about 24 hours; if its just that you're seeing 'lp is scanning your branch' [07:03] if you're seeing something else, describe what you're seeing. [07:03] <_habnabit> ... no, that's not my question. [07:03] ok [07:03] <_habnabit> Doing on-the-fly conversion from to . [07:03] in which case 'bzr help formats' [07:03] ah [07:03] <_habnabit> Right, I know there's multiple formats. [07:04] so you have an old format branch on launchpad [07:04] or locally [07:04] <_habnabit> On launchpad. The local branch is 2a. [07:04] just upgrade it - if its on launchpad, click on the button. if its local, 'bzr upgrade' locally. [07:04] <_habnabit> I did the upgrade and then pushed. That's not enough? [07:05] <_habnabit> Also, what button are you talking about? I don't see anything about upgrading branches. [07:06] _habnabit: no [07:06] _habnabit: it isn't enough [07:07] _habnabit: you need to upgrade the target [07:07] <_habnabit> How does one do that? [07:07] there is an upgrade branch link at the bottom of the page [07:07] * thumper has to go [07:07] dishing dinner [07:07] <_habnabit> Oh, there it is. [07:08] <_habnabit> Thought it would be at the top. === agnel is now known as agnel-brb [07:18] I am part of a particular team in Launchpad and I want to stay a part of that team. I don't want to receive all the bugmails directed at that team, is that somehow possible? [07:19] no. I asked the same question a few weeks ago. :-( [07:19] if its a bug contact [07:19] then subscribe to the same things, and set your subscription to no-mail [07:19] that won't stop mails for bugs assigned to the team. [07:19] but thats a feature I think. You can however filter those by their headers. [07:22] well, I'm having a hard time filtering them (anybody familiar with sieve and dovecot?) [07:22] Laibsch: this *may* help in some sense: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-registry/+question/105361 [07:23] Laibsch: I use rules like this: [07:23] Laibsch: Yes [07:23] if header :contains "X-Launchpad-Bug" "distribution=ubuntu" { [07:23] if header :contains "X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale" "@motu-swat" { [07:23] fileinto "FOSS.Ubuntu.bugs.motu-swat"; [07:23] elsif header :contains "X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale" "" { discard; } [07:23] I'd love to use something like that [07:24] That filters emails I receive through the motu-swat team to a separate folder. [07:24] I can't seem to even get dovecot to start using sieve [07:24] I opened a question about it, let me look for it [07:24] Laibsch: That's a seperate problem. :-) [07:24] Laibsch: thats really going to be offtopic here. [07:24] I know [07:24] Laibsch: just use procmail or whatever; sieve is a totally unpolished thing. [07:25] which is why I wanted to redirect things to the question on LP [07:25] lifeless: So isn't. [07:25] sieve is great! [07:25] I moved to it from procmail a few months ago. [07:25] https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+question/109523 help would be GREATLY appreciated [07:25] * spm adds wgrant to the ignore list for even daring to suggest such heresy [07:25] wgrant: it must have moved along a metric tonne [07:26] wgrant: last I saw there wasn't even sieve integration for thunderbird [07:26] lifeless: And there's procmail integration for Thunderbird...? [07:26] 'vim ~/.dovecot.sieve' is all I need. [07:26] wgrant: procmail doesn't *aim* to be a integrated client-controlled gui ruleset [07:27] Neither does sieve, last I heard? [07:27] sieve does, I believe. [07:27] ah, its coming along [07:27] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/2548 [07:27] But just about nothing implements it. [07:27] StevenK: very much so [07:27] StevenK: its why it was invented [07:27] * StevenK goes back to writing bugs [07:27] and, ask me in another channel, I can give you the rant about poor integration in open source projects [07:30] Is there a good reason that the distro branching script thingy doesn't also copy the BranchRevisions, thereby eliminating this quite ridiculous delay? [07:31] wgrant: separation of concerns is one possible answer; it could stagger the scans over a few days as an alternative [07:39] IIRC mwhudson said the scans were staggered, but only over 12 hours. [07:40] Ah, so they're no longer staggered at all. [07:42] for maverick? yeah, we updated with a 0-12 hours randomness. :-/ [07:43] spm: s/hours/months/ next time ;) [07:44] sssh [07:44] * spm blames the bzr startup time as the major problem [07:47] spm: tell me we don't reinvoke bzr for each branch. [07:49] lifeless: no idea; I was having a dig at spiv in ref to his talk he did ages back about making python programs startup faster :-) [07:53] spm: can I rename a team if it has a mailing list? [07:54] spm: or put it another way, how can I rename a team if it has a mailing list? [07:54] thumper: hah. hah. hah. [07:54] thumper: [sorry, had to be said :(] [07:54] * thumper pokes lifeless in the eye [07:55] lifeless: sorry, had to be done [07:55] * lifeless is saved by the LCD screen between us [07:55] thumper: lp makes project setup hard; use create-project ;) [08:00] jelmer: https://answers.launchpad.net/bzr-git/+question/109223 <- what happens next? Is someone who can do this reading along? [08:05] thumper: as spm hasn't answered - AFAIK renaming a list is tricky-losa-intervention-required, so 'file a question' time. [08:06] sjamaan: I've reassigned to launchpad-code [08:08] jelmer: Sorry if I'm being thickheaded, but where can I see that? [08:08] sjamaan: The assignee of the question [08:09] "Assignee: No assignee [08:09] That's what I see === agnel-brb is now known as agnel === voRieLLo is now known as voRia === mthaddon changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad down/in read-only from 09:00-11:00UTC for a code update | Delays occurring with pulling and scanning branches due to new maverick branches | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: bac | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ [09:12] * apw notes that edge is a slow as snot, multi minutes to open a bug where-as after disabling redirection bugs loading in <10s [09:50] could someone please have a look at why one of my builds (i386) is stalled on the process [09:50] https://launchpad.net/~alejoduque/+archive/ppa-alejo/+build/1714884 [09:50] lpia and amd64 finished 8 hours ago.. [09:51] The i386 PPA builders are pretty busy at the moment. [09:51] dspstv: the queue for i386 is much bigger because it does all the arch-independent builds too [09:51] So it's just that yours hasn't reached the front of the queue, I think. [09:52] https://launchpad.net/builders says the PPA i386 queue is 13 hours long atm. [10:00] ouch [10:01] is there a way to know when there will be a jamm? [10:01] often this builds in 10-15min [10:03] OOPS-1585D756 [10:03] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585D756 === thekorn is now known as _thekorn [10:14] dspstv: This particular delay is because of the recent release of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS -- the builders were temporarily retasked to serve release downloads. [10:14] They've been returned, but there is a bit of a backlog. [10:14] yes, i found the place where to get the infos [10:14] http://identi.ca/launchpadstatus [10:14] thanks === _thekorn is now known as thekorn [10:25] Is the Bazaar repo viewer down for maintaince? [10:26] see topic [10:29] I was just wondering if it was down temporarily or during the whole maintaince period... [10:33] core update is today? [10:33] (Hi all :P) [10:35] topic [10:40] thank you maxb [10:53] hello [10:55] do I need a launchpad login in order to fetch code? [10:56] nope [11:02] oh my bad, that wasn't an error, just a warning [11:04] documentation is in Answers, isn't it? [11:04] anddam: https://help.launchpad.net/ [11:05] thanks [11:05] bye === jsk-afk is now known as jsk1 === jsk1 is now known as jsk-office [11:25] my bazaar branch has been updating for around 8 hours now - https://code.launchpad.net/~sproaty/whyteboard/development [11:27] sproaty, it's a known problem, there is a huge backlog of branches to process (~20000), we guess they'll all be finished in something like another 10h [11:27] sproaty, it's related to the opening of a new ubuntu release [11:28] no problem [11:28] ah it didn't make it scheduled april release eh [11:28] It did. But the new release opening happens a few days after the previous release. [11:31] wgrant, cool :) [11:40] henninge, hei again xD [11:41] and good morning [11:41] Oh hi, easter_egg! [11:41] henninge, what's up? [11:42] Yesterday was quite busy, so I could not reply. [11:42] I understood [11:44] henninge, and I'm still unable to login in launchpad ;~ [11:46] henninge, someone can take off the non ascii character of my account when the bug ins't fixed? [11:46] easter_egg: I don't think anymore that that is the problem :( [11:47] easter_egg: I found bug 556878. [11:47] Launchpad bug 556878 in canonical-identity-provider "Cannot reactivate a deactivated account" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/556878 [11:48] easter_egg: you said you merged accounts. Was one of them deactivated? Did your account get deactivated? [11:48] easter_egg: also, we are rolling out a new version of Launchpad today and so all the admins are quite busy :( [11:48] wasn't much better yesterday [11:49] henninge, one of then, yes... the ~a.j [11:50] so, this bug affect me and another person [11:52] henninge, so, maybe taking off the non-ascii character my account is possible to my account keep not working ;~ [11:52] of my account, is possible* [11:53] easter_egg: I could not see the OOPS details on Saturday but now I can and it is a different failure to what I observed then. [11:53] easter_egg: so yes, that will not fix it. [11:54] easter_egg: we have other people with non-ascii names: http://launchpad.net/~danilo ;) [11:54] henninge, lol [11:55] henninge, and he can normally login? [11:55] yes [11:56] easter_egg, yeah, I can :) as a matter of fact, I am the LP developer as well and it'd be a major nuisance if I couldn't log in :) [11:56] easter_egg: so, we need an admin to look into that in more detail and they are hard to come by today. Sorry ;( [11:58] henninge, I not deactivated the old account in the admin panel... [11:59] I did, was as follows: [11:59] merge the account.. === mthaddon changed the topic of #launchpad to: Delays occurring with pulling and scanning branches due to new maverick branches | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: bac | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [11:59] confirmed two of three emails [12:00] and change something... [12:00] my photo, my name, joined a group and get status of administration in this group [12:01] easter_egg: what is the other account, not the one you are using now? (just the name, no email address here, please). [12:01] henninge, and, finally I see the three email confirmation === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [12:02] and I confirmed my account, the old things migred for new account [12:02] easter_egg: what was the old account called? [12:02] henninge, ~a.j [12:03] henninge, maybe... there was some kind of conflict between groups [12:03] easter_egg: ok, that's really gone. Just checking. [12:05] easter_egg: can you logg into other websites, like dev.launchpad.net ? [12:06] or wiki.ubuntu.com or one.ubuntu.com [12:06] easter_egg: they are all using the same OpenID authentication. [12:06] yes [12:06] I can [12:06] but... [12:07] Logged in as a.j-merged [12:07] o.O [12:07] Ah! [12:07] the account name is ayrton.araujo [12:07] a.j-merged its strange [12:08] easter_egg: have you ever tried to remove the launchpad cookies from your browser? [12:09] easter_egg: or used a different browser? [12:09] henninge, I will try now [12:11] henninge, no.. I can't [12:11] easter_egg: what's the latest OOPS ID? [12:12] Error ID: OOPS-1585K1175 [12:12] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585K1175 [12:14] easter_egg: where did you see the "Logged in as a.j-merged" ? [12:14] I like this bot ubottu =] [12:14] its open source? [12:15] dunno [12:15] https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-bots [12:15] henninge, in the top of page dev.launc... [12:15] ok [12:15] and wiki.ubuntu too [12:15] thanks jpds [12:15] and in my account of ubuntu one XD [12:15] lol [12:16] I had not noticed [12:16] ok [12:16] jpds, thanks [12:16] easter_egg: I will file a question for that on behalf of you and add all the details you told me. [12:18] thanks =] === agnel is now known as agnel-away [12:18] henninge, I will be there [12:19] I will try to run the launchpad in localhost [12:19] and I will try to reproduce this bug [12:19] easter_egg: what do you see here: https://login.ubuntu.com/ [12:20] maybe I can hacking something and send this to launchpad =] [12:20] henninge, I will check now [12:20] easter_egg: sure, you'd be very welcome to do so. You can read all about that on dev.launchpad.net ;) [12:21] henninge, oh [12:21] what? [12:21] henninge, thats show a dialog to update my account [12:22] yes, it does the same for me ;) That is normal. [12:22] ok... [12:22] I will try update [12:22] easter_egg: is launchpad.net on the list below that? [12:22] yes [12:23] what date? [12:23] https://launchpad.net/ 2010-05-04 === salgado-afk is now known as salgado [12:24] easter_egg: ok, so your logins seem to really succeed. [12:24] I changed out my name to Ayrton Araujo for test [12:26] Error ID: OOPS-1585G1420 [12:26] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585G1420 [12:26] easter_egg: we have some doubled information here, unfortunately. There is also a name configured in launchpad. [12:26] the name changed [12:26] but xD [12:27] henninge, I was correct XD [12:27] what do you mean? [12:27] henninge, maybe join in the group that I was [12:28] easter_egg: but you still cannot log in, right? [12:28] henninge, yes [12:28] what I say, maybe join in a group that I was in old account before confirm all the emails [12:29] cause the problem, doubling the informations [12:30] I'm getting consistent timeouts trying to copy packages between PPAs since the rollout. Can someone check into OOPS-1585D1377 ? [12:30] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585D1377 [12:30] henninge, for exemple... [12:30] henninge, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-br.am/+members [12:30] maxb: oops too fresh but there are problems with the build farm atm. [12:30] i.e. since the roll-out. [12:31] this should not involve the build farm [12:31] * henninge knows too little about ppas :/ [12:32] AFAIK what I'm doing should only involve the database and the publisher [12:32] maxb, You tried for another provider? [12:32] from* [12:32] * maxb wonders what on earth easter_egg is talking about [12:33] easter_egg: maxb sits in the UK, so basically right next to the server compared to you ... ;) [12:33] henninge, because... [12:34] * maxb sits in an office with a 100Mbit link to a London datacentre :-) [12:34] in Brazil, sometimes many provides of internet... [12:34] can't resolve somes ips [12:34] some* [12:35] if other people can upload packages, thats possible to be a problem with your provider [12:35] thats I mean [12:38] More of the same oops, just to show it's reproducable: OOPS-1585F1349 OOPS-1585O1581 OOPS-1585E1350 OOPS-1585EC1266 OOPS-1585H1403 OOPS-1585G1436 [12:38] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585F1349 [12:38] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585O1581 [12:38] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585E1350 [12:38] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585EC1266 [12:38] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585H1403 [12:38] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585G1436 [12:38] maxb, or nobody can upload packages in your ppa? [12:38] bigjools: ^ can you confirm these timeouts maybe related to the roll-out changes? [12:38] * bigjools is looking [12:39] henninge: are you help contact today? [12:39] bigjools: no, just happen to be here ... ;) [12:40] FYI the operation in question is a copy-with-existing-binaries, between two PPAs owned by ~mercurial-ppa, and it's one I do very regularly (from a script, even - screenscraping the web UI - yes, blech, but I haven't got around to APIizing it yet) [12:41] ! [12:41] copy checks did change in the release [12:41] but were live on edge for ages [12:42] henninge, Im installing the launchpad in localhost now [12:43] easter_egg: You said you updated your account on login.ubuntu.com. What was the name before it? The same with the non-ascii character? [12:43] henninge, tha name was: Ayrton "Freeman" Araújo [12:43] now is Ayrton Araujo [12:44] ok, I am just wondering where the "a.j-merged" comes from. [12:46] henninge, me too o.O [12:46] easter_egg: does it show up on "login.ubuntu.com"? [12:48] easter_egg: anyway, I filed a question: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/109576 [12:48] and will go to lunch now :/ [12:48] :) [12:49] henninge, no.. not show up in login.ubun.. [12:49] the login names not show up [12:49] just the name, emails etc [12:49] henninge, ok [12:49] thanks [12:50] enjoy lunch =] [12:51] maxb: not ignoring you BTW, just waiting for the oopses to sync to somewhere I can see them [12:52] np, thanks for looking [13:01] There is stuff stuck in the ubuntu import que from the 15th of April, its now the 4th of may [13:04] maxb: I can't find any of those OOPSes [13:05] maxb: you got those reported in a copy request on +copy-packages, right? [13:10] bigjools: yes, that's correct [13:10] maxb: which PPA/binary? I'll try to reproduce [13:10] s/binary/package/ === agnel-away is now known as agnel [13:12] https://launchpad.net/~mercurial-ppa/+archive/staging-snapshots/+copy-packages [13:12] Destination: mercurial-ppa/snapshots [13:12] same series [13:12] copy binaries [13:12] ticking all 5 sources [13:12] anyone able to take alook, there are things stuck in the ubuntu import que from the 15th of April. [13:12] ? [13:13] maxb: just worked fine copying to my testing PPA [13:13] hrm. let me try that again.... [13:14] bigjools: Nope, fails here. OOPS-1585K1281 [13:14] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1585K1281 [13:14] hmph [13:14] bigjools, when will it be possible to delete ppas? [13:14] easter_egg: right now [13:15] bigjools, in next version? [13:15] no, now [13:15] bigjools, now? In last week was not possible [13:16] * noodles775 deleted a ppa a few days ago. [13:16] o.O [13:16] easter_egg: why don't you look at a ppa page [13:17] bigjools, I can't now ;x But I will try as soon possible xD [13:17] maxb: were you using edge or lpnet? [13:17] bigjools, because... [13:17] In last week [13:18] bigjools: Hmm, so it works if I copy one source at a time. But I definitely used to be able to copy all five at once. I know this because it's a daily build [13:18] maxb: maybe I was lucky! [13:19] bigjools, I tried to change my name, but I can't because the ppa, and I try to delete the ppa, but it was not possible... [13:19] easter_egg: you can't change your name yet, that is coming soon [13:19] so, I created a new account with the name that I wanted ;P [13:19] but you can delete PPAs [13:19] bigjools, strange xD [13:19] I've been using edge mainly before now, mainly lpnet today because because I figured it ought to be less likely to timeout [13:20] hmmm [13:20] maxb: and the timeout was on lpnet? [13:20] bigjools, I tried hard and not found anything about deleting PPAs, in my old account... [13:20] I've seen the same timeout repeatably on both today [13:20] ok [13:20] bigjools, this was also a bug? [13:21] easter_egg: it was on the edge service only until today, when some new code was pushed out to all the servers, so everyone can delete PPAs now [13:22] bigjools, thanks to explain =] [13:25] easter_egg: you're welcome === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara [13:30] maxb: so I suspect I was lucky with my copy, but the copy checker was changed to pick up file conflicts which is no doubt incurring more database queries and slowing it down. :( [13:30] mtaylor: ping [13:31] bigjools: And more confusingly, on one attempt just now, I got a completely erroneous report of a file conflict on the .orig.tar.gz [13:31] maxb: intra-archive copy? [13:31] cross archive copy [13:31] The following source cannot be copied: [13:31] * mercurial 1.6~1.5.2+3-4263d8998daa-0ppa1~karmic1 in karmic (mercurial_1.6~1.5.2+3-4263d8998daa.orig.tar.gz already exists in destination archive with different contents.) [13:31] this is a li [13:31] *lie [13:32] StevenK: ^ [13:32] Yes, it's a lie, I have a branch [13:32] is that the same bug? [13:32] cool [13:32] Yes, it's the same bug [13:32] I'm confused, how did this not break edge before the rollout? [13:33] On second thoughts, I must lunch now. afk. [13:39] Hi, anyone willing to work out automatic update of translations for the GNUmed project with me ? [13:39] shilbert, is that about the automatic template generation? [13:41] it is about checking why a the translation in launchpad seem not to be synced with the translations provided in the bzr branch [13:41] someone helped me yesterday [13:41] I did some changes but apparently I still did not do the right thing [13:42] shilbert, oh, there is a problem with pulling and scanning branches (see topic), and translations can get noticed only after branches are pulled and scanned [13:42] shilbert, so, if that happened sometime in the last 24h, that's most likely the problem === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann [13:44] danilos, so I will just wait what happens === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ [13:44] shilbert, we are expecting branch scanner to catch up with the backlog in the next 12h, so we'd all have to wait until that happens [13:45] StevenK, i assume you are aware that the checksum missmatch bug seems to have spread to -proposed to -updates transitions [13:58] apw: It's in the copy checker, so it would affect any copy of that nature, yes. [14:02] StevenK, fair enough, sounds like a long day in store [14:02] apw: I already have a fix ... [14:02] apw: It's being handled. [14:03] How would that affect pocket copies? === Aramis_ is now known as l3on === JanC_ is now known as JanC [14:38] Hi. Regarding building/running Launchpad on Lucid - is the current documentation on dev.launchpad.net up to date? It still says lucid is the development version === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann [14:49] hi, is bzr broken in launchpad right now? non of our branches are updating [14:50] gord: yes, see topic [14:51] thanks === manish_ is now known as manish [14:59] askhl_: Well, lucid was only released a few days ago... and it is a wiki.... fix it ! :-) [15:00] maxb: right :). But I'd like to build/install it, so it's just whether I should follow the lucid instructions [15:01] Also... I can edit this? [15:02] You may need to join ~launchpad-dev in order to be able to edit [15:04] maxb: right, I might do that at some point [15:14] loggerhead is down? [15:15] nigelbabu: works for me, but there are still some issues with branches [15:16] intellectronica: aftering abusing the F5 key, it now works [15:16]