[00:25] http://blog.bofh.it/debian/id_375 :( [00:27] That's the next hurdle. [00:27] First we need to get on top of the patches Ubuntu is completely ignoring. [00:27] Then we can apply our skills to the patches that Ubuntu is hoarding. [02:59] just an announcement, we're at 69 bugs. can we make it 0 before UDS? [04:20] alright, i'm thinking of trying to review a patch. is anyone here in case i run into any trouble? [08:10] good morning [09:03] nigelbabu: so... what did we get out of the patch day? how did it pan out? :) [11:41] dholbach: 116 patches reviewed [11:41] dholbach: I'll send out a mail and blog post today [11:51] persia: you about? [11:51] we need to have that debate :D [11:54] nice [11:55] dholbach: in belgium? [11:55] nope, I'll get there on sunday [11:55] ah, ok [11:55] I'm sorting out a few smaller things, then get to planning my UOW session [11:55] oh, yeah, the first 2 hours :) [13:13] dholbach: got a minute for me? can you look at the latest ubuntu-review-overview code and see if things look okay? [13:13] nigelbabu: link? :) [13:14] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-review-overview/trunk/annotate/head%3A/patch-overview.py [13:14] nigelbabu: will take a look [13:15] thank you :) [13:16] ddecator: you wanted to get started with review? [13:18] cyphermox: /ws 28 [13:18] grr [13:19] moo? [13:19] sorry :) [13:20] anyway since I pinged you by mistake... [13:20] Thanks for being a review lead, we managed to get the count down to 69 unreviewed bugs now [13:20] cyphermox: a total of 116 bugs reviewed :) [13:20] didn't really do much, but np :) it's great that things are going well [13:23] :) [13:25] nigelbabu: just small changes: http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/patch [13:25] fixed imports [13:25] fixed the filename [13:25] etc [13:28] thank you :) [13:29] dholbach: why is the tasks line removed? [13:30] nigelbabu: because it's called twice [13:30] nigelbabu: and the second time "tasks" is not used again [13:30] dholbach: oh yeah, grr why didn't I see that one [13:31] no big deal :) [13:31] it takes a good deal of time to run, planning to run it overnight [13:44] * nigelbabu is making graphs [13:48] persia: I have holes in the data, we didn't post hourly :(, neither you nor me [14:10] nigelbabu: I suspect there wasn't that much variation for many of the gaps, but extrapolate where you can :) [14:13] persia: I have an unpretty graph [14:13] I dunno how to make it pretty, suggestions welcome [14:14] http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/patch-day.jpg [14:14] persia: ^ [14:20] nigelbabu: now differentiate the graph with respect to time and make a new one =p [14:20] hyperair: it is differentiated with time [14:20] what's the timezone of the times in the graph? [14:20] UTC [14:21] nigelbabu: no, i mean dy/dx [14:21] nigelbabu: which would get you a graph of the gradient per time [14:21] hyperair: oh, that [14:28] ok, prettier now, http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/patch-day-2.jpg [14:29] persia, dholbach, hyperair: ^ [14:29] no, I didn't do the dy/dx [14:30] haha [14:30] cool [14:30] what did you use to draw the graph anyway? [14:30] open office [14:30] it sucks, I know [14:38] oh no, the graph is statistically wrong [14:50] hyperair:can you look at the second graph... [14:50] you'd notice that I had some gaps in time, is that okay? [14:50] i mean mathematically [14:58] nigelbabu: there are gaps? [14:58] i didn't notice [14:59] and i didn't know openoffice could make graphs [14:59] I don't mind the gaps, if the graph wouldn't look like it's bending space and time... [15:00] hyperair: how else do you make graphs [15:01] nigelbabu: gnuplot. [15:01] nigelbabu: they look quite bad though [15:01] yofel: the distance between 1 hour and 3 hours look the same [15:01] hyperair: they look bad now? or on gnuplot? [15:02] nigelbabu: gnuplot. [15:02] nigelbabu: let me look for a graph i did sometime back.. [15:04] http://dl.dropbox.com/u/169656/banshee-memusage.png [15:04] nigelbabu: ^ [15:05] hyperair: I <3 it! [15:05] nigelbabu: !! [15:05] nigelbabu: but the font hinting is not really good. [15:06] nigelbabu: well you could use plotdrop, it's fairly easy to use. [15:06] it's a drag-drop gtk+ ui for gnuplot [15:09] hyperair: yuck, only command line? [15:09] nigelbabu: unfortunately so. [15:10] nigelbabu: but like i said, plotdrop's pretty good. i made that graph using plotdrop. [15:10] double yuck [15:10] updating, cant apt-get for another 15 mins [15:12] heh [15:15] hyperair: will the current graph do for basic stuff? [15:15] nigelbabu: i think it's fine really [15:15] * nigelbabu needs to move to next item on "things to do" [15:16] ok, ty [15:28] http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/aTor4hFZXZ [15:28] I'm writing a mail to devel, anyone care to help me edit the thing more finer? [15:33] nigelbabu: NICE [15:34] dholbach: :) [15:35] yup, good to me [15:36] thanks popey :) [15:36] np, anytime [19:12] persia: new plan, as soon as mails from the mailing list hits of new patches, attack them, so we keep the count to down [19:12] yesterday and today, there were 2 that were supposed to be ignored but one task was not a blacklist, so we eneded up getting sub'd [19:22] I'm doing some wok on standard replies. If anyone would like to create new ones or correct the ones I have there, please go ahead [19:23] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/StandardReplies [19:23] I'm sure Patch Day might have given some ideas of what to write === yofel_ is now known as yofel [20:48] nigelbabu: yah. not sure how much i can help, but i'm interested in learning how the process works so i can do it if i have extra time or a need to review one at some point [22:00] hm, I didn't read the whole page in a while, but I just noticed that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Patches doesn't mention the review team at all...