[00:25] <nhandler> http://blog.bofh.it/debian/id_375 :(
[00:27] <persia> That's the next hurdle.
[00:27] <persia> First we need to get on top of the patches Ubuntu is completely ignoring.
[00:27] <persia> Then we can apply our skills to the patches that Ubuntu is hoarding.
[02:59] <nigelbabu> just an announcement, we're at 69 bugs.  can we make it 0 before UDS?
[04:20] <ddecator> alright, i'm thinking of trying to review a patch. is anyone here in case i run into any trouble?
[08:10] <dholbach> good morning
[09:03] <dholbach> nigelbabu: so... what did we get out of the patch day? how did it pan out? :)
[11:41] <nigelbabu> dholbach: 116 patches reviewed
[11:41] <nigelbabu> dholbach: I'll send out a mail and blog post today
[11:51] <nigelbabu> persia: you about?
[11:51] <nigelbabu> we need to have that debate :D
[11:54] <dholbach> nice
[11:55] <nigelbabu> dholbach: in belgium?
[11:55] <dholbach> nope, I'll get there on sunday
[11:55] <nigelbabu> ah, ok
[11:55] <dholbach> I'm sorting out a few smaller things, then get to planning my UOW session
[11:55] <nigelbabu> oh, yeah, the first 2 hours :)
[13:13] <nigelbabu> dholbach: got a minute for me? can you look at the latest ubuntu-review-overview code and see if things look okay?
[13:13] <dholbach> nigelbabu: link? :)
[13:14] <nigelbabu> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-review-overview/trunk/annotate/head%3A/patch-overview.py
[13:14] <dholbach> nigelbabu: will take a look
[13:15] <nigelbabu> thank you :)
[13:16] <nigelbabu> ddecator: you wanted to get started with review?
[13:18] <nigelbabu> cyphermox: /ws 28
[13:18] <nigelbabu> grr
[13:19] <cyphermox> moo?
[13:19] <nigelbabu> sorry :)
[13:20] <nigelbabu> anyway since I pinged you by mistake...
[13:20] <nigelbabu> Thanks for being a review lead, we managed to get the count down to 69 unreviewed bugs now
[13:20] <nigelbabu> cyphermox: a total of 116 bugs reviewed :)
[13:20] <cyphermox> didn't really do much, but np :) it's great that things are going well
[13:23] <nigelbabu> :)
[13:25] <dholbach> nigelbabu: just small changes: http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/patch
[13:25] <dholbach> fixed imports
[13:25] <dholbach> fixed the filename
[13:25] <dholbach> etc
[13:28] <nigelbabu> thank you :)
[13:29] <nigelbabu> dholbach: why is the tasks line removed?
[13:30] <dholbach> nigelbabu: because it's called twice
[13:30] <dholbach> nigelbabu: and the second time "tasks" is not used again
[13:30] <nigelbabu> dholbach: oh yeah, grr why didn't I see that one
[13:31] <dholbach> no big deal :)
[13:31] <nigelbabu> it takes a good deal of time to run, planning to run it overnight
[13:44]  * nigelbabu is making graphs
[13:48] <nigelbabu> persia: I have holes in the data, we didn't post hourly :(, neither you nor me
[14:10] <persia> nigelbabu: I suspect there wasn't that much variation for many of the gaps, but extrapolate where you can :)
[14:13] <nigelbabu> persia: I have an unpretty graph
[14:13] <nigelbabu> I dunno how to make it pretty, suggestions welcome
[14:14] <nigelbabu> http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/patch-day.jpg
[14:14] <nigelbabu> persia: ^
[14:20] <hyperair> nigelbabu: now differentiate the graph with respect to time and make a new one =p
[14:20] <nigelbabu> hyperair: it is differentiated with time
[14:20] <hyperair> what's the timezone of the times in the graph?
[14:20] <nigelbabu> UTC
[14:21] <hyperair> nigelbabu: no, i mean dy/dx
[14:21] <hyperair> nigelbabu: which would get you a graph of the gradient per time
[14:21] <nigelbabu> hyperair: oh, that
[14:28] <nigelbabu> ok, prettier now, http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/patch-day-2.jpg
[14:29] <nigelbabu> persia, dholbach, hyperair: ^
[14:29] <nigelbabu> no, I didn't do the dy/dx
[14:30] <hyperair> haha
[14:30] <hyperair> cool
[14:30] <hyperair> what did you use to draw the graph anyway?
[14:30] <nigelbabu> open office
[14:30] <nigelbabu> it sucks, I know
[14:38] <nigelbabu> oh no, the graph is statistically wrong
[14:50] <nigelbabu> hyperair:can you look at the second graph...
[14:50] <nigelbabu> you'd notice that I had some gaps in time, is that okay?
[14:50] <nigelbabu> i mean mathematically
[14:58] <hyperair> nigelbabu: there are gaps?
[14:58] <hyperair> i didn't notice
[14:59] <hyperair> and i didn't know openoffice could make graphs
[14:59] <yofel> I don't mind the gaps, if the graph wouldn't look like it's bending space and time...
[15:00] <nigelbabu> hyperair: how else do you make graphs
[15:01] <hyperair> nigelbabu: gnuplot.
[15:01] <hyperair> nigelbabu: they look quite bad though
[15:01] <nigelbabu> yofel: the distance between 1 hour and 3 hours look the same
[15:01] <nigelbabu> hyperair: they look bad now? or on gnuplot?
[15:02] <hyperair> nigelbabu: gnuplot.
[15:02] <hyperair> nigelbabu: let me look for a graph i did sometime back..
[15:04] <hyperair> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/169656/banshee-memusage.png
[15:04] <hyperair> nigelbabu: ^
[15:05] <nigelbabu> hyperair: I <3 it!
[15:05] <hyperair> nigelbabu: !!
[15:05] <hyperair> nigelbabu: but the font hinting is not really good.
[15:06] <hyperair> nigelbabu: well you could use plotdrop, it's fairly easy to use.
[15:06] <hyperair> it's a drag-drop gtk+ ui for gnuplot
[15:09] <nigelbabu> hyperair: yuck, only command line?
[15:09] <hyperair> nigelbabu: unfortunately so.
[15:10] <hyperair> nigelbabu: but like i said, plotdrop's pretty good. i made that graph using plotdrop.
[15:10] <nigelbabu> double yuck
[15:10] <nigelbabu> updating, cant apt-get for another 15 mins
[15:12] <hyperair> heh
[15:15] <nigelbabu> hyperair: will the current graph do for basic stuff?
[15:15] <hyperair> nigelbabu: i think it's fine really
[15:15]  * nigelbabu needs to move to next item on "things to do"
[15:16] <nigelbabu> ok, ty
[15:28] <nigelbabu> http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/aTor4hFZXZ
[15:28] <nigelbabu> I'm writing a mail to devel, anyone care to help me edit the thing more finer?
[15:33] <dholbach> nigelbabu: NICE
[15:34] <nigelbabu> dholbach: :)
[15:35] <popey> yup, good to me
[15:36] <nigelbabu> thanks popey :)
[15:36] <popey> np, anytime
[19:12] <nigelbabu> persia: new plan, as soon as mails from the mailing list hits of new patches, attack them, so we keep the count to down
[19:12] <nigelbabu> yesterday and today, there were 2 that were supposed to be ignored but one task was not a blacklist, so we eneded up getting sub'd
[19:22] <nigelbabu> I'm doing some wok on standard replies.  If anyone would like to create new ones or correct the ones I have there, please go ahead
[19:23] <nigelbabu> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/StandardReplies
[19:23] <nigelbabu> I'm sure Patch Day might have given some ideas of what to write
[20:48] <ddecator> nigelbabu: yah. not sure how much i can help, but i'm interested in learning how the process works so i can do it if i have extra time or a need to review one at some point
[22:00] <yofel> hm, I didn't read the whole page in a while, but I just noticed that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Patches doesn't mention the review team at all...