[02:22] <nigelbabu> persia: ok, so tomorrow is patch day,who does the starting delights? :)
[02:33] <nigelbabu> err, today rather
[03:04] <nigelbabu> bdrung: just reminding you that patch day starts today :)
[03:08] <nigelbabu> nhandler: ^
[03:08] <nigelbabu> who else to remind now
[03:08] <nhandler> Thanks nigelbabu
[03:08] <nhandler> Where is the schedule?
[03:09] <nigelbabu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay
[03:09] <nhandler> thanks
[03:40] <nhandler> nigelbabu: One thing we might want to do is poke the next reviewer when it gets close to their turn
[03:49] <ajmitch> good to see all the slots filled now
[07:24] <dholbach> good morning
[11:05] <persia> Patch Day! Patch Day! Patch Day!
[11:05] <persia> So, this is the beginning of patch day.  The 5th of May is slowly winding itself over the globe.
[11:06] <persia> Who all's here?
[11:06]  * vish never seen persia so excited ;)
[11:07] <persia> hey vish.
[11:07] <vish> hi..
[11:09] <BlackZ> hey persia
[11:10] <persia> Hey BlackZ.
[11:10] <persia> So, 330 outstanding patches seeking quick review: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs
[11:10] <persia> Let's get that down to 0 by the end of today.  We've almost 50 hours, so if we can do better than one patch every 10 minutes, we win!.
[11:16] <ajmitch> hi all
[11:16] <persia> Hey slytherin, popey.  Welcome!
[11:16] <slytherin> :-)
[11:16] <popey> o/
[11:16] <persia> So the list of patches we're trying to clear today is https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs
[11:17] <persia> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide is a guide to how we review the patches.
[11:17] <persia> There's other informative links in the /topic if you're curious :)
[11:18] <kermiac> hey ppl - I've never done patch review before but I'm willing to give it a shot :) is there anything I can help with?
[11:18] <persia> kermiac: Absolutely.  We've a little over 300 patches we're targeting today.
[11:19] <persia> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide is the procedure we're using: just grab any bug to which ~ubuntu-reviewers is subscribed, and have at it.
[11:19] <vish> yay , knocked one out..
[11:19] <kermiac> ok, I'll have a look. Thanks persia :)
[11:20] <persia> Hurrah vish!
[11:21] <vish> persia: hmm , Bug #111939 , has the debdiff , earlier sponsors [ bdrung ] mentioned there was no debdiff , but now we have one , we can unsubscribe the reviewers and subscribe the sponsors right? also nigelbabu has spoken about this bug to didrocks
[11:21] <ubot3> Malone bug 111939 in metacity "Not possible to alt-tab during a drag-and-drop operation" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/111939
[11:22] <persia> vish: Needs a maverick patch at this point, as well.
[11:22] <vish> ah.. ok
[11:24] <persia> vish: If yo'd like, you can probably easily convert nigelbabu's lucid-proposed debdiff to maverick, and then drop it from our queue.  Looks like it's already upstream, so would probably benefit from some tags.
[11:24] <yofel> hm, what needs to be done on bug 154349? correct the tags?
[11:24] <ubot3> Malone bug 154349 in synaptic "synaptic won't remember certain preferences" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154349
[11:25] <persia> yofel: Looks like it's tags only there, yeah.
[11:25] <persia> yofel: Might be able to just drop from the queue, depending on the upstream status of the patches.
[11:26] <yofel> mvo merged it into lucid but not trunk yet (as said on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~oliver-joos/synaptic/lp154349/+merge/23250)
[11:26] <yofel> would that be accepted or sent?
[11:27] <persia> I think just patch-forward-upstream: needs to have been merged to be patch-accepted-upstream
[11:27] <yofel> ok
[11:28] <yofel> remove the patch tag or leave it?
[11:29] <bdrung> vish: yes (subscribing ubuntu-sponsors)
[11:29] <persia> leave it.  Otherwise it just gets added again and the team resubscribed.
[11:29] <yofel> ok
[11:29] <vish> persia: hmm , i think nigelbabu already has the debdiff for that too..
[11:29] <bdrung> nigelbabu: do the review team recommend DEP-3?
[11:30]  * persia didn't see if, but if it's there, yeah, bdrung is right.
[11:30] <vish> ah yay.. bdmurray just replied ;)
[11:30] <vish> oopd bdrung ^
[11:30] <persia> bdrung: We don't really care: we focus on getting patches to upstream, mostly.
[11:31] <persia> bdrung: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow
[11:31] <bdrung> persia: getting patches upstream does not conflict with using DEP-3 header.
[11:31] <yofel> persia: tagged, the workflow says to unsubscribe the reviewers team now, can you do that?
[11:32] <persia> bdrung: Right, but we don't insist on it: we assume that it's best to pass the patch around with appropriate attribution, regardless of the format.  DEP-3 is more important in the context of getting a patch applied as a distro-patch than in the context of ensuring communication with usptream is happening.
[11:32] <persia> yofel: Sure.  154349, right?
[11:32] <yofel> yes
[11:32] <persia> yofel: Done.
[11:32] <yofel> thanks :D
[11:32] <yofel> next one...
[11:32] <persia> Damascene: Are you finding everything you need?
[11:33] <bdrung> persia: yes. IMO a reference or recommendation for DEP-3 in the reviewguide would be nice.
[11:34] <Damascene> persia, I found out that I'm not a member of bugsquad nor understand how to make .deb files
[11:34]  * yofel didn't know about DEP-3, will read it later
[11:34] <persia> bdrung: Do you really think it's relevant for patches that aren't being applied at a distro-level?
[11:35] <bdrung> persia: i think it's useful. You have the link to launchpad in the patch.
[11:36] <persia> OK.  You do know that we don't expect patch authors to read the reviewers guide, right?
[11:37] <bdrung> persia: yes. the member of the review team could add the header (at least when he/she creates a debdiff)
[11:37] <persia> But generally we *don't* create debdiffs.
[11:37] <persia> We mostly just forward the patches upstream.
[11:39] <persia> (the exception being patches to distro-patches or packaging, but those don't generally get DEP-3 anyway)
[11:40] <ajmitch> persia: so where the patch comes from upstream via the debian maintainer, and it's only SRU material (mysql), does the review team need to be subscribed?
[11:40] <persia> ajmitch: In cases like that it's be nice of us to debdiffise it and push to sponsors, but not, that doesn't need us to do anything.
[11:41] <persia> s/not/no/
[11:41] <ajmitch> well it's being handled by a server team member
[11:41]  * ajmitch isn't in the team, so can't unsub
[11:41] <persia> In that case, we don't need to care about it at all: just add the tags (patch-accepted-upstream, etc.) and move on.
[11:41] <ajmitch> bug 343870 if you want to take it off the list
[11:41] <ubot3> Malone bug 343870 in mysql-dfsg-5.1 "php-cli segmentation fault with mysql extension" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343870
[11:42] <persia> Sure.
[11:42] <persia> Done.
[11:43]  * dholbach adds ajmitch
[11:43] <persia> dholbach: Thanks!
[11:44] <dholbach> blogged about it too http://daniel.holba.ch/blog/?p=678
[11:44] <ajmitch> dholbach: ta
[11:45] <persia> hey duanedesign!
[11:45] <yofel> how would one handle bug 251335? part of the patch was accepted, part  of it needs work, the bug is tagged as patch-needswork already
[11:45] <ubot3> Malone bug 251335 in synaptic "Synaptic searches on UI thread" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/251335
[11:47] <persia> yofel: I'd probably call that "patch-forwarded-upstream" and "patch-needswork".
[11:48] <persia> yofel: Shall I unsub the team for that one?
[11:48] <yofel> I think yes (at least that's what I believe after reading the review guide)
[11:49] <persia> Done.
[12:00] <persia> So we've finished the first hour of patch day, and are already 6% complete.  At this rate, we'll be done in 16 hours!
[12:01] <ajmitch> persia: the 312 that's showing is a bit high, too
[12:02] <ajmitch> as multiple bug tasks on the same bug show up in the list
[12:02] <persia> ajmitch: Sure, but since I started with the 330 number (also a bit high), I figure it's only fair to compare against that.
[12:03]  * persia tries to convince LP to provide a more correct number
[12:03]  * ajmitch tries to decide what to do about this bug
[12:03] <persia> Which bug?
[12:04] <ajmitch> bug 551901, it's sort-of-but-not-quite upstreamed
[12:04] <ubot3> Malone bug 551901 in krb5 "likewise-open fails to join Windows 2000 SP4 domain" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/551901
[12:04] <ajmitch> again, being handled by the server team people :)
[12:04]  * ajmitch is going for familiar territory in the list
[12:05] <persia> Probably the same: needs tagging, and unsubscription.  Bugs well-in-hand tend to just need gentle poking.
[12:05] <ajmitch> ok
[12:06] <ajmitch> I think I'll get back to this tomorrow, a little late for me to think straight this evening
[12:07] <persia> Thanks!  Have a good night.
[12:07] <persia> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers seems to be the URL for the lower-number (but I don't have the count from the start of Patch Day).  201 now.
[12:08] <persia> Anyone looking for instructions, or buglists?
[12:08] <persia> nigelbabu: Are you about?
[12:11] <yofel> persia: can you unsubscribe the team from bug 33288? nigelbabu seems to have forgot about it (and should one re-ad the patch tag for those bugs?)
[12:11] <ubot3> Malone bug 33288 in poppler "Evince doesn't handle columns properly" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33288
[12:11] <persia> yofel: I don't see the point of re-adding the patch tag, personally.
[12:12] <yofel> ah wait, there's no patch on it anymore right
[12:12] <persia> dholbach: Could you add yofel to the team?  He seems to have a good handle on the process :)
[12:12] <dholbach> yofel: is your launchpad id yofel too?
[12:12] <yofel> yep
[12:13] <dholbach> super
[12:13] <persia> Thanks.
[12:13] <dholbach> done
[12:15] <yofel> thanks :D
[12:26]  * persia pokes nigelbabu again
[12:27] <persia> Hey hyperair!
[12:27] <hyperair> hey persia =)
[12:29] <persia> hyperair: Would you be up for starting a bit early?  nigelbabu doesn't seem to be about.  We're down to 200 according to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers and 309 acording to https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs  (from 201 at 11:00 and 330 at 10:00)
[12:29] <hyperair> heh? it's already review day?
[12:30] <hyperair> =O
[12:31] <hyperair> i need to be running at 9pm, though, it seems.
[12:31] <hyperair> that'd be in 1.5h
[12:31]  * hyperair goes to grab some dinner first
[12:32] <persia> Of course, and you're listed as next on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay :)
[12:32] <persia> Of course, and you're listed as next on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay :)
[12:32] <hyperair> i swear i thought that was 24h from now.
[12:32] <persia> The 5th of May is creeping around the globe :)
[12:32] <hyperair> oh looks like i put my name in for today as well!
[12:32] <hyperair> =O
[12:33] <hyperair> okay i'll go look at things
[12:33] <persia> Looks like you're also scheduled for 24h from now.
[12:33] <hyperair> yes, i am
[12:33]  * hyperair kicks java
[12:33] <hyperair> uh what do i do if launchpad decides to hate me today?
[12:34] <hyperair> it's been hating me a lot recently
[12:34] <persia> Ask for help?  Lots of folks are active and doing stuff, so if you can't get somewhere, I'm sure someone else can.
[12:35] <persia> Main thing you need to do during your shift is make sure people know about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide and answer any questions that come up.
[12:36] <persia> also, maybe good to post statistics at the top of each hour, and make sure you coordinate with the next person on the schedule when the time comes.
[12:39] <hyperair> okay
[12:39] <persia> Thanks for starting early!
[12:49] <hyperair> persia: is there an easy way to filter only bugs affecting packages *i* can upload to?
[13:00] <nigelbabu> I'm here, sorry to be late
[13:01] <hyperair> \o/
[13:01] <nigelbabu> hyperair: you're on now?
[13:03] <yofel> hi nigelbabu
[13:03] <nigelbabu> hey yof
[13:03] <hyperair> nigelbabu: no, you're on.
[13:04] <nigelbabu> hyperair: ok.  the wiki shows you, since you covered for me, gladly
[13:04] <yofel> can someone double check bug 202009? IMO that's not a patch, but a scritpt that somehow workarounds the issue changing the default and user settings while at it
[13:04] <ubot3> Malone bug 202009 in grub "update-grub not updating menu.lst" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202009
[13:04] <nigelbabu> heya yofel (didn't tab earlier)
[13:05] <persia> hyperair: Not that I know.
[13:05] <hyperair> persia: =(
[13:08] <r0tes_pf3rd> when do the patch-day start?
[13:08] <nigelbabu> r0tes_pf3rd: we've started already
[13:09] <r0tes_pf3rd> oh, cool
[13:09] <r0tes_pf3rd> how can i help?
[13:10] <nigelbabu> r0tes_pf3rd: You can help by reviewing patches.  I'll point you the documentation so you can start off
[13:10] <nigelbabu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide
[13:10] <nigelbabu> 182 untouched bugs to go, so there's still plenty out there :)
[13:11] <r0tes_pf3rd> ok, i will look on the page
[13:11] <nigelbabu> yofel: I think we have something similar to that grub bug already
[13:11] <nigelbabu> i.e. a fix is already in I think
[13:12] <nigelbabu> from karmic on I remember only 1 kernel being displayed on boot
[13:14] <BlackZ> hey jono
[13:15] <nigelbabu> hyperair: you cool for next hour?
[13:15] <yofel> nigelbabu: well, I do remember the discussions about menu.lst not updating in karmic, but I'll leave the bug handling to someone that knows a bit more about grub, do you agree though that that's not a patch?
[13:15] <hyperair> nigelbabu: unfortunately not. got a meeting at 9pm (45min from now)
[13:15] <nigelbabu> hyperair: wait, so you're taking care of this hour or you want me to?
[13:16] <nigelbabu> yofel: agreed there, its a new script
[13:16] <hyperair> nigelbabu: er. up to you, which do you prefer?
[13:17] <jono> hey BlackZ
[13:17] <nigelbabu> hyperair: I did around 20 minutes to prepare a presention for UOW, either now or next hour
[13:17] <nigelbabu> s/did/need
[13:17] <hyperair> alright, go do it, i'll handle this hour =)
[13:17] <nigelbabu> hyperair: thank you, poke if you need something, I should be around :)
[13:17] <hyperair> nigelbabu: sure.
[13:18]  * hyperair regrets not remembering set theory and curses java's weird transformation API
[13:36] <nigelbabu> anyone think its worth it to update review lead on topic?
[13:41] <nigelbabu> dholbach: about?
[13:57]  * persia thinks it's not worth updating the /topic for every change, as it's likely to be more flexible than scheduled.
[13:59] <nigelbabu> yeah, hence I didn't d it
[13:59] <nigelbabu> do it
[14:00] <nigelbabu> hyperair: ok, taking over :)
[14:00] <nigelbabu> Folks, 180 bugs unreviewed in the queue.
[14:00] <nigelbabu> I'll be the review lead for the next few hours
[14:04] <nigelbabu> bdrung: I've been lazy to follow dep-3 on that metacity bug since I wanted someone to first test
[14:12] <nigelbabu> persia: do we want to advertise in -bugs and -motu every 6 hours or so?
[14:12] <nigelbabu> hello fschrat
[14:12] <persia> I'd say 4, but sure.
[14:12] <nigelbabu> persia: hm 4 is fine too :)
[14:13] <nigelbabu> malev: hey, nice to see you here, Patch day is today!
[14:15]  * hyperair grumbles
[14:15] <fschrat> hello everyone
[14:15] <hyperair> i spent all my time trying to test that chkrootkit patch
[14:15] <hyperair> turns out chkrootkit hung trying to read /proc/kmsg
[14:15] <malev> hi nigelbabu ! I'll start in a few minutes
[14:15] <nigelbabu> hyperair: awesome
[14:15] <nigelbabu> fschrat: hey, welcome
[14:16] <nigelbabu> malev: great :)
[14:34] <nigelbabu> persia: can take a look at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40823731/vncExtInit.cc.patch ?
[14:34] <nigelbabu> isn't the patch file formatted wronly ?
[14:39] <persia> No, just differently.  We're used to looking at the output of `diff -u ...`: that's the output of `diff ...`
[14:42] <nigelbabu> oh, ah
[14:42] <nigelbabu> looks like I need to test tht bug
[14:51] <nigelbabu> what would be the call on bug 424927? leave it for jfo?
[14:51] <ubot3> Malone bug 424927 in linux "include CK patch set (BFS)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/424927
[14:53] <dholbach> nigelbabu: yes
[14:53] <persia> Indeed.  It's in one of the blacklisted packages, but left over from before the blacklist was in place.
[14:54] <nigelbabu> oh, then I have some cleaning to do
[14:56] <nigelbabu> dholbach: you'll be around for my session right, just in case I cna't handle questions
[14:57] <dholbach> nigelbabu: around that time I was planning to meet somebody for dinner :-/
[14:57] <dholbach> nigelbabu: what about bdmurray and james_w and bryce?
[14:58] <nigelbabu> dholbach: I'll talk to james
[14:58] <dholbach> better ping all of them :)
[14:58] <nigelbabu> yeah, good idea
[14:59] <nigelbabu> bdmurray, james_w:  My UOW session on patch review is at 1700, if you folks can be around to help with questions, would be great :)
[15:00] <dholbach> nigelbabu: I have an idea for when the patch day is over: we could start making a list of bugs that were solved where the patch reviewers put some time into fixing them and we blog "the story of these patches" later on
[15:00] <dholbach> (a bit like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/Diaries)
[15:01] <nigelbabu> dholbach: I'm +1, I actually want to ask brian for a tar of all the mails in moderate on the patch review m/l during patch day
[15:02] <nigelbabu> moderation queue
[15:02] <nigelbabu> dat way we can know who did what
[15:06] <nigelbabu> Status update: 172 unreviewed bugs
[15:08] <nigelbabu> heya arand :)
[15:09] <arand> nigelbabu: Hello, hmm, I'm likely not going to be of much help, but I though I might listen and learn, it that is ok?
[15:09] <nigelbabu> arand: sure :)
[15:23] <nigelbabu> ok, good news
[15:24] <nigelbabu> we have gone below 170 mark
[15:24] <nigelbabu> 167 unreviewed bugs
[15:28] <nigelbabu> hello there dyfet
[15:29] <nigelbabu> would you like to help with patch review?
[15:30] <dyfet> I would be happy to try
[15:30] <nigelbabu> dyfet: great! you can go through https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide
[15:30] <nigelbabu> please ask if you have any qiestions
[15:31] <nigelbabu> there is always a review lead here till the end of patch day
[15:45] <nigelbabu> heya qense
[15:46] <nigelbabu> we're down to 160 unreviewed bugs folks :)
[15:46] <qense> hi nigelbabu!
[15:46] <nigelbabu> qense: patch day today!
[15:46] <qense> My congratulations to the review team!
[15:46] <qense> aha!
[15:48] <nigelbabu> qense: another 40 hours or so to go
[15:48] <yofel> meh, what's the policy if someone adds an upstream patch to a bug?
[15:48] <qense> Huh? How long is your definition of a day?
[15:49] <nigelbabu> yofel: if its integrated upstream, add patch-accepted-upstream
[15:49] <yofel> ok
[15:49] <nigelbabu> qense: a day in all time zones, 49 hours
[15:50] <qense> Good idea :P
[15:50] <qense> So for my timezone the day's actually tomorrow!
[15:50] <nigelbabu> qense: haha
[15:52] <yofel> for me too, but who cares :P
[15:52] <nigelbabu> qense: see, you should be inspired by yofel :D
[15:52] <qense> I'm already working very hard on Mergimus!
[15:53] <qense> Even though it's not Write an App-day!
[15:53] <nigelbabu> qense: lol
[15:55] <nigelbabu> starcraftman: /ws 29
[15:55] <nigelbabu> grrr
[16:04] <malev> anyone choose a patch as they want or there is a sort of order or something like that?
[16:05] <nigelbabu> malev: have you seen the query link on review guide
[16:05] <nigelbabu> just take a pick from that query
[16:05] <nigelbabu> it should show you all unreviewed patches
[16:05] <malev> this is the query: All open bugs with patches attached: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_supervisor=&field.bug_commenter=&field.s
[16:05] <malev> ubscriber=&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_no_package.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_patch=on&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on   ?
[16:06] <malev> sorry, it's a big query
[16:06] <malev> I'm here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/KnowledgeBase
[16:06] <malev> and I take the query from there
[16:07] <nigelbabu> not that one, let me find it
[16:07] <nigelbabu> malev: click on query here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow
[16:09] <nigelbabu> malev: to start off you can go with bug 569469
[16:09] <ubot3> Malone bug 569469 in update-manager "[lucid] program crashes when string "%s ago" is displayed" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/569469
[16:09] <nigelbabu> it seems easy enough
[16:10] <malev> nigelbabu, oks! going there
[16:13] <nigelbabu> malev: so, what do you make of the situation there
[16:13] <malev> I'm trying to reproduce the bug
[16:14] <malev> oh there is nothing to reproduce, it's only bad english :D
[16:14] <malev> gonna check the patch
[16:17] <malev> nigelbabu, which branch should I download to chech the patch?
[16:18] <nigelbabu> malev: I'm just checking tht up
[16:18] <nigelbabu> malev: https://launchpad.net/update-manager
[16:19] <malev> yes, but, if you go to branches, there are a lot! which onw
[16:19] <malev> the development?
[16:19] <malev> or the lucid?
[16:19] <malev> https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager
[16:20] <nigelbabu> if you notice the bug, mvo talks about trunk
[16:21] <nigelbabu> so you should check the trunk brach
[16:21] <malev> cool
[16:23] <malev> nigelbabu, you are giving a talk in a few minutes?
[16:23] <nigelbabu> malev: the 3rd session today
[16:27] <nigelbabu> malev: if you didn't find the commit yet, its commit 1807
[16:27] <malev> nigelbabu, I'm downloading the branch. It0's REALLY solw
[16:28] <nigelbabu> yes, because of maverick stuff
[16:31] <nigelbabu> malev: when hunting for commits, its easier on the web interface
[16:31] <malev> nigelbabu, might be, but, how can I test the patch if I don't use it?
[16:32] <nigelbabu> string changes are kinda easy to predict looking at the code :)
[16:34] <nigelbabu> bdrung: poke
[16:37] <yofel> anyone got a minute to look at bug 491940? would that be accepted or needswork o.O? LTSP seems to be happy with the patch, Chris not
[16:37] <ubot3> Malone bug 491940 in ltsp "Patch for LTSP clients to properly reboot/shutdown" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/491940
[16:38] <yofel> and are we seriously supposed to get subscribed just to package a patch? (not that I mind, I'm just not sure there)
[16:40] <nigelbabu> yofel: yes, thats part of we do
[16:41] <nigelbabu> packaging patches
[16:41] <malev> lauchpad is down?
[16:41] <yofel> good
[16:42] <nigelbabu> yofel: talk to chris and hear his take on it (especially after lxde accepted a similar patch)
[16:42] <nigelbabu> malev: checking
[16:42] <nigelbabu> malev: nope
[16:42] <malev> don't now is working
[16:45] <malev> nigelbabu, I donwload the trunk and it's on commit 1817 ten more than what the web site says...
[16:46]  * nigelbabu stabs loggerhead
[16:49] <nigelbabu> malev: what is 1807 about?
[16:49] <malev> I'm with the patch of update-manager. I can't aply the patch. don't know why
[16:49] <malev> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Desktop/UpdateManager1.py.rej
[16:49] <malev> bzr: ERROR: Patch application failed
[16:50] <malev> I think I'm using a different branch
[16:52] <nigelbabu> malev: you can't apply because the code changed
[16:52] <nigelbabu> mvo applied another change to fix the same issue
[16:53] <nigelbabu> and second thing, look at the path you're trying to patch, it doesn't exsit
[16:53] <malev> that is what I was looking now!
[16:53] <malev> well, I'm going to try to create another patch with a good path :D
[16:53] <malev> I start enjoying this :D
[16:53] <nigelbabu> malev: you dont need to, it would still fail
[16:54] <nigelbabu> because like I said, mvo already fixed it :)
[16:54] <malev> ooo too bad
[16:54] <malev> then I'll close the bug :(
[16:54] <nigelbabu> no no
[16:54] <nigelbabu> just change tag to patch-rejected
[16:55] <nigelbabu> say in comments that another fix for this has been commited already
[16:55] <malev> because.. it's all ready fixed
[16:55] <malev> oks
[16:55] <malev> thanks
[16:55] <nigelbabu> getting a feel for the process now?
[16:55] <malev> haha
[16:55] <malev> I think
[17:03] <malev> there are some bug reports with doesn't has a patch attached but has the patch tag. should I delete the tag?
[17:03] <nigelbabu> bug number?
[17:05] <yofel> sometimes a patch is just pasted into a comment, check for those too, or the patch is upstream and only a link to the commit is given
[17:08] <nigelbabu> Status update: 155 bugs to be reviewed
[17:12] <malev> Hey I am in a BR that: It has a bug, but there is newer verstions in which it is fixed. so the OR recomend us to apply the patch or to update the version provided. what do you whink?
[17:12] <malev> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-scipy/+bug/538774
[17:12] <ubot3> Malone bug 538774 in python-scipy "scipy.io.loadmat() excessively slow (regression)" [Undecided,Fix committed]
[17:19] <nigelbabu> malev: there is not talk of an upstream commit, ask OP for a link to upstream commit to confirm its fixed
[17:20] <malev> nigelbabu, ok
[17:52] <nigelbabu> cyphermox: all yours in 10 minutes
[17:53] <nigelbabu> and be ready to handle a huge influx after the UOW session
[18:04] <cyphermox> yup
[18:37] <cyphermox> hi!
[19:12] <nigelbabu> status update, 154 unreviewed bugs
[20:51] <bdrung> nigelbabu: pong
[21:17] <lucasmocellin> hi
[21:18] <lucasmocellin> I'm customizing a Ubuntu distro for distance learning, and the main point is to apply online tests. I would like to know if there is someone involved to version control in Ubuntu, mainly related to "what/how it happens" when canonical upgrade a ubuntu version like from 9.10 to 10.04. I would like to upgrade my distro and keep an easy control of everything modified.
[22:59] <cyphermox> well, I have to get going, sorry I can't stick around longer
[23:12] <ajmitch> morning all :)
[23:16] <persia> cyphermox: Sorry about that.
[23:17] <persia> Good morning ajmitch
[23:18] <ajmitch> how's the patch day going?
[23:18] <ajmitch> I see you're booked in for an extra-long session now
[23:20] <persia> Depends on how one counts.  Down to 277/175 bugs left to track 12 hours in.
[23:21] <persia> Yeah, seems like nobody else was up for being the named contact during these hours :)
[23:24] <ajmitch> sorry, it sort of falls in my work hours as well :)
[23:25] <persia> Understood.  Mine too, but I don't mind answering some questions on IRC (and expect the number of folk around to be light for most of it)
[23:27] <ajmitch> yes, thanks for stepping up todo it
[23:28] <persia> nigelbabu has a handy way of helping people up the steps :)
[23:33] <persia> OOh.  only 152 bugs by another count.  I defintely need to use the right queries, I think.
[23:33] <ajmitch> which count are you using now?
[23:34] <persia> 152 is the number from the query at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow
[23:35] <ajmitch> ok, so that doesn't show the tasks fixed in ubuntu but still pending in debian, which is probably what we want
[23:36] <persia> It also doesn't show a lot of the bugs that have already been properly tagged and forwarded, etc.
[23:37] <ajmitch> I should clear up that krb5 one that I asked you about last night
[23:38] <ajmitch> and apt-xapian-index, I can ask upstream about that directly
[23:39] <ajmitch> it's useful to have a few active developers in the NZ loco channel
[23:39] <ajmitch> quite a few of us are DDs in there
[23:40] <persia> Indeed.
[23:47] <persia> I have to run off for a bit: I'll definitely answer any unanswered questions when I return.  Apologies for anyone who gets stuck in the meantime.
[23:48]  * ajmitch will be around, sort of
[23:48] <persia> Thanks :)