| nhandler | http://blog.bofh.it/debian/id_375 :( | 00:25 |
|---|---|---|
| persia | That's the next hurdle. | 00:27 |
| persia | First we need to get on top of the patches Ubuntu is completely ignoring. | 00:27 |
| persia | Then we can apply our skills to the patches that Ubuntu is hoarding. | 00:27 |
| nigelbabu | just an announcement, we're at 69 bugs. can we make it 0 before UDS? | 02:59 |
| ddecator | alright, i'm thinking of trying to review a patch. is anyone here in case i run into any trouble? | 04:20 |
| dholbach | good morning | 08:10 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: so... what did we get out of the patch day? how did it pan out? :) | 09:03 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: 116 patches reviewed | 11:41 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: I'll send out a mail and blog post today | 11:41 |
| nigelbabu | persia: you about? | 11:51 |
| nigelbabu | we need to have that debate :D | 11:51 |
| dholbach | nice | 11:54 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: in belgium? | 11:55 |
| dholbach | nope, I'll get there on sunday | 11:55 |
| nigelbabu | ah, ok | 11:55 |
| dholbach | I'm sorting out a few smaller things, then get to planning my UOW session | 11:55 |
| nigelbabu | oh, yeah, the first 2 hours :) | 11:55 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: got a minute for me? can you look at the latest ubuntu-review-overview code and see if things look okay? | 13:13 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: link? :) | 13:13 |
| nigelbabu | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-review-overview/trunk/annotate/head%3A/patch-overview.py | 13:14 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: will take a look | 13:14 |
| nigelbabu | thank you :) | 13:15 |
| nigelbabu | ddecator: you wanted to get started with review? | 13:16 |
| nigelbabu | cyphermox: /ws 28 | 13:18 |
| nigelbabu | grr | 13:18 |
| cyphermox | moo? | 13:19 |
| nigelbabu | sorry :) | 13:19 |
| nigelbabu | anyway since I pinged you by mistake... | 13:20 |
| nigelbabu | Thanks for being a review lead, we managed to get the count down to 69 unreviewed bugs now | 13:20 |
| nigelbabu | cyphermox: a total of 116 bugs reviewed :) | 13:20 |
| cyphermox | didn't really do much, but np :) it's great that things are going well | 13:20 |
| nigelbabu | :) | 13:23 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: just small changes: http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/patch | 13:25 |
| dholbach | fixed imports | 13:25 |
| dholbach | fixed the filename | 13:25 |
| dholbach | etc | 13:25 |
| nigelbabu | thank you :) | 13:28 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: why is the tasks line removed? | 13:29 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: because it's called twice | 13:30 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: and the second time "tasks" is not used again | 13:30 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: oh yeah, grr why didn't I see that one | 13:30 |
| dholbach | no big deal :) | 13:31 |
| nigelbabu | it takes a good deal of time to run, planning to run it overnight | 13:31 |
| * nigelbabu is making graphs | 13:44 | |
| nigelbabu | persia: I have holes in the data, we didn't post hourly :(, neither you nor me | 13:48 |
| persia | nigelbabu: I suspect there wasn't that much variation for many of the gaps, but extrapolate where you can :) | 14:10 |
| nigelbabu | persia: I have an unpretty graph | 14:13 |
| nigelbabu | I dunno how to make it pretty, suggestions welcome | 14:13 |
| nigelbabu | http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/patch-day.jpg | 14:14 |
| nigelbabu | persia: ^ | 14:14 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: now differentiate the graph with respect to time and make a new one =p | 14:20 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: it is differentiated with time | 14:20 |
| hyperair | what's the timezone of the times in the graph? | 14:20 |
| nigelbabu | UTC | 14:20 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: no, i mean dy/dx | 14:21 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: which would get you a graph of the gradient per time | 14:21 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: oh, that | 14:21 |
| nigelbabu | ok, prettier now, http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/patch-day-2.jpg | 14:28 |
| nigelbabu | persia, dholbach, hyperair: ^ | 14:29 |
| nigelbabu | no, I didn't do the dy/dx | 14:29 |
| hyperair | haha | 14:30 |
| hyperair | cool | 14:30 |
| hyperair | what did you use to draw the graph anyway? | 14:30 |
| nigelbabu | open office | 14:30 |
| nigelbabu | it sucks, I know | 14:30 |
| nigelbabu | oh no, the graph is statistically wrong | 14:38 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair:can you look at the second graph... | 14:50 |
| nigelbabu | you'd notice that I had some gaps in time, is that okay? | 14:50 |
| nigelbabu | i mean mathematically | 14:50 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: there are gaps? | 14:58 |
| hyperair | i didn't notice | 14:58 |
| hyperair | and i didn't know openoffice could make graphs | 14:59 |
| yofel | I don't mind the gaps, if the graph wouldn't look like it's bending space and time... | 14:59 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: how else do you make graphs | 15:00 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: gnuplot. | 15:01 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: they look quite bad though | 15:01 |
| nigelbabu | yofel: the distance between 1 hour and 3 hours look the same | 15:01 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: they look bad now? or on gnuplot? | 15:01 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: gnuplot. | 15:02 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: let me look for a graph i did sometime back.. | 15:02 |
| hyperair | http://dl.dropbox.com/u/169656/banshee-memusage.png | 15:04 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: ^ | 15:04 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: I <3 it! | 15:05 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: !! | 15:05 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: but the font hinting is not really good. | 15:05 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: well you could use plotdrop, it's fairly easy to use. | 15:06 |
| hyperair | it's a drag-drop gtk+ ui for gnuplot | 15:06 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: yuck, only command line? | 15:09 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: unfortunately so. | 15:09 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: but like i said, plotdrop's pretty good. i made that graph using plotdrop. | 15:10 |
| nigelbabu | double yuck | 15:10 |
| nigelbabu | updating, cant apt-get for another 15 mins | 15:10 |
| hyperair | heh | 15:12 |
| nigelbabu | hyperair: will the current graph do for basic stuff? | 15:15 |
| hyperair | nigelbabu: i think it's fine really | 15:15 |
| * nigelbabu needs to move to next item on "things to do" | 15:15 | |
| nigelbabu | ok, ty | 15:16 |
| nigelbabu | http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/aTor4hFZXZ | 15:28 |
| nigelbabu | I'm writing a mail to devel, anyone care to help me edit the thing more finer? | 15:28 |
| dholbach | nigelbabu: NICE | 15:33 |
| nigelbabu | dholbach: :) | 15:34 |
| popey | yup, good to me | 15:35 |
| nigelbabu | thanks popey :) | 15:36 |
| popey | np, anytime | 15:36 |
| nigelbabu | persia: new plan, as soon as mails from the mailing list hits of new patches, attack them, so we keep the count to down | 19:12 |
| nigelbabu | yesterday and today, there were 2 that were supposed to be ignored but one task was not a blacklist, so we eneded up getting sub'd | 19:12 |
| nigelbabu | I'm doing some wok on standard replies. If anyone would like to create new ones or correct the ones I have there, please go ahead | 19:22 |
| nigelbabu | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/StandardReplies | 19:23 |
| nigelbabu | I'm sure Patch Day might have given some ideas of what to write | 19:23 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| ddecator | nigelbabu: yah. not sure how much i can help, but i'm interested in learning how the process works so i can do it if i have extra time or a need to review one at some point | 20:48 |
| yofel | hm, I didn't read the whole page in a while, but I just noticed that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Patches doesn't mention the review team at all... | 22:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
