nigelbabu | persia: ok, so tomorrow is patch day,who does the starting delights? :) | 02:22 |
---|---|---|
nigelbabu | err, today rather | 02:33 |
nigelbabu | bdrung: just reminding you that patch day starts today :) | 03:04 |
nigelbabu | nhandler: ^ | 03:08 |
nigelbabu | who else to remind now | 03:08 |
nhandler | Thanks nigelbabu | 03:08 |
nhandler | Where is the schedule? | 03:08 |
nigelbabu | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay | 03:09 |
nhandler | thanks | 03:09 |
nhandler | nigelbabu: One thing we might want to do is poke the next reviewer when it gets close to their turn | 03:40 |
ajmitch | good to see all the slots filled now | 03:49 |
dholbach | good morning | 07:24 |
persia | Patch Day! Patch Day! Patch Day! | 11:05 |
persia | So, this is the beginning of patch day. The 5th of May is slowly winding itself over the globe. | 11:05 |
persia | Who all's here? | 11:06 |
* vish never seen persia so excited ;) | 11:06 | |
persia | hey vish. | 11:07 |
vish | hi.. | 11:07 |
BlackZ | hey persia | 11:09 |
persia | Hey BlackZ. | 11:10 |
persia | So, 330 outstanding patches seeking quick review: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs | 11:10 |
persia | Let's get that down to 0 by the end of today. We've almost 50 hours, so if we can do better than one patch every 10 minutes, we win!. | 11:10 |
ajmitch | hi all | 11:16 |
persia | Hey slytherin, popey. Welcome! | 11:16 |
slytherin | :-) | 11:16 |
popey | o/ | 11:16 |
persia | So the list of patches we're trying to clear today is https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs | 11:16 |
persia | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide is a guide to how we review the patches. | 11:17 |
persia | There's other informative links in the /topic if you're curious :) | 11:17 |
kermiac | hey ppl - I've never done patch review before but I'm willing to give it a shot :) is there anything I can help with? | 11:18 |
persia | kermiac: Absolutely. We've a little over 300 patches we're targeting today. | 11:18 |
persia | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide is the procedure we're using: just grab any bug to which ~ubuntu-reviewers is subscribed, and have at it. | 11:19 |
vish | yay , knocked one out.. | 11:19 |
kermiac | ok, I'll have a look. Thanks persia :) | 11:19 |
persia | Hurrah vish! | 11:20 |
vish | persia: hmm , Bug #111939 , has the debdiff , earlier sponsors [ bdrung ] mentioned there was no debdiff , but now we have one , we can unsubscribe the reviewers and subscribe the sponsors right? also nigelbabu has spoken about this bug to didrocks | 11:21 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 111939 in metacity "Not possible to alt-tab during a drag-and-drop operation" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/111939 | 11:21 |
persia | vish: Needs a maverick patch at this point, as well. | 11:22 |
vish | ah.. ok | 11:22 |
persia | vish: If yo'd like, you can probably easily convert nigelbabu's lucid-proposed debdiff to maverick, and then drop it from our queue. Looks like it's already upstream, so would probably benefit from some tags. | 11:24 |
yofel | hm, what needs to be done on bug 154349? correct the tags? | 11:24 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 154349 in synaptic "synaptic won't remember certain preferences" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154349 | 11:24 |
persia | yofel: Looks like it's tags only there, yeah. | 11:25 |
persia | yofel: Might be able to just drop from the queue, depending on the upstream status of the patches. | 11:25 |
yofel | mvo merged it into lucid but not trunk yet (as said on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~oliver-joos/synaptic/lp154349/+merge/23250) | 11:26 |
yofel | would that be accepted or sent? | 11:26 |
persia | I think just patch-forward-upstream: needs to have been merged to be patch-accepted-upstream | 11:27 |
yofel | ok | 11:27 |
yofel | remove the patch tag or leave it? | 11:28 |
bdrung | vish: yes (subscribing ubuntu-sponsors) | 11:29 |
persia | leave it. Otherwise it just gets added again and the team resubscribed. | 11:29 |
yofel | ok | 11:29 |
vish | persia: hmm , i think nigelbabu already has the debdiff for that too.. | 11:29 |
bdrung | nigelbabu: do the review team recommend DEP-3? | 11:29 |
* persia didn't see if, but if it's there, yeah, bdrung is right. | 11:30 | |
vish | ah yay.. bdmurray just replied ;) | 11:30 |
vish | oopd bdrung ^ | 11:30 |
persia | bdrung: We don't really care: we focus on getting patches to upstream, mostly. | 11:30 |
persia | bdrung: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow | 11:31 |
bdrung | persia: getting patches upstream does not conflict with using DEP-3 header. | 11:31 |
yofel | persia: tagged, the workflow says to unsubscribe the reviewers team now, can you do that? | 11:31 |
persia | bdrung: Right, but we don't insist on it: we assume that it's best to pass the patch around with appropriate attribution, regardless of the format. DEP-3 is more important in the context of getting a patch applied as a distro-patch than in the context of ensuring communication with usptream is happening. | 11:32 |
persia | yofel: Sure. 154349, right? | 11:32 |
yofel | yes | 11:32 |
persia | yofel: Done. | 11:32 |
yofel | thanks :D | 11:32 |
yofel | next one... | 11:32 |
persia | Damascene: Are you finding everything you need? | 11:32 |
bdrung | persia: yes. IMO a reference or recommendation for DEP-3 in the reviewguide would be nice. | 11:33 |
Damascene | persia, I found out that I'm not a member of bugsquad nor understand how to make .deb files | 11:34 |
* yofel didn't know about DEP-3, will read it later | 11:34 | |
persia | bdrung: Do you really think it's relevant for patches that aren't being applied at a distro-level? | 11:34 |
bdrung | persia: i think it's useful. You have the link to launchpad in the patch. | 11:35 |
persia | OK. You do know that we don't expect patch authors to read the reviewers guide, right? | 11:36 |
bdrung | persia: yes. the member of the review team could add the header (at least when he/she creates a debdiff) | 11:37 |
persia | But generally we *don't* create debdiffs. | 11:37 |
persia | We mostly just forward the patches upstream. | 11:37 |
persia | (the exception being patches to distro-patches or packaging, but those don't generally get DEP-3 anyway) | 11:39 |
ajmitch | persia: so where the patch comes from upstream via the debian maintainer, and it's only SRU material (mysql), does the review team need to be subscribed? | 11:40 |
persia | ajmitch: In cases like that it's be nice of us to debdiffise it and push to sponsors, but not, that doesn't need us to do anything. | 11:40 |
persia | s/not/no/ | 11:41 |
ajmitch | well it's being handled by a server team member | 11:41 |
* ajmitch isn't in the team, so can't unsub | 11:41 | |
persia | In that case, we don't need to care about it at all: just add the tags (patch-accepted-upstream, etc.) and move on. | 11:41 |
ajmitch | bug 343870 if you want to take it off the list | 11:41 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 343870 in mysql-dfsg-5.1 "php-cli segmentation fault with mysql extension" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343870 | 11:41 |
persia | Sure. | 11:42 |
persia | Done. | 11:42 |
* dholbach adds ajmitch | 11:43 | |
persia | dholbach: Thanks! | 11:43 |
dholbach | blogged about it too http://daniel.holba.ch/blog/?p=678 | 11:44 |
ajmitch | dholbach: ta | 11:44 |
persia | hey duanedesign! | 11:45 |
yofel | how would one handle bug 251335? part of the patch was accepted, part of it needs work, the bug is tagged as patch-needswork already | 11:45 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 251335 in synaptic "Synaptic searches on UI thread" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/251335 | 11:45 |
persia | yofel: I'd probably call that "patch-forwarded-upstream" and "patch-needswork". | 11:47 |
persia | yofel: Shall I unsub the team for that one? | 11:48 |
yofel | I think yes (at least that's what I believe after reading the review guide) | 11:48 |
persia | Done. | 11:49 |
persia | So we've finished the first hour of patch day, and are already 6% complete. At this rate, we'll be done in 16 hours! | 12:00 |
ajmitch | persia: the 312 that's showing is a bit high, too | 12:01 |
ajmitch | as multiple bug tasks on the same bug show up in the list | 12:02 |
persia | ajmitch: Sure, but since I started with the 330 number (also a bit high), I figure it's only fair to compare against that. | 12:02 |
* persia tries to convince LP to provide a more correct number | 12:03 | |
* ajmitch tries to decide what to do about this bug | 12:03 | |
persia | Which bug? | 12:03 |
ajmitch | bug 551901, it's sort-of-but-not-quite upstreamed | 12:04 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 551901 in krb5 "likewise-open fails to join Windows 2000 SP4 domain" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/551901 | 12:04 |
ajmitch | again, being handled by the server team people :) | 12:04 |
* ajmitch is going for familiar territory in the list | 12:04 | |
persia | Probably the same: needs tagging, and unsubscription. Bugs well-in-hand tend to just need gentle poking. | 12:05 |
ajmitch | ok | 12:05 |
ajmitch | I think I'll get back to this tomorrow, a little late for me to think straight this evening | 12:06 |
persia | Thanks! Have a good night. | 12:07 |
persia | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers seems to be the URL for the lower-number (but I don't have the count from the start of Patch Day). 201 now. | 12:07 |
persia | Anyone looking for instructions, or buglists? | 12:08 |
persia | nigelbabu: Are you about? | 12:08 |
yofel | persia: can you unsubscribe the team from bug 33288? nigelbabu seems to have forgot about it (and should one re-ad the patch tag for those bugs?) | 12:11 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 33288 in poppler "Evince doesn't handle columns properly" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33288 | 12:11 |
persia | yofel: I don't see the point of re-adding the patch tag, personally. | 12:11 |
yofel | ah wait, there's no patch on it anymore right | 12:12 |
persia | dholbach: Could you add yofel to the team? He seems to have a good handle on the process :) | 12:12 |
dholbach | yofel: is your launchpad id yofel too? | 12:12 |
yofel | yep | 12:12 |
dholbach | super | 12:13 |
persia | Thanks. | 12:13 |
dholbach | done | 12:13 |
yofel | thanks :D | 12:15 |
* persia pokes nigelbabu again | 12:26 | |
persia | Hey hyperair! | 12:27 |
hyperair | hey persia =) | 12:27 |
persia | hyperair: Would you be up for starting a bit early? nigelbabu doesn't seem to be about. We're down to 200 according to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers and 309 acording to https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs (from 201 at 11:00 and 330 at 10:00) | 12:29 |
hyperair | heh? it's already review day? | 12:29 |
hyperair | =O | 12:30 |
hyperair | i need to be running at 9pm, though, it seems. | 12:31 |
hyperair | that'd be in 1.5h | 12:31 |
* hyperair goes to grab some dinner first | 12:31 | |
persia | Of course, and you're listed as next on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay :) | 12:32 |
persia | Of course, and you're listed as next on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay :) | 12:32 |
hyperair | i swear i thought that was 24h from now. | 12:32 |
persia | The 5th of May is creeping around the globe :) | 12:32 |
hyperair | oh looks like i put my name in for today as well! | 12:32 |
hyperair | =O | 12:32 |
hyperair | okay i'll go look at things | 12:33 |
persia | Looks like you're also scheduled for 24h from now. | 12:33 |
hyperair | yes, i am | 12:33 |
* hyperair kicks java | 12:33 | |
hyperair | uh what do i do if launchpad decides to hate me today? | 12:33 |
hyperair | it's been hating me a lot recently | 12:34 |
persia | Ask for help? Lots of folks are active and doing stuff, so if you can't get somewhere, I'm sure someone else can. | 12:34 |
persia | Main thing you need to do during your shift is make sure people know about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide and answer any questions that come up. | 12:35 |
persia | also, maybe good to post statistics at the top of each hour, and make sure you coordinate with the next person on the schedule when the time comes. | 12:36 |
hyperair | okay | 12:39 |
persia | Thanks for starting early! | 12:39 |
hyperair | persia: is there an easy way to filter only bugs affecting packages *i* can upload to? | 12:49 |
nigelbabu | I'm here, sorry to be late | 13:00 |
hyperair | \o/ | 13:01 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: you're on now? | 13:01 |
yofel | hi nigelbabu | 13:03 |
nigelbabu | hey yof | 13:03 |
hyperair | nigelbabu: no, you're on. | 13:03 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: ok. the wiki shows you, since you covered for me, gladly | 13:04 |
yofel | can someone double check bug 202009? IMO that's not a patch, but a scritpt that somehow workarounds the issue changing the default and user settings while at it | 13:04 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 202009 in grub "update-grub not updating menu.lst" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202009 | 13:04 |
nigelbabu | heya yofel (didn't tab earlier) | 13:04 |
persia | hyperair: Not that I know. | 13:05 |
hyperair | persia: =( | 13:05 |
r0tes_pf3rd | when do the patch-day start? | 13:08 |
nigelbabu | r0tes_pf3rd: we've started already | 13:08 |
r0tes_pf3rd | oh, cool | 13:09 |
r0tes_pf3rd | how can i help? | 13:09 |
nigelbabu | r0tes_pf3rd: You can help by reviewing patches. I'll point you the documentation so you can start off | 13:10 |
nigelbabu | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide | 13:10 |
nigelbabu | 182 untouched bugs to go, so there's still plenty out there :) | 13:10 |
r0tes_pf3rd | ok, i will look on the page | 13:11 |
nigelbabu | yofel: I think we have something similar to that grub bug already | 13:11 |
nigelbabu | i.e. a fix is already in I think | 13:11 |
nigelbabu | from karmic on I remember only 1 kernel being displayed on boot | 13:12 |
BlackZ | hey jono | 13:14 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: you cool for next hour? | 13:15 |
yofel | nigelbabu: well, I do remember the discussions about menu.lst not updating in karmic, but I'll leave the bug handling to someone that knows a bit more about grub, do you agree though that that's not a patch? | 13:15 |
hyperair | nigelbabu: unfortunately not. got a meeting at 9pm (45min from now) | 13:15 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: wait, so you're taking care of this hour or you want me to? | 13:15 |
nigelbabu | yofel: agreed there, its a new script | 13:16 |
hyperair | nigelbabu: er. up to you, which do you prefer? | 13:16 |
jono | hey BlackZ | 13:17 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: I did around 20 minutes to prepare a presention for UOW, either now or next hour | 13:17 |
nigelbabu | s/did/need | 13:17 |
hyperair | alright, go do it, i'll handle this hour =) | 13:17 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: thank you, poke if you need something, I should be around :) | 13:17 |
hyperair | nigelbabu: sure. | 13:17 |
* hyperair regrets not remembering set theory and curses java's weird transformation API | 13:18 | |
nigelbabu | anyone think its worth it to update review lead on topic? | 13:36 |
nigelbabu | dholbach: about? | 13:41 |
* persia thinks it's not worth updating the /topic for every change, as it's likely to be more flexible than scheduled. | 13:57 | |
nigelbabu | yeah, hence I didn't d it | 13:59 |
nigelbabu | do it | 13:59 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: ok, taking over :) | 14:00 |
nigelbabu | Folks, 180 bugs unreviewed in the queue. | 14:00 |
nigelbabu | I'll be the review lead for the next few hours | 14:00 |
nigelbabu | bdrung: I've been lazy to follow dep-3 on that metacity bug since I wanted someone to first test | 14:04 |
nigelbabu | persia: do we want to advertise in -bugs and -motu every 6 hours or so? | 14:12 |
nigelbabu | hello fschrat | 14:12 |
persia | I'd say 4, but sure. | 14:12 |
nigelbabu | persia: hm 4 is fine too :) | 14:12 |
nigelbabu | malev: hey, nice to see you here, Patch day is today! | 14:13 |
* hyperair grumbles | 14:15 | |
fschrat | hello everyone | 14:15 |
hyperair | i spent all my time trying to test that chkrootkit patch | 14:15 |
hyperair | turns out chkrootkit hung trying to read /proc/kmsg | 14:15 |
malev | hi nigelbabu ! I'll start in a few minutes | 14:15 |
nigelbabu | hyperair: awesome | 14:15 |
nigelbabu | fschrat: hey, welcome | 14:15 |
nigelbabu | malev: great :) | 14:16 |
nigelbabu | persia: can take a look at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40823731/vncExtInit.cc.patch ? | 14:34 |
nigelbabu | isn't the patch file formatted wronly ? | 14:34 |
persia | No, just differently. We're used to looking at the output of `diff -u ...`: that's the output of `diff ...` | 14:39 |
nigelbabu | oh, ah | 14:42 |
nigelbabu | looks like I need to test tht bug | 14:42 |
nigelbabu | what would be the call on bug 424927? leave it for jfo? | 14:51 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 424927 in linux "include CK patch set (BFS)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424927 | 14:51 |
dholbach | nigelbabu: yes | 14:53 |
persia | Indeed. It's in one of the blacklisted packages, but left over from before the blacklist was in place. | 14:53 |
nigelbabu | oh, then I have some cleaning to do | 14:54 |
nigelbabu | dholbach: you'll be around for my session right, just in case I cna't handle questions | 14:56 |
dholbach | nigelbabu: around that time I was planning to meet somebody for dinner :-/ | 14:57 |
dholbach | nigelbabu: what about bdmurray and james_w and bryce? | 14:57 |
nigelbabu | dholbach: I'll talk to james | 14:58 |
dholbach | better ping all of them :) | 14:58 |
nigelbabu | yeah, good idea | 14:58 |
nigelbabu | bdmurray, james_w: My UOW session on patch review is at 1700, if you folks can be around to help with questions, would be great :) | 14:59 |
dholbach | nigelbabu: I have an idea for when the patch day is over: we could start making a list of bugs that were solved where the patch reviewers put some time into fixing them and we blog "the story of these patches" later on | 15:00 |
dholbach | (a bit like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/Diaries) | 15:00 |
nigelbabu | dholbach: I'm +1, I actually want to ask brian for a tar of all the mails in moderate on the patch review m/l during patch day | 15:01 |
nigelbabu | moderation queue | 15:02 |
nigelbabu | dat way we can know who did what | 15:02 |
nigelbabu | Status update: 172 unreviewed bugs | 15:06 |
nigelbabu | heya arand :) | 15:08 |
arand | nigelbabu: Hello, hmm, I'm likely not going to be of much help, but I though I might listen and learn, it that is ok? | 15:09 |
nigelbabu | arand: sure :) | 15:09 |
nigelbabu | ok, good news | 15:23 |
nigelbabu | we have gone below 170 mark | 15:24 |
nigelbabu | 167 unreviewed bugs | 15:24 |
nigelbabu | hello there dyfet | 15:28 |
nigelbabu | would you like to help with patch review? | 15:29 |
dyfet | I would be happy to try | 15:30 |
nigelbabu | dyfet: great! you can go through https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide | 15:30 |
nigelbabu | please ask if you have any qiestions | 15:30 |
nigelbabu | there is always a review lead here till the end of patch day | 15:31 |
nigelbabu | heya qense | 15:45 |
nigelbabu | we're down to 160 unreviewed bugs folks :) | 15:46 |
qense | hi nigelbabu! | 15:46 |
nigelbabu | qense: patch day today! | 15:46 |
qense | My congratulations to the review team! | 15:46 |
qense | aha! | 15:46 |
nigelbabu | qense: another 40 hours or so to go | 15:48 |
yofel | meh, what's the policy if someone adds an upstream patch to a bug? | 15:48 |
qense | Huh? How long is your definition of a day? | 15:48 |
nigelbabu | yofel: if its integrated upstream, add patch-accepted-upstream | 15:49 |
yofel | ok | 15:49 |
nigelbabu | qense: a day in all time zones, 49 hours | 15:49 |
qense | Good idea :P | 15:50 |
qense | So for my timezone the day's actually tomorrow! | 15:50 |
nigelbabu | qense: haha | 15:50 |
yofel | for me too, but who cares :P | 15:52 |
nigelbabu | qense: see, you should be inspired by yofel :D | 15:52 |
qense | I'm already working very hard on Mergimus! | 15:52 |
qense | Even though it's not Write an App-day! | 15:53 |
nigelbabu | qense: lol | 15:53 |
nigelbabu | starcraftman: /ws 29 | 15:55 |
nigelbabu | grrr | 15:55 |
malev | anyone choose a patch as they want or there is a sort of order or something like that? | 16:04 |
nigelbabu | malev: have you seen the query link on review guide | 16:05 |
nigelbabu | just take a pick from that query | 16:05 |
nigelbabu | it should show you all unreviewed patches | 16:05 |
malev | this is the query: All open bugs with patches attached: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_supervisor=&field.bug_commenter=&field.s | 16:05 |
malev | ubscriber=&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_no_package.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_patch=on&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on ? | 16:05 |
malev | sorry, it's a big query | 16:06 |
malev | I'm here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/KnowledgeBase | 16:06 |
malev | and I take the query from there | 16:06 |
nigelbabu | not that one, let me find it | 16:07 |
nigelbabu | malev: click on query here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow | 16:07 |
nigelbabu | malev: to start off you can go with bug 569469 | 16:09 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 569469 in update-manager "[lucid] program crashes when string "%s ago" is displayed" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/569469 | 16:09 |
nigelbabu | it seems easy enough | 16:09 |
malev | nigelbabu, oks! going there | 16:10 |
nigelbabu | malev: so, what do you make of the situation there | 16:13 |
malev | I'm trying to reproduce the bug | 16:13 |
malev | oh there is nothing to reproduce, it's only bad english :D | 16:14 |
malev | gonna check the patch | 16:14 |
malev | nigelbabu, which branch should I download to chech the patch? | 16:17 |
nigelbabu | malev: I'm just checking tht up | 16:18 |
nigelbabu | malev: https://launchpad.net/update-manager | 16:18 |
malev | yes, but, if you go to branches, there are a lot! which onw | 16:19 |
malev | the development? | 16:19 |
malev | or the lucid? | 16:19 |
malev | https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager | 16:19 |
nigelbabu | if you notice the bug, mvo talks about trunk | 16:20 |
nigelbabu | so you should check the trunk brach | 16:21 |
malev | cool | 16:21 |
malev | nigelbabu, you are giving a talk in a few minutes? | 16:23 |
nigelbabu | malev: the 3rd session today | 16:23 |
nigelbabu | malev: if you didn't find the commit yet, its commit 1807 | 16:27 |
malev | nigelbabu, I'm downloading the branch. It0's REALLY solw | 16:27 |
nigelbabu | yes, because of maverick stuff | 16:28 |
nigelbabu | malev: when hunting for commits, its easier on the web interface | 16:31 |
malev | nigelbabu, might be, but, how can I test the patch if I don't use it? | 16:31 |
nigelbabu | string changes are kinda easy to predict looking at the code :) | 16:32 |
nigelbabu | bdrung: poke | 16:34 |
yofel | anyone got a minute to look at bug 491940? would that be accepted or needswork o.O? LTSP seems to be happy with the patch, Chris not | 16:37 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 491940 in ltsp "Patch for LTSP clients to properly reboot/shutdown" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/491940 | 16:37 |
yofel | and are we seriously supposed to get subscribed just to package a patch? (not that I mind, I'm just not sure there) | 16:38 |
nigelbabu | yofel: yes, thats part of we do | 16:40 |
nigelbabu | packaging patches | 16:41 |
malev | lauchpad is down? | 16:41 |
yofel | good | 16:41 |
nigelbabu | yofel: talk to chris and hear his take on it (especially after lxde accepted a similar patch) | 16:42 |
nigelbabu | malev: checking | 16:42 |
nigelbabu | malev: nope | 16:42 |
malev | don't now is working | 16:42 |
malev | nigelbabu, I donwload the trunk and it's on commit 1817 ten more than what the web site says... | 16:45 |
* nigelbabu stabs loggerhead | 16:46 | |
nigelbabu | malev: what is 1807 about? | 16:49 |
malev | I'm with the patch of update-manager. I can't aply the patch. don't know why | 16:49 |
malev | 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Desktop/UpdateManager1.py.rej | 16:49 |
malev | bzr: ERROR: Patch application failed | 16:49 |
malev | I think I'm using a different branch | 16:50 |
nigelbabu | malev: you can't apply because the code changed | 16:52 |
nigelbabu | mvo applied another change to fix the same issue | 16:52 |
nigelbabu | and second thing, look at the path you're trying to patch, it doesn't exsit | 16:53 |
malev | that is what I was looking now! | 16:53 |
malev | well, I'm going to try to create another patch with a good path :D | 16:53 |
malev | I start enjoying this :D | 16:53 |
nigelbabu | malev: you dont need to, it would still fail | 16:53 |
nigelbabu | because like I said, mvo already fixed it :) | 16:54 |
malev | ooo too bad | 16:54 |
malev | then I'll close the bug :( | 16:54 |
nigelbabu | no no | 16:54 |
nigelbabu | just change tag to patch-rejected | 16:54 |
nigelbabu | say in comments that another fix for this has been commited already | 16:55 |
malev | because.. it's all ready fixed | 16:55 |
malev | oks | 16:55 |
malev | thanks | 16:55 |
nigelbabu | getting a feel for the process now? | 16:55 |
malev | haha | 16:55 |
malev | I think | 16:55 |
malev | there are some bug reports with doesn't has a patch attached but has the patch tag. should I delete the tag? | 17:03 |
nigelbabu | bug number? | 17:03 |
yofel | sometimes a patch is just pasted into a comment, check for those too, or the patch is upstream and only a link to the commit is given | 17:05 |
nigelbabu | Status update: 155 bugs to be reviewed | 17:08 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
malev | Hey I am in a BR that: It has a bug, but there is newer verstions in which it is fixed. so the OR recomend us to apply the patch or to update the version provided. what do you whink? | 17:12 |
malev | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-scipy/+bug/538774 | 17:12 |
ubot3 | Malone bug 538774 in python-scipy "scipy.io.loadmat() excessively slow (regression)" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 17:12 |
nigelbabu | malev: there is not talk of an upstream commit, ask OP for a link to upstream commit to confirm its fixed | 17:19 |
malev | nigelbabu, ok | 17:20 |
nigelbabu | cyphermox: all yours in 10 minutes | 17:52 |
nigelbabu | and be ready to handle a huge influx after the UOW session | 17:53 |
cyphermox | yup | 18:04 |
cyphermox | hi! | 18:37 |
nigelbabu | status update, 154 unreviewed bugs | 19:12 |
bdrung | nigelbabu: pong | 20:51 |
lucasmocellin | hi | 21:17 |
lucasmocellin | I'm customizing a Ubuntu distro for distance learning, and the main point is to apply online tests. I would like to know if there is someone involved to version control in Ubuntu, mainly related to "what/how it happens" when canonical upgrade a ubuntu version like from 9.10 to 10.04. I would like to upgrade my distro and keep an easy control of everything modified. | 21:18 |
cyphermox | well, I have to get going, sorry I can't stick around longer | 22:59 |
ajmitch | morning all :) | 23:12 |
persia | cyphermox: Sorry about that. | 23:16 |
persia | Good morning ajmitch | 23:17 |
ajmitch | how's the patch day going? | 23:18 |
ajmitch | I see you're booked in for an extra-long session now | 23:18 |
persia | Depends on how one counts. Down to 277/175 bugs left to track 12 hours in. | 23:20 |
persia | Yeah, seems like nobody else was up for being the named contact during these hours :) | 23:21 |
ajmitch | sorry, it sort of falls in my work hours as well :) | 23:24 |
persia | Understood. Mine too, but I don't mind answering some questions on IRC (and expect the number of folk around to be light for most of it) | 23:25 |
ajmitch | yes, thanks for stepping up todo it | 23:27 |
persia | nigelbabu has a handy way of helping people up the steps :) | 23:28 |
persia | OOh. only 152 bugs by another count. I defintely need to use the right queries, I think. | 23:33 |
ajmitch | which count are you using now? | 23:33 |
persia | 152 is the number from the query at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow | 23:34 |
ajmitch | ok, so that doesn't show the tasks fixed in ubuntu but still pending in debian, which is probably what we want | 23:35 |
persia | It also doesn't show a lot of the bugs that have already been properly tagged and forwarded, etc. | 23:36 |
ajmitch | I should clear up that krb5 one that I asked you about last night | 23:37 |
ajmitch | and apt-xapian-index, I can ask upstream about that directly | 23:38 |
ajmitch | it's useful to have a few active developers in the NZ loco channel | 23:39 |
ajmitch | quite a few of us are DDs in there | 23:39 |
persia | Indeed. | 23:40 |
persia | I have to run off for a bit: I'll definitely answer any unanswered questions when I return. Apologies for anyone who gets stuck in the meantime. | 23:47 |
* ajmitch will be around, sort of | 23:48 | |
persia | Thanks :) | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!